he has more experience in bankruptcies than anyone on the planet.
Ahh, Bobby boy...
Nice to see you keeping the lying Dem party narrative going...
Trump hasn't had bankruptcies? So all that stuff in the news about it was like the fake moon landings? Wow. You know that some people say the earth is more than 6000 years old, can you believe what idiots they are? Jesus loves this I know because fox news told me so.
I'm not the commander in chief with a hundred advisors. They will need to figure out a plan of action to prevent Islam and most important, Islamists, from getting their hands on nukes. Holding individuals responsible in Islamic countries from developing nukes could be just one of a multi pronged approach.
My honest answer........I just don't know the answers to your questions.
Islam has nukes. Pakistan has had nukes since the first successful test in 1998. They sold the technology all around the world already. You are little late on this.
Islamists can only get nukes it they steal them. US weapons are far and away in the biggest danger of that followed by Russia. They could build a dirty bomb with non fissionable material, but that is far from a nuclear explosion. That material could be stolen from any place that deals in radioactive isotopes including some hospitals. This has always been a threat long before islamic terror.
What individual in what country should we hold responsible and how?
Any country that has the will and money can develop nuclear weapons. The only way to force a determined country to stop development would be an all out war of conquest. That is the situation in the real world, as opposed to your neocon fantasy world, plain and simple. Beyond all out war it comes down to negotiation and cooperation. Which is why demonizing and provoking Iran has always made zero sense.
Doing nothing? WTF are you babbling about. The US has been actively working at this since the trinity test.
Back at ya. I'm against the defense spending as well. But the real problem is in the legacy of the left wing jackasses. Things like medicare, social security, obummer care, the federal department of homeland security, energy, education, epa, etc etc etc.
Whatever dude. Pull your head out of the mises asshole. Left or right they all spend and spend. The only difference is the right wing sheeple have been indoctrinated by the people pocketing the money while laughing their asses off to believe the "real problem" is spending by the left. Spending by the right isn't "real" government spending. You prove my point time and time again. baa,baa,baa.
Our best bet is to infiltrate their politics, find out their nuclear bomb locations and simply take them.
Curiosity overwhelms me. What is your plan to simply take them? What about all the facilities scattered all over the country, many in dense urban areas, that would be used to make more pretty quickly? What is your plan there? If you destroy the facilities what are you gong to do about all the people that know how to build more facilities and more bombs? Should we kill them all? What should we do about all the states Pakistan sold technology to like NK, Iran, and China that could easily sell back whatever we destroy I guess we should go after them also. Invading china would be lots of fun.
So how is all this going to work again other than simple minded meaningless statements like we should simply take them?
I just want the facts presented, not a combination of facts and interpretation/opinion from some reporter who works for the media outlet.
For those that appreciate politically neutral facts when it comes to news, what media outlets do you use/recommend out there?
There are none if you read/watch US based news. First CBS turned news into entertainment with 60 minutes never let facts interfere with a good story attack journalism then FOX turned entertainment news into political activism that went beyond ignoring facts to simply using fiction as news if it advanced their political agenda. All the rest of the media tagged along behind because the sheeple were willing to lap it up without question. The more outrageous and absurd the higher the ratings. Americans love to be lied to as long as it fits in with what they believe should be true.
Zero, Although somehow as a "successful businessman" he has more experience in bankruptcies than anyone on the planet. After the Reagan, Shrub, Obama debt marathon that might be the most critical skill we will need in the next 4 years.
Then why does the government grow so much when right wing fanatics are in power?
Then why does the government grow so much when left wing fanatics are in power? LBJ, FDR, Carter, Obummer, Wilson
Reality doesn't really impinge on your thinking much does it? Funny that the government grew more under champions of smaller government like Reagan and Shrub than under left wing fanatics like Obummer, LBJ, Carter or Clinton. The point, which you fail to comprehend, was the right wing is always saying they want smaller government, until they get in power. Then there is a roman orgy of defence spending and corporate welfare without cutting anything else except taxes for the wealthy. What is even funnier is the mindless sheeple worshipping at the alter of conservatism, like you, actually believe the right wing fanatics cut the size government. The modern conservative movement exists only to enrich the 1% who are laughing all the way to the bank about sucking in the rubes with "fair and balanced" fear mongering about god, guns, anyone non white, and "big" government. Big being defined as any money not spent making the 1% wealthier.
No country can be denied nuclear weapons if they really want them.
Islamic countries that pursue nukes must be controlled. There is no other choice.
Controlled how? We couldn't get Pakistan to tell us where, which they damn well knew, Bin Laden was for 9 years. How are we going to control their nukes? Any practical suggestion? I thought not. Iran? A country as big as the US east of the Mississippi with 80 million people? Should we invade? Nice bit of neocon wet dream though. Change the sheets and go back to sleep.
Any country that really wants to develop nuclear weapons and has the money to pay for it will.
She was also supposed to turn over the all her work-related emails for record keeping (period, end of story, regardless of where kept) prior to leaving office.
No the federal records act and the national archive act didn't have a time frame specified until the amendment of 2014. Which should have been called the hillary clinton amendment. The lack of the statute detailing a specific time frame is what made hillary technically in compliance with the law. She was still reviewing her emails 5 years later fully intending to get them out to the state department on the twelve of never.
There's not one singe building project in South Florida for middle class being built.
Not one, that's intentional. Start building units that sell between $150 to $225, that will pull all of the used houses back into the $89 to $150 range that they've worked so hard to get over $275 starting.
Iran in the long run, cannot be denied because like India, most of the program is home grown, unlike countries, such as Pakistan. S
No country can be denied nuclear weapons if they really want them. Making a nuclear bomb just isn't that hard. The physics was worked out a long time ago and is well known. Processing enough material to make a nuclear bomb is very, very hard and very very expensive. Which is why a country has to really want it.
Why would you think Pakistan didn't grow their own nuclear program. Not only did they grow their own, they sold the technology all around the world. Read up on Munir Ahmad Khan. Pakistan (America's BFF) provided Iran with technology as well as North Korea. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004_03/Pakistan
President Erdogan is not liked, particularly by the US. He is a Muslim, too independent-minded, insufficiently response to American demands in spite of his support for the anti-ISIS war in Syria and Iraq. Perhaps worst of all, Erdogan is sometimes critical of Israel over its repression of the Palestinians.
That's the worst of all? Really? No problem with purges, persecution of the press, dubious prosecutions, dismantling of secular society, intolerance and oppressive fundamentalism. book banning, constantly abusing his power as president, internet blocking, shutting down twitter, etc. etc. etc.? The worst of all is criticizing Israel. I have a lot of trouble taking anyone who says something so dumb seriously.
At least you can go to the beach if you don't mind walking on the used needles and condoms (aka long island whitefish)
The beach there is actually very clean.
Actually the beach is clean, but the city is still a shithole. I was just there. There is the boardwalk block and the rest of the city. Been like that since the 70's when the first casino's went up. I applied to the second casino that went up, Ceaser's I think it was, in 1978 and was told by HR that they weren't hiring white men. They actually said that. They were having a very hard time meeting the casino commission quotas for women and minorities.
I will grant that pleasantville is showing some signs of improvement, it would be hard to go any further downhill, and big time shopping has shown up at the parkway exit.
Amazingly after many many decades of people losing their asses investing there because it has to improve some day Asbury Park is starting to show a pulse. The gay community has moved in big time and has started actually gentrifying it. It's not great, but it's improving.