Comments 1 - 40 of 40 Search these comments
Oops, this was already discussed:
http://patrick.net/misc/American+women+rate+80%25+of+men+on+dating+site+as+below+average
They just assume a guy is ugly until they know how much money he makes.
Almost 80% of men were ranked below average by women, which is of course impossible.
Why is this impossible?
Nearly all children are of above-average intelligence.
It's the transformative power of money. Hunchback balding gnomes become knights in shining armor, and ASSHOLES become princes of geniality and good manners.
Don't take it personally guys. Women don't expect men to be beautiful, by and large. But they do expect other women to be beautiful, on the other hand.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2002391/Sorry-chaps-women-dress-impress-other.html
Sorry chaps, women only get dressed up to impress each other
By Andrew Levy for the Daily Mail
Updated: 19:33 EST, 10 June 2011
Men left waiting for hours as their partners get ready for a big night out won’t be pleased.
Women apparently dress to impress other women.
A poll of 2,000 debunks the myth that they spend hours in front of a mirror on a Saturday night to impress men.
The truth is, two thirds are trying to encourage compliments from their peers.
Six out of ten women aged between 18 and 30 said they had their girlfriends in mind when they chose what to wear on a big night out.
And more than a quarter said the most genuine compliments they received came from women they don’t know – not men. Yesterday a spokesman for Simple skincare, which commissioned the report, said: ‘There is an assumption that women go all out to impress the opposite sex, but this research has revealed this isn’t always the case.
‘The fact that so many women care about what their peers think of their appearance is only natural.’
She added: ‘On the whole, women are much more in the know when it comes to clothes, make-up and style, so it’s not a surprise that girls go out to impress other women as opposed to men.’
Two thirds of women believe that men say they look good regardless of what they look like and just say it as standard, without thinking.
And 48 per cent of women polled actually prefer to get a compliment from a female stranger as opposed to a man.
More than half of women say they have never got themselves ‘dolled up’ purely to snare a man and 22 per cent claim a man’s opinion doesn’t matter to them at all.
Women don't expect men to be beautiful, by and large.
No, no. It is not that women do not expect us to be beautiful. It is that they will not ALLOW us to be. They don't want us to break the accord.
Oops, this was already discussed:
http://patrick.net/misc/American+women+rate+80%25+of+men+on+dating+site+as+below+average
What are the odds that an obscure old blog post with data that, on first glance, makes women look shallow and bad, would be posted twice here? Well, when you have a site full of middle aged white dudes who see themselves as victims and who scour the net looking for proof, I'd say the odds are excellent!
What are the odds that an obscure old blog post with data that, on first glance, makes women look shallow and bad, would be posted twice here? Well, when you have a site full of middle aged white dudes who see themselves as victims and who scour the net looking for proof, I'd say the odds are excellent!
When you have a bunch of well educated middle aged white dudes who are tired of having women blame them for getting made up (Patriarchy! Women only fight over little black dresses because of Muh Soggy Knee!), you get these kinds of posts. Shallow and bad has nothing to do with it: It's biology.
Don't take it personally guys. Women don't expect men to be beautiful, by and large. But they do expect other women to be beautiful, on the other hand.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2002391/Sorry-chaps-women-dress-impress-other.html
Sorry chaps, women only get dressed up to impress each other
This, I believe.
Their harshest judges will be their competitors. Dumb stick men are a slam dunk.
If you can have boundless resources laid at your feet because of appearances only, nature would evolve you to spend a lot of time and attention on your looks and seductiveness i.e. the fertile female who puts all of her money on makeup, clothes etc.
When you have a bunch of well educated middle aged white dudes ...
Thanks for the laugh.
BTW it's "well-educated".
Spelling is the first refuge of (s)he without an argument. I'm so proud you paid attention the one time when your 9th grade "well-respected" English teacher found that lesson off her magazine-rack to assist with your razor-sharp vocabulary.
The lack of a hyphen completely invalidates my argument.
The male of any species has to be either useful or pretty. Not both.
have you considered a display card firmware malfunction?
When you have a bunch of well educated middle aged white dudes ...
Thanks for the laugh.
BTW it's "well-educated".
The male of any species has to be either useful or pretty. Not both.
I find both works for me.
What are the odds that an obscure old blog post with data that, on first glance, makes women look shallow and bad, would be posted twice here? Well, when you have a site full of middle aged white dudes who see themselves as victims and who scour the net looking for proof, I'd say the odds are excellent!
I think in this case it's more about middle aged white dudes pondering what kind of bizarre inconsistency can come out of female brains.
Sorry chaps, women only get dressed up to impress each other
And slut shaming is mostly a female activity...
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html?pagewanted=all
[ This woman had been chosen by the researchers, Tracy Vaillancourt and Aanchal Sharma, because she “embodied qualities considered attractive from an evolutionary perspective,†meaning a “low waist-to-hip ratio, clear skin, large breasts.†Sometimes, she wore a T-shirt and jeans, other times a tightfitting, low-cut blouse and short skirt.
In jeans, she attracted little notice and no negative comments from the students, whose reactions were being secretly recorded during the encounter and after the woman left the room. But when she wore the other outfit, virtually all the students reacted with hostility.
They stared at her, looked her up and down, rolled their eyes and sometimes showed outright anger. One asked her in disgust, “What the [expletive] is that?â€
Most of the aggression, though, happened after she left the room. Then the students laughed about her and impugned her motives. One student suggested that she dressed that way in order to have sex with a professor. Another said that her breasts “were about to pop out.†]
But I guess this doesn't stop feminists from blaming the patriarchy.
They just assume a guy is ugly until they know how much money he makes.
1.) Can he support me?
2.) Can he support future and/or existing children?
......
10.) Is he skilled in tickling Ms. Muffy?
It's not that women are more judgemental--it's that men are *less* judgmental. See here: we'll bang pretty much anything within very loose parameters (yes, pun bought and paid for). Oh, of course, we have minimal standards not to plow the ultra obese or smelly/hairy/manly ones, but, as my mama always said, "Bend 'em over and they all look the same."
And slut shaming is mostly a female activity...
This one has always seemed weird. No matter how many partners a woman has had, she keeps a mental list of other women who have had more than she has, and are therefore somehow loose. I figured it was just a self-esteem boost, but it seemed weird that it was always limited to women.
But then I noticed all these middle-class guys seething at other members of the middle class, blaming them for society's problems. It's the same phenomenon: people police their own groups, often quite harshly.
Sorry chaps, women only get dressed up to impress each other
Amaral is part of a growing number of women who opinion polls show have recently warmed to Bolsonaro, a divisive candidate whose comments belittling rape and defending the gender pay gap have long alienated many female voters.
If the trend continues, some of the women who previously balked at the former army captain could help propel him to the presidency, and possibly a first-round victory on Sunday, pollsters and analysts say.
That prospect cheers investors who fear a return of the PT’s state-run policies, but terrifies Bolsonaro’s critics, who say his views echo those of U.S. President Donald Trump or even hardline Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.
Amaral said she was not thrilled by Bolsonaro’s pledge to loosen gun laws and disliked his homophobic statements, but ultimately she was willing to overlook those if he was able to beat PT candidate Fernando Haddad.
“In truth, my vote is a protest vote,” said Amaral, a 64-year-old retired civil servant in downtown Rio de Janeiro. “Right now, among the current crop of candidates, none of them would be my choice to govern the country.”
After ruling Brazil for 13 of the last 15 years, the PT is blamed by many for a crippling recession, rising violence and voracious corruption.
And yet if I read this right 11% of those men rated zero still got messages from women where only 1% women rated at zero received messages.
"The vast majority of men were ranked as 0s, 1s, and 2s by Women"
And yet if I read this right 11% of those men rated zero still got messages from women where only 1% women rated at zero received messages.
Women also like guys who are intelligent, funny, polite, considerate among other qualities. They also are attracted to assholes which seems paradoxical.
Women also like guys who are intelligent, funny, polite, considerate among other qualities. They also are attracted to assholes which seems paradoxical.
You can be rich all you want, if you are bald and short, it may not be enough....
Besos will marry a super model or anyone he fucking wants next
Fun Chart:
The dotted lines are the rankings of attractiveness. The vast majority of men were ranked as 0s, 1s, and 2s by Women, below the average of 2.5 to a scale of 0-5. In fact, the largest category was ranking men as "1"s
Men view women along a natural bell curve, with the vast majority of women within the center of the range. Indeed, men were somewhat 'nicer', with a bias towards scoring women slightly higher in attractiveness generally.
The next time a feminist talks about Marie Claire or Cosmo being run by the Patriarchy, impossible standards of beauty, unrealistic expectations - here you go.
Almost 80% of men were ranked below average by women, which is of course impossible.