Comments 1 - 8 of 8 Search these comments
Your reading comprehension needs work. Some out of work Trump U personnel should be able to help. They might even get you a deal on some steak.
Shut up Libby, WaPoo said Hillary was running on Change and Trump was a Risk. People went with Risk.
WaPo said that Trump was running on Change. Clinton emphasized the risk associated with Trump. She was rebranding his change as risk. WaPo said that people picked Change despite the risk. You seriously need help with reading comprehension.
Here are some quotes:
What's fascinating is that the Clinton campaign (or Grunwald, at least) didn't misread the electorate as conventional wisdom over the past six days has suggested. She understood that it was a change-vs.-more-of-the-same dynamic — and that the desire for change was very, very strong.
Why did Clinton lose, then? Because no one understood just how much people wanted change and how big a risk they were willing to take to put someone way outside of the political system into the White House.
...
That's what happened to the Clinton campaign. It was based on the old rules of the road. If your opponent is the change candidate, turn that change against him. Rather than refreshing change, turn it into dangerous change.
That all happened. And Trump still won.
WaPo is even saying that Clinton herself didn't really try to fight the narrative that Trump represented change. She just tried to rebrand it. Bill Clinton did try to brand Hillary as a change agent, but that didn't stick, and it was not used by the campaign.
Since IHLlary was not elected, I miss the the sight of IHLs thumping baseball bats in their palms outside of every government office.
Hillary was running on Change at the end of her campaign. Do we need to go to the debate video?
Do we need to go to the debate video?
Why don't you just find out where the WaPo article said that Hillary was an agent of change? That is your title after all and the reason that I'm pointing out your lack of reading comprehension skills.
You don't seem to get this worried, that the report is not accurate, when WaPo spreads lies and misinformation about Trump.
Trump IS lies and misinformation. If the WaPo reports that, it is textbook accuracy - to take a phrase out of Paul Ryan's mouth.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/14/one-of-hillary-clintons-top-aides-nailed-exactly-why-she-lost/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_1_na&utm_term=.0344f5d1fa7a