patrick.net

I'm shocked -- SHOCKED -- that there is fraud taking place among global warming denialists.

Fraud? Touche.

There is no peer reviewed evidence supporting carbon dioxide increasing atmosphere temperatures to a negative effect. On the other hand none of the literature supporting carbon based thermal biosphere disaster mention how our global temperature is controlled by water in it's many forms. If you wish to worry about something of importance, study the problem of over fished oceans, over harvested forests, the population boom that is outstripping the food supply.

A few facts. No amount of tax can alter the earths temperature. Carbon dioxide is a trace gas and cannot ever increase to more than about 500ppm, it is not physically possible. Harnessing the atom as mankind's source for energy is the only known energy that can replace petroleum and natural gas. So called "green energy" such as solar and wind energy can only provide a tiny percentage of the energy needed by mankind, it is horribly expensive, vary damaging to wildlife and habitat during operation and vary polluting during manufacture. Cannot ever supply our needs no matter how advanced it becomes.

Lets kill of this failed energy control scheme, treat it like a dead horse, bury it out back somewhere and forget about it.

jazz music says

there is no cohesive, consistent alternative theory to human-caused global warming. Some blame global warming on the sun, others on orbital cycles of other planets, others on ocean cycles, and so on.

The papers barely rise above the level of "it was cold today in Wugga Wugga, PA - take that, liberals!" argument.

I still enjoy the facility with which these fucktards slide immediately between arguing that the sun is heating the earth and only a few hours later claiming there is no evidence the earth is heating. And no shame or cognitive dissonance whatsoever.

farmrdave says

Carbon dioxide is a trace gas and cannot ever increase to more than about 500ppm, it is not physically possible.

Has anyone heard of this piece of claptrap before? I've never seen it.

farmrdave says

If you wish to worry about something of importance, study the problem of over fished oceans, over harvested forests, the population boom that is outstripping the food supply.

Be careful, if people start worrying about water quality, they are going to notice all of the ocean acidification caused by CO2 and eutrophication caused by over application of fertilizer.

farmrdave says

Harnessing the atom as mankind's source for energy is the only known energy that can replace petroleum and natural gas.

Are you advocating nuclear energy, or just trying to get people to stick their heads back into the ground?

farmrdave says

Carbon dioxide is a trace gas and cannot ever increase to more than about 500ppm

I have been laughing at these people for years, and I have never encountered this particular nugget of stupidity.

Usually they just lie about the effects, claim the earth is not warming, or claim that solar activity is doing the deed (while simultaneously claiming the earth isn't warming anyway).

This is a new one.

farmrdave-joined 28 Aug 2015

Beginner trolls commenting on Patnet is really entertaining to the old pros here.

Mars has an atmosphere that's mostly carbon dioxide, so the 500ppm "ceiling" is bullshit. He's right about the ocean pollution tho. It's getting bad. Humans are causing terrible harm to our planet. I haven't seen any workable solutions come out of the global warming scientific community yet tho. Lots of alarm but no fire truck.

Venus's atmosphere is 95.5% carbon dioxide.

Global warming is science by assertion fiat. All it lacks is valid, proven cause and effect, no bigee.

HydroCabron says

Venus's atmosphere is 95.5% carbon dioxide.

Gee, I guess that's why it's so hot!!