New Orwellian term about to destroy speech forever
« prev   random   next »

9
2

New Orwellian term about to destroy speech forever

By iwog following x   2015 Sep 30, 10:56am 8,778 views   36 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


Cyber violence. That's the term the United Nations is using to bully every nation on earth into squashing free speech and censoring the internet. Furthermore this is being done for no other reason than to save feminists from hurt feelings.

Did someone call you a stupid cunt? You're the victim of cyber violence and you need to call the police. Very sad day for civilization indeed.

Urgent action needed to combat online violence against women and girls, says new UN report
http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/9/cyber-violence-report-press-release

New York, 24 September 2015 – A new report released today by the United Nations Broadband Commission reveals that almost three quarters of women online have been exposed to some form of cyber violence, and urges governments and industry to work harder and more effectively together to better protect the growing number of women and girls who are victims of online threats and harassment.

Two disgusting bitches testifying before the UN about gamers calling them bad words:

#politics

1   Blurtman   ignore (1)   2015 Sep 30, 11:09am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Obey! Conform! Free think is treason.

3   Tenpoundbass   ignore (6)   2015 Sep 30, 11:54am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

When I'm down and out, I take comfort in knowing that somewhere a purple haired Liberal is injecting social justice in my stead.

It's the only way I can be a clueless self centered selfish bitch is through their proxy.

4   zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2015 Sep 30, 12:42pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Their arguments would be more meaningful to me if they were naked.

5   Quigley   ignore (0)   2015 Sep 30, 1:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

The UN is a joke.
These women are the punchline.
I'm not worried.

6   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2015 Sep 30, 2:00pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Sarkesian, former Marketing for MLM/Self-Help Guru, and Zoe Quinn, serial adulterer and general mental case.

7   georgeliberte   ignore (0)   2015 Sep 30, 2:24pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Well thankfully femanazis never make hate videos against men, laws maybe, but not videos. Anyway while I feel "You suck" and "You're a liar" are not hate statements, they are at best inarticulate and immature arguments. Mobs? Seriously? Disagreeing with your illogical and dishonest personal feelings and views is not hate- it is a contrary set of feelings and viewpoints.

8   New Renter   ignore (11)   2015 Sep 30, 3:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Do you have strongly worded opinions on this matter? Send them here:

At Ogilvy Public Relations: Tara Mullins
E-mail: tara.mullins[@]ogilvy.com
Mobile: +1 646 520 6468
Tel: +1 212 880 5243

At ITU: Sarah Parkes
Chief, Media Relations and Public Information, ITU
E-mail: sarah.parkes[@]itu.int
Mobile: +41 79 599 1439

At UN Women: Sharon Grobeisen
Media & Communications Officer
E-mail:sharon.grobeisen[@]unwomen.org
Mobile: +1 646 781 4753

9   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2015 Sep 30, 3:49pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

iwog says

cyber violence

Some virtual hand reached out of the screen when they were browsing Etsy and slapped them?

10   New Renter   ignore (11)   2015 Sep 30, 3:56pm   ↑ like (6)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

I like this part especially:

Anita Sarkeesian, a survivor of cyber violence

By that definition 99.327% of Patnetters are "survivors". Hell, I'm shocked IWOG is still alive and quacking.

Jeez, talk about diluting the value of a word...

11   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2015 Sep 30, 3:58pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Considering all the problems in the world-this is what they discuss in the UN??

12   Tenpoundbass   ignore (6)   2015 Sep 30, 4:02pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

"Hey hon how was your day at the UN today..."

"Well first DSK droped by with some hookers and some blow, then we listened to the same old countries call America the Devil.
Then we took a 5 martini lunch then feilded crack pot Liberals for the rest of the day. I tell ya, it's amazing they pay me to show up!"

13   New Renter   ignore (11)   2015 Oct 1, 5:41pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

lostand confused says

Considering all the problems in the world-this is what they discuss in the UN??

I'll bet if you zoom in on the delegates most were playing Angry Birds.

14   mell   ignore (1)   2015 Oct 5, 8:48am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

At some point you have to make a decision from which side the bigger danger is lurking and take a stand, even if it does not agree with many other of your political views. While cuckservative Republicans certainly aren't better, your are digging your own grave by hating everything on the right, incl. conservative, old-school liberals. And by hating the economics team that you don't like, though economics is very fuzzy per se anyways (not the math behind, but people's perception, optimism and even random inventions can influence the economy quite a lot). You do have a son, and while you may have an exit plan (some foreign country) it is possible/likely that this sick wave will continue to suck in more and more countries and there is no safe harbor anymore. And even if you make out fine in your exile, is it fair to your fellow men and sons of others to vote for a party that promotes exactly this perverse ideology that you are so against and which is far more pervasive in disrupting people's civil liberties and social, sexual and career development than any particular economic or 'right-wing' policy. Think about it without making up your mind immediately.

15   mell   ignore (1)   2015 Oct 5, 9:01am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

New Renter says

I like this part especially:

Anita Sarkeesian, a survivor of cyber violence

By that definition 99.327% of Patnetters are "survivors". Hell, I'm shocked IWOG is still alive and quacking.

Jeez, talk about diluting the value of a word...

That protection doesn't apply to men, which are 99,327% of the patnet population - so there are no survivors of cyber violence here.

16   iwog   ignore (3)   2015 Oct 5, 9:48am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

In the world of feminism, disagreeing with a woman is a violent act and an attempt to silence her.

17   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2015 Oct 5, 11:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

...and Mansplaining.

18   iwog   ignore (3)   2015 Oct 5, 11:42am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Unfortunately I find my self unhappy allies with right-wing media since those dimwits are the only ones pissed off about liberal feminism enough to give it proper coverage. Anyway here's what happens when feminists disagree with each other:

Feminist Conference In Meltdown: No Platforming Unsafe Speakers Exposes Warring Factions
http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/10/03/feminist-conference-in-meltdown-no-platforming-unsafe-speakers-exposes-warring-factions/

Feminism in London (FiL), one of the largest feminist conferences in the UK, has seen two major speakers pull out because of “ideological totalitarianism” and “sectarian” “warring feminist factions,” who fell out over an attempt to “no-platform” certain speakers who were “unsafe” because everyone did not agree with them on everything.

19   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2015 Oct 5, 12:41pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Going on to speak of the “warring feminist faction” and the “ridiculous” situation, where the different “factions… can not speak to each other.” She also lambasted the recent “no platforming” of Maryam Namazie – a secular campaigner and founder of the Council of Ex-Muslims – at the University of Warwick.

Julie Bindel, a journalist for The Guardian and the first person to report on the Rotherham rape scandal, is no stranger to no-platforming. The words “Julie Bindel is Vile” were enshrined in the NUS manifesto for several years, and she has been banned for speaking on pretty much every university campus in the country for nearly a decade.

Namazie was invited by the Secular/Atheist student groups, then dis-invited by the Student Council. She speaks about the dangers of Islam to Women.

Bindel revealed a huge rape ring of Muslim Men grooming underage, young women to service them all.

The “speaker policy,” which they refer to, states that external speakers on campus must “seek to avoid insulting other faiths or groups, within a framework of positive debate and challenge” and “must not spread hatred and intolerance in the community” or disrupt “social and community harmony.”

In 2012 preacher Assim Al-Hakeem spoke at Warwick. Al-Hakeem had previously called homosexuality an “illness,” “unnatural” and compared gay people to “animals.” The same year homophobic preacher Abu Usamah At-Thahabi was given a platform at the institution.


http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/26/atheist-ex-muslim-banned-from-university-could-incite-hatred/

The Multi Kult will eventually fall apart from it's own massive internal contradictions. Right now it barely survives by practicing extreme cog diss over Islam vs. Women's Rights and simply making ex-Muslim Women Right's Advocates unpersons. The whole transgender thing - "M to F trans are secret anti-feminist male spies" idea has resulted in the shutdown of the Womyn's Music Festival in Michigan after decades.

20   FortWayne   ignore (0)   2015 Oct 6, 8:30am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Feminists are just horrible people these days.

This crap isn't about freedom, it's about restricting peoples lives. Because feminists hate men, they are driven by hatred.

This is the kind of thing left is known for when they get too much power. Someone from the left brought them into UN, people from the street don't show up to testify otherwise.

And this kind of crap will be legal I bet if Hillary gets elected, because she will to make good on her promises to all those nutcase feminist groups out there.

22   FortWayne   ignore (0)   2015 Oct 6, 5:50pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Apparently telling someone "You suck" as capital offense by feminists when uttered in their direction. Loonies.

23   georgeliberte   ignore (0)   2015 Oct 7, 9:25am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Chances are pretty good they don't suck worth a rat's ass. They probably are repelled by anything male and prefer to munch.

24   PeopleUnited   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 16, 9:09pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

nyc says
Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us all.


This AI is relentless. What is the true agenda here? It appears to be some kind of cyber psyop.
25   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 16, 11:35pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

A few purple haired IHLs broadcast over you tube with bloody ball sacks hanging from their snarling teeth and busy cyber sleuths clacking and hunting in the background will resolve this problem rather quickly.
26   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2017 Oct 17, 12:55am   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

But-but-but . . . CYBER! VIOLENCE! IS! MY! LIFE!
27   Blurtman   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 17, 3:22am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

But it offends them, and they are upset by it. So why can't we make it be illegal?
28   BlueSardine   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 17, 4:37am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Voting democrat has consequences...

iwog says
Did someone call you a stupid cunt? You're the victim of cyber violence and you need to call the police. Very sad day for civilization indeed
29   errc   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 17, 5:49am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

PeopleUnited says
nyc says
Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us all.


This AI is relentless. What is the true agenda here? It appears to be some kind of cyber psyop.


S/he is making Republicans very uncomfortable with all these truths. I can see why Patrick would ban him
30   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 17, 6:48am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Crap like this is why a one world government is a horrific idea for US residents.
31   BlueSardine   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 17, 7:00am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Universal truth: All trigglypuffs vote democrat.
32   PeopleUnited   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 17, 7:11am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

errc says
PeopleUnited says
nyc says
Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us all.


This AI is relentless. What is the true agenda here? It appears to be some kind of cyber psyop.


S/he is making Republicans very uncomfortable with all these truths. I can see why Patrick would ban him


I actually see this as more of a small government bot. That is the ideology it is promoting. And republicans lean way more towards small government than democrats. But this bot is attacking both republican and democrats equally from my perspective. It is just that the bot tends to appeal more to people who think government is too big. The bot doesn't like any law that restricts freedom. What you don't see is that democrats seek to restrict freedom as much if not more than republicans. The bot is quite good at pointing out that those of us who are not in the 1% elites who control every, actually have more in common than not, and that the liberal identity politics is being used to divide and distract us while the elites continue to use us and enrich themselves.
33   errc   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 17, 7:37am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

I actually see this as more of a small government bot. That is the ideology it is promoting. And republicans lean way more towards small government than democrats.

———————

Bwahahaha lolol lmao!!!
34   errc   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 17, 7:39am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The bot doesn't like any law that restricts freedom.

——————

Which is why I said it’s making Republicans very uncomfortable.

You don’t seem to acknowledge reality, but don’t worry, you’re not alone.
35   Patrick   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 17, 8:00am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

PeopleUnited says
nyc says
Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us all.


This AI is relentless. What is the true agenda here? It appears to be some kind of cyber psyop.


Yes, it's definitely a bot with an agenda. Even though I mostly agree with it, I'd like the forum to be for humans alone.
36   anonymous   ignore (5)   2017 Oct 17, 10:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

No one hates free speech more than Americans do.

Comment as anon_b30b4 or log in at top of page: