"I had never heard of Windows 10. ...," she told the newspaper.
And that's a red flag right there. If your company is dependent on IT, and it probably is, you can go through life being completely ignorant of technology. That strategy just doesn't work in the 21st century.
I look at that picture and think that's where all businesses are going, a giant centralized infrastructure where automation and outsourcing has eliminated the need for employees that use all that infrastructure.
No you're thinking of conservatives whether they be Democrats or Republicans. H.R. 2978 (101st): Flag Protection Act of 1989. Conservatives have no right to bitch and moan about free speech when they support and sponsor tyrannical legislation like the Flag Protection Act, which basically takes a huge shit on the Constitution. People where actually prosecuted under this law. This isn't an imaginary scenario like conservatives are always fantasizing about to justify their beliefs. This shit actually happened.
I kind of wonder what would have happened if Scotland had left the UK and stayed in the EU while the remaining UK left. Then Scotland could have adopted the Euro and had an economic advantage over the UK. But oh well, that didn't happen. The UK would have probably built a wall along the Scottish border or something.
Honey, I'm not wasting time and money on tickets until you give me an address, and even then, I'm not giving you my ID. I'll show up and snap a full pictures of the cardboard box you call a home and a few pictures of your ugly ass to post on PatNet and that will be it. You'll get no ID from me and when I leave you still won't be able to stalk me. So no, your excuses are transparent. You don't have the balls to meet up in real life. You never did. Bluff called. Cowardice revealed.
It's not at all hard to understand that you are a chicken shit using an excuse not to give the address to where you say you want me to go. It's not hard to understand that it's a ploy and even if I gave you my personal information, which could be easily faked with Photoshop, you would not give out the address and you are only trying an obvious ploy to get me to reveal my personal information, which honey isn't going to happen because you are the only idiot here. And since you need none of that to give the address of your party, and there is no downside to you giving the address without my personal information, you are clearly a lying little coward. Please, keep it up. Every time you open your mouth, you further indicate how much of a loser, coward, and liar you are. It's beautiful.
Repeating a lie does not make it true, CIC. You never had any intention of revealing your address and the so-called invitation you posted is a farce. Everyone knows this. The only way you can demonstrate otherwise is by posting the address right here and now. You literally have nothing to lose. There is no cost if you actually are inviting me to your house. Your clearly irrelevant demands are obvious excuses not to do so. Your refusal to provide an address with that invitation is a dead give away that you were always bluffing about meeting up with me. You don't need to know my real name, social security number, or home address to meet me at your house or at a public bar. You are simply a lying little shit coward and everyone knows it. No further lies are going to convince anyone differently.
Well robots will always take over even if the minimum wage was $1 an hour. Silicon and code will always be cheaper in the long run than a human being. You economically illiterate assclowns have never proposed a solution and you never will.
This is true. This is also why we need society, not a bunch of technologically illiterate trust fund boys, owning the means of automation. If we transition to a Georgist-like economy where the automations created by engineers who don't own those automation are owned by the public instead of the richest 0.01% of the public, then we can have a guaranteed income for everyone and our economy will prosper as people no longer have jobs. This would be a damn enjoyable society to live in. The alternative is a tiny fraction of lazy do-nothing asses being opulently rich with mass poverty currently seen only in third-world nations and all the violence that goes with that. Where labor is cheap, life is cheap.
And you've just stated that shooting someone who attempts to rape your family is immoral... Nice set of values psycho.
No, I did not. And the fact that you think such a statement is psycho is tantamount to admitting that Christianity is crazy. I am completely in agreement that the moral thing is to use the least amount of violence necessary to stop the evil act even if the least amount of violence necessary is fatal. Unlike you, however, I do not take pleasure at the idea of killing someone even someone who is doing a vile act. And that is what makes me morally superior to you.
Nonetheless, according to Christian doctrines, which you well know, your killing of the intruder would cause him to die in a state of mortal sin condemning him to an eternity of torture. By any sane standard, doing that would make you an inherently immoral person having done something far worse than mass rape and murder. So if you believe in the Christian afterlife, you are morally bankrupt for choosing to kill a person in such a state of sin regardless of whether or not he were to kill you and your family. If you don't believe in the Christian afterlife, then the Christian moral teachings are, as you pointed out, psychotic.
The passage you referenced refers exclusively to these things being done to you, not your family. Are you really that desperate to be right that you'd intentionally misrepresent the Bible?
The passage I reference clearly states that one should gladly accepting suffering rather than harm others. But hey, you're dodging the point. If a person broke into your house and you lived alone, would you refrain from shooting him to stop him from raping and killing just you? Of course not. So you reject the teachings of your god. So do I. I'm just honest about it. Christianity is stupid and a poor basis of morality. That said, Christianity clearly has had no impact on changing your morality or anyone else's. People who like to kill "bad guys" continue to like to kill "bad guys" regardless of what their religion teaches. Religion has never been effective in understanding or promoting morality. You are living proof of that. You reject the very basis of Christian morality and the idea that the afterlife, not this life, is what really matters.