0
0

Bank of America, Fraud and RICO


 invite response                
2013 Jan 10, 2:33am   2,785 views  10 comments

by Buggmann   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

I am looking for feedback and information from individuals who have endured dealing with the Countrywide(CW)/Bank of America(BAC) mortgage modification and foreclosure fiasco.

I entered into a modification under duress in 2010 based on the T&C of the Mar 2009 Consent Judgment. I am now nearly one year into the process of modification under the April 2012 Consent Judgment (HAMP). It is over four years since this matter was opened. I was advised that my application was accepted and was in process for final approval in May 2012 - I have not heard a word about it since August 2012 and it remains an open item. BAC has not yet moved for foreclosure although I have received an Notice of Intent to Accelerate.

I have documented every piece of correspondence and phone call that has taken place with CW/BAC since day one and I have found a disturbing pattern of repetition: (i) BAC tells me to stop making payments so that I will be eligible for the program - I was current in 2009 and I was seeking to pay late amounts in 2012; (ii) BAC advised me that late payments, penalties, interest, fees, etc., are not an issue because when the modification is done the principal will be adjusted - initially to 95% of the FMV, now by $100K; (iii) BAC has subordinated fraud by requiring me to submit false statements on government required forms in order to satisfy my eligibility; (iv) BAC has perpetrated fraud by filing false reports with government and private institutions and agencies regarding my credit information such that it "improves" my FICO scores - I have copies of the conflicting documents in my possession; BAC has provided oral and written false and misleading information to me that has caused me to be in default in breach of the contractual agreement in effect - I have taped conversations.

A review of the RICO Act provisions as they apply to civil matters confirms that: (i) the actions of CW and BAC meet and violate RICO; (ii) BAC has committed multiple acts that break a number of the federal and state law enumerated in RICO; (iii) BAC has done so on multiple occasions on multiple issues; (iv) BAC has done so on an ongoing basis over a period of at least four years.

I have serious doubts that BAC will ever offer me a modification proposal or offer me a proposal that I cannot accept. Therefore, I am planning a strategy to protect myself, my property, my interests and my rights buy binging an action against BAC seeking specific performance, actual damages and punitive damages based on the civil component of the RICO Act.

I would be interested in hearing from anyone in any capacity who might be able to add to my knowledge data base as I prepare for this effort.

Thanks for any help!

#housing

Comments 1 - 10 of 10        Search these comments

1   PockyClipsNow   2013 Jan 10, 3:30am  

Three years of free squatting with no end in sight! Congrats on your windfall!!!

This is how you do it people- live free or die! Lol

2   HEY YOU   2013 Jan 10, 4:20am  

Hope you win.

3   Buggmann   2013 Jan 10, 4:22am  

Re-read my comments. CW directed me to stop making payment in 2009. I began making payments in 2010 and continued to do so until 2012 when an injury limited my income. I attempted to bring my mortgage current with payments but was directed into HAMP. This is what they wanted me to do, not what I wanted to do, because they earned subsidies for handling the mortgage via the federal programs and did not when working directly with me.

4   PockyClipsNow   2013 Jan 10, 5:45am  

Ok so short sell the home. I dont see the problem here.

5   Buggmann   2013 Jan 10, 8:09am  

The "short sale" tax exemption expired on 12/31/2012. I am looking at $100K+ additional taxable income with a short-sale. In the meantime BAC has me on a leash with the HAMP application "still in processing."

6   PockyClipsNow   2013 Jan 10, 9:58am  

Wait i thpught cpngress just extended that one year?

7   PockyClipsNow   2013 Jan 10, 10:00am  

The feds are amazingly generous now, in the early 90s bust there was no prgograms or forgivness. They put liens on people and garnished wages forever for those upside down loans.

8   Buggmann   2013 Jan 10, 11:08am  

I stand corrected. Apparently the "fiscal cliff deal" extended the exemption for one more year.

9   8d95   2017 Feb 11, 9:06am  

Find a contingency attorney, the facts will be somewhat moot here if you think you can economically battle a corp like b of a in court. They will have you tied up for year exhaust all your money and you will be broke while they yawn, contingency attorneys even the playing field. then you can refocus on your facts. hope this isnt 4 years too late for you..

10   justme   2017 Feb 11, 11:03am  

I hope @Buggmann reads this. There has been plenty of news recently of what a fraud HAMP was. It was for the benefit of the banks, not the debtors.

The @patrick feature of sending email notifications with @username is awesome. By the way, how do I quote at-names when there are spaces in the name?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions