- On 18 May 2013
in
Housing starts plummet,
Bigsby said:
what did this cheap azz expect from eating food openly displayed on the sides of the road, visited by flies that have been feeding on big piles of pig manure nearby?
typical cheap ass American tourists in SouthEast Asia. spending like $200 bucks for the whole trip and expecting great experiences of that of Paris or Hawaii. why don't you write a fucking blog to cry about it too you cheap asshole!
as a matter of fact, even the natives stopped eating streets food 10 years ago. they are mostly for cheap Western tourists now! :)
If you weren't joking, that's a shame. Some of the street food in Asia is spectacular. And that is not a joke. And to say that locals don't eat it is even more ridiculous.
- On 17 May 2013
in
9/11 Continuing the War on Liberty,
Bigsby said:
All I hope to achieve from this thread is to inform more people of the controversy and make an attempt at debating the deniers.
Debate the deniers? What on Earth does that mean? You and your ilk are the deniers. And you have already long ago drawn your conclusions. You always trot out this line about being open and interested in the debate, etc. etc. No, you aren't. Your posts show that to be a lie. You are a conspiracist. You are just trying to give yourself a bit of credibility, but you are clearly being disingenuous, so it actually gives you less.
- On 17 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
Goodbye Bgamall. I'm no longer going to respond to you. That's a promise. You need the oxygen of responses so that you feel empowered to post your idiotic conspiracy theories. You don't warrant it. I realise that your life may seem pointless now you are retired and you're frustrated by the fact that the only place people seem to take notice of you is on a forum, but seriously, there must be more constructive ways of massaging your out of control ego.
I suggest you read a good book rather than spending your time on all your conspiracy websites. I recommend The Age of Wonder by Richard Holmes. - On 17 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
And why would the Fire Department commander be in on this conspiracy by the way?
Leaders are always in on conspiracy. Grunt firefighters who heard explosions in the towers BELOW THEM, were forbidden from testifying and there was a gag order on them.
You guys will not be detectives in this life or the next.
A Fire Department commander?
- On 17 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
So you know better than him what he meant. Well done.
He knew what he meant when he first made the statement, "pull it".
He said they decided to pull it and they watched it collapse. In the context there is nothing else he could have meant. But then he realized that admitting that they pulled it would expose the entire conspiracy. Oh, Oh.
Like I said, you appear to know what the person meant better than the person who actually said it. Quite the talent. And why would the Fire Department commander be in on this conspiracy by the way?
- On 17 May 2013
in
9/11 Continuing the War on Liberty,
Bigsby said:
As open-minded as ever I see.
- On 17 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
basically, there are the gullible, and the stupid... other than that, nobody believes the conspiracy crap.
Silverstein said pull it. This has been reinterpreted by the debunker illuminati to mean pull them. But pull it does not mean pull them.
Only to a crazed debunker would it mean them.
So you know better than him what he meant. Well done.
- On 17 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
You seem to be deleting insult free posts. Perhaps you should tell Goran. That's 3 different people's posts you've deleted in quick succession. Why is that?
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
That wasn't the point. It was a rhetorical question. I couldn't care less what you are doing.
Then don't ask the question.
And you can think about the point I was making.
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
Really? Every single person I know in the area goes travelling and they've nearly all bought in the last ten years. Do you see how generalising works?
Not in the SFBA proper. Ask around.
Except most of my friends live in that area...
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
You specifically said you own a home and are doing an 3 week travel. Then asked what I was doing? You don't remember that? Scroll up. Then when I answer and it isn't to your liking then you post as if I was challenging you. Makes no sense.
That wasn't the point. It was a rhetorical question. I couldn't care less what you are doing. The point was as I expressed in my previous post.
Also, my point is that if I extended myself to buy in the SFBA like most, then I wouldn't be able to travel. I would need to work full-time all the time just to cover the costs which are over double what I pay now. I am not saying everyone is like that. If you own and can travel then amazing. Most SFBA people buying now or anytime in the past 10 years can't.
Really? Every single person I know in the area goes travelling and they've nearly all bought in the last ten years. Do you see how generalising works?
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
That's his opinion.
I don't agree with any of BGmall's conspiracy threads, but I also don't see the need to go into his threads, call him an idiot, and then complain for being deleted in his own thread!
Regardless, I don't think you should be banned, I think the self-moderating system is doing its job. But if you think you or Iwog have any leeway to complain about being deleted in threads where you two are constantly insulting, and harassing the thread starter, that to me seems ridiculous.
I insult him when he insults me and vice-versa. He has recycled the same topic multiple times. He is simply an attention seeking conspiracy nut. I've challenged his points frequently and he is totally oblivious to any reasoning. He wants people to react. That is why he deletes posts. He is fishing for a reaction. Perhaps you need to go back to when this started to get a more evenhanded perspective. And by the way, he actually deletes posts that are invariably free from insults but have a relevant point that he can't counter - that is what I am complaining about. He tends to keep the other posts because he is looking to maintain the argument.
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
Anyone posting with personal insults will always be deleted in my posts. Don't like it, then don't post. PERIOD!
Fine. What personal insults did Iwog have in the posts you deleted?
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
Hmm
Italy , Brasil , Dominican Republic, Hawaii, Alaskan cruise, Australia. And that is just in 2013 that is booked!
And I've been to England, Paris, Dubai, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Sri Lanka, and California (which is not my place of residence) so far this year. What is your point? People who have homes travel you know.
See how that works. Someone calls a challenge. I respond with an answer, and then my answer is then somehow a challenge? Follow the thread properly or please don't comment.
It wasn't a challenge. The point was that you've frequently posted that you are leading this amazing life and boast about travelling here and there because you are free from a mortgage. My point was that it has nothing to do with the mortgage and a lot more to do with whether or not you have one you can afford. Your life is not suddenly put on hold just because you buy a house.
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
What rules have I broken?
From Tips and Tricks: http://patrick.net/forum/?p=1208339
Users that deliberately insult other users will be suspended for a day or more. Please use the dislike link to mark personally insulting comments.
You're just fortunate Patrick is too busy to moderate every personal insult on the forum, and in general the moderation has gone to a self-moderated system where Premium members can delete comments like yours.
Like I said, you have no legitimate beef for being deleted, and neither does Iwog.
Then Patrick can suspend me. You took comments that I made to Bgamall in a single thread that has been an ongoing argument with him posting his conspiracy drivel in thread after thread in the process accusing me of all sorts. Again why didn't you mention that?
From just the final page of the thread you took my comments from Bgamall said the following in separate posts:
You are an idiot Biggs.
It is in plain site for anyone who wants to understand. You are the dumbest brick I have ever run across.
Why continue to embarrass yourself? You are truly the moron of morons.
Here is the deal, if you are paid to post this drivel, the blood is on your hands for 9/11 at judgement day. I would not want to be you.
You have no case, Biggs. Again, if you are paid to help the propaganda, the blood is on your hands. Otherwise you are just ignorant.
All this from a person that thinks all WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolitions and that both Sandy Hook and the Boston bombings were faked. And yet I'm being called the troll and pulled up for insulting him. Post your same remarks to him then.
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
Hmm
Italy , Brasil , Dominican Republic, Hawaii, Alaskan cruise, Australia. And that is just in 2013 that is booked!
And I've been to England, Paris, Dubai, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Sri Lanka, and California (which is not my place of residence) so far this year. What is your point? People who have homes travel you know.
- On 17 May 2013
in
But But But Housing is the only game, you must BUY!,
Bigsby said:
APOCALYPSEFUCK is Shostakovich says
most people buy because they think it will be the road to riches.
Well, it is, isn't it?
If Rich is defined as being enslaved for 30 years by the bank and infinity by the city. I'd rather define it by travel, no real financial reason to work, and time to devote to family and yourself. Owning a million dollar hut in the SFBA doesn't let people get near that dream.
I own a home in Monterey. I'm going to Bali for 3 weeks this summer, followed by 6 weeks in Japan. What are you doing?
- On 17 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
Sorry, puffs of smoke that were squibbs were observed in the twin towers. The WTC7 buckled like a demolition that it was.
A few puffs of very separated smoke/dust/debris do not a demolition make. They do however make it air and the consequential debris being expelled due to downward pressure from debris falling.
Let me ask you, do you ever sleep?
Er, I make it nine minutes past midnight on the West coast when you posted. Guess what time it is in Kuwait? And guess what Friday is over here.
I don't know if there was a bulge. There apparently are no pictures and the NIST didn't refer to it as being a reason for collapse.
You love eyewitness reports but seemingly only when they fit your argument. Research after the event is irrelevant to making a decision at the time about what you think is going to happen to a building. 'Oh, look a the bulge in WTC7. Let's go inside and have a look around' or 'Oh, look a the bulge in WTC7. Do you think it might collapse? It might be an idea to evacuate the building....' Which choice do you think you would have made?
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
And I didn't say any pictures of the bulging, did you, Biggs?
You haven't seen or heard controlled demolitions at any of the three buildings, and yet...
And are you denying that there was a bulge and that it contributed to the view of the people on the ground that the building might collapse?
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
No, they were surprised it collapsed. If it was bulging, then it could not empty its innards and yet keep the integrity of the outside walls. Yet the argument you rely on rests with the concept that the inward parts of the building collapsed while the outside somehow kept its integrity. That cannot happen. Demolition folks that were involved in the demoliton happened to be there and said it would collapse. They knew.
So why did a number of the people actually there say they feared a collapse? Why was the building evacuated? And what do you mean IF it was bulging? Come on, explain away. Oh, actually, let me guess, all these people had inside knowledge of an upcoming CD and/or are lying. Is that going to be your argument? It is, isn't it?
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
Yes, how could I not realise that a stupid Youtube video could so easily destroy 100,000 words of painstaking research? You really are quite a sad little man. I suggest you just go to sleep and dream of something better to tax your limited intellect with.
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
They are only lies to a conspiracy nut like you. You seem to not understand that simple fact. It may surprise you, what with your ridiculously over-inflated ego, but things don't become lies just because you say they are a lie.
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
This may help you Deletemall:
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm
And remember, you still haven't answered my question about how long you now believe the collapse took.
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
Explain their position Bigsby.
How can I when you keep deleting my posts? And why should I do it once again? Just go and read the NIST report. Is that so difficult for you? Are you concerned about reading an actual scientific report? Do you have an aversion to looking at the whole picture rather than merely certain very narrow misrepresentations that you (mistakenly) think support your assertion.
Anyway, I keep getting dragged back into your bullshit through my lack of willpower. Read NIST, try and understand it, think about the lack of intellectual honesty you are displaying, try and check your ego, take a deep breath, and really, really take a long hard look at what you are actually saying. Seriously, think about it, because the story you have concocted seems to have left reasoning at the door.
- On 16 May 2013
in
Insider Trading: This was a doozy folks. 911 Trading,
Bigsby said:
In other words, the building on the outside was intact all the way around. And it was imploded from the bottom as we see on video after video provided here showing that the bottom pillars are removed so the buildings fall symmetrically or nearly symmetrically.
And there we have another blatant misrepresentation of the facts. You really can't help yourself, can you? You accuse people of lying based on nothing and yet you do it so brazenly. Why is that?