« prev   random   next »

25
19

Funny picture thread

By zzyzzx following x   2011 Dec 9, 1:03am 352,135 views   1,743 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    












#humor

« First    « Previous    Comments 1664 - 1743 of 1743    Last »

1666   OccasionalCortex   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 1, 3:09pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

This is how the world really ends:
1670   MisterLearnToCode   ignore (4)   2019 Feb 1, 3:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

OMFG Comedy Gold
1671   d6rB   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 1, 5:17pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Butthead: “Uh, hey, baby.” “Damn we’re smooth.” “We’re gonna score”
Beavis: “Beaver kicks ass!”

My favorite cartoon of 1990's.
1673   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 1, 6:53pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I like it.

I actually know a woman with the last name Wong-Lee. She's quite meek, so I'm sure if she ever got in legal trouble she would be the Wong-Lee accused.
1675   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 1, 6:57pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

True, but even more true of the Democrats. They have been completely given up on their role as the representatives of labor, and are actively undermining labor with tens of millions of illegals.
1683   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 2, 12:07pm   ↑ like (9)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

marcus says


@marcus the racism and hate for working people illustrated in the comic absolutely guarantees that nothing will be solved.

If you actually want to make a difference, you have to drop the smug and condescending attitude towards people whose lives have been devastated by globalization.
1684   Tenpoundbass   ignore (13)   2019 Feb 2, 1:01pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says


You forgot Flat Earth.
1687   TrumpingTits   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 2, 2:53pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
If you actually want to make a difference, you have to drop the smug and condescending attitude towards people whose lives have been devastated by globalization.


But @Patrick, that is the real reason why they push micromanaging Deplorables. They don't really believe in Global Warming either.

The good news is that said same Deplorables will refuse taxpayer bailouts of Marcus' pension.
1688   Tenpoundbass   ignore (13)   2019 Feb 2, 6:28pm   ↑ like (6)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Sneak up behind them and scare them, bite 'em in the ass

1692   Onvacation   ignore (3)   2019 Feb 3, 1:36pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says


@marcus the racism and hate for working people illustrated in the comic absolutely guarantees that nothing will be solved.

It also illustrates the school's brainwashing of our children to be smug little social justice warriors.
1693   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 3, 1:42pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Right. So much hate.

Believing ignorance is bad and science is good makes one a "smug little SJW."
1694   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 3, 1:58pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

The left is perhaps more guilty of suppressing science on a wide scale, in the name of "social justice".

For example, races exist and are easily distinguished even by cheap tests like 23andme.com. (Not to mention that they are trivially distinguished by your own eyes.) And the races differ considerably in their behaviors and abilities on average. These are well-documented scientific facts which directly contradict SJW teaching.

Or the fact that men have greater variability in almost all characteristics than women do, leading to a preponderance of men at the highest (and lowest) levels of IQ. This fact was so hated by leftists that they had it erased from scientific journals with cooperation from SJW editors. And yet it remains scientifically true.

Or the fact that identical twins are not more likely to both be gay if one of them is. This proves that being gay is not determined by genes. It is simply the ancient and well known vice of sodomy, a bad choice in life, nothing more.

And on and on. Anything that contradicts what it taught in grievance studies classes will be ruthlessly suppressed, no matter how much hard scientific evidence backs it up.
1695   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 3, 2:12pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

If we accept that, on average for certain characterisitcs , people of one race differ from others in another race, my belief is that we never the less deal with people on an individual basis.

My question is, what kind of person get triggered by other people who want to treat people of different races as if they are the same, when as individuals, comparing one person to the next, they basically are ?

Who benefits and how do they benefit when it becomes no longer a questioned fact, as to which attributes are on average immutably different between races ?
1696   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 3, 2:25pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

America does in fact deal with its citizens of all races far more equitably than most countries.

The triggering is not from treating everyone the same. No one objects to that.

The problem is in being taught an outright lie and being told by schools and employers that merely questioning the lie will get you expelled or fired, or sent to Maoist-style re-education classes.

It is an outright lie that there are no races. Race actually exists and has large and real consequences.

Similarly, men and women are genetically inclined in different directions and have different strengths. It is another outright lie that the differences in the corporate world are entirely due to "sexism".

And again, it is an outright lie that homosexuality is something innate and immutable. It's just a poor choice in life and science backs this up.

If SJWs would stop with the lies, it would be much easier for everyone - but their grievance-based ideology demands that scientific facts be denied to make certain groups feel better about their weaknesses or their status. And their globo-capitalist funders would cut off funding if SJWs would stop dividing people with lies. It's bad for profits to have people unified against globalists you know. The purpose of the funding is to get us to fight each other so that we cannot fight them. Divide and conquer.
1697   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 3, 2:34pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
The problem is in being taught an outright lie and being told by schools and employers that merely questioning the lie will get you expelled or fired, or sent to Maoist-style re-education classes.


But why is this "lie" so completely off the radar of people like me (and no, I don't teach it), and yet so important to you and other Trump voters. I HONESTLY can not begin to fathom it.

Unless it's what I think it is.

marcus says

Who benefits and how do they benefit when it becomes no longer a questioned fact, as to which attributes are on average immutably different between races
1698   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 3, 2:37pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
And again, it is an outright lie that homosexuality is something innate and immutable. It's just a poor choice in life and science backs this up.


I would agree that sometimes you're right. In others, not so sure. I have no need to come down on one extreme or the other on this question. SO I take a libertarian view on it. Besides, it may be in the interest of leveling the population growth.

Patrick says
their grievance-based ideology


You're referring to the far left, not me. But I agree that it's too big an element of the left. Possibly a disadvantage of having the dispossessed and oppressed under your tent, but it's not nearly the whole tent. LEt's see who the dems come up with next time. I have no idea how it goes. But I would even take a somewhat left winger over Trump.

Democrats have to appeal to minorities in the same way that republicans have to appeal to white racists.

I'll grant you that it's a sad situation.
1699   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 3, 2:40pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Thanks @marcus

I don't really want to fight at all. But I also don't want people having power to enforce lies on the rest of us to salve their own feelings, or because it pleases the sponsors of NPR.

I don't care what gays want to do to each other. It's their right to fuck up their lives. I just don't want them teaching it to children.
1700   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 3, 2:52pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
It is another outright lie that the differences in the corporate world are entirely due to "sexism".


I think you're confused. Corporations have liberal policies that operate 'as if' this were true.

Big difference.

I think you would find very few (only extreme feminists) arguing that it is literally true in an absolute sense .
1701   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 3, 2:54pm   ↑ like (5)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

James Damore was fired for Google for attempting to make exactly that point: the difference in distribution of men and women in engineering is not entirely due to sexism.

So that's one huge corporation pretending that it is literally true that sexism accounts for all of the difference in numbers between male and female engineers.

And it's an excellent example of how telling the truth will get you fired.
1702   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 3, 2:59pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (3)   quote   flag        

Lies often have a purpose behind them. I find the acceptance of Trumps lies much more frightening.

I understand lies that are intended to increase the numbers of female engineers. Even if it probably won't be all that effective. Who knows, perhaps having more women engineers ultimately improves aspects of the way engineers communicate with each other,or other aspects of the group, in ways that more than offsets any negatives.
1703   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 3, 3:01pm   ↑ like (7)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says

I understand lies that are intended to increase the numbers of female engineers. Even if it probably won't be all that effective.


I just cannot accept being officially taught a lie and told to shut up about it. Ever.
1709   Kakistocracy   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 6, 2:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The Come to Jesus Meeting...

1710   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (2)   2019 Feb 6, 3:48pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
Who knows, perhaps having more women engineers ultimately improves aspects of the way engineers communicate with each other,or other aspects of the group, in ways that more than offsets any negatives.

What negatives?
Are you saying women are bad engineers but are better than men at communicating?
1711   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 6, 7:24pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Are you saying women are bad engineers but are better than men at communicating?


Lol, too much truth.

There are good woman engineers of course, but women provably, scientifically have less interest and aptitude for engineering on average. And communicate better than men do, on average.

Even chimpanzee children have starkly different interests. Male chimpanzee kids choose to play with trucks, female chimpanzee kids choose to play with dolls. No one taught them that.
1715   CBOEtrader   ignore (5)   2019 Feb 8, 3:47am   ↑ like (8)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says


*When a liberal meme is more of an indictment on the liberal himself.
1719   Trog2FdUp2C   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 9, 8:57pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        



"Russia ....." "Aha?"
1723   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 12, 9:35pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I'm banning politics from this thread.
1724   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 12, 9:49pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Does that mean you go back and eliminate all the stuff that pokes at "libtards".

Of course not.

Speaks volumes.
1725   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 12, 9:52pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Actually as I think about it, it gives me a tiny amount of hope.

Very very very very very very very deep down, you know.
1727   d6rB   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 13, 8:26am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says

WRONG! We can see result of non-teaching in public schools.
What they call "calories" on food packets is actually kilocalories, or thousands of calories. So, gallon on gasoline has 31000 kcal, while human needs ca. 2000 kcal/day.
1728   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 13, 10:00am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Ah, thanks for doing the math. Didn't quite feel right anyway. Off by 1000x!
1729   marcus   ignore (7)   2019 Feb 13, 9:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I thought it was ironic. Maybe our fuehrer will lighten up.
1730   Patrick   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 13, 10:08pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Nah, I'm pretty humorless when it comes to humor!

@marcus Nothing against you personally. I'm glad you're here.
1731   TrumpingTits   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 14, 8:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
I'm banning politics from this thread.


Can't tell if that was a joke or not.
1734   curious2   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 15, 8:27pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

1735   FortWayneIndiana   ignore (3)   2019 Feb 15, 9:04pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

curious2 says
That's false. @Patrick, why do you litter your own site with outright lies?


You are quoting either false studies or studies that simply point that people who grow in the same household, under same conditions, more likely end up gay. Which has been proven. It's socially constructed to a high degree. Raise normal kids in a gay neighborhoods, and likelihood of them going looney is higher. Same with Trannies. Which is why this shit is child abuse. The lower the IQ of the child, the higher probability of children raised that way turning out homos. That was another study. And no study has found a genetic difference between gays and normal, which likely means that it's not genetic, but socially constructed (aka sexual confusion). There is no gay gene, just stupidity.

See, your problem is that you ignore half the damn evidence curious2.
1736   curious2   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 15, 10:09pm   ↑ like (8)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The discussion above was veering off topic (no pictures), so I replied in the Reply Thread. Now back to pictures:

1738   SunnyvaleCA   ignore (0)   2019 Feb 16, 11:54am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The picture with "one gallon of gasoline contains about 31 million calories..." followed by "human daily caloric requirement is 1500 to 2500 depending on the person" is mixing up calories with kilocalories. When talking about human dietary intake, the government requires that food be incorrectly labeled. Those are kilocalories, not calories. Thus a person requires about 1,500,000 to 2,500,000 calories per day.

I think English now has the terms "gram calorie" or "small calorie" for real calories and "large calorie" for food. So needlessly confusing!

Anyway, a "small" calorie (which was used for the gasoline) is the energy required to heat a gram of water 1 degree celsius. If your body weighs 170 pounds (170 pounds under earth gravity = 77,000 grams), 2500 "small" calories of energy would be enough to raise your body temperature from 98.6 to 99.2 degrees fahrenheit — you would perish very quickly from lack of energy. Heck, the energy expended in chewing and digesting a huge hamburger would exceed its 900 "calorie" energy content.

So... the calories in a gallon of gasoline would "only" run your 2500/day body for 12.4 days. That's still an amazing amount of energy!
1739   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 16, 1:05pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says


Cute. But everything on that list is doable only if 1st world population is allowed to stabilize and decrease to a level sustainable by renewables. However, the left is for unfettered immigration from 3rd world to 1st world, an do not give a damn about the increasing populations effects on pollution, resource depletion, and "carbon footprint." If the AGW really cared about the environment, they would back Trump in halting illegal immigration and would support tariff policies against high polluting exporters like China and India.
1740   Tenpoundbass   ignore (13)   2019 Feb 16, 1:11pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HeadSet says
If the AGW really cared about the environment, they would back Trump in halting illegal immigration and would support tariff policies against high polluting exporters like China and India.


Don't forget South America.
I saw a new company today called "Brazilian Lumber Company".

I was wondering when the billions of logs Brazil cut down from their rain forests were going to make it to our markets.

How quickly we forget that the Bush Jr. Feds pretty much sent Gibson into ruination for using Brazilian Rosewood. That was harvested years and years before the mass clear cutting during the Al Gore "Save the Planet" rein of Terror, while he ignored the Earth's Rain forests getting clear cut during Obama's administration.
1741   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2019 Feb 16, 1:17pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tenpoundbass says
I saw a new company today called "Brazilian Lumber Company".


This is just a porno channel. Get wood from watching women getting Brazilians and waxing on live web sites.

« First    « Previous    Comments 1664 - 1743 of 1743    Last »



about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions