South Carolina Bill Would Block Porn, Charge Fee For Access
invite response
2016 Dec 19, 3:31pm 7,497 views 29 comments
Comments 1 - 29 of 29 Search these comments
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2016 Dec 19, 3:33pm
Pay the $20 or if you live in the majority of the state that is a 30 mile or less drive from the next state over, buy it there.
FuckTheMainstreamMedia
2016 Dec 19, 3:34pm
Btw I'm against this law as it's a freedom of speech issue. I'm merely pointing out what the worst case scenario really is.
lostand confused
2016 Dec 19, 4:00pm
Sometimes republicans-sigh-I wouldn't be surprised if this dude is caught with porn on his laptop.
Another tax on consumers. Excuse me! A fee. Wonder how their state budget is doing?
I can't do all the research.
Braindead Republicans will gladly pay.
" all computers, tablets and smartphones " companies,BOYCOTT this slime.
S.C.knows porn.Republicans continue fucking america
by voting for a 5 TIME DRAFT DODGING COWARD.
Come on you fucking trump voters defend this coward
while many of my friends were injured & killed while silver spooned
slime hide in the shadows shaking in fear.
Too bad the list doesn't show Redneck White Trash S.C. Christian Republican visits.
http://www.dailydot.com/irl/pornhub-data-usage-duration-search-interactive-map/
Hey--as long as Starbucks is forced to write "Merry Christmas" on their cups, I don't care if the government decides which Internet sites I can visit.
That's the real free speech issue.
Strategist
2016 Dec 19, 4:14pm
I don't care if the government decides which Internet sites I can visit.
Communism.
Hey--as long as Starbucks is forced to write "Merry Christmas" on their cups, I don't care if the government decides which Internet sites I can visit.
Right wing CHRISTIAN SHARIA LAW.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 19, 5:02pm
A new bill in South Carolina would require all computers, tablets and smartphones sold in the state to come with a porn filter installed and demand device owners to pay a $20 fee to remove the content blocker.
Sounds like it
1. Violates the First Amendment.
2. Violates the interstate commerce clause.
3. Is just begging hackers on all the world to install massive porn portals on every single computer in South Carolina.
The solution is for the federal government to require, by law, that all computers, tablets, and smartphones sold in South Carolina to require a filter that blocks Christian content and requires that device owners pay a $20 fee to remove that content blocker. Turn around is fair play.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 19, 10:00pm
Dan's lucky he doesn't live in SC.
He'd be broke....
Only a dumb old shit like CIC would think that anyone pays for porn nowadays. Hey CIC, your wife gives it away for free.
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
Why not just pass a law requiring all females to suck off every guy they see?
Heard a joke today.
If abortion is murder,a blowjob is cannablism!
Not surprising. Prostitution and churches are the top two businesses at risk in SC.
Y
2016 Dec 20, 6:33am
Abolish the "you must bake the queer cake" amendment, and we will permit you to enjoy a "Merry Whatever" cup of java...
Even trade.
Hey--as long as Starbucks is forced to write "Merry Christmas" on their cups,
"Abolish the "you must bake the queer cake" amendment, and we will permit you to enjoy a "Merry Whatever" cup of java...
Even trade."
I didn't know cakes had sexual preferences.
while many of my friends were injured & killed while silver spooned
slime hide in the shadows shaking in fear
sorry about your friends but 'silver spooned slime' abound on both sides of aisle and there is no shortage of chicken hawks in the democratic party of today. Like Obama and Clinton. I don't see their kids signing up for the military, nor the kids of many of their supporters.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 20, 7:54am
Abolish the "you must bake the queer cake" amendment, and we will permit you to enjoy a "Merry Whatever" cup of java...
Even trade.
The cost of using public business resources like land zoned commercial is serving the entire community, not just what political and social subsets you want to serve. The reason businesses cannot simply refuse service to gays is the exact same reason they cannot refuse service to blacks, women, or any other minority. If a business sets up shop, it prevents other businesses from setting up shop. This means that businesses that refuse to service some people prevent those people from conducting the business at all with anyone.
Think about it this way. There are a lot of Jewish bankers. Imagine if all the banks simply refused to let Christians open accounts because doing so went against the banker's religious beliefs. After all, Christians betrayed and persecuted the chosen people and their false religion distracts from Yahweh's real message of redemption and coming savior. Now imagine if all the Christians were at a severe financial disadvantage because they couldn't get bank accounts. As a result, they can't trade stocks, open IRAs, or make any of the investments controlled by the Jewish-dominated financial industry. I suspect that Christians wouldn't be OK with this "religious freedom".
Calls to let bigots run businesses that discriminate against other groups are hypocritical. Plain and simple.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 20, 7:55am
"Abolish the "you must bake the queer cake" amendment, and we will permit you to enjoy a "Merry Whatever" cup of java...
Even trade."
Use the PatNet quote feature or people have no idea who you are quoting.
It was the post directly above mine. I would think you could sort that one out.
Unfortunately I can't use the quote feature.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 20, 8:13am
It was the post directly above mine. I would think you could sort that one out.
Not when the person you are quoting is being "ignored" by me. Unfortunately, PatNet doesn't display the posts of such users. What I really want is just a "ban from my threads" feature, not an ignore feature.
Unfortunately I can't use the quote feature.
Send a message to @Patrick. If there is a bug, he'll want to know.
How are you trying to use the quote feature? You should select the text you want to quote and then click the Quote link. It requires JavaScript, but it works on all major browsers.
If it doesn't work for you, check if there is an error message in the JavaScript console.
"Not when the person you are quoting is being "ignored" by me. Unfortunately, PatNet doesn't display the posts of such users. What I really want is just a "ban from my threads" feature, not an ignore feature."
Ah--good point.
He knows about the bug. It's the browser.
NuttBoxer
2016 Dec 20, 8:29am
A new bill in South Carolina would require all computers, tablets and smartphones sold in the state to come with a porn filter installed
Jailbreak/Root/Uninstall
NuttBoxer
2016 Dec 20, 8:32am
Sounds like it
1. Violates the First Amendment.
2. Violates the interstate commerce clause.
You forgot the most important one. It violates property rights.
Dan8267
2016 Dec 20, 8:38am
You forgot the most important one. It violates property rights.
Wow, that says a lot about our differing values. I think free thought and speech are more important than property rights, and the really offense part of this bill is forcing someone else's false and despicable religion onto me. But hey, how does that compare to $20 of property?
Dan8267
2016 Dec 20, 8:41am
Jailbreak/Root/Uninstall
For PCs and laptops this is easy. For Windows tablets is is also easy. For iPhone, Android tablets and smartphones, not so much. Without intercepting and disabling the automatic installation paths at the OS level, you really can't stop spyware and malware from being installed on this platform. Have you ever gotten Facebook and FitBit to permanently stay off your phone even after rooting it? If so, please post the exact steps you took. The exact steps.
georgeliberte
2017 Oct 29, 9:50am
A new bill in South Carolina would require all computers, tablets and smartphones sold in the state to come with a porn filter installed and demand device owners to pay a $20 fee to remove the content blocker.
The bill comes from Republican state Representatives Bill Chumley* and Mike Burns who would like to require manufacturers or sellers to ensure all devices have a digital content filter installed or face a fine.
Both device makers and sellers who don’t want to bother with installing a filter would be able to waive the requirement for a $20 fee for each device. Likewise, the purchasers of these devices equipped with a filter could pay $20 to have the content block lifted—but only after proving they are at least 18 years old.
More: http://www.ibtimes.com/south-carolina-porn-ban-state-proposes-requiring-porn-filter-charing-fee-remove-it-2462763
http://gizmodo.com/proposed-law-would-block-porn-in-south-carolina-unless-1790272091?utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_twitter&utm_source=gizmodo_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
* The same Bill Chumley who stated that the Charleston massacre victims should have been able to take on "one skinny person shooting a gun"
#FirstAmendment #Porn #GOP