patrick.net

What did he do lie to another person at the building permit office.
That lying sack of shit. Why can't he be a cold blooded ruthless killer like Hillary.

So, CIC, I think I asked this before and got crickets.

Can you list out sources that you consider unbiased?

Ironman says

EVERY source today is biased one direction or another. But when a certain poster repeatedly uses the SAME biased sources to support a certain narrative, well, you figure it out...

OK--how about you do this then: rather than simply claiming the source is biased and ending it there, how about you actually detail where the "biased" source is incorrect.

Example--WaPo says x is a lie, but as you can see from these other sources (linked, of course), it's not a lie at all and WaPo is wrong.

That's how adults do it.

tatupu70 says

That's how adults do it.

...when they're talking to adults.....or even intelligent children.

Trumpligula is making dishonesty great again.

When you are on a jury, if a witness lies about something, you can discard the entire testimony of the witness. The reason is that its usually not worth the effort to figure out if the rest of what they say is true....and you probably can't figure it out anyway.

I do choose to apply this to other aspects of life. For instance this article from drooling mouth breather German Lopez

http://www.vox.com/2016/8/4/12374644/korryn-gaines-police-shooting-video-baltimore-county

In that article he says this:

Police said Gaines threatened to kill them, and then an officer fired at her once. So what if the officer didn’t fire at all, and the cops backed down and, perhaps, came back later?

He actually suggests that the cops could reasonably leave a scene where a suspect has a shotgun and has barricaded herself with her small child. This suggestion is so preposterous on face value that no analysis is required. German Lopez is incomprehensibly stupid(or assumes his target audience is) and perhaps deserves a Darwin Award on the same level as Ribas.

When someone makes a claim like that, I believe no further review is required. They've shown who they are and how they look at things. Similarly there are websites and news organizations that are so spastic, they deserve to be ignored. Mother Jones, Daily Koz, Politico....you see anyone here quoting the Blayze or Infowars? No, cause its biased propaganda crap. Don't come at me with garbage.

the thing is, those fact checking sites actually go through each fact, and demonstrate how they got to the conclusion. Often with "true but misleading" as a choice, and an explanation.

Step by step.

you'll notice that "call me stupid" aka ironvagina can't be bothered with that detail.

what does he have?

ZERO SOURCES to dispute.
ZERO ANALYSIS as to why his conclusion is different.

And a bunch of personal attacks/ misdirection as his best effort to retort.

Sad, just sad.

Ironman says

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

And a bunch of personal attacks

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

you'll notice that "call me stupid" aka ironvagina

Folks, the brain dead are out in force today.

step on up, and prove you aren't a dumbfuck!

OFFER an alternative fact checking source, that shows Hillary lies more than Trump. You can't do it!
Go through the actual claim by claim analysis in the multiple sites showing Trump lying 5 times as often as Hillary, show what is wrong.. You can't do it!

Or, be a pussy and bitch!

What's really scary is how many anti-corruption, anti-war, anti-lobbyist Democrats are deliberately and consciously ignoring Hillary and the Clintons' record.

You don't have to vote for Trump, you can abstain or vote for Jill Stein.

Trust me, it's not a wasted vote. If Stein gets 5% or more of the vote, you'll have transformed the democratic party.

thunderlips11 says

You don't have to vote for Trump, you can abstain or vote for Jill Stein.

Trust me, it's not a wasted vote. If Stein gets 5% or more of the vote, you'll have transformed the democratic party.

Transforming the party into anti-vaxxers isn't my idea of progress.

thunderlips11 says

You don't have to vote for Trump, you can abstain or vote for Jill Stein.

Trust me, it's not a wasted vote. If Stein gets 5% or more of the vote, you'll have transformed the democratic party.

One could say the same for Trump. You don't have to vote for Hillary. Yada yada - vote libertarian - yada yada.

All 4 are different, and they have their pluses and minuses. Just pick the one you like the best, and if you are in a battleground state, pick between the two who are actually standing a chance of winning.

The worst thing about Hillary is her trustability. The funny thing is that even on this issue, regardless of what you or I think, people think these two cats are about equal. People don't really trust either of them to be honest.

President Hillary Clinton. Get used to the sound of it, dumbfucks!

Ironman says

That's what WaPo, Slate, Mother Jones, Salon, ThinkProgress and NYT keeping telling you. Never underestimate the power of a false narrative from the media.

Do you have a tinfoil hat and reading list to spare? I'd like to give it to my dog as a research project. He can do some reading and get back to me to explain how your mind works.

November 9th, 2016.

The day America fully emerged as a sexist country. It will be dumb Americans, led by Stein and Bernie Sanders, who caused the great Trump disaster.

I can hardly wait for the moaning to begin.

BTW, has Britain caught on fire, with Emperor Ming slinging hot hail at London after Brexit?