1
0

Cockroaches scurry for cover when the light is shined on them


 invite response                
2016 Aug 3, 12:11pm   2,224 views  13 comments

by Tenpoundbass   ➕follow (7)   💰tip   ignore  

http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/03/media/khizr-khan-television-interviews/index.html?iid=hp-toplead-dom

Enough is enough," he said after a Tuesday night interview on CNN. "We are not going to participate in this tit for tat." He has no more interviews scheduled. But his message about morality continues to resonate far and wide. Khan, the father of a Muslim-American soldier killed in Iraq in 2004, denounced Donald Trump's candidacy at the Democratic National Convention last week, and he's been alternating offense and defense ever since. Trump has repeatedly challenged Khan and his wife Ghazala, saying they "viciously attacked" him at the convention. Khan, sometimes joined by his wife, responded in nearly a dozen...

#ironmanisdansbitch

Comments 1 - 13 of 13        Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   2016 Aug 3, 12:13pm  

by Ann Coulter3 Aug 20160
SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Khizr Khan, the Muslim “Gold Star Father” who harangued Americans at the Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side, is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to defend their heinous policies. The “Jersey Girls” were the classic example, first described in that magnificent book Godless: The Church of Liberalism.

In order to shut down a debate they’re losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has “sacrificed” more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.

Khan’s argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that “our” Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.

If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year — as we do — we’d already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn’t have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the “argument” part of Khan’s point is gibberish.

Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can’t say anything.

Yes, a candidate for president of the United States is supposed to be prohibited from discussing a dangerous immigration program because Khan’s son was one of fourteen (14!) Muslim servicemen killed by other Muslims in our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. That’s why we’re obligated to import yet more Muslims – including, undoubtedly, some just like the ones who killed his son. Q.E.D.!

If you think that doesn’t make any sense, keep your yap shut, unless you lost a child in Iraq, too.

There were virtually no Muslims in America before Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act. Today, we admit more immigrants from Muslim countries than from Great Britain.

Are Americans allowed to have an opinion on whether that’s a good idea?

So far, it’s worked out great!

In addition to the sudden appearance of honor killings, clitorectomies, hijabs and massive government frauds, Muslim immigrants have given us: The most devastating terrorist attack in world history, followed by terrorist attacks at Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, a military recruiting center in Chattanooga, Times Square, Vaughan Foods in Oklahoma, San Bernardino and an Orlando nightclub, among other places.

We’ve admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had been admitted before 9/11. If we don’t make it 3 million, we’re monsters? May we ask how many Muslims Khan’s mystery Constitution requires — or is that out of bounds unless we had a child who died in Iraq?

Apparently, sending out a victim to make their argument was the only option left for the “Make America Muslim!” crowd.

After Trump somehow got the crazy idea that a presidential candidate was allowed to discuss government policies and proposed a temporary ban on Muslim immigration — which, by the way, is perfectly constitutional — the entire media and political class erupted in a sputtering rage.

Conscience of a Nation, Speaker Paul Ryan proclaimed: “That’s not who we are.” Jeb! Bush made the subtle and clever argument that Trump was “unhinged.” Marco Rubio called any pause in Muslim immigration “offensive.” ABC News’ Jonathan Karl called Trump’s plan “outrageous” — which was way better than MSNBC, where Trump was compared to white supremacists and Nazis.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Trump had “disqualifie(d)” himself from “serving as president” for suggesting any slowdown in Muslim immigration. Vice President Joe Biden — tribune of blue-collar Americans everywhere! — said that if Trump were the nominee, Hillary would “win in a walk.”

Then it turned out Trump’s Muslim ban was a huge hit with actual voters. Hillary, who promises to quadruple the number of Syrian “refugees” we bring in, is quite far from winning “in a walk.”

So the media and political class had no choice: They had to produce a victim to make their argument, in order to block any response. For their next trick, Democrats plan to produce a little girl whose parents were recently murdered to present their tax plan. (Better make sure they weren’t killed by an illegal alien!)

Does anyone know what Khan thinks of gays? How about miniskirts? Alcohol? Because I gather we’re going to have to turn all our policies over to him, too. What have you sacrificed, Barney Frank??

Muslim troops accounted for 0.2 percent of all U.S. troop deaths in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Southerners accounted for 38 percent of those killed in Iraq and 47 percent in Afghanistan.

What has South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley “sacrificed” compared to the families of these men? How about Nikki put their flag back up?

The Confederate flag won’t lead to thousands of dead and maimed Americans, as Muslim immigration does. The only danger posed by the Confederate flag is that media elites will hold the South in even greater contempt than they already do, assuming that’s possible.

But as long as they brought it up, if only people who lost children in our wars may discuss public policy, then only they should vote, not only on how many more Muslim immigrants this country needs, but on all government policies. What has Chuck Todd sacrificed? Have any current members of The New York Times editorial board ever lost a son in war? (Fighting on the American side.)

The inevitable conclusion to the hysteria over Khan is that only those who have worn the uniform and heard shots fired in anger can vote in our elections. Hello, media? Hey — where’d everybody go?

4   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Sep 15, 3:33pm  

BTW, if your son had just killed countless people in a mass shooting, would you be going to political rallies a few weeks later?

Unless, of course, you believed what he did redeemed him from his Haram behavior, guaranteed him a seat in heaven, and now want to back the Candidate you feel will advance your Islamist cause.

Deplorable.

5   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Sep 15, 3:35pm  

Quigley says

http://www.infowars.com/what-the-media-isnt-reporting-about-khizr-khan/

Wow. I knew he made his living peddling visas (inc. tax free 'investor' visas. When the tax free time limit expires, they transfer the assets at cut-rate prices to relatives, who then get an investor visa... so the assets perpetually pays no tax) to wealthy Pakis and Gulfies, but I didn't know this.

When is the media going to cover Huma Abedin's editorial positions at her mother's pro-Salafi/Wahabi Women's Publication, paid for by WAMY and other Islamist groups?

6   OneTwo   2016 Sep 15, 3:47pm  

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

BTW, if your son had just killed countless people in a mass shooting, would you be going to political rallies a few weeks later?

Unless, of course, you believed what he did redeemed him from his Haram behavior, guaranteed him a seat in heaven, and now want to back the Candidate you feel will advance your Islamist cause.

Deplorable.

Did you take your brain out of first gear before you wrote that? Seriously, you should be embarrassed.

7   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Sep 15, 3:55pm  

Rashomon says

Did you take your brain out of first gear before you wrote that? Seriously, you should be embarrassed.

For what?

The father of a guy who just shot a bunch of innocent people - nevermind the next two sentences, let's even assume he wasn't proud of his son for jihading the gay away - have the emotional wherewithal to travel hours to a political rally just weeks after the incident?

Did Dennis Klebold's parents make trips to political rallies right after Columbine?

8   OneTwo   2016 Sep 15, 4:06pm  

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

For what?

The father of a guy who just shot a bunch of innocent people - nevermind the next two sentences, let's even assume he wasn't proud of his son for jihading the gay away - have the emotional wherewithal to travel hours to a political rally just weeks after the incident?

Did Dennis Klebold's parents make trips to political rallies right after Columbine?

It's a free country. He is free to do what he did. And what he did clearly doesn't require your asinine comment on it.

9   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Sep 15, 5:37pm  

Rashomon says

It's a free country. He is free to do what he did. And what he did clearly doesn't require your asinine comment on it.

Man makes such a rapid recovery from guilt and responsibility, he goes to a political rally weeks after one of the worst (if not the worst) mass shootings carried out in US History by his own son . Furthermore, he gets interviewed by TV.

Mmm hmm. And I'm asinine for pointing that's odd behavior. I'm sure if Dylann Roof's family was seen at a Trump Rally, and then gave interviews to media, it would go uncommented upon by pundits.

The Orland gay club gunman's father has well-known anti-American views and is an ideological supporter of the Afghan Taliban. A new message posted by the father on Facebook early Monday morning also makes it clear he could have passed anti-homosexual views onto his son.

From that rabid right-wing Breitbart CBS:
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/orlando-shooting-omar-mateen-father-seddique-mateen-taliban-god-punish-gays/

So I'm totally off base by thinking that somebody who endorses the Taliban and is rabidly Anti-Gay might think it's a good thing that his son went out killing gays, saving his family "Shame" and getting himself into Paradise.

10   OneTwo   2016 Sep 15, 6:17pm  

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

Man makes such a rapid recovery from guilt and responsibility, he goes to a political rally weeks after one of the worst (if not the worst) mass shootings carried out in US History by his own son . Furthermore, he gets interviewed by TV.

Mmm hmm. And I'm asinine for pointing that's odd behavior. I'm sure if Dylann Roof's family was seen at a Trump Rally, and then gave interviews to media, it would go uncommented upon by pundits.

So you are the arbiter of what everyone else should or should not do at any given time then.

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

So I'm totally off base by thinking that somebody who endorses the Taliban and is rabidly Anti-Gay might think it's a good thing that his son went out killing gays, saving his family "Shame" and getting himself into Paradise.

Vast numbers of Americans are anti-gay, including plenty on here. That doesn't mean they necessarily endorse murder, does it? Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall reading the father saying he supported his son's actions.

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

and now want to back the Candidate you feel will advance your Islamist cause.

Feel free to enlighten us about how Hillary is going to further his Islamist agenda.

11   MMR   2016 Sep 15, 6:23pm  

thunderlips11 is deplorable says

Mmm hmm. And I'm asinine for pointing that's odd behavior.

That's why you're so deplorable

12   marcus   2016 Sep 15, 6:48pm  

TPB,

Don't you ever get tired of defending the orange douchebag, and the stupid shit he does ? I notice that when you do defend him, it's always for this superficial bullshit like the back and forth about Kahn.

It's never about his lies about being generous to charities, or his stiffening so many contractors and people that have done work for him. OR the degree to which the public deserves to see his tax returns in light of how dishonest he may be about his wealth, his charitable giving, and in light of the the secrecy of his business dealings.

IT's never about the number of health deferments he had to avoid the draft for military service during the vietnam war. OR about the serious questions about his having the emotional stability for the job, let alone the disposition or intellect for it.

13   HEY YOU   2016 Sep 15, 7:15pm  

One thing about patnet is that one can see many here pick a side,left/right.
Guess one could not choose either.
DIE! Republican & Democratic voters,DIE NOW! before you destroy America.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions