Show Comments That Contain...
  • On 17 Apr 2014 in Why aren't ACA premiums tax deductible?, CaptainShuddup said:

  • On 17 Apr 2014 in Majority of workers feel they are overweight, CaptainShuddup said:

    YesYNot says

    So the food pyramid said to limit Salt, Oil, and Sugar, which are the main-stays of processed food. But that is about the opposite of what people have done in the last 20 years.

    The guide and pyramid are an unfortunate compromise between nutritional information and the desires of various food industry lobbies. This leads to intentionally confusing recommendations, like keep fat to less than 30 percent of calories, and that cake should be counted in the grains category. Cake should be listed in the oil and sugar category, period.

    The My Plate Icon does no better.

    The price of healthful vegetables and raw unprocessed foods is becoming a luxury and a premium, while our food distribution is consolidating more and more to a mass production assembly line of saturated sweetened fat, loaded with chemical for each to alter thickness, longevity, color, texture and dried and crammed into a bag, canned, frozen or dispensed from a machine.

    Then we have people in Washington who like to rock the vote, rattling on about eating your veggies, while not say one single damn word about the crap and the additives that is in 85% of the food we eat. There's just to much money to make them stop, feeding people that poison.

  • On 17 Apr 2014 in Americans envision profound technological changes in the next 50 years, CaptainShuddup said:

    The last century benefited mankind, this time man is here to benefit the profits of science.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    lostand confused says

    I am so disgusted with both parties and yearn for someone to vote.

    You can't! You're not allowed to. I bet you're registered like most sane people in this country as NPA. We're not allowed to be heard in the Primaries, so the biggest dumbest Idiot line carry for both parties are the ones who make it past the first Asshole contest. That is a production brought to us by one Party with two marketing departments. Each put on a pageant with the deep pocket media sponsors. You and I, and the 1/3 of the country JUST LIKE US, do not get to participate while the Idiot left the retarded right suck each other off and boast about democracy. If any of the other 2/6th that's 1/3 republican or Democrat prospectively and the 1/3 that are no party affiliated. Unilaterally make the decision for us, the person that will become the President by just a cunt hair over 50%, and they'll then fawn all over them selves about what a major Victory it was, and how this pol and that pol got it right or wrong.

    It's enough to make you want to sit out the next election for sure.
    I would love to see a race where the disgusted people and those who have no emotional attachment to either candidate other than their reprogrammed hate and force fed sound bytes they have on the other candidate, Just sit out the election.

    The turn out would be interesting, and I bet the loser no matter which party it was, would bitch about how they lost all of those Votes that they never fucking had in the first place.

    NPA should occupy the next two elections polling stations, it's time we abolish the closed primaries, it is the biggest and greatest tool they have for fixing the election and setting the tone to Super Tuesday. After that it's just a slick skid mark all the way to the oval office. Whoooooooooooshhhhhhhhhhh

    If the primaries weren't closed, then the Republican backers that the collective Patnet hates, and the agitating Liberal super pacs, would have to buy and pay off a lot more people. Buying and rigging elections aren't cheap.
    And that's just the cost, for a two horse election.

    Imagine if popular vote actually did chose our candidates for the presidential election. The electoral college would not be for sale, and votes would not be easily rigged or discarded. If the candidates were actual candidates that got there because the voters gave a fuck enough to chose him. Rather than they voted for him, and signed up for a Citi bonus reward card, for jumping in a van and voting for Candidate(x).

    I think I will sit out the next one-unless Hillary runs-then will vote against.

    Helmethair Clinton didn't even make a suitable Stormtrooper you want her to run a country?

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Fixing the broken lower rungs of the property ladder, CaptainShuddup said:

    New Renter says

    Note low end does not mean ghetto. What I am talking about is smaller homes (1000-1500 sqft) on smaller lots (under 7000 sqft) in decent used shape and not in a dangerous neighborhood.

    Well of course not, though the NAR and social pressure has said yes they are ghettos.

    You wouldn't want to be caught dead living in one as an owner, but it's actually quite hip and trendy to rent them.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    NO that's not where I was going at all.

    Here's what the facts are and not the sound bytes, sit down Jr.

    You see things have changed in Women issues, and Gay issues, the Governments injection of the Churches view against women's and gay issues, they have made great strides. Now lets give them a big round of applause everybody!!!!

    BUT!

    Here's the thing, while the Liberals have been running around the country creating the worst pieces of Legislation in History which has sailed right through and passed. They never seem to run out of reasons to blame Republicans for., when the Liberal legislation failures are exposed.

    Obama has proven he can make anything at all happen.

    Even the mythical beast that "obamacare" is supposed to be, someday, one day. Which here's another fucked up thing.
    By every Liberal account, Obamacare from the get go, was some lose improvisationaly implemented bill, constructed adhoc and obfuscated with boons to the Insurance, big pharma, and the private Medical industry complex.
    From the get go, after every Liberals argument was lost, the final retort was "Well it's meant to be fixed."

    You guys do know some fixes are very simple?

    Patient:"MY arm hurts when do this"

    Doctor: "Well don't do that!"

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Fixing the broken lower rungs of the property ladder, CaptainShuddup said:

    Also I don't think Move ups will be as big of a social pressure as it once was. I think going forward, your modest earner, who buys and lives prudently, will either buy for good. Or buy to rent out.
    I think the days, of young Hipster couples, buying a house that is not to their standards. Or something they would not want to live in for a long time. But buy it anyway out of desperation, to get their finances started with a starter home, is a thing of the past.
    That depends on classic economics for that model to work.

    Unless your wages go up considerably you can't really swing houses your way to affluence. It used to be that taxes and insurance while more than other neighborhoods. They weren't as prohibitively different back then. So it was possible to save up enough money to flip into bigger and better place, wile still making the same wages you made in the last house, and not have the taxes and insurance strangle you to death.

    People will eventually stop having such a shallow skeptical eye, that was also a relic of that era where your address was a stigma and social driver to keep up with the Jones' with out actually getting a Jones' raise in Income. That's impossible today.

    So people will eventually start seeing those looked over neighborhoods with less of a skeptical eye, or with a decorators eye. And will buy them for the long term.

    That will also create a society that will hold their neighbor accountable for how they at least keep up their property, and people who victimize people in their community with theft or violence.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    But women can decide what to do with her fetus and treat it like a part of her body, as long as it's done in early development.

    But OK let's do this Ya'll, since all you guys can drag up is this Champion wound scab that is the poor hapless pregnant women in this country.

    Have the Republicans successfully blocked any Women issues that have come up in Washington in the last 5 years? If so what issues, and what was the outcome?
    Have the Liberals lost ground on Women's issues in this administration, or gained ground?

    Let's hear it.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    sbh I don't need Google, I could debate you with just one sheet of paper. An insurance monthly statement, is all it's going to take to bring this little Pissy party to a kaput.

    Obamacare is so fucked up, many poor and elderly aren't even biting for the Freebie subsidized care. Because in this economy, it is possible to be poor, and still own something. Obamacare says, "here let me stitch that up for you, but then all of your shit is MINE."

    The Liberals really are going to have to depend on the hopelessly Liberal no matter what, and the piss-poor who are oblivious to why or how they got there, and all ways will be.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    sbh says

    Two strawmen and a flaccid cop out.

    Well answer the question, should naming a fetus be illegal?

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    marcus says

    Tell me the last time the republicans risked taking on a huge issue like health care in the way the democrats have.

    Where should we send the "Thank You" flowers?

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Is this Romney's 47%?, CaptainShuddup said:

    Oh here comes Marcus to keep the topic on track.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Will This Induce the GOP to Reform or Double Down on Repeal?, CaptainShuddup said:

    You'll need to do better than that.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    You hate that people debated if fetuses should have a name?

    I bet you are just disgusted by people who pick out a name the day they find they are pregnant?

    But lets just stick with what the current Republican talking points are shall we? That stuff was all fun back in Bush's term. Which abortions are still legal in this country, so why are you guys still but hurt about it?

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Tell me anything that you hate about Republicans the most., CaptainShuddup said:

    What about it?

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Is this Romney's 47%?, CaptainShuddup said:

    sbh says

    That's what gets your panties in a twist: he won by being some leftist version of the people you defend.

    I see you went to the Iwog school of shit smoke.

    I'm not defending anyone by calling Obama like everyone sees it.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Is this Romney's 47%?, CaptainShuddup said:

    sbh says

    You gotta admit, not being that moron is all he really needed.

    Hey Genius, Obama has already made every single fuck up, that Liberals claimed every single one of his Republican rivals going all the way back to the 2008 primaries, would make.

    He's not only the Liberal's description of Romney, he's been Palin, McCain, Perry, Bush, you name it. There's not one Republican boogieman that Obama hasn't topped.

    He makes a 90 something year old Jimmy Carter, sound like the Smartest American in the world, and makes Jimmy Carter's administration a smashing Liberal success.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Will This Induce the GOP to Reform or Double Down on Repeal?, CaptainShuddup said:

    Lose logic argument (Check)
    Make petty attacks(check)

    I like how Liberals mastered the chicken pecking gobbledygook that are Tweets and it is even perfectly acceptable reprint news, and admissible evidence.

    BUT!!!!

    Blister a Liberal's ass in forum debate, their coup de grâce, the Crème de la Crème, the only desperate shit they can think of, is to poke jabs at grammatical mistakes.

    It must be conflicting tormenting affliction to be a Liberal.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Will This Induce the GOP to Reform or Double Down on Repeal?, CaptainShuddup said:

    I read yesterday that premiums in Florida went up as much as 25 to 35% just from 2013 to 2014 premiums. They expect the same for next year.

    Let's see how many inured voters are still insured let alone their job survives 7 more months until November.

    My guess is, the Liberals will find religion before November, so they can claim the GOP is the Devil, so they can run on the.

    Vote Democrat because they are "LESS" evil than Republicans.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Will This Induce the GOP to Reform or Double Down on Repeal?, CaptainShuddup said:

    Let me guess they polled uninsured Liberals, who opted to not pay, or single people who's full insurance premium costs are covered by their employer.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Is this Romney's 47%?, CaptainShuddup said:

    So Basically what you guy's common mantra about Obama is the same reoccurring theme.

    "Obama's greatest accomplishments to date, is Romney's sound bytes."

    OK I understand I got it. I hear you loud and clear.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Is this Romney's 47%?, CaptainShuddup said:

    mmmarvel says

    Really? Then how do you explain this?

    "Mitt Romney won 59 percent of the overall white vote"

    Um... Because those White voters were smart enough to know Obama expected them to pay and pay and pay and pay and pay and pay and pay and pay and pay.

    Now that he's elected they have two options...

    Either sit on their ass and stay at home... er I mean the shelter and collect assistance, or get a job with more pay.

    Even if they get a better job, it's still NOT enough.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/16/irs-considers-taxing-work-perks-like-food-gym-memberships/?intcmp=latestnews

    Those greedy bastards wants to tax their lunch and every thing else they get.

    They should be called National heroes and treated with greater respect than this administration gives the ones who have to finance Obama's dream of a Socialist fascist utopia.

  • On 16 Apr 2014 in Fixing the broken lower rungs of the property ladder, CaptainShuddup said:

    golfplan18 says

    Assuming they sustain ownership, assuming they have an amortizing mortgage, and assuming house prices rise, after some period of waiting, the first-time homeowners could sell their starter house, usually to another first-time buyer, for enough to cover the sales costs and provide a 20% down payment on a move-up house.

    20% DP isn't the norm anymore for a "First time Buyer".
    And all of the good move up homes are being sold to cash strapped investors.

    I don't think this will ever change with the climate of government championed greed. The only way I see this trend changing is if Zoning laws change to protect single home neighborhoods.
    Meaning if you purchase a house it can't be rented out to third parties or the Buyers must also live on the property.

    Condos and HOA neighborhoods have it, why not on a local City zoning and ordinance level?

  • On 15 Apr 2014 in Hookers turning Airbnb apartments into brothels, CaptainShuddup said:

    I love it when tech fails because people just can't handle a good thing.

  • On 15 Apr 2014 in Is this Romney's 47%?, CaptainShuddup said:

    bgamall4 says

    This still is part of Romney's 47 percent. Those damn corporations are a part of it. But you know Romney would never admit corporations were a part of the 47 percent he called moochers.

    When you stop pretending that Obama hasn't exhibited and announced on several occasions that he would govern alone with his pen. So anything at this point, and I do mean anything, about this administrations short Cummings, would rest squarely on Obama's shoulder for not giving a good greasy crank about it.

    If you're butt hurt because those big ole corporations did do this and they didn't pay that, just consider who really could do the most in Washington to stop it.

    And if you're dirty liberal filthy blame finger is still pointing at Mitt Romney.

    Then it would appear that Mitt Romney really did win the 2012 elections, and Obama is just playing Token at this point.

Home   Tips and Tricks   Questions or suggestions? Mail p@patrick.net   Thank you for your kind donations

Page took 564 milliseconds to create.