IT can easily be argued that deep deep down, Africans are less aggressive than than European whites. Eurpean whites would not have tolerated total enslavement as well as Black Africans did.
I completely agree with you on this point. If you look into the history of slavery of different peoples you'll find that many didn't do well under that yoke. Most of the Native American tribes just chose to die instead of being slaves. Other people's were very hard to subordinate and couldn't be kept down for long. The Africans were unique in their servility and adaptability to the slave life. That and their physical differences made the case for racial slavery that perpetuated that crime upon American history.
Whites are more violent by far than blacks, but also more intelligent, more cultured, and more introspective. That makes most whites feel bad about being violent. However most does not equal all, as I've learned throughout my life. Violent and sociopathic whites have been the bane of my life at a ratio of 20:1 for any other race of peoples.
The point I was making is that you can not threaten the livihood or security of white people and get away with it. That is literally the lock that keeps the monkey on the chain and off your neck. Piss off white people too much and you won't like the results. Hell, you likely won't survive the results!
Odds are just figured by money, not people. Sure it's peoples' money, but they provide it in disproportionate amounts so the odds are skewed towards the opinions of those with more money. Elections aren't always like that, being a more one vote per person sort of deal. Nice try tho, Strategist.
Policies that have enhanced our differences have contributed to the racial tension mess we find ourselves in as a nation. Policies like Affirmative Action, racial and gender "studies," promotion of "victim hood," quashing of free speech by activists, ghetto culture, and neglect of the family structure have created a society with a significant underclass. This group, assured of their victimhood, feels they have license to commit any outrage against a perceived oppressive majority. Said majority does not and can not expect to accept such a draconian and pernicious affront to their well being and security. So the backlash commences and liberals everywhere are SHOCKED! Well, guess what? You threaten a man's ability to protect his family and way of life and he is going to come and eat your FUCKING LUNCH just the way God made him to be.
After all the blatant executive order minority activist bullshit that Obama has pulled, I have a feeling that non-black, non-Latino Americans are extremely mistrusting of any minority candidate, especially on the left. at least, that's the word on the street.
At this point, trying to convince the idiots that Islam is our enemy is just pissing into the wind. They don't think using their frontal cortexes, but using their emotional centers instead for all. The only way to appeal to a person like that is with an emotional (and probably false) argument since that's all they understand.
If their kids start actually studying the Koran they'll find that they need to wage jihad on the people they grew up with to win the favor of Allah. The problem isn't the people. It's the toxic culture/religion they drag in with them.
Although, according to statistics, we'd be far better off (crime-wise) replacing all our black people with Syrians.
What I wanna know is who the FUCK do these black idiots think will hire their no-good asses once/if they graduate? Nobody wants trouble-makers like that on staff, and there are many ways of saying "Thanks, but we chose someone else." They're literally ruining things for black students everywhere. Some black students are beginning to speak out against these abuses, condemning the movement as violent and misguided. I know if I were black I'd be pissed about this.
Racism in hiring is waaaaaay easier than anyone suspects. If they want jobs they'd better STFU.
They should sue. Like Disney doesn't make enough money, it has to outsource tech jobs and force IT workers to train their Chindian replacements. I hope they win a billion dollars and the case sets a precedent that keeps the wealthy owner assholes from misusing this program again. And I hope Congress acts to repeal it. There is almost no legitimate reason why you'd need to hire a guy from another country to replace a guy here.
Here's a thought. Saudi Arabia is in control of OPEC, which decides prices and production of Middle East oil, and what currency (dollar) will be used to trade it. This makes SA a very important "Ally" of the USA, worth making sacrifices for. If SA decided that its northern neighbor Iraq needed a good smack down and wanted the USA to do it, but the US is like "Hey our people are peacing out here, we need a provocation.'
So Saudi Arabia is like, "Hey, how about we do some terror in your NYC?" And the bastards here said okay.
So it was no accident that almost all the hijackers were Saudis. It was a Saudi operation, carried out with the tacit blessing of US leaders, for the express purpose of sparking a war to take out an Arab rival.
The USA was just a cat's paw for the Arabs.
Am I Gary now?
Just out of touch with the voter base. Most of which are sick and tired of the establishment putting them out of work and undercutting salaries by letting illegals come in and work without intervention. Illegal immigrants are a disaster for working people's rights.
Democrats should be the first to acknowledge this but they are the worst offenders. Clearly they do NOT have middle America's interests at heart, and it's becoming more
Apparent every day.
The more the democrats show up (BLM, occupy universities, encourage unchecked Muslim immigration) the more Trump seems like the only option to those of us who aren't complete fuckwits. Even Bernie, as much as I respect the guy for sticking to his ideals, fell down hard on the Syrian immigration thing. If he'd taken even as moderate a road as the Canadian PM and offered the women and families but no single dudes a refuge, he'd be golden. But instead he wants all no checks, no worries that some of the majority single men are going to be bad for America.
Trump with all his xenophobia has it sewn up. People with families who vote don't want their kids threatened by foreign terrorist assholes.
But it's dirty pussy! Especially nasty pussy that has an infection. Not that it doesn't happen sometimes, but to use the "essence" of such a problem to create bread...
Just get some vagisil next time and drink cranberry juice.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"
That's the language used. Now tell me how it applies to selection of refugees? How has Congress violated this law? Their bill just increases screening requirements, doesn't even mention a religion. But the President, were he not a Muslim himself, could certainly instruct his state department to select the most persecuted religious groups first for refugee status.
Islam is a culture, a vile and toxic culture that infects the world with strife and dysfunction. There's no need to respect such a culture, and disrespecting it is in no way "racist" because it's a culture that spans many races. It would be like saying "People who don't like metal heads are racist." Or more to the point: "People who hate Christianity are racist."