follow iwog following
follow iwog 2016 Jul 26, 7:17am
42,044 views 434 comments
« First « Previous Comments 395 - 434 of 434 Last »
Many people didn’t buy at $10. They bought at $18-20 as they admitted in this thread while claiming “nothing wrong with 10% year.” My last response was for those.If you bought at $10, even after dividends, you only do as good as Apple and Amazon in the same period, which is why it is still not a good pick. It’s not a bad one but not a good one either
Forgive me for saying this but what you wrote just screams shuckster.
still not a good pick
When you have someone in this thread saying 100% appreciation plus dividends over a couple of years isanon_604a7 saysstill not a good pickI think it's pretty clear that the lights are on but nobody is home. I guess I'm just a loser for pointing out how silly that comment was but that's kind of the tone of the times.
It's always easy to look back and claim how great you did. But unless you came out and predicted it, it's worth shit. It's like going to Vegas and winning for a weekend and then bragging how great you are at gambling and how you just knew its gonna be RED.Iwog had the balls to come out with some predictions - NAC and ARLP both. NAC as a place to park your cash has been absolutely great because the alternative is savings account of 0.75% interest you pay taxes on top. NAC has held steady and been paying 5.8% tax free. Nothing wrong with that. ARLP - lets talk in 2 years. It's not over until its over. It should do great under trump. Apple was a dog for 2 years. I started doing options on it early this year. Kept rolling over and over. Pretty sweet. Great run until I lost a FAT round in July when it had a moment of slump. So half the winnings were out the window again...wish I had just kept going till now. But hey, nobody knows the future.
But many don’t realize this: there is nothing special about these two stocks. Iwog recommended these at the big dip in early 2016. Most stocks you bought at that point would have done well.
get booed out of this boys club
Hey sub - just click the ignore button on all assnonymous posters who post like tards.
so i will stop commenting.
Is Iwog gone for good from this site?
anon_7c0c9 saysbut one of the greatest recommendations ever seen on patnetlol duck detected
but one of the greatest recommendations ever seen on patnet
Nobody says anything is special - in hindsight tech stocks were a great buy. But I didn't see anyone come out here in this forum in 2016 when apple was a dog saying - Apple is a buy, don't believe the noise and here is why I believe it is a buy ....
But no wonder that he is no longer posting just like Logan. People that actually have interesting insights get booed out of this boys club. Without people like that there is little of interest in here...as I can find negativity and whining on Facebook all day.
Are you sad the the iwog lemmings have no one to follow since he's gone?
True but AAPL is part of most funds and moves the index funds as well just by its size, so you don't have to be buying just AAPL to make better returns.
sure but that was just an example - who has actually made a public prediction and backed it up by data other then Iwog? Anyone can throw out some prediction and hope to be right. They do it on CNBC all day :)
What's so great about this "ARLP" y'all are talking about again?
Go back 2 yearsARLP +50%Nasdaq +43%DJIA +45%nevermind that you would have also been earning 20% on the original investment at the time
Go back 2 years
Many people didn’t buy at $10. They bought at $18-20 as they admitted in this thread while claiming “nothing wrong with 10% year.”
Nasdaq +43%DJIA +45%
theoakman saysGo back 2 yearsARLP +50%Nasdaq +43%DJIA +45%nevermind that you would have also been earning 20% on the original investment at the timeYou mean Jan 11, 2016? My chart starts on the day this thread started.
I guess when people lose money on the regular basis, a stock performing not much better than indexes can appear to be “greatest picks ever” LoL.
<What are you doing in the thread? Sure seems some people are members of the “oh muh gawd, please give me an opportunity to catch Iwog being wrong for ...
Sure seems some people didn't get a warning about posts using word "you".
Satoshi_Nakamoto saysSure seems some people didn't get a warning about posts using word "you".Yes, looks like the delete button is going to get used today again.
Maybe "TDS" should be a banned. Is it not a personal attack?
anon_13ce6 saysMaybe "TDS" should be a banned. Is it not a personal attack?Yes, it is personal to simply attack Trump for no particular reason, but he's not a user of the site as far as I know.The goal is just to eliminate the flame wars.
That’s not what TDS means.
Good for your chart, but the original recommendation was made 2 years ago.