Comments 1 - 40 of 48 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yes, not what I thought. I thought you were going to ask PatNetters to pledge not to promote fake news and alternative facts. Now that would be a good pledge.
Instead of money, this pledge drive is about new users.
Each user can attempt to bring in new users by making more intelligent, well-written, and well thought out posts. This is the most persuasive way to grow a user base on a forum.
Each user can attempt to bring in new users by making more intelligent, well-written, and well thought out posts. This is the most persuasive way to grow a user base on a forum.
Sure, that would be good!
You do realize that the presence of a few trolls prevents exactly that from happening, right?
Maybe you'd get bored without Ironman there.
No. There are more than enough idiots in the world. And I would look forward to the boredom of not having to deal with the problem such idiots create in the real world. That would be a nice boredom. I'd even call it another name: relaxation.
I like most of Dan's posts. He does make thoughtful arguments.
@Ironman you are by far the most negative, snide, and mocking person on the site. You have some good points, but a truly awful personality. Why not just try to feel good will for others and see if you can learn something as well as teach?
You have some good points, but a truly awful personality.
I have yet to see CIC even demonstrate a broken clock being coincidentally right. But yes, his personality is awful. Being himself is both his crime and his punishment.
I quite frankly don't get how dumb a person has to be to think that he's persuading people to his side by being such a despicable wretch. And it's not like he's an intelligent, witty asshole. He's quite dumb, completely uncreative, and has the charisma of an unflushed toilet. He's like if Donald Trump had a nasty, retarded brother who was half chimp.
I don't see why you put up with him.
He does make thoughtful arguments.
People may not like what I say, but everything I write is honest and has some justification to back it up. I never present misinformation, so if you're going to disagree with me either you have your facts wrong or we have different value judgements. In the former case, I will humiliate the opposition. In the later, all I can say is that our values differ. Value judgements may be repugnant, but they cannot be right or wrong. In contrast, facts are.
People like CIC hate people like me because we can expose their lies and hypocrisy so easily. They can't bullshit when we are around.
How about sharing a post with someone?
That's the whole point of this thread.
All I have is spammers I'm in regular contact with. I supose I could send them a bit of links.
but a truly awful personality.
Why, because I refuse to be Politically Correct??
No, because you are malicious and petty, and don't give a damn about the truth or about others. This is a point you demonstrate even in this thread. What's really sad is that you think you are hurting other people with your words when you really are just revealing what a loser you are. No person with a real life or friends would care to upset strangers on the Internet. Loneliness and misery loves company, and you illustrate that every day.
All I have is spammers I'm in regular contact with. I supose I could send them a bit of links.
Lol, sure, maybe patrick.net will pick up some fans in Russia and Moldova.
You do realize that the presence of a few trolls prevents exactly that from happening, right?
Yeah Dan you should really talk... what's that thing about pot and kettle again? Remind me how that line goes?
I pledge to BOYCOTT ALL REPUBLICANS.
Democrats can DIE DUMB. That'll be easy.
You do realize that the presence of a few trolls prevents exactly that from happening, right?
Yeah Dan you should really talk... what's that thing about pot and kettle again?
Oh honey buns, feel free to explain exactly how I am a troll and with examples. Just because I debunk your lies does not make me a troll. A troll disrupts conversations and derails the debate of central points. I do the exact opposite. I attack the central ideas of my opponents and expose why they are wrong.
But hey, prove me wrong. Show a single example in my 25,594 and climbing comments where I even attempted to disrupt a conversation, distract from the central points of a discussion, or mislead the audience in any way. With nearly 26,000 comments, the evidence should be damn easy to find if it exists.
I call bullshit on you.
Never really noticed that share icon. There is some real gold(mostly of the hilarious/outrageous nature), on Patnet. I will definitely share next time I see/post some.
Maybe it is hard to recommend this site...
Yea while I enjoy patnet, I wouldn't want to subject anyone I like to the massive brain drain that is your resident troll, the most negative person on the site.
I do like the feature you added where you display the currently logged on users atop the page.
I'd think that a certain someone might not like people seeing that he lives under ghe bridge to patnet 24/7, just waiting to spread his misery. But maybe he's such a failed loser, he doesn't care that people see that he has no life
he doesn't care that people see that he has no life
I am certain that is the case. And no need to mention names. We all know exactly who you are talking about.
he doesn't care that people see that he has no life
I am certain that is the case. And no need to mention names. We all know exactly who you are talking about.
Normally, I find it odd when a singular person speaks in plural like "we". However, in this case, it does seem appropriate.
Why is it that some people feel the need to pluralize I to we? Is it because they know their words are bogus, so they invent imaginary friends to get their back?
There's only one person in this thread posting images in likeness of their self, or as you describe in your oh so sad, self deprecating way, "crap". Freudian slip?
Normally, I find it odd when a singular person speaks in plural like "we". However, in this case, it does seem appropriate.
I, of course, meant everyone reading or participating in this thread, and clearly I was correct as that person could not resist immediately joining in, demonstrating his ugly personality.
Should there be some kind of civility cutoff, where users below a certain civility level are not seen unless you explicitly ask for that?
Should there be some kind of civility cutoff, where users below a certain civility level are not seen unless you explicitly ask for that?
How about you just grow a set and ban him? You've poured how many hours of your time into this site. Valuable time you could have spent any number of ways , with your family etc. Yet you are too much of a pussy to do the right thing.
In the time he's been vandalizing your site, and harassing other users, you've been bleeding members. You want to ask those of us that remain, to invite our friends and family here? Subject them to that crap? GET A CLUE, PATRICK
Is it because they know their words are bogus, so they invent imaginary friends to get their back?
One user whom I respect but occasionally disagree with has at least three different accounts, ostensibly for himself and two others in the same household, and presumes to speak for all three at least. He might also be using "the royal we". He seems to use "we" mainly when caught up in fight mode, trying to reinforce unsourced and sometimes counter-factual comments that would not really get much if any agreement. His better comments that cite links stand on their own with no need for imaginary friends or pretensions to royalty, so it might be some psychological over-compensation or attempt to intimidate.
It reminds me of Islam: "submit to my false assertions or my followers will beat you down."
it's the guy who posts this crap:
You are the only one posting those photos to this thread. If you want to post photos, the one from Stripes made me laugh, partly because it reminded me of Bill Murray, whom I love. Really, if you and Dan want to continue fighting for some reason, a sort of Geneva convention might help a lot. I suggest:
1) no NSFW photos;
2) not starting in on each other in multiple threads where the other has not even commented yet.
Maybe if you could limit these skirmishes to text or simply amusing photos, in one thread per day, PatNet might not be quite so difficult to recommend or admit associating with.
The Dan v. Ironman feud is the most disinteresting thing I've ever witnessed. It's so bad that anytime i sense it is about to continue, i have to fight the urge to gouge my eyes out with a spork. Almost as disinteresting as any of the other Ironman vs. (insert the majority of patnet users names at random)
disinteresting
The word you're looking for is uninteresting, but otherwise I agree.
Yea, that as well.
Hmmm, OK. I'm going to:
1. Limit user accounts to one per IP address.
2. Run all of Ironman's comments through moderation from now on. So I'll have to vet them for reasonable civility.
I should be able to get that done tomorrow.
Pnet is internet junk food in the guise of debate.
I think that because the majority of the scientific world thinks that. Yes. We are at 400ppm, and growing by 2ppm per year, due to human fossil fuel use.
But today, between Ironman and Hater, my gosh the level of data analysis hit an all time record low. Amazingly laughable. That has been entertaining for me. :)
The Dan v. Ironman feud is the most disinteresting thing
Instead of being such a whiner and crybaby, there's this feature here called "ignore".... Why don't you try it???
Or continue to whine and cry like a little girl, your choice???
I'm not a whiner, I'm a pragmatic Problem Solver. Looks like I just helped Patrick solve his Troll problem. So how about you take the hint and find another forum to pollute and vandalize. Save him the trouble of having to moderate all your posts. Ok?
Run all of Ironman's comments through moderation from now on. So I'll have to vet them for reasonable civility.
Yes, that's the solution, continue to cater to the Special Snowflakes and the minority crybabies...
That will surely bring in NEW users.... NOT....
Au Contraire mon frere. Quit your whining
Good point. Errc is hardly much better.
Maybe. But definitely different.
I'd prefer to attack a persons ideas, whereas Ironman spends all his waking hours attacking people.
Comments 1 - 40 of 48 Next » Last » Search these comments
Instead of money, this pledge drive is about new users, especially ones that support your own point of view, lol!
Please help by making a commitment to click at least two share links after any post or comment you like.
It should pop up your email program with a truly minimal message like this:
Send them out and that's all there is to it! If you enjoy the site, or just want to expose your writing to a bigger audience, let's get some new users.
Claim credit by saying you've done your part in a comment below.