patrick.net

Men's rights activists who are less than an 8 can rejoice. We will once again have parity on who gets to decide whether to become parents.

Huh, how does that follow?

Just fish them trailing afterbirth out of the dempsters and mail them in government postage paid boxes to Washington DC. The geniuses will fix it.

YesYNot says

Huh, how does that follow?

MRAs who are 8s and above get sex. They don't want RvW overturned, because it will reduce the amount of sex they get. MRAs are upset that women get to choose whether to become a parent, but men don't get to opt out (of financial responsibility). They claim that this is unfair. If RvW is overturned, women lose too, so all is fair, albeit a lose lose situation. MRAs who are under an 8 don't get much sex so the theory goes. Logically, if someone isn't getting sex, they shouldn't worry about the injustice in reproductive rights, so it shouldn't matter. But people are not logical. Poor people are very concerned that there is no 'death tax,' although they would never pay one. They hope to one day be rich enough for it to matter, and guys who get little to no sex are still holding out hope that their fortunes might change.

There's a benefit to restricting abortion.

STDs.

"Condoms or Bust"