« prev   random   next »


It was a leak, not a hack

By MisterLearnToCode following x   2017 Aug 10, 10:44am 1,399 views   6 comments   watch   nsfw   quote     share    

Lost in a year that often appeared to veer into our peculiarly American kind of hysteria is the absence of any credible evidence of what happened last year and who was responsible for it. It is tiresome to note, but none has been made available. Instead, we are urged to accept the word of institutions and senior officials with long records of deception. These officials profess “high confidence” in their “assessment” as to what happened in the spring and summer of last year—this standing as their authoritative judgment. Few have noticed since these evasive terms first appeared that an assessment is an opinion, nothing more, and to express high confidence is an upside-down way of admitting the absence of certain knowledge This is how officials avoid putting their names on the assertions we are so strongly urged to accept—as the record shows many of them have done..

We come now to a moment of great gravity.

There has been a long effort to counter the official narrative we now call “Russiagate.” This effort has so far focused on the key events noted above, leaving numerous others still to be addressed. Until recently, researchers undertaking this work faced critical shortcomings, and these are to be explained. But they have achieved significant new momentum in the past several weeks, and what they have done now yields very consequential fruit. Forensic investigators, intelligence analysts, system designers, program architects, and computer scientists of long experience and strongly credentialed are now producing evidence disproving the official version of key events last year. Their work is intricate and continues at a kinetic pace as we speak. But its certain results so far are two, simply stated, and freighted with implications:

There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer.

Forensic investigations of documents made public two weeks prior to the July 5 leak by the person or entity known as Guccifer 2.0 show that they were fraudulent: Before Guccifer posted them they were adulterated by cutting and pasting them into a blank template that had Russian as its default language. Guccifer took responsibility on June 15 for an intrusion the DNC reported on June 14 and professed to be a WikiLeaks source—claims essential to the official narrative implicating Russia in what was soon cast as an extensive hacking operation. To put the point simply, forensic science now devastates this narrative.


That's it. Guccifer didn't do it. That means we should be looking at DNC IT Admins. Like the one who was killed last year.

Note the Source is the most respectable Left-wing magazine in the country.

1   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 10, 11:33am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quick! Bury this!

2   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2017 Aug 10, 11:40am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Sorry to see you go Two Scoops.

3   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 10, 11:44am   ↑ like (5)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

It's always a shame when someone suicides by shooting themselves twice in the back

4   curious2   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 10, 12:07pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

One question I keep wondering about, and nobody seems to ask: why did Seth Rich die? Police found him conscious, able to talk to them. That doesn't sound like a professional murder, unless it was botched surprisingly badly. Then, he died in a hospital. No suspects, no arrests. Conspiracy theories have tended to focus on the issue of who shot him and why, but nobody seems to ask the bigger questions: who killed him, and how did they do it with nobody getting arrested? Did the shooter(s) know precisely where to stand in order to avoid being seen by security cameras, and yet not know how to kill someone? Were they simply lucky in choosing the right place to stand, and unlucky in failing to choose the right place to shoot? Or, did they get an assist from police and/or hospital staff, who completed the task? Even though Seth Rich was young and apparently otherwise healthy, it wouldn't take much to turn life threatening wounds into fatal wounds. Decades ago, autopsies were routine, and found many cases in which the actual cause of death differed from what people had assumed. Today, autopsies have become comparatively rare, and most decedents get buried without anyone knowing for certain what killed them. Shot in the back? That didn't kill him on the scene, so why did he die later elsewhere? Hospitals can't save everyone, but a young and otherwise healthy male would have a better chance than most, so why didn't he recover?

5   HEY YOU   ignore (7)   2017 Aug 10, 2:22pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If Trump signed the sanctions bill against Russia, it's true they hacked or he's a fool.
How are you leaning?

".. the most respectable Left-wing magazine in the country."

The left-wing never has an agenda,everyone knows that.

And who the hell knows who is involved in Guccifer?
I always come to a conclusion without all the facts.

6   bob2356   ignore (4)   2017 Aug 10, 3:34pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsMcGee says


That's it. Guccifer didn't do i

Based on the word of two total unknowns called the Forensicator and Adam Carter the name of a character in a BBC espionage series called Spooks. As relayed by the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity who's last memorandum in 2011 stated they had intelligence no one else had that showed Israel was going to attack Iran. Still waiting for that attack.

Color me just a little sceptical about this. Especially since no where does it say if the file allegedly downloaded to a stick was actually the emails and how they determined it. Pretty odd detail to leave out.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions