6
0

CNN this morning


 invite response                
2016 Oct 13, 9:08am   9,816 views  45 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (12)   💰tip   ignore  

Again, this morning.

* Nothing about Needy Latinos
* Nothing about the Catholic Bashing by Hillary Aides
* Nothing about Clinton's staff joke about their own lack of diversity.
* Nothing about discussing how much Algeria needs to pay to the Clintons to get off a Terror State List.
* Nothing about Saudis giving CF $1M for Bill's Birthday

Instead:

* King Bimbul of Thailand Dying
* Cyndi Lauper endorsing Hillary
* Grope Story
* Russia's role in the Election (but NOTHING on the Podesta leaks)
* A picture of a mountain valley
* Bob Dylan Nobel Prize

Not even in the sidebar.

Comments 1 - 40 of 45       Last »     Search these comments

1   Tenpoundbass   2016 Oct 13, 9:18am  

You notice the bald face lies about Trump from yesterday are missing because they are infact baseless and Trump can pretty much sue the whole Journalism market and win.
Trump could be ten times bigger than the Hearsts and Murdoch combined if he sued all of those news outlets that broke journalism rules and opened them selves up for liable littigation.

CNN is freaking MUM on Trump kissing people today.

Gee I wonder why that is?

2   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 9:42am  

CNN either recently updated, or they are tailoring front pages to viewers ... as this is what I see ...

3   joshuatrio   2016 Oct 13, 9:58am  

Wow. Just when you think libs couldn't get any lower. They pander this bullshit 24/7. Talk about bigots.

4   Tenpoundbass   2016 Oct 13, 10:05am  

Rew says

as this is what I see

It's back to reporting. Yesterday it was opinion and jourlanist convictions more like accusation pieces than reporting.

"He was like an Octopus" will be a hit song by the end of the week. And everyone will know where she lifted the lyrics for the song she was singing.

5   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 13, 10:15am  

I love how you cry babies just want to blame the messenger instead of focusing on the story. Don't you always hate it when the Clinton campaign does that? Don't you know that Donny blaming everybody else instead of showing any contrition is what brought this shit-storm on?

The fact that Bannon has been taken Conway's leadership role shows that this is now about the coming media empire rather than a political campaign.

6   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 10:44am  

Wikileaks HEROIC revelations about Bush!
Wikileaks HEROIC revelations about Banks!
Wikileaks RUSSIAN AGENT for revelations about Hillary!

NYT HEROIC for leaking Pentagon Papers!
NYT HEROIC for leaking 1995 Trump Tax Returns!
Wikileaks CRIMINAL for leaking DNC Anti-Bernie Plotting!

7   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 13, 11:06am  

^ yeah - Clinton loved Assange prior to 2016. You really nailed it lips.

Are you really equating someone in Trump tower sending a copy of his tax returns to the times with Russia hacking into one party's servers? Would you really be equating these if you didn't have a horse in the game?

The concept of a Wikileaks can be good. But it would be much more credible if 1. He was getting info from whistleblowers instead of gov't spies, and 2. They didn't drop all of said information a month before an election.

The timing is like this Billy Bush thing - totally fishy. Even Joe Scarborough who has nothing good to say about Trump these days is pointing that out. So, the Billy Bush tape and Wikileaks are well timed political attacks, and should be treated as such. Since these October surprises are pretty routine and expected, I guess the campaigns should have gotten all of their policy talk out by now, because from here to the election promises to be a circus.

If Wikileaks drops something big and it is confirmed, I'll take it seriously rather than disregarding it. But, I'll be more wary of it considering the obvious motivations of the source. My bet is that there is no bombshell. There are a lot of people making money off of clicks. Dropping hints of the other shoe dropping is mostly just an attempt to get more clicks, get more attention, or whatever.

8   Heraclitusstudent   2016 Oct 13, 11:12am  

Found in business headlines this morning, this really important business story:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trumps-scottish-golf-courses-post-more-losses-150952441--finance.html?ref=gs

9   turtledove   2016 Oct 13, 11:15am  

Nothing about...

according to former Clinton insider Larry Nichols, Hillary came running into the Clinton HQ and said, “You won’t believe what the motherf___r [Bill] just did. He tried to rape some bitch!”

Read more: http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/every-clinton-sex-assault-victim/#ixzz4MzSXbQdH

10   15c5   2016 Oct 13, 11:19am  

It is absolutely hilarious watching Trump backers try and rationalize what's going on. Your candidate is going down in flames and you're looking for everyone to blame except where the blame belongs on your worthless candidate

11   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 11:21am  

YesYNot MAPGA says

^ yeah - Clinton loved Assange prior to 2016. You really nailed it lips.

No, the Media loved Assange, for the most part (except when he touched to much upon Oligarchs like Octopuses, whose tentacles spread all over the word, including Mass Media).

Just like the Media constantly refers to McCarthyism as a bad thing, then does it themselves over Wikileaks, Guccifer, and anybody else who comes out with leaks unfavorable to Hillary.

12   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 13, 11:59am  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

Just like the Media constantly refers to McCarthyism as a bad thing, then does it themselves over Wikileaks, Guccifer, and anybody else who comes out with leaks unfavorable to Hillary.

I had the radio on yesterday, and they were discussing the leaks. The conclusion was that most of it is about what you would expect from a campaign. It's interesting, but not scandalous. You may disagree, but that's my conclusion based on what you've posted about the leaks. I don't go looking through them myself, but I do look at the leaks you've been highlighting.

What is going on right now with Trump's words and the women coming out is basically a national discussion on how women should be treated in the workplace as well as in a dating situation. A lot has changed on that front since 1992. I heard people debating whether Bill would have been elected in 1992 had social media been around. Social media is not the big important change. It's how men and women are expected to interact that has changed. I think that Trump dismissing it as locker-room talk without explaining what he meant and what about it is locker-room talk is really driving the continued questions.
Bragging about sexual conquests certainly falls under what I would call locker-room talk or guy talk. IMO most guys outgrow it when they become comfortable with their sexuality and place in the world - usually in their 20s. But Trump wasn't really bragging about his conquests. He was bragging about being sexually aggressive and getting away with it. Trump's words could have been taken in a number of ways. 'They let you get away with it' might mean that they might be offended, but aren't going to take it to the police or sue you if you are famous. It might also mean that they all want it if you are famous. Neither of those explanations would have played well, IMO, but he didn't even explain what he meant. That's been one of my complaints with his campaign from day one. So, people are likely to interpret it in various ways. That's really Trump's fault.

13   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 12:23pm  

Trump, "I will not allow the Clinton machine to turn our campaign into a discussion of their slanders and lies."

Translation: "It should be a discussion about my slanders and lies against them."

Camp Clinton is immune on this battleground of sex scandals and the treatment of women. Those that think Bill or emails matter have already made up thier mind. Trump, go for a policy battle! You can do it! Go for the high ground ... (laughing my butt off)

14   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 12:28pm  

TDove, Roger Stone and Robert Morrows don't have any pretense of credible political nuetrality at all. They aren't reporters. They are GOP strategists.

Edit: see post above on Trump comments. (Wink)

15   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 7:57pm  

http://www.slate.com/articles/video/video/2016/10/fox_news_didn_t_air_michelle_obama_s_trump_speech_video.html

"Fox News has a habit of ignoring memorable speeches critical of Republican nominee Donald Trump. The network infamously skipped Gold Star father Khizr Khan’s rebuke of Trump at the Democratic National Convention. And today, it chose not to cut to Michelle Obama’s powerful speech from New Hampshire, in which she offered a scathing and personal critique of Trump’s remarks about women and the growing list of sexual assault allegations against him."

When FLOTUS had the audacity to be a "black vagina talking" check out what Fox was covering.

17   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 8:47pm  

Rew says

CNN either recently updated, or they are tailoring front pages to viewers ... as this is what I see ...

I still don't see any Wikileaks articles.

If Manafort, Conway, or Cohen had leaked emails that had just one of : Catholic Spring, Needy Latinos, Supprting TPP Draft Letter (in early 2015), "Didn't come off like a bitch this time", almost exact wording of a debate question, tricking former Nominee opponent with token superficial Superdelegate Reform, top aides worried her attitudes about ordinary Americans will be revealed, etc. --- it would be CNN.Com top headline for a week - each and any, not necessarily all of them.

In Brazil, all the Media was all for getting rid of Rouseff and replacing her with a guy under investigation, because he was "One of Them".

18   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 8:52pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

I still don't see any

articles about the bicycle at the bottom of the Mariana trench. Don't these people know what matters to real Americans?

19   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 8:53pm  

Oh, and Bill Richardson is a "Dick".

"Trump leaked emails call HISPANIC GOVERNOR a NEEDY LATINO and a NAUGHTY WORD!!! UNQUALIFIED. Week-long story begins today, with coverage every 5 minutes. Let's go to Wolf in the Situation Room."

Shit, if Melania Trump called people "Rednecks" at an official campaign Stump like Bill Clinton just did, that would probably be headline news for days.

20   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 8:57pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

NEEDY LATINO

It's "Needy Latina" don't you know they throw themselves at the #Douchebag even when they're 74.

21   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 8:57pm  

Cognitive Dissonance is a pain.

22   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 8:57pm  

neplusultra57 says

When FLOTUS had the audacity to be a "black vagina talking" check out what Fox was covering.

Newt and a lot of legs. Just me, or is that juxtaposition kind of creepy?

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

I still don't see any Wikileaks articles.

That's because there is no news there. "Oh look, a politician was a politician." I haven't seen any #damningEvidence from the emails at all. Wikileaks = the last desperate ploy of Russia and Brietbart to spin unwanted attention away from the Trum-plosion.

She didin-doo-nuttin'.

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

If Manafort, Conway, or Cohen had leaked emails that had just one of : Catholic Spring, Needy Latinos, Supprting TPP Draft Letter (in early 2015), "Didn't come off like a bitch this time", almost exact wording of a debate question, tricking former Nominee opponent with token superficial Superdelegate Reform, top aides worried her attitudes about ordinary Americans will be revealed, etc. --- it would be CNN.Com top headline for a week - each and any, not necessarily all of them.

In Brazil, all the Media was all for getting rid of Rouseff and replacing her with a guy under investigation, because he was "One of Them".

Mother of incoherent babble. Calm down. Breathe. Trump is going to lose, but it's ok. You will still go on. The sun will still rise.

23   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 8:58pm  

Rew says

Mother of incoherent babble. Calm down. Breathe. Trump is going to lose, but it's ok. You will still go on. The sun will still rise.

Note the "Babble" and "It's Ok" tell for Cognitive Dissonance.

24   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 8:59pm  

Hitlary Ãœber Alles

25   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 8:59pm  

Let me try this again.

Melania Trump goes on a stump speech and calls Hillary supporters "Dumb Negroes". Media decides it's not worth covering. Yeah, right!!!

26   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 9:00pm  

Link me where Hillary has said such a thing.

27   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 9:05pm  

Rew says

Link me where Hillary has said such a thing.

Exactly my point.

Less than 48 hours ago, Bill Clinton called Trump supporters "Rednecks" in a stump speech for his wife, the Presidential Candidate. Can't get any closer than a spouse.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/12/bill-clinton-donald-trump-base-is-your-standard-re/

This morning MSNBC (we already have CNN). No mention of Bill calling Trump supporters "Rednecks".

I guess the everybody at most of the major networks and outlets has decided for America what's important. That's called pushing a narrative, not reporting the news.

But Bill's speech isn't "Needy Latinos" "We need a Catholic Spring" "Bill Richardson is a dick" "She didn't come off as a bitch this time" "She doesn't want to apologize (again)" "Here is a draft letter Hillary will need to have when she announces her pro-TPP platform (in March 2015)" "Please support reinstating Glass Steagal" "Bernie has $35M reasons why Hillary is tied to Wall Street" "Boy, we sure fooled Bernie after he endorsed Her on the Superdelegates!" "I've burned all bridges by keeping Biden out, but happy to be on the HRC team"

28   Patrick   2016 Oct 13, 9:22pm  

OK, then the mainstream media is severely biased, right?

29   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 9:22pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

Let me try this again.

Melania Trump goes on a stump speech and calls Hillary supporters "Dumb Negroes". Media decides it's not worth covering. Yeah, right!!!

Or not, because you look the fool: Someone who didn't do something theoretically does something she didn't do and someone else that didn't do something actually theoretically and yet a third party that wasn't involved in either of the other two non-events didn't do yet another thing that should have been important to the party making all of this up....and this is supposed to illustrate how other people suffer from cognitive dissonance? How do you get up in the morning?

30   OneTwo   2016 Oct 13, 9:29pm  

rando says

OK, then the mainstream media is severely biased, right?

Severely? That obviously depends on your outlook. They are more biased than the likes of the BBC, but people in this day and age are free to pick and choose their bite-sized pieces of (self-reinforcing) news information as they see fit, so if they want to be less well informed, then that is their choice.

31   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Oct 13, 9:33pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

No mention of Bill calling Trump supporters "Rednecks"...
Melania Trump goes on a stump speech and calls Hillary supporters "Dumb Negroes".

Well, he did call himself a redneck, so if you were really under the mistaken impression that 'redneck' is the equivalent of 'nigger', it would be sort of like a black person calling another black person 'my nigga'.
Has CNN been dogging Melania yet for threatening (with a lawsuit) Trump's accusers? Maybe they'll go there at some point, but they seem pretty much hands off with Melania. They didn't slam her too hard for potentially coming here illegally, for faking her college degree, for plagiarizing Michelle O's speech, for obviously marrying an old fatty with droopy balls for the money, etc.

32   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 9:35pm  

rando says

OK, then the mainstream media is severely biased, right?

All media sources are biased, some more severely, than others. You cannot just wave away sites like AP and RealClearPolitics as unbalanced though. On the whole they do a pretty good job. Anything with a TV voice these days is far more news-u-tainment than news though.

The problem I have is the right doesn't get to hold up Fox and Breitbart as a counter to perceived imbalance. That's not a justification for blatant spin.

33   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 9:45pm  

neplusultra57 says

Or not, because you look the fool: Someone who didn't do something theoretically does something she didn't do and someone else that didn't do something actually theoretically and yet a third party that wasn't involved in either of the other two non-events didn't do yet another thing that should have been important to the party making all of this up....and this is supposed to illustrate how other people suffer from cognitive dissonance? How do you get up in the morning?

Not at all. If Jesse Jackson got up and said "They're niggers. I grew up with niggers. I am a nigger, blah blah blah so vote for one of my kids."

It would be ridiculously newsworthy. "Jesse Jackson called himself and the people he grew up with niggers! Does he have self-respect? Is this okay in a Black leader?"

It's extremely newsworthy for Hillary's top aides to say Catholics (who have always leaned democratic and still do) need a "Catholic Spring" or that "Bill Richardson is a Dick" or "We tricked Sanders with the Delegates, he thought he would get something for his endorsement, hahaha".

The Oligarch (Jeff Bezos, Carlos Slim) owned Media is taking sides, just like the Media takes sides in Brazil and other Banana Republics to make sure "One of theirs" gets in and outsiders stay the hell away from the reigns of power.

What's the evidence that these Trump Accusers have for their years or decades old assertions?

"What is submitted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." So why isn't the media dismissing these stories? Remember the last few times the media went apeshit over rape allegations: Duke LaCrosse, UVA, Tawana Brawley.

PS I'm glad you guys aren't playing the "Altered" Card. Hillary already admitted the emails were stolen in the debates, and none of her Campaign Bigwigs have said they are fake.

34   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Oct 13, 9:47pm  

One last question for the night - I'll check in the morning.

If Hillary lashed out at Negroes with profanity, would you still vote for her?

35   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 9:49pm  

rando says

OK, then the mainstream media is severely biased, right?

Define mainstream such that it matters over and above the entire constellation of web news. Sooner or later you should admit "mainstream media" is a PC cop out for not wanting to say plainly that other people are full of shit and why. You're not oppressed by MSM any more than I am or anyone your age or anyone with a friggin' smart phone so why should anyone else be? It's as if the all powerful "MSM" forces you to type in every website you ever visit. OMG! Mainstream non-fiction is preventing me from learning history from more than one source. Tap water is "mainstream" water? Who knew! I guess that's why no one is aware of bottled water and even if they were wouldn't be able to understand what it is.

36   anonymous   2016 Oct 13, 9:49pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

If Hillary lashed out at Negroes with profanity, would you still vote for her?

of course, they'd vote for any vagina just like they voted for any black skinned guy. you know, the important traits regarding leadership.

37   neplusultra57   2016 Oct 13, 10:08pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

If

the #Douchebag said on tape he enjoyed beating mothers as they nursed their babies and Breitbart didn't mention it what would that say about Bannon's ex-wife? There's no proof she didn't know about it and she's already falsely claimed Bannon beat her. She's never been asked about it so how can she be trusted not to have been involved? You'll never hear this on the biased MSM will you? Why isn't the MSM investigating Bannon's ex? This is what they do, time and time again: blaming the victim without any proof. 1) The #DoucheBag didn't beat those mothers, and 2) he wasn't lying about beating them either. He doesn't lie and he doesn't beat nursing mothers, and there is no proof of either so it can only mean that Bannon's wife is lying.

38   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 10:22pm  

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

If Hillary lashed out at Negroes with profanity, would you still vote for her?

www.youtube.com/embed/QsRYhmm4TtI

39   Rew   2016 Oct 13, 10:25pm  

landtof says

any vagina just like they voted for any black skinned guy

(sigh) ... That's right. I've never voted for a white male, ever, in my lifetime. Trump may die on the battlefield over women's issues, but Clinton isn't going into the office because of her sex.

40   OneTwo   2016 Oct 13, 10:33pm  

Rew says

Thunderlips Russian Agent 0069 says

If Hillary lashed out at Negroes with profanity, would you still vote for her?

www.youtube.com/embed/QsRYhmm4TtI

Infowars... 4chan poster claims... You may as well post up a claim from someone on here for all the validity your link has. Why not wait till something is actually released and then compare it to what Trump says day after day before posting up what ifs?

Comments 1 - 40 of 45       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions