« prev   random   next »

19
6

Discuss Anything

By Patrick following x   2015 Feb 9, 7:43am 291,893 views   489 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


Patrick.net is an uncensored anonymous forum.

I hope to make it pleasant to use while still maintaining everyone's right to speak and to draw a following for their ideas. I especially want to people to have a place to say things they cannot say in person because of family or work or school pressure to conform to the politically correct opinions in their area.

Moderation policy:

TL;DR If you are expressing a sincerely held point of view with good will, you don't need to read the next 3 lines. Such comments and posts are very welcome here.
Do not deliberately insult the other users. That shuts down actual debate and kills the spirit of good will.
Do not insult the moderators. They have been very fair.
Do not insult the site. Just go somewhere else. This was lot of work for me, and is completely free for you.


Here are the original articles that made this site famous:

https://patrick.net/post/1282720/2015-07-11-ten-reasons-it-s-a-terrible-time-to-buy-an-expensive-house
https://patrick.net/post/1282721/2015-07-11-eight-groups-who-lie-about-the-housing-market
https://patrick.net/post/1282722/2015-07-11-37-bogus-arguments-about-housing

If you don't like this site, please allow me to start your own forum for you where you can personally be in charge of its moderation policies. Complaints about moderation policies will also swiftly be deleted.

Please do talk about news, issues, facts, opinions and everything else under the sun. Comments expressed with sincere good will are especially welcome.

Flag personal comments with the "personal" link by each comment so that they will go into moderation where they will be reviewed by a moderator. Please do not mark comments as personal if they are not about you or the others users. Please do not post personally identifying information about yourself or others. That will be deleted, and you may get banned.

If you're not registered or don't have the "personal" link, please report the personal comment to p@patrick.net by email.

If you ignore another user, you will not see their posts or comments. The ignore link is on their user page. Just click their name or icon to get to their user page.

To get another user's attention, mention him in a comment with an @ character prepended to his username ( for example @Patrick ) and then he will get an email of that comment.

If you include an image URL ending in .jpg, .png, or .gif it will be converted into the visible image in a post or comment.

If you include a YouTube or Vimeo URL, the post or comment will display the video.

These basic html tags work: a b blockquote br code del font hr i iframe img li ol ol p strike sub sup u ul video vsmall

You can also surround a word or phrase with the * character to make it bold or the _ character to make it italic.

You can edit any post or comment you entered within a week of creating it. After a week, content is permanent and will not be deleted.

Please write p@patrick.net with questions or suggestions.

patrick.net has never received a national security letter.

« First    « Previous    Comments 201 - 240 of 489    Next »    Last »

201   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 6, 1:45pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

mell says
jazz_music says
Fortunately, most millennials aren't buying any of the bullshit, God bless their hearts.


Gen Z is fairly conservative. What both may not buy is globalism.


I keep seeing a certain group of people saying this without offering any proof

Kids today are mostly both Secular and Liberal

What tenants of Conservatism do you claim todays youth espouse?
202   someone else   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 6, 1:46pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

jazz_music says
tobacco and alcohol industries also killing people while gaining massive wealth AND THE POWER TO PREVENT DEMOCRACY.


That's not a problem unique to one side or the other. Democrats are more heavily funded by the rich, and they want something for their donations: laws favorable to their businesses.

The real problem is the lack of a labor party in the US. The Democrats used to approximate a labor party, but have abandoned that job so as not to offend Wall Street Bankers and other extremely wealthy Democratic donors. And it turns out that the Democratic strategy dividing labor by race, gender, etc, is very good for preventing the unity necessary to actually form a labor party.
203   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 6, 1:50pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

That's not a problem unique to one side or the other

——————-

How long will America survive with people constantly critical of all things liberal, while excusing Republican bad actors by saying yea but dems do it too, regardless of if its even true?
204   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 1:54pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says
How long will America survive with people constantly critical of all things liberal, while excusing Republican bad actors by saying yea but dems do it too, regardless of if its even true?



Maybe try reforming the Democratic Party.

Start by replacing Pelosi and Corey Booker in their next primaries.
205   jazz_music   ignore (6)   2018 Mar 6, 1:56pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rando says
The real problem is the lack of a labor party in the US. The Democrats used to approximate a labor party,

Agree. Our reality is that on one hand you have Democrats who make promises and betray you to get wealthy and special status for themselves and family.

On the other hand we have Republicans who PROMISE you betrayal as something that you must have in order to be truly free and prosperous.

One is simply more insulting than the other, and the more insulting one creates vast gains for more plutocrats, we become fair game for everything. The possibilities are wide open.

Truly it would be best to have real representation WITHOUT THE BETRAYAL be it either the broken promises type or the delusions of grandeur type.

To get anything at all, we are going to have to mobilize and have some negative effect on return on investments, be it either by boycotting, or finding an alternate way of life or etc., etc., etc.

Grim picture, I know, because we are all eating the poison apple to varying extents. No accident there. Reagan's masters sure knew what they were doing to us.

As usual, the young ones are our main hope, you know, the ones who are not deep into debt and worried about retiring yet.
206   jazz_music   ignore (6)   2018 Mar 6, 1:57pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rando says
Democrats are more heavily funded by the rich

Could that be because they perceive a danger there if Democrats are left unchecked?
207   mell   ignore (2)   2018 Mar 6, 1:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says
RafiMaas says
mell says
The FF were Christians, I doubt they would have voted for recreational drug use, even though they were big on personal liberty. It's about the context.


I can guarantee they wouldn't have voted for recreational drug use. Because they didn't have to, it was already legal. They believed in freedom, they grew marijuana and some probably even used it.


Thank you

It’s refreshing to see America isn’t dead yet


Except for that it's a myth, see the link above. Just because you and I want them to be as freedom loving and possible doesn't mean they were. What I was trying to illustrate is that they may have been closer to today's repubs/libertarians, without judgement.
208   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 6, 2:00pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

mell says
RafiMaas says
mell says
The FF were Christians, I doubt they would have voted for recreational drug use, even though they were big on personal liberty. It's about the context.


I can guarantee they wouldn't have voted for recreational drug use. Because they didn't have to, it was already legal. They believed in freedom, they grew marijuana and some probably even used it.


https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/busting-some-myths-about-the-founding-fathers-and-marijuana/

Either way I wouldn't jump to conclusions here. In context many things back then were forbidden or problematic at least, that are viewed as ok today.


I read your silly link, but contrary to the title, they didn’t bust any myths wrt the FF and Hemp/Cannabis. So then why did you post it?

Jump to conclusions about what?
Care to elaborate on what you meant with the rest of your words? Intentionally vague, they hold no meaning. Explain please
209   mell   ignore (2)   2018 Mar 6, 3:06pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says
mell says
RafiMaas says
mell says
The FF were Christians, I doubt they would have voted for recreational drug use, even though they were big on personal liberty. It's about the context.


I can guarantee they wouldn't have voted for recreational drug use. Because they didn't have to, it was already legal. They believed in freedom, they grew marijuana and some probably even used it.


https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/busting-some-myths-about-the-founding-fathers-and-marijuana/

Either way I wouldn't jump to conclusions here. In context many things back then were forbidden or problematic at least, that are viewed as ok tod...


It clearly refutes Rafis post that they were "using" MJ as in smoking it and that they would have voted for it. It was used for rope and they did not cultivate the high THC kind. I think you are focusing solely on MJ because it is the most important thing for you, but many are willing to trade in Republican shortcomings wrt MJ as long as they don't have to endure the leftist reign in other more important topics. Otherwise Hillary should have win with 90$% of the vote as most, left and right, these days do not care if you toke a little at your home.
210   jazz_music   ignore (6)   2018 Mar 6, 3:58pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Start by replacing Pelosi and Corey Booker

Wouldn't that just force Rush Limbaugh and his ilk to come up with new lies and accusations?

Is there ever going to be a DNC member that the right wing media would NOT criticize, demonize, humiliate, and rail against???

Come on now. Warren got into the limelight and then comes the Pocahontas cracks etc., etc., etc., but if only the democrats tried just a little bit harder to please you, eh?

You know damn well that anybody who gets into the public eye and is not far right wing is going to be a never-ending subject of ridicule and demonization.
211   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 4:01pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

jazz_music says
Is there ever going to be a DNC member that the right wing media would NOT criticize, demonize, humiliate, and rail against???


So Rush is an excuse to tolerate putting up with Neoliberals in your party, because he might make fun of their replacements on the radio?
212   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 4:02pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

jazz_music says
You know damn well that anybody who gets into the public eye and is not far right wing is going to be a never-ending subject of ridicule and demonization.


Yeah, Trump is just worshipped daily on Comedy Central, SNL, the View, Jimmy Kimmel, Rachel Maddow, Anderson180, etc.

hahahahahaha
213   missing   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 6, 4:04pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

mell says
Maybe partially true, but it works better than all other forms on this planet. Otherwise people wouldn't be crossing the border to live under this bad system.


This is such a poor logic. Embarrassing!
214   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 6, 4:05pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Why is that poor logic?
215   missing   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 6, 4:11pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Are you seriously asking me this?
216   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 6, 4:13pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Why is that poor logic?


Capitalism will never tolerate a representative government; its inefficient as a vehicle for greater profits.


Maybe partially true, but it works better than all other forms on this planet. Otherwise people wouldn't be crossing the border to live under this bad system.

—————————

Absent any logic
217   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 6, 4:13pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Seems like solid logic to me. If this were a worse system than, say, in Mexico, why have 20 million Mexicans come here illegally?
218   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 4:15pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

People aren't flooding boats to get to Cuba, North Korea, or Bangladesh.
219   missing   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 6, 4:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Mexico also has capitalism.

I come from a capitalistic system, slightly different that the US version. I think as a whole, for the majority of the people, it is a better version. However, for me personally the US is better because it is a winner take all system. I can also always go back and maybe will.
220   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 6, 4:35pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

FP says
Mexico also has capitalism.


Clearly they're not doing it right. Maybe we aren't either, but we are definitely getting better results than Mexico does.
221   cynn   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 6, 4:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

The Kochs just haven't figured out "cartels" yet.
222   missing   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 8, 1:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Clearly they're not doing it right. Maybe we aren't either, but we are definitely getting better results than Mexico does.


This is beyond the point.
223   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 2:08pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
Clearly they're not doing it right. Maybe we aren't either, but we are definitely getting better results than Mexico does.


Mexico spent most of the 19th Century in "Free Trade", shipping out raw materials while importing finished products.

Thus, they industrialized much more slowly and unevenly than tariff-protected America in the 19th Century under Hamilton's All-American Tariff.

It's much the same all over Central and South America. BIg Landed Wealth doesn't care about mass employment, they just want to trade the cotton and the aloe and the copper for a BMW, and make sure the landless workers don't get uppity when it comes to wages.

Defeating Big Confederate Landlords - who were as opposed to the Homestead Act as Tarriffs - they envisioned the midwest full of slaves on huge wheat farms - was a big leg up for American Prosperity.
224   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 23, 9:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Hi @Patrick - there's a T2 guy in the mod queue asking to be deleted, both comment and account.
225   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Mar 23, 9:24am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Hi @Patrick - there's a T2 guy in the mod queue asking to be deleted, both comment and account.


I believe that's a brand new account of user: FP
226   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 23, 9:48am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Deleted it. There was only one comment anyway.
227   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Apr 12, 7:58am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Deleted two clear personal attacks from two users this AM. One about going to somebody having to go to GNC, the other about mental issues of a user.
228   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Apr 26, 1:35pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

There's a pretty clear personal insult in my mod queue, but the delete button is gone.
229   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 26, 2:48pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

@TwoScoopsPlissken was the comment more than a week old?

After a week, a comment can't be deleted, except by me. It can still be marked "personal" and go into the moderation queue though.

I deleted one today from the moderation queue, but can't remember how old it was.
230   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Apr 26, 4:25pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Hi Pat, not sure. It had a dislike already, didn't check the date. It could have been older.
231   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Apr 27, 11:44am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Approved Sniper's remarks about Wookie, don't know if it's really "personal" and Wookie said he doesn't particularly care and it seems to be a group thing about milenials vs. a insults at a user.

I'm biased towards approval absent "Go Fuck Yourself, you sniveling shitbag."

So approved, but not 100% sure this is the kind of Convo Pat.net wants/doesn't want since it is about user history and whatnot. Happy to reconsider.
232   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Apr 27, 11:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Okay, so posts along this line are getting thrown to moderation. I leave it in moderation for others to take a look.
233   CBOEtrader   ignore (2)   2018 Apr 27, 11:48am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

yeah, its a childish conversation. even if those two want to have that convo, i'd lean towards deleting it anyways... just to keep the forum focused on actual discussions. dont want this place slipping back into the realm of personal flame wars.
234   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 27, 12:45pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
I'm biased towards approval absent "Go Fuck Yourself, you sniveling shitbag."


I'm the same way. As long as it's not directly and obviously personal, I let it go through.
235   Patrick   ignore (1)   2018 Apr 27, 12:49pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CBOEtrader says
yeah, its a childish conversation. even if those two want to have that convo, i'd lean towards deleting it anyways... just to keep the forum focused on actual discussions. dont want this place slipping back into the realm of personal flame wars.


I really don't want flame wars. I'm definitely still on the pendulum swing away from "anything goes" towards quickly deleting anything that sounds like a personal attack on other users.
236   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 May 14, 3:52pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

One Edvard comment approved, the other left in moderation for "Shut Up" even though the rest isn't personal.
237   LeonDurham   ignore (0)   2018 Jun 3, 10:39am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
I really don't want flame wars. I'm definitely still on the pendulum swing away from "anything goes" towards quickly deleting anything that sounds like a personal attack on other users.


@Patrick--

If you really applied this standard without bias, it would be great. As it is now, it is ridiculous. I challenge you to look at curious2's posts over the past 3 days and tell me how his remain but mine are deleted and I somehow end up in moderation. This website is a joke.
238   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Jun 3, 11:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
If you really applied this standard without bias, it would be great. As it is now, it is ridiculous. I challenge you to look at curious2's posts over the past 3 days and tell me how his remain but mine are deleted and I somehow end up in moderation. This website is a joke.


There are no standards anymore, either you're part of the "club", or your not.

I'm in post moderation for doing NOTHING wrong, and no posts deleted, yet past posters (who were deleted) are back under new names attacking other uses with freedom.

Amazing
239   APHAman   ignore (8)   2018 Jun 3, 12:29pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
Patrick says
I really don't want flame wars. I'm definitely still on the pendulum swing away from "anything goes" towards quickly deleting anything that sounds like a personal attack on other users.


@Patrick--

If you really applied this standard without bias, it would be great. As it is now, it is ridiculous. I challenge you to look at curious2's posts over the past 3 days and tell me how his remain but mine are deleted and I somehow end up in moderation. This website is a joke.


Just blame everything on liberals, leftists and democrats and never ever be critical of anything the Republicans do, especially the special snowflake President, and you will be fine with the mods here
240   curious2   ignore (0)   2018 Jun 3, 12:41pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

LeonDurham says
I challenge you to look at curious2's posts over the past 3 days and tell me how his remain but mine are deleted and I somehow end up in moderation.


Your comments do remain, including this one:

LeonDurham says
as expected. Run away little man.


If some of your comments are not appearing, you might have blocked scripting or something, but it has nothing to do with me. I have never flagged any of your comments as personal, even though some are, clearly. I had simply stopped responding to you, and you responded to that by taunting me (see above). Now you seem to pursue the matter in other threads. Again, it has nothing to do with me, so I would prefer that you (including your aliases joeyjoejoejr and tatupu70 among others) leave me out of it.

« First    « Previous    Comments 201 - 240 of 489    Next »    Last »





The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions