Now if your "inconveniences" helped to save just one life, would you say it was worth it?
What are you, some kind of globalist moron? Even JFK supported gun rights. He knew that the globalists were just itching to disarm America.
Republicans don't put their sexual deviants in the White House. Clinton and JFK are prime examples.
JFK wanted a nation that was free of the banksters. He wanted a nation that was sovereign,that rejected the excesses of the globalists. He wanted a nation that stood for gun rights, free speech, and freedom of religion. He didn't want the globalists running the nation. You are such a dickwad, Socal. You know nothing.
It doesn't really matter what Linda Tripp says. The idiots running for president in her party are even bigger losers than Hillary! Jeb Bush wants to do away with medicare? Are you kidding me? Einstein he is not.
You liberals with your appeasement policies are ruining this nation. I guess you won't get it, until someone crosses the border illegally and shoots up your kids specifically, and even then I bet you'll blame guns not the person.
. In recent years, El Paso, Texas has had the lowest murder rate of any American city with a population of 500,000 or more, despite sitting directly across the Rio Grande from Juarez, a Mexican city plagued with horrific gang violence. Other metropolitan magnets for new arrivals from south of the border, such as San Diego, San Antonio and Phoenix, are similarly pacific. "Cities of concentrated immigration are some of the safest places around," Mr Sampson observes.
So, I hate to tell you this, Wayne, but you don't know what you are talking about.
The invention of the gun has nullified all advantages of strength and has made murder as easy for a woman to commit as for a man.
That is reassuring. :)
will never be completely "solved" unless you exterminate all men (a "final solution" which has been proposed by various feminists).
So that is why my wife wants to buy a larger freezer. Gotta keep the checks coming.
This is a serious issue, and problem. I don't believe it was what happened in Ivana Trump's case. For one thing, the rape was not drug out of the past, but occurred just two years prior to the divorce from Donald Trump. Therefore, the rape could have been a result of threats of divorce or could have set in motion the divorce. It is not necessarily the result of the divorce.
Hope you Einsteins can understand that point of view. But realize, Ivana says it is now a non story because she knows there is big money for the family in running for president.
I want a cabinet that gives me a boner, not a cabinet that gives immense hirsute lesbians clit erections.
Well, then you will like all the men in the next Republican administrations. FortWayne says
Just hope she will keep shaming mankind to a minimum.
That won't happen with threads like this.
Any other suggestions we can send into the IHLary campaign?
I thought you hated banksters and war. Instead you are just a two bit bigot trying to make a joke.
I read that she signed a pre-nup. There are no shortage of divorce case stories where folks make up things for various reasons, including custody rights. Ivana said he did not rape her in the criminal sense. If he had raped her, the reason it might have come out before the divorce is for her own protection, to report the crime. The "non-criminal(?)" rape allegedly occurred in 1989. Ivana filed for divorce in 1991 over The Donald's alleged infidelity.
The proximity of the "rape" to the divorce shows possibly that Trump was trying to intimidate her to avoid divorce. That is a possibility. To just say this is a standard blow up of an incident to get money is not necessarily the only explanation.
Hillary’s camp spends big bucks on polls - Weekly Standard: “Hillary Clinton has already spent nearly one million dollars on polling. According to the Democratic presidential candidate’s first Federal Election Commission disclosure report, the campaign has already spent $904,915.00 on polling…The Hillary for America campaign, the Clinton campaign's official title, has already spent $18,699,814.02. So far the campaign has raised $47,549,949.64. Clinton has $28,850,135.62 cash on hand.”
Hillary is like Jeb Bush and Rick Perry and Huckleberry Hound. They are all NWO and in the pockets of the NWO.
The only hope with Hillary is that she is against many of the wars that the right wants. But they are all Zionist globalists and all have globalist agendas, which differ slightly as to party.
From what I have read, the rape allegation came out during a divorce proceeding. Shouldn't it have come out before then? His wife Ivana has denied that Trump raped her.
Why would it come out before? She may have let it go for the money. Coming out in divorce does not settle the issue. Trump never should have used the word "Rape". He hurt his cause.
Will rape ever go back to meaning forcible genital contact onto an overpowered partner against their will?
How do you know that didn't happen to Ivana?
You have to understand that Gramm is just evil incarnate. His wife deregulated derivatives bets and he deregulate banking and housing. They were more responsible for the credit crisis than anyone but the central banks, who wanted this bubble.
The major difference between today's libertarians and today's liberals is simple: libertarians start with the public having all rights and take away freedoms selectively as necessary to secure order, give aid, and provide for the common defense.
Liberals begin by removing all rights and then gift certain ones back selectively based on who helps them retain power.
The Liberals, Neocons, Libertarians and everyone who could contributed to the deregulation of the banking industry. Greedarians is what we need to call all of them. When push came to shove, it didn't matter the ideology. Money is the ideology and desire for world domination.
This is utter nonsense. Ron Paul has personally donated far more to charitable courses than either that Gary Asshole or you. What the Gary Asshole and You are advocating is a mobster monopoly that keep $80 for every $100 that it forcibly takes from the public then give $20 to the "Widows and Orphans."
Bgamall is Gary. He links to his website.
You outed me Bigsby. Damn. I was trying to hide from Reality. Don't want a libertarian idiot on my tail.
I don't see that development as totalitarian at all.
Well then you have the IQ of a midget.
Reality, I always knew you were all about controlling the masses. You say the masses will not need cars. That is a sure fire way to establish totalitarianism. Screw you, reality. You cannot take the guns so you want to take the cars.
Reality, not giving government help is UnAmerican. Private rich people donate squat. You know this. The middle class is more generous than the rich. You can bailout banksters but not tornado victims? You are a sicko, Reality.
given that the arriving of self-driving cars will fundamentally change the landscape and how/where people will live and commute.
Fuck self driving cars.
The difference between German Autobahn built by Hitler in the 1930's vs. American Interstate in the 1950's was that the Germans did not have the large number of cars to run on the Autobahn; they eventually had to allow bicycles on the Autobahn in the 1940's because the pristine roads were empty and facing weather erosion anyway. LOL. Whether some infrastructure is worthwhile to be built is literally dependent on likely utilization rate. A bridge to nowhere is never worthwhile in the economic sense, even if it adds to GDP, which is not real economy. Building too far ahead of time is literally waste.
That is not the problem here in the US. We have crumbling infrastructure. You are listening to those pesky sicko libertarians again.
In the US, FDR's pension pyramid scheme (Social Security) created a temporary surplus of funds that allowed the government to tax more and spend more for a couple decades (just like other government pensions schemes typically do), but by the time of 1960's the need to fulfill previous premises arrived and LBJ had to come up with Medicare/Medicaid to pay for SS shortfall; then again in the 1980's, Reagan's need to increase SS tax in order to pay for previous promises; now Romney/Obama/SCOTUS scheme to pay for SS/MM via Obamacare Tax. The continuation of government has been accumulating bigger and bigger fraudulent political promises that have to be fulfilled by subsequent generations via higher and higher taxes.
If people did not work, new generations of people, you could call Social Security a pyramid scheme. But since new workers always come to fund the system, it is not a pyramid scheme. Once there are no more workers, Social Security will be the least of our problems.
You have been listening to too many sicko libertarians.
because of Western Greed
Like Milton Friedman said, you think the Chinese aren't greedy? You think Russia isn't greedy! You think Cuba isn't greedy? You're not greedy? It's always someone else who's greedy, isn't it.
No greed exceeds the Zionist globalist greed at this time.
The other interesting story is Saudi Arabia's $10B investment in Russia, and some other tidbits that seem to show Saudi Arabia is hedging a bit against the ye olde "Bitter Lake" Alliance between itself and the USA. Interesting things happening with Saudi Arabia and India, as well as the other Gulf States (esp. Qatar) and China. The Iran deal is also fueling it a bit.
Saudi Arabia has to hedge its bets against the US and Israel. Zionism, Yinon and maybe Clean Break, proposed the destruction of Saudi Arabia as part of the regime change plan. Whether that is now tweaked, it is on paper and is a potential goal of Israel once it takes care of Syria.
I respect the Republcians because they know Donald Trump is right.
Of course they know Donald Trump is right. You can't have a party full of idiots without eventually attracting the biggest idiot to the election. My only question is why it took you this long? Wasn't president Bachman good enough for you?
Bachman was a globalist. I think Trump is for national sovereignty, which would be a good thing. Only problem is he slandered the illegals who don't commit a bunch of crimes. He should take it back and make his one off ever human apology. Then his ideas would have more meaning.
I am a liberal, I am for letting people who are here have a pathway to citizenship. I am for a better border control, and for national sovereignty. Iwog, the globalists want an open border. That is fact.
If you don't like the globalists you can't like an open border.