
|
Who disagrees that house prices will continue to fall?
Real estate businesses disagree, because they don't make money if buyers do not
buy. These businesses have a large financial interest in misleading the public
about the foolishness of buying a house now. The NAR has harmed America far more
than terrorism did.
Real estate is all about deception. There is no transparent market because bids
are never published, unlike the stock market. There should be a law to change
that, but the NAR is one of the largest lobbyists in Congress, so don't expect
any changes soon.
- Buyers' agents get nothing if there is no sale, so they want their clients
to buy no matter how bad the deal is, which is the exact opposite of the buyer's
best interest. Agents take $100 billion each year in commissions from
buyers. Agents claim the seller pays the commission, but always fail to
mention that the seller gets that money from the buyer. Think about it: who
brings the money to the table - the seller or the buyer? All money comes from
buyers. No buyer, no money.
If a stock broker were to charge 6% on the sale of stock, he would quickly go
out of business. Real estate brokers don't do much more than stock brokers, so
why should you give up nearly two years of your working life earning money to
pay a realtor for the few hours they may put into helping you buy or sell a
house? 6% of the 30 years it takes to pay off a house is 1.8 years of donating
your working time to realtors.
There are good buyer's agents who really believe they are helping the buyer,
but they're in denial about their conflict of interests. Author Upton Sinclair had
a great explanation for this: "It is difficult to get a man to understand
something when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
- Mortgage brokers take a percentage of the loan, so they want buyers to
take out the biggest loan possible. Even worse - mortgage brokers get paid
according to how bad the deal is for the buyer. The worse the deal is
(higher interest rate, points, fees, etc) the more the mortgage broker gets!
- Banks got origination fees and then sold most mortgages, so they did not care
about the bankruptcy of borrowers. They would lend way beyond what buyers could
afford because they thought they risked nothing if the buyer were to default.
Banks sold most loans to the government agencies Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The
conversion of low-quality housing debt into "high" quality Fannie Mae debt with
the implicit backing of the federal government was the main support for the
housing bubble. That is ending as Fannie Mae shrinks.
The other way for banks to dump the risk of loan default has been the Wall
Street market for mortgage-backed securities. Now that mass foreclosures have
eliminated the loan-resale market, banks are under pressure to increase loan
quality.
- Appraisers are hired by mortgage brokers and banks, so they are going to
give the appraisals that mortgage brokers and banks want to see, not the truth.
Appraisers that kill a deal by telling the truth do not get called back to do
other appraisals.
- Newspapers earn money from advertising placed by realtors, lenders, and
mortgage brokers, so papers are pressured by that money to publish the real
estate industry's unrealistic forecasts. Worse, realtors have a near-monopoly
on sale price information, and newspaper reporters never ask realtors
hard questions like "how do we know you're not lying about those prices?" The
result is an endless stream of stories reporting that the National Association
of Realtors (NAR) says it's a good time to buy. Asking the NAR about housing is
like walking into a used car dealership and asking the salesman if today would
be a good day to buy a car.
- Owners themselves do not want to believe they are going to lose huge
amounts of money.
Previous Page
Next Page: What are their arguments?
|