3
0

YUUUGE Donald mistakes last night...


 invite response                
2016 Oct 10, 2:38pm   6,072 views  26 comments

by Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

1. muslim asks about islamophobia, blames muslims, since "they haven't been reporting..." GREAT for appealing to your bigoted based, but as a reach out to muslims or anyone else not already in the trump sewer? not so much!

2. Threats to jail hillary. Once again, that shit works at your racist rally's, but outside of there, it plays like a tinhorn third world tyrant leader... First off, since Trump is ignoring the fact that the legal process has already run its course, he is basically saying he doesn't give a crap about the law Second, it makes him look petty and small, which he of course is. Third, as a way to re-unite America after a divisive campaign, special attacks on the other parties candidate is about as stupid as his attacks on his past GOP competitors. And, 4th, since he's said several times he'd also like to go after the owner of amazon//washininton pose, it is a clear view that trump will definitely abuse the presidency to settle his personal scores and silence critics. McCarthy anyone?

3. Keeps running black = ghetto stereotype. Great reach out! "your lives suck Niggers, so you might as well vote for me even though I sure as hell won't rent to you, or want you working at my golf course!"

4. Literally attacked the moderators after the FIRST QUESTION, for being unfair to him... seriously, pussygroper, shut up!

5. Bitched that he didn't get equal time over and over, but post debate, it was clear he spoke a little bit more than Hillary.

6. "spence said what about syria? fuck that fool, somebody smack that bitch!" Nothing says good leadership like cutting the legs off of your number 2.... If spence had a pair, he'd be resigning today, to preserve whatever dignity he never had!

7. Lied well known lies over and over... I know for trump supporters, and GOP in general facts don't matter, but to some people in this country they do.

8. Left himself very exposed on his reply to "I grope pussy on whoever the fuck I want" quote. When he said, "I have never actually done that, it is locker talk" well, if ONE PERSON comes forward and refutes this, claiming he groped her without consent, you've got the headlines for the next two weeks, the act, the quote, and lying....

Comments 1 - 26 of 26        Search these comments

2   turtledove   2016 Oct 10, 3:09pm  

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

well, if ONE PERSON comes forward and refutes this, claiming he groped her without consent

It wouldn't even matter if it's true. He really screwed himself with those tapes. At this point, someone reasonably credible just has to say it.

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

since Trump is ignoring the fact that the legal process has already run its course, he is basically saying he doesn't give a crap about the law

I didn't get that at all from what he said. I got that he is questioning whether the law was actually followed, something many question. He is saying that when he puts someone in charge of the investigation that the law will be followed. In his opinion she broke the law. If proper procedure had been followed she would have had an indictment; if found guilty then jail. The FBI and some members of Congress chose to look the other way. That's not typical. You wouldn't be granted such a courtesy. With just a civil case and you would be in contempt of court for destroying evidence after a subpoena. "My dog ate it," won't be good enough. You are responsible for producing it. That should be so much more so in a criminal investigation, and typically, it is. Further, it isn't typical in a criminal investigation that the suspect be put in charge of determining what emails are relevant and which aren't. She may not have done anything wrong with respect to selling favors or giving away secrets... But she sure as hell knows about legal procedure. There's no excuse here.

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

Bitched that he didn't get equal time over and over, but post debate, it was clear he spoke a little bit more than Hillary.

Only because he bitched. Had he not, they would have allowed Hillary the last word at every turn.

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

Literally attacked the moderators after the FIRST QUESTION, for being unfair to him

The moderators asked him follow-up questions throughout. They did not do the same for Hillary. Why didn't they ask her why she destroyed the emails after the subpoena? Why didn't they ask her as a legal professional why she thought that the suspect gets to decide what evidence to turn over? Yet, they asked Trump follow-up questions for many of the things he said. It really did look like he was debating three people. Or at least 2.5 people. Anderson wasn't too bad.

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

Keeps running black = ghetto stereotype

Are you denying that there are more black people living in crime ridden areas with poor schools? These are real issues. He didn't say that all black people live like that.

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

"spence said what about syria? fuck that fool, somebody smack that bitch!" Nothing says good leadership like cutting the legs off of your number 2

Hardly the first time a presidential candidate disagreed on an issue with his running mate. Presidents don't always agree with their vice presidents. Obama disagrees with Biden on immigration strategy. I don't see what the big deal is.

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

since "they haven't been reporting..."

Unfortunately, it's true. Plenty saw what was going on and could have prevented what happened in San Bernardino had they reported it.

3   truth will find you   2016 Oct 10, 3:34pm  

turtledove is deplorable says

I didn't get that at all from what he said. I got that he is questioning whether the law was actually followed, something many question. He is saying that when he puts someone in charge of the investigation

that would be a historic misuse of the presidency. If you knew your history, or how the government functions, you'd know this. A PRESIDENT would say, "while I disagree with this last result, it is time to move on to the issues of the country." Nixon tried influencing his attorney generals vis a vis special prosecutors, and two of them in a row resigned. turtledove is deplorable says

Only because he bitched. Had he not, they would have allowed Hillary the last word at every turn.

pure conjecture and rationalization on your part; He wasn't behind in terms of time by any real amount, ever during the debate. He looked like a bitchy whiner doing it. Just like you look trying to excuse it here.

turtledove is deplorable says

The moderators asked him follow-up questions throughout. They did not do the same for Hillary.

Hillary answered the questions that were asked, Trump never did. Even on follow up, he flat out refused to answer the asked question. AND this puts to rest your stupid theory above, that he wasn't getting equal time without crying for it. a follow up question by definition gives a debater more time.

turtledove is deplorable says

Hardly the first time a presidential candidate disagreed on an issue with his running mate. Presidents don't always agree with their vice presidents.

are you kidding? of course they can disagree, but you don't hear one just flat out bitch slap the other one!

turtledove is deplorable says

Unfortunately, it's true. Plenty saw what was going on and could have prevented what happened in San Bernardino had they reported it.

you are a racist/ bigoted dumbfuck then, just like trump. There is zero evidence that anyone ever saw any bomb making stuff. And in actual fact, many times the leads that stop attacks come from muslims, as just happened in europe, and as started the informaiton trail that lead to bin laden's death.

It is easier and easier to see how you support trump with your rather poor thinking and clearly bigoted world view.

4   zzyzzx   2016 Oct 10, 3:53pm  

Which filthy third world country will you be deported to once Trump gets elected?

5   truth will find you   2016 Oct 10, 4:04pm  

Ironman says

"At Farook’s mother’s house, however, neighbor Aaron Elswick recalled another neighbor noticing “quite a few packages” arriving “within a short amount of time.”

packages? FFS, that must mean bombs! It isn't like there's a company called amazon that will sell everything including groceries!

I've had 30 packages from amazon delivered to myself in the past 2 months. I better report myself! buhdist terrorists!

6   truth will find you   2016 Oct 10, 4:05pm  

truth will find you says

Ironman says

"At Farook’s mother’s house, however, neighbor Aaron Elswick recalled another neighbor noticing “quite a few packages” arriving “within a short amount of time.”

packages? FFS, that must mean bombs! It isn't like there's a company called amazon that will sell everything including groceries and ship them in packages!

I've had 30 packages from amazon delivered to myself in the past 2 months. I better report myself! Buddhist terrorists!

7   turtledove   2016 Oct 10, 4:10pm  

truth will find you says

that would be a historic misuse of the presidency. If you knew your history, or how the government functions, you'd know this.

So who do you think appoints the FBI director and nominates the US attorney general?

truth will find you says

pure conjecture and rationalization on your part;

No more so than your assertion that it had no impact on his allotted time.

truth will find you says

Hillary answered the questions that were asked,

And since she was asked so few follow-up questions, that makes it super easy to achieve.

truth will find you says

of course they can disagree, but you don't hear one just flat out bitch slap the other one!

It was hardly a bitch slap.

truth will find you says

There is zero evidence that anyone ever saw any bomb making stuff.

That just isn't true. Calling me names doesn't change that.

8   bob2356   2016 Oct 10, 4:50pm  

turtledove is deplorable says

truth will find you says

pure conjecture and rationalization on your part;

No more so than your assertion that it had no impact on his allotted time.

truth will find you says

Hillary answered the questions that were asked,

And since she was asked so few follow-up questions, that makes it super easy to achieve.

That's a contradiction, not that you are going to admit it. Trump got asked too many questions so he didn't get enough time to speak. Think about it.

9   truth will find you   2016 Oct 10, 4:53pm  

turtledove is deplorable says

There is zero evidence that anyone ever saw any bomb making stuff.

That just isn't true. Calling me names doesn't change that.

you deserve the names, for stating WITHOUT BASIS that muslims saw bomb making material.

debunked, over and over. use google you dumb bigot:
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-trump-debate-san-bernardino-20161009-snap-story.html

exactly one person who knew, and he called himself in immediately. he had been a co-conspirator on a prior plot, so that hardly makes him some random muslim who failed to notify, when he is actually a potential terrorist himself, and was arrested.

10   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 10, 6:50pm  

bob2356 says

truth will find you says

Hillary answered the questions that were asked,

And since she was asked so few follow-up questions, that makes it super easy to achieve.

That's a contradiction, not that you are going to admit it. Trump got asked too many questions so he didn't get enough time to speak. Think about it.

Not only is it a contradiction but it is an outright obliteration of the modes of time: the lack of something which would condition a thing that precedes it cannot be called upon as blame for the thing. It's rewarding to watch bias (in this case, Republicans') mess with objective reality.

11   Rew   2016 Oct 10, 6:57pm  

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

4. Literally attacked the moderators after the FIRST QUESTION, for being unfair to him... seriously, pussygroper, shut up!

He is running an ineffective add on this now.
www.youtube.com/embed/N5kp3WYniRQ

12   turtledove   2016 Oct 10, 7:25pm  

These two are just impossible to talk to. They aren't even trying to listen to another perspective. It's nothing but immature name calling.... and a complete waste of time.

As for Bob's comment. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by a contradiction. She was asked only around two or three follow-up questions. So to say that she answered all follow-up questions is misleading. Trump was asked many, many more. So, it's comparing apples to oranges. Now how you got a contradiction out of that statement is beyond me. Or are you saying that the fact that he called them out when they tried to cut him off to make sure that he got the same time to answer a question as Hillary was given is the contradiction? I don't think that either has anything to do with the other. One was responding to the comment that Trump was bitching that he wasn't being given the same amount of time, followed by the calculation that he got as much time as Hillary. I said that's because he called them out on it whenever they tried to cut him off. Again, I'm not sure where this contradiction is. The other was to say that Trump was asked many more follow-up questions than Hillary. As if the moderators were debating Trump. So perhaps there are three of you who are just impossible to talk to... Unless you can give me more than "contradiction."

To the other two of you... If I might make a suggestion. I tell my kids this all the time. Instead of focusing all your attention on YOUR next point, instead try listening to what the other person is trying to say. We're not all idiots. Try to put yourself in the other person's shoes and figure out why the person is saying what he/she is saying. There is value in alternative opinions even if you disagree with them. But you're so focused on your very own point that you just shut down completely when anyone else has something to say. You really are doing yourselves a disservice at understanding other human beings. But the name calling is really sad. I have no interest in it. Feel free to spend the rest of the evening congratulating yourselves on your respective genius on all topics. Don't let reality get in the way. And know... from the bottom of my heart, what you think of me couldn't possibly mean any less. If name calling is the only way you can make yourself feel important, have at it. But it adds nothing.

13   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 10, 7:31pm  

I thought trump was completely avoiding the moderators in the beginning, so they called him out on it. He looked like an idiot whining about time. He got more time in each of the first two debates. He should get docked time for interrupting. He did better as they moved beyond the pussy grabbing sexual assault questions.

14   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 10, 7:36pm  

1, 3, and 7 are his whole personality. He will always do that. 4 and 5 also seem pretty normal for him. 2 was a mistake, but in his trump bubble, it must seem pretty normal. The rabid base wants it. 8 is interesting. He had to either do that or just say that they all wanted it. It was really good only option, I think. TYT says that women have already been coming forward. I'm sure MSM will pick it up if / when credible.

15   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 10, 8:01pm  

turtledove is deplorable says

As for Bob's comment. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by a contradiction. She was asked only around two or three follow-up questions. So to say that she answered all follow-up questions is misleading. Trump was asked many, many more. So, it's comparing apples to oranges. Now how you got a contradiction out of that statement is beyond me.

I don't know if you are including me in one of the two you refer to, but wrt bob's comment, although he is more than capable of answering of himself, I'll take a stab: You may not like it but Clinton's answers were such that they didn't warrant follow-ups. Trump's train-of-consciousness, thorazine drivel made the moderators hold him to actually answering the questions. How many times did Cooper have to follow-up if Trump meant he had actually done the "grabbing"? Someone who has such disrespect for speech is going to get more follow-ups. It reflects the quality of his speech, not the bias of the moderators. Not everything is a conspiracy rigged against Trump. Most of it is just him being deficient.

16   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 10, 8:45pm  

As for number 6, why have he and pence not spoken about Syria? Wtf do they talk about? That seems really weird, and I don't know why it hasn't gotten any attention.

17   Rew   2016 Oct 10, 8:49pm  

YesYNot MAPGA says

As for number 6, why have he and pence not spoken about Syria? Wtf do they talk about?

It must be the typical locker room stuff we all engage in, right?

18   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 10, 8:53pm  

Rew says

It must be the typical locker room stuff we all engage in, right?

Well, you do have to prepare for the office, and there is going to be a lot of pussy coming through those doors. Can you imagine the redecorating?

19   15c5   2016 Oct 10, 10:01pm  

turtledove is deplorable says

I tell my kids this all the time. Instead of focusing all your attention on YOUR next point, instead try listening to what the other person is trying to say. We're not all idiots.

This from someone who claims that "muslims saw the bomb materials" then is too lazy to read links proving otherwise.... Do you tell your kids it is ok to just make shit up if it supports your preconceived bigotry too?

20   marcus   2016 Oct 10, 10:38pm  

zzyzzx is deplorable says

Which filthy third world country will you be deported to once Trump gets elected?

No surprise here.

Deplorable indeed.

21   marcus   2016 Oct 10, 10:42pm  

YesYNot MAPGA says

He got more time in each of the first two debates. He should get docked time for interrupting.

Yep. But let's not let what happened and is easy to prove get in the way of the Brietbart (Trump campaign's) narrative.

22   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 13, 8:02am  

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

8. Left himself very exposed on his reply to "I grope pussy on whoever the fuck I want" quote. When he said, "I have never actually done that, it is locker talk" well, if ONE PERSON comes forward and refutes this, claiming he groped her without consent, you've got the headlines for the next two weeks, the act, the quote, and lying....

@Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses You grabbed the bull by the pussy with this one. It's funny how Clinton focuses on how moments from the debate will or can be used in the following weeks. Trump doesn't seem to put any thought into that.

23   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 8:08am  

YesYNot MAPGA says

Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses says

8. Left himself very exposed on his reply to "I grope pussy on whoever the fuck I want" quote. When he said, "I have never actually done that, it is locker talk" well, if ONE PERSON comes forward and refutes this, claiming he groped her without consent, you've got the headlines for the next two weeks, the act, the quote, and lying....

@Sharingmyintelligencewiththedumbasses You grabbed the bull by the pussy with this one. It's funny how Clinton focuses on how moments from the debate will or can be used in the following weeks. Trump doesn't seem to put any thought into that.

He operates solely in real time. He has no reflective anticipation. He lives entirely in the moment, which is only part of his lousy impulse control. He's a constant trainwreck. And a ripened douche.

24   Shaman   2016 Oct 13, 8:35am  

Trump won the debate and he's about to win the Presidency. Get over it.

25   Shaman   2016 Oct 13, 8:37am  

Also, since I know you'll just say I'm biased, I freely admitted that Hillary won the last debate, and I posted such right away! Unlike some people, I can be objective about things even when I have opinions and a bias.

https://patrick.net/?p=1296196&c=1327778#comment-1327778

26   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 13, 8:47am  

We can all be objective. I originally thought that Trump won too. But the polls showed that people didn't like him as much as I thought they would. Furthermore, as sharing pointed out, he set himself up for the cascade of accusations that followed.
https://patrick.net/?p=1296828&c=1332734#comment-1332734

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions