patrick.net

That was literally a half-truth.

Ok we now have liar CNN, Liar Wolf Blitzer, Liar Radditz, and now Liar Chuck Todd.

Who else should be labeled to identify their deceitfullness? These people should have it tattooed on their forehead to warn the American public.

I would be honored if you all would use patrick.net as a way to call out the continuous deceit, divisiveness, and fear mongering in the corporate press.

So, why wouldn't Priebus rule it out? Why say we won't rule it out, then immediately after say we're not going to do it?

Which one is a lie? If he's decided he's not going to do it--isn't that ruling it out?

This isn't a Muslim country and they have not show any respect for this country. And they attack the very fabric of American culture. The Muslim community at large has been a failure in putting a spokes person to mitigate the damage to their image that Imams and radical vocal leaders in the Muslim community does to their image. They are more worried about upsetting those in Islam that hate the West and want to destroy it, than they are about reassuring the World that they really are a religion of peace.

So fuck them!

rando says

That was literally a half-truth.

You need a Politico Fact grading system. For a Lie by Omission such as this, I'd say MOSTLY BULLSHIT

I'll answer my own question. The reason he wouldn't rule it out is because he wants to leave open the possibility that they WILL do it in the future. That is the only reason to answer the question as he did.

So CNN is, in fact, completely correct to report it the way they did based on the answer Priebus gave. Priebus absolutely caused this. And I'm sure he did it on purpose.