What idiot will post first on this one?
« prev   misc   next »

0
5

What idiot will post first on this one?

By anonymous following x   2014 Sep 11, 1:14am 13,801 views   27 comments   watch   quote     share    


Brilliant?

1   iwog   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 11, 1:26am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

The consensus among scientist brave enough to state an opinion is that the twin towers as well as building 7 were demolished by explosives.

This is a bald faced lie.

The consensus among scientists is overwhelmingly that the towers were brought down by two airplanes.

2   iwog   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 11, 1:33am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

No informed scientists think that the TWO airplanes brought the THREE buildings down.

So you dismiss the 95% of scientists, most of whom are REAL demolition experts, because..................you don't agree with them.

That allows you to make the dishonest statement you did?

3   Indiana Jones   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 11, 2:21am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

iwog says

The Professor says

No informed scientists think that the TWO airplanes brought the THREE buildings down.

So you dismiss the 95% of scientists, most of whom are REAL demolition experts, because..................you don't agree with them.

That allows you to make the dishonest statement you did?

Link for the 95%?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/911-at-least-this-aspect-of-it-was-not-an-inside-job.html

Very convincing case for controlled demolition of bldg 7, but conclusion of this author is that the government "misspoke", or that is was only a little white lie since no persons died in the building demo.

Lying about a pre-meditated controlled demolition of a whole building in the midst of a national crisis and blaming it on natural causes? Seems like a big deal to me.

4   ttsmyf   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 11, 4:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Your Excellencies: What have you done to expunge this?

5   bob2356   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 11, 4:30am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

The consensus among scientist brave enough to state an opinion is that the twin towers as well as building 7 were demolished by explosives.

Stupidity never sleeps.

6   rooemoore   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 11, 6:26am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

iwog says

So you dismiss the 95% of scientists,

Do you have a link or are you making things up?

Says the guy who lives in a permanent fantasy land.

7   Strategist   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 11, 6:32am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

iwog says

The Professor says

No informed scientists think that the TWO airplanes brought the THREE buildings down.

So you dismiss the 95% of scientists, most of whom are REAL demolition experts, because..................you don't agree with them.

I doubt if it's even 95%. It's probably 99.99% who agree it was the planes. The other .001% have lost it, and not in a position to hold any job.

8   Strategist   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 11, 8:44am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

Strategist says

It's probably 99.99% who agree it was the planes.

The official report claims office fires. Are you saying the people at NIST don't know what they're doing?

The planes loaded with fuel could cause a lot of fires.

9   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2014 Sep 11, 9:13am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Strategist says

The planes loaded with fuel could cause a lot of fires.

Only a maniac would believe that kind of canard.

10   Indiana Jones   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 11, 2:41pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

The Professor says

Indiana Jones says

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/09/911-at-least-this-aspect-of-it-was-not-an-inside-job.html

Very Interesting! This explains it!

I knew building 7 had a built in thermite self destruct system. Now that they admitted to blowing up WTC7 can they admit to blowing up the twin towers so we can move on?

The govt. will only admit to it when it doesn't matter anymore. Notice how no one cares about Building 7 being demolished? Because of of the massive lie campaign, most people have already decided what happened on that day and will miss the truth, even when the article is presented in front of them! It doesn't matter anymore that they blew up the building 7 and then lied about it! That was sooo 13 years ago!

We are all on to Jennifer Lawrence's leaked nudie pics, or wait, that was sooo yesterday!

11   elliemae   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 11, 2:51pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Indiana Jones says

Notice how no one cares about Building 7 being demolished?

I saw a piece on the history channel about tower 7. It seemed plausible.

I would be interested in your furnishing a list of those "scientist" who are brave enough to state their opinion.

I was married to a scientist and my impression was that both he and his cohorts had absolutely no problem stating their opinions. Over & over. Ad nauseum.

12   bob2356   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 11, 8:08pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

Strategist says

The planes loaded with fuel could cause a lot of fires.

Only a maniac would believe that kind of canard.

All those post crash plane fires you see on tv are special effects done by the same people who faked the moon landings. The ones with the bent elbows.

13   JH   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 12, 12:39am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

We all saw the videos, idiot, some live.

14   HydroCabron   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 12, 12:52am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

Only a maniac would believe that kind of canard.

The fuel was safely in the gas tanks, silly! No way it could ignite!

Therefore there had to be accelerant planted in the weeks or hours preceding the event. My bet is on rappelling NWO-Rothschild commandos in dark gray cammies and soot face paint.

15   elliemae   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 12, 12:54am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

JH says

We all saw the videos, idiot, some live.

You only thought that they were live. What really happened is that David Copperfield made a huge illusion that the WTC existed. The towers were never actually there, it was all smoke & mirrors. So, in order to allow the poor guy to move on to another illusion, he had to bring down the curtain (so to speak).

Those "live" photos weren't - the newscasters were paid actors.
Nobody died, they're all being housed in a warehouse in New Jersey.

Mystery solved!

16   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2014 Sep 12, 12:54am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HydroCabron says

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

Only a maniac would believe that kind of canard.

The fuel was in the gas tanks, silly!

Therefore there had to be accelerant planted in the weeks or hours preceding the event. My bet is on rappelling NWO-Rothschild commandos in dark gray cammies and soot face paint.

There. Who says there are no reasonable people on PatNet?

17   TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 12, 4:02am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

I knew building 7 had a built in thermite self destruct system

Wait, what?

Finding some iron oxide in the rubble of a building is hardly unusual.

18   bob2356   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 12, 4:31am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

HydroCabron says

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

Only a maniac would believe that kind of canard.

The fuel was safely in the gas tanks, silly! No way it could ignite!

Therefore there had to be accelerant planted in the weeks or hours preceding the event. My bet is on rappelling NWO-Rothschild commandos in dark gray cammies and soot face paint.

Alien NWO-Rothschild commando's. from area 51.

19   bob2356   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 12, 6:59am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

bob2356 says

Alien NWO-Rothschild commando's. from area 51.

So it wasn't the Saudi's?

Hey if you can change your conspiracy every 30 seconds so can i.

20   bob2356   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 16, 12:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

bob2356 says

The Professor says

bob2356 says

Alien NWO-Rothschild commando's. from area 51.

So it wasn't the Saudi's?

Hey if you can change your conspiracy every 30 seconds so can i.

I've been pretty consistent Bob.

So true, you've consistently parroted whatever nonsense 911nutjob.com has posted.

21   bob2356   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 16, 1:49am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The Professor says

bob2356 says

So true, you've consistently parroted whatever nonsense 911nutjob.com has posted.

THE TRUTH Bob, the truth!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySsLonIqicA

You should look at the evidence Bob. It was not aliens that blew up the towers.

Just because it's on youtube doesn't make it the truth. Just because there is a web page doesn't make it the truth. Do you know my dog is one of the 2000 registered engineers on architechs and engineers for 9/11 truth? After 6 years they still haven't asked for proof he's is actually an engineer. Do you suppose my dog is the only one on the list who isn't really an engineer?

22   elliemae   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 16, 2:18am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says

Just because it's on youtube doesn't make it the truth. Just because there is a web page doesn't make it the truth. Do you know my dog is one of the 2000 registered engineers on architechs and engineers for 9/11 truth? After 6 years they still haven't asked for proof he's is actually an engineer. Do you suppose my dog is the only one on the list who isn't really an engineer?

My dearly departed dog had a Bachelor's Degree in Liberal Arts awarded solely on her life skills. It cost me $30 (and for another $200 they were willing to send the transcripts for the classes she would have taken if she had actually gone, which is scary as shit).

That your dog is an esteemed engineer doesn't surprise me. I'm sure he's built a lot of shit.

23   P N Dr Lo R   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 16, 2:23am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

You just have to wonder and roll your eyes at people who think it was an inside job, but on this site nothing should be a surprise.

24   Blurtman   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 16, 3:07am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

If building 7 collapsed solely from fire, then building construction specs must have undergone a major revision to prevent this from happening again. And existing buildings must have been retrofitted appropriately to prevent this from happening again. Have they?

25   P N Dr Lo R   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 16, 1:35pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

The Professor says

6 in 10 Americans question the official story

Doesn't surprise me a bit! There are a lot of nutty people in the country today!

26   Strategist   ignore (0)   2014 Sep 16, 1:42pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

elliemae says

bob2356 says

Just because it's on youtube doesn't make it the truth. Just because there is a web page doesn't make it the truth. Do you know my dog is one of the 2000 registered engineers on architechs and engineers for 9/11 truth? After 6 years they still haven't asked for proof he's is actually an engineer. Do you suppose my dog is the only one on the list who isn't really an engineer?

My dearly departed dog had a Bachelor's Degree in Liberal Arts awarded solely on her life skills. It cost me $30 (and for another $200 they were willing to send the transcripts for the classes she would have taken if she had actually gone, which is scary as shit).

That your dog is an esteemed engineer doesn't surprise me. I'm sure he's built a lot of shit.

Your dog probably deserved that degree more than half the Panetters.

27   P N Dr Lo R   ignore (1)   2014 Sep 17, 2:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

P N Dr Lo R says

There are a lot of nutty people in the country today!

Confirmed by the comments on Rin's latest bragging post Rin's corroboration with a female ex-classmate.


Comment as anon_2a68a or log in at top of page: