« prev   random   next »

« First    « Previous    Comments 3 - 42 of 42    Last »

3   jazz_music   ignore (7)   2014 Jun 6, 9:14am   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

He's not dead enough.

He's a fucking symbol of the success the of oligarchs campaign of oppression.

4   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 6, 9:32am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

One thing I'll say about Hitler: that bullet left him perma-dead. No resurrections, do-overs, or undead phase.

5   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 6, 9:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - ??????

6   Strategic Renter   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 6, 9:48am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Jimmy Carter - bad President
Ronald Reagan - good President
George Bush sr - OK President
Bill Clinton - good President
George Bush jr - bad President
Barack Obama - Improving golfer

7   dublin hillz   ignore (0)   2014 Jun 6, 9:59am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Buried with thatcher with no parental guidance.

8   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 6, 10:03am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I think they should dig him up, give him falsies and a reality show.

9   Blurtman   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 6, 12:34pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says

Jimmy Carter - bad President

Ronald Reagan - good President

George Bush sr - OK President

Bill Clinton - good President

George Bush jr - bad President

Barack Obama - ??????

If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.

10   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2014 Jun 6, 12:56pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Blurtman says

Strategist says

Jimmy Carter - bad President

Ronald Reagan - good President

George Bush sr - OK President

Bill Clinton - good President

George Bush jr - bad President

Barack Obama - ??????

If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.

Well the President of Gambia claims he has a cure for AIDS!!
http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/anger-herbal-aids-cure-gambia-article-1.1231539

11   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (38)   2014 Jun 6, 2:31pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

All America wants at the Reagan library is a Sinatra Pavilion.

The rest of it should be paid for by private donations.

12   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 6, 2:36pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Blurtman says

Strategist says

Jimmy Carter - bad President

Ronald Reagan - good President

George Bush sr - OK President

Bill Clinton - good President

George Bush jr - bad President

Barack Obama - ??????

If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.

Probably so, but I was looking at it purely from the economic point.

13   Blurtman   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 7, 1:06am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Strategist says

Blurtman says

Strategist says

Jimmy Carter - bad President

Ronald Reagan - good President

George Bush sr - OK President

Bill Clinton - good President

George Bush jr - bad President

Barack Obama - ??????

If you or a loved one were HIV positive during Reagan's reign, you would likely say bad president, or worse, a murderer of horribly sick people.

Probably so, but I was looking at it purely from the economic point.

Regarding Clinton, from memory, years 2-7 offered great and reliable stock market returns. Anyone could have made 20% per year in a low risk index fund. Double your money in 5 years. Ka ching!

14   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 2:48am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Blurtman says

Probably so, but I was looking at it purely from the economic point.

Regarding Clinton, from memory, years 2-7 offered great and reliable stock market returns. Anyone could have made 20% per year in a low risk index fund. Double your money in 5 years. Ka ching!

Today it's even better. Ka ching Ka ching.

15   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 6:41am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (3)   quote   flag        

Blurtman says

Regarding Clinton, from memory, years 2-7 offered great and reliable stock market returns. Anyone could have made 20% per year in a low risk index fund. Double your money in 5 years. Ka ching!

I guess Reagan/Bush policies kept working well into Clinton years..

of course when Clinton waltzed in Silicon Valley asking what Big Govt

could do.. the leaders here told him to go fuck himself... Seems there

wasnt anyone who dig what he wanted... Last trip he made to SFBA as

Prez... was strickly going to East Palo Alto schools..

Bottom line, Clinton did a rats ass to stimulate an economic growth.

16   Homeboy   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 6:56am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

thomaswong.1986 says

I guess Reagan/Bush policies kept working well into Clinton years..

of course when Clinton waltzed in Silicon Valley asking what Big Govt

could do.. the leaders here told him to go fuck himself... Seems there

wasnt anyone who dig what he wanted... Last trip he made to SFBA as

Prez... was strickly going to East Palo Alto schools..

Bottom line, Clinton did a rats ass to stimulate an economic growth.

Har har. Are you for real?

17   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 6:59am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Homeboy says

Har har. Are you for real?

What great economic policies did Clinton enact to create a boom economy ?

and forget about balancing a budget.. that what Gingrich/GOP plan...

If anything, Clintons mismanagement led to the beginning of the a housing bubble.

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/09/30/business/fannie-mae-eases-credit-to-aid-mortgage-lending.html

18   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 7:02am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

thomaswong.1986 says

Homeboy says

Har har. Are you for real?

What great economic policies did Clinton enact to create a boom economy ?

and forget about balancing a budget.. that what Gingrich/GOP plan...

There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.
His only negative was having the hots for an intern, just like every other normal male on the planet.

19   zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 7, 7:06am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Zombie Reagan would still be way better then Obama.

20   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 7:06am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Strategist says

There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.

What great economic plan did he have ? All of the plans for the recovery came from Bush R. which led to the job booms.

So what what that "reason" ? I bet you dont even know.

21   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 7:09am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

thomaswong.1986 says

Strategist says

There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.

What great economic plan did he have ? All of the plans for the recovery came from Bush R. which led to the job booms.

You have a point there. A lot of it had to do with Reagan taming inflation.
By the same logic you cannot blame Obama for a bad economy.

22   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 7:18am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

bgamall4 says

Strategist says

Jimmy Carter - bad President

Ronald Reagan - good President

George Bush sr - OK President

Bill Clinton - good President

George Bush jr - bad President

Barack Obama - ??????

Ronald Reagan was not a good president. I thought he was, but he signed into law liar loans that ended up destroying America after he passed away. I often wonder what he would have thought about that result of his actions to Thatcherize America.

It was because of the liar loans I got my first home, when I lied through my teeth. They did not cause the crash of 2008, it was the NINJA loans.
Should I be thanking Reagan to make it possible to get my first home?

23   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 8:09am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

bgamall4 says

Strategist says

It was because of the liar loans I got my first home, when I lied through my teeth. They did not cause the crash of 2008, it was the NINJA loans.

Why am I the bad guy? I never defaulted.
They were happy, I was happy, everyone was happy.
Should I be thanking Reagan to make it possible to get my first home?

Liar loans were part of the NINJA loan complex. You are a typical selfish libertarian type who would play the fiddle while Rome burned.

24   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 7, 8:10am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

bgamall4 says

Strategist says

It was because of the liar loans I got my first home, when I lied through my teeth. They did not cause the crash of 2008, it was the NINJA loans.

Should I be thanking Reagan to make it possible to get my first home?

Liar loans were part of the NINJA loan complex. You are a typical selfish libertarian type who would play the fiddle while Rome burned.

Why am I the bad guy? I never defaulted.
They were happy, I was happy, everyone was happy.

25   CL   ignore (0)   2014 Jun 7, 11:29am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Strategist says

thomaswong.1986 says

Strategist says

There was a reason why he won a second term. Those were the good old days.

What great economic plan did he have ? All of the plans for the recovery came from Bush R. which led to the job booms.

You have a point there. A lot of it had to do with Reagan taming inflation.

By the same logic you cannot blame Obama for a bad economy.

I think Volcker would say he had a little something to do with that. Reagan wisely left him in place until his heartthrob could be installed.

26   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2014 Jun 7, 11:48am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Reagan also personally discovered the North Sea oilfields, and supervised the ramping up of production from 1981 onward, which did quite a bit to curb inflation.

27   jazz_music   ignore (7)   2014 Jun 7, 12:41pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

thomaswong.1986 says

Bottom line, Clinton did a rats ass to stimulate an economic growth.

WHICH IS TO CLINTON'S CREDIT SINCE "STIMULATE ECONOMIC GROWTH" IS ANOTHER CHEESY EUPHEMISM FOR "NANNY STATE WELFARE FOR WEALTHY CRONIES"

28   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 12:49pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

bgamall4 says

You lied, but in the Thatcher self certified loan regime that came to America as liar loans, the financial system lied for people.

You mean to describe those home buyers who didnt have a W-2 job... frankly many were and are today consultants and small business owners. Therefore incomes in the past for a loan were difficult.

Or do you maintain everyone earned a W-2 Salary from working for some employer ?

29   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 12:50pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

jazz music says

WHICH IS TO CLINTON'S CREDIT SINCE "STIMULATE ECONOMIC GROWTH" IS ANOTHER CHEESY EUPHEMISM FOR "NANNY STATE WELFARE FOR WEALTHY CRONIES"

Dont be a coward.. give us examples of Clintons great Economic Plan which saved the economy and gave a boom to the stock market.

It sure the fuck wasnt Hilary Care ...

30   jazz_music   ignore (7)   2014 Jun 7, 12:51pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Really Reagan's monument is the largest ex-officio presidential complex of it's type. It costs a huge amount to run it each year ALL at the taxpayer's expense.

Reagan killed off a lot of societal benefit under the ruse of "privatization" and his monument is certainly not privatized. It stands on top of a mountain on precious coastal Southern California land surrounded by various law enforcement agencies who ALL LOVE LOVE LOVE Reagan for obvious reasons.

The fact that this monument to our defeat as a people stands unchallenged with no meaningful opposition, not even any demonstrations, even to this OBSCENITY in our society means that we are all pwned worse than any people in memory.

WE ALL SUCK! --The Reagan library proves it too.

31   jazz_music   ignore (7)   2014 Jun 7, 12:54pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

thomaswong.1986 says

Dont be a coward..

Don't be leg humping horses, you'll get hurt, on second thought go right ahead, it'll do you a lot of good!

32   jazz_music   ignore (7)   2014 Jun 7, 1:06pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Clinton administration for all you DOUCHEBAG ASSHOLES who's computers are shit and you are so inept that you can't look up Clinton's CONSERVATIVE ADMINISTRATION and the AUSTERITY he imposed on the electorate.

NYTIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/1993/02/18/us/clinton-s-economic-plan-the-details-clinton-s-plan-austerity-and-change.html

Oh oh oh yeah I know this is liberal media and therefore you ignore all.

"The wide array of budget cuts and tax changes President Clinton proposed last night would fundamentally alter the way the Government raises and spends money. He said the aim of the program was to spread the burden of reducing the deficit and improving the economy's long-term prospects. The tax provisions were spelled out in greater detail than many of the spending goals. All figures are for fiscal years in billions of dollars. NEW TAXES Individual taxes

Higher income taxes: The top tax rate would be raised to 36% rate for for people filing joint returns who have a taxable income over 140,000, or signle filers with a taxable income above $115,000. In addition, the plan proposes a 10% surtax on taxable income over $250,000, excluding capital gains; would increase the alternative minimum tax rates for people with many deductions, and extend the limits on itemized deductions. The capital gains tax rate would remain unchanged at 28%. Revenue in billions 1994: $27.7 1997: $26.3 1993-98: $126.3

Health insurance: Income above $135,000 would be made subject to Medicare payroll tax. Revenue in billions 1994: 2.8 1997: 6.8 1993-98: 29.2

Energy: Fuels would be taxed according to their energy content; a gasoline tax scheduled to expire on 9/30/95 would be extended. Revenue in billions 1994: 1.5 1997: 24.9 1993-98: 79.3

Club dues: Club membership expenses could no longer be deducted either as an individual or business expense. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.1 1997: 0.3 1993-98: 1.2

Moving expenses: The plan would disallow deductions for meals and real estate expenses during moves. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.1 1997: 0.4 1993-98: 1.7

Social Security Taxes: Taxes would rise on Social Security benefits for people with adjusted gross incomes exceeding $25,000 (individuals) or $32,000 (couples). Revenue in billions 1994: 2.7 1997: 6.9 1993-98: 21.4 BUSINESS TAXES

Executive pay: Businesses would not be able to claim payments to a single individual of more than $1 million as a deductible expense. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.1 1997: 0.2 1993-98: 0.6

Business meals and entertainment: Only 50 percent of such costs could be deducted; down from 80 percent. Revenue in billions 1994: 1.8 1997: 3.7 1993-98: 16.1

Corporate tax rate: The rate would be increased to 36 percent, from 34 percent, for taxable income above $10 million. Revenue in billions 1994: 7.7 1997: 5.7 1993-98: 30.6

Securities dealers: Would be required to price their holdings at market value. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.5 1997: 1.1 1993-98: 4.4

Puerto Rico: Tax incentives for corporate investment there would be limited. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.2 1997: 2.1 1993-98: 7.0

Lobbying: Lobbying expenses would no longer be deductible. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.1 1997: 0.2 1993-98: 1.0

International Business: Miscellaneous increases. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.8 1997: 2.1 1993-98: 8.6 TAX BREAKS: Individual taxes

Earned Income Tax Credit: Clinton wants to expand this credit aimed at low-income families with children. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.5 1997: 6.7 1993-98: 26.8 Business taxes:

Investment tax credits: The credits would be temporary for large businesses and permanent for small businesses. Revenue in billions 1994: 9.2 1997: 2.3 1993-98: 28.9

Research and experimentation credit: The plan would make it permanent. Revenue in billions 1994: 1.2 1997: 2.0 1993-98: 9.6

Real Estate: The plan would extend low-income housing credits and mortgage revenue bonds and change certain investment rules. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.6 1997: 1.3 1993-98: 5.5

Training and education: The Administration would make permanent a credit for employer-provided education assistance, and would provide credits for certain jobs and youth apprenticeships. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.6 1997: 1.0 1993-98: 5.0

Enterprise Zones: President Clinton wants to provide tax credits for businesses in needy areas. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.1 1997: 1.2 1993-98: 4.1

Capital gains: The capital gains tax would be cut only for new investments in small businesses. Revenue in billions 1994: 0 1997: 0.4 1993-98: 0.7 SPENDING CUTS

Defense Department: The department would reduce new weapons purchases, troop levels, training and maintenance. It would also freeze pay in 1994 and give smaller-than-forecast salary increases in the future. Revenue in billions 1994: 11.8 1997: 36.2 1993-98: 126.9

Environmental Protection Agency: The agency would not renew certain wastewater treatment grants, except near the Mexican border. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.1 1997: 1.9 1993-98: 6.3

Staff Reductions: President Clinton plans to eliminate 100,000 Federal staff positions through attrition over four years. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.9 1997: 2.5 1993-98: 10.5

Administrative Efficiencies: Miscellaneous savings would be achieved across all Federal agencies other than the Defense Department, for which savings are counted separately. Revenue in billions 1994: 0.7 1997: 3.5 1993-98: 11.2

Streamlining Government: President Clinton would take various measures to streamline all Federal agencies, not counting the Defense Department Revenue in billions 1994: 0.6 1997: 3.3 1993-98: 12.1

Pay for Federal employees: They would receive no raise in calendar 1994, and certain rules for calculating their pay would change in 1995. Revenue in billions 1994: 1.4 1997: 2.7 1993-98: 11.3

Interest on national debt: The Administration would shorten the maturity of Treasury securities. Revenue in billions 1994: 1.6 1997: 3.9 1993-98: 16.4 Controlling health care costs: President Clinton plans a very long list of specific limits on Federal health care spending. Revenue in billions 1994: 3.1 1997: 17.2 1993-98: 60.3 SPENDING INCREASES

Short-term economic: A package of highway construction, wastewater cleanup projects and summer jobs for youths would be put in effect this year. Revenue in billions 1997: 0 1994-98: 30.0

Energy: The Federal Government would spend more money on nuclear fusion research and on the developing renewable energy sources and more energy-efficient Federal buildings. Revenue in billions 1997: 1.3 1994-98: 3.0

Environment: Research would be done in forestry management and the development of new environmental technologies, while more money would be spent on clean water and the protection of natural resource. Revenue in billions 1997: 3.5 1994-98: 8.0

Education: President Clinton would create a national service program to allow students to pay off their loans through civil service. He would also spend more on worker training, Head Start educational programs for young children and other educational programs. Revenue in billions 1997: 15.7 1994-98: 37.8

Housing and community development: The Federal Government would provide more community development grants, give tax incentives for businesses to move into needy areas and would extend the low-income housing tax credit. Revenue in billions 1997: 3.1 1994-98: 9.6.

Technology: Led by the Commerce Department, the Federal Government would partly or entirely pay for the development of a national, high-speed computer data network and of commercial applications for inventions developed in Federal laboratories. Revenue in billions 1997: 6.1 1994-98: 17.0

Transportation: The Federal Government would spend more money on mass transit and high-speed rail systems, airport improvements and highways. Revenue in billions 1997: 3.0 1994-98: $8.4"

33   jazz_music   ignore (7)   2014 Jun 7, 1:08pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

So as you ignore the above as you must I say FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE HERE.

34   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 1:20pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

jazz music says

Oh oh oh yeah I know this is liberal media and therefore you ignore all.

"The wide array of budget cuts and tax changes President Clinton proposed last night would fundamentally alter the way the Government raises and spends money. He said the aim of the program was to spread the burden of reducing the deficit and improving the economy's long-term prospects. The tax provisions were spelled out in greater detail than many of the spending goals. All figures are for fiscal years in billions of dollars. NEW TAXES Individual taxes

and now for the back wash.....

Flashback: Clinton Said He Raised Taxes on the Rich ‘Too Much’

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/335049/flashback-clinton-said-he-raised-taxes-rich-too-much-eliana-johnson

It’s worth noting that, for his part, President Clinton claimed that he raised taxes on the wealthy “too much.” According to a 1995 New York Times report, Clinton told attendees at a Houston fund raiser, “Probably there are people in this room still mad at me at that budget because you think I raised your taxes too much. It might surprise you to know that I think I raised them too much, too.”

The Dangerous Myth About The Bill Clinton Tax Increase

http://www.forbes.com/sites/charleskadlec/2012/07/16/the-dangerous-myth-about-the-bill-clinton-tax-increase/

During the first four years of his Presidency, real GDP growth average 3.2%, respectable relative to today’s economy, but disappointing coming as it did following just one year of recovery from the 1991 recession, the end of the Cold War and the reduction in consumer price inflation below 3% for the first time (with the single exception of 1986) since 1965.

For example, it was a half a percentage point slower than under Reagan during the four years following the first year of the recovery from the 1982 recession.

Employment growth was a respectable 2 million a year. But real hourly wages continued to stagnate, rising only 2 cents to 7.43 an hour in 1996 from $7.41 in 1992. No real gains for the middle class there.

Federal government receipts increased an average of $90 billion a year while the annual increase in federal spending was constrained to $45 billion. That led to a $183 billion, four-year reduction in the budget deficit to $107 billion in 1996.

35   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 7, 1:23pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

jazz music says

WE ALL SUCK! --The Reagan library proves it too.

none of Clinton or Obamas economic policies can compete with Reagan..

how could they.. Clinton was not a great Gov of not so great State and Obama is still a 2yr senator.. Not much for experience to look on...

no wonder both are dreadful failures..

36   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 8, 3:28am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

bgamall4 says

Strategist says

Why am I the bad guy? I never defaulted.

You lied, but in the Thatcher self certified loan regime that came to America as liar loans, the financial system lied for people.

Everyone lies. Let the person who never lied throw the first stone.
Oh yeah, Thatcher - The Iron Lady. Reagan and Thatcher together brought the Soviet Union to it's knees and gave freedom to millions. I cannot thank them enough.

37   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 8, 3:33am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

jazz music says

So as you ignore the above as you must I say FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE HERE.

Don't need to read above, Clinton was a wonderful President as far as I am concerned. So was Reagan. It takes moderates and independents to realize they were both good in their own ways.

38   thomaswong.1986   ignore (5)   2014 Jun 8, 3:39am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

jazz music says

So as you ignore the above as you must I say FUCK YOU AND THE HORSE YOU RODE HERE.

so you pick a comment from a Gay japanese actor.. what else did Hollywood teach you.. certainly nothing in Economics and Business.

39   CL   ignore (0)   2014 Jun 9, 2:10am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

thomaswong.1986 says

none of Clinton or Obamas economic policies can compete with Reagan..

Jazz Music has provided a detailed history of Clinton's policies. Your comment above certainly doesn't reflect the overwhelming recollection of politicians, voters or economists of Billy's tenure.

Isn't it incumbent on you to detail what was so great about Reagan's policies that weren't solely dependent on Volcker's courageous monetary policy? Did Reagan end stagflation or Volcker?

40   ChapulinColorado   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 11, 1:49am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Gerald Ford - OK President

Jimmy Carter - OK President

Ronald Reagan - good President

George Bush sr - OK President

Bill Clinton - great President

George Bush jr - worst President

Barack Obama - ??????

41   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (38)   2014 Jun 11, 2:03am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Gerald Ford - Twit

Jimmy Carter - Jesus twit

Ronald Reagan - Demented tool of fascists

George Bush sr - REALTOR

Bill Clinton - Bankster cocksucker and collaborator

George Bush jr - Bankster cocksucker/tool of fascists and oligarchs and REALTOR

Barack Obama - Bankster cocksucker/tool of fascists and oligarchs

42   Strategist   ignore (2)   2014 Jun 11, 2:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

Gerald Ford - Twit

Jimmy Carter - Jesus twit

Ronald Reagan - Demented tool of fascists

George Bush sr - REALTOR

Bill Clinton - Bankster cocksucker and collaborator

George Bush jr - Bankster cocksucker/tool of fascists and oligarchs and REALTOR

Barack Obama - Bankster cocksucker/tool of fascists and oligarchs

You just can't get good help these days.

« First    « Previous    Comments 3 - 42 of 42    Last »


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions