5
0

News is bad for you and giving up reading it will make you happier


 invite response                
2017 Aug 16, 5:40pm   8,538 views  29 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (55)   💰tip   ignore  

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli

News is bad for your health. It leads to fear and aggression, and hinders your creativity and ability to think deeply. The solution? Stop consuming it altogether
...
In the past few decades, the fortunate among us have recognised the hazards of living with an overabundance of food (obesity, diabetes) and have started to change our diets. But most of us do not yet understand that news is to the mind what sugar is to the body. News is easy to digest. The media feeds us small bites of trivial matter, tidbits that don't really concern our lives and don't require thinking. That's why we experience almost no saturation. Unlike reading books and long magazine articles (which require thinking), we can swallow limitless quantities of news flashes, which are bright-coloured candies for the mind. Today, we have reached the same point in relation to information that we faced 20 years ago in regard to food. We are beginning to recognise how toxic news can be.

Comments 1 - 29 of 29        Search these comments

1   PeopleUnited   2017 Aug 16, 5:43pm  

Exactly. Plus, what passes for "news" is mostly propaganda and sales tactics for corporations and corporate ideology.

Take CNN for example. They have lost their shit about how deplorable Trump is in the wake of the Charlottesville violence. They claim he missed his opportunity. Yet NOT ONE OF THEM will take the opportunity to try to unite America. Instead they sow even more division and hate. It is deplorable.

Unplug America. It is your only hope.

2   Patrick   2017 Aug 16, 5:44pm  

And a good quote by Thoreau:

And I am sure that I never read any memorable news in a newspaper. If we read of one man robbed, or murdered, or killed by accident, or one house burned, or one vessel wrecked, or one steamboat blown up, or one cow run over on the Western Railroad, or one mad dog killed, or one lot of grasshoppers in the winter, - we need never read of another. One is enough. If you are acquainted with the principle, what do you care for a myriad instances and applications?

3   Patrick   2017 Aug 16, 5:52pm  

PeopleUnited says

Take CNN for example. They have lost their shit about how deplorable Trump is in the wake of the Charlottesville violence. They claim he missed his opportunity. Yet NOT ONE OF THEM will take the opportunity to try to unite America. Instead they sow even more division and hate. It is deplorable.

Yes, this is why I don't watch CNN anymore, ever. Most of the lamestream media is just like that, not trustworthy, addicted to inciting more hate rather than cooling things down.

There is a huge opportunity for some reasonable centrist to speak the right words, stick to principles and empathy, and get the attention of millions. I don't know exactly what those words are though. It's like composing a hit song. You don't know it until it takes off.

4   Dan8267   2017 Aug 17, 11:22am  

Patrick says

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli

News is bad for your health. It leads to fear and aggression, and hinders your creativity and ability to think deeply. The solution? Stop consuming it altogether

Ironic news article is ironic. Oh way, that's hypocrisy, not irony.

5   Dan8267   2017 Aug 17, 11:22am  

My bad. It's from the Guardian. That's not news.

8   RWSGFY   2017 Aug 17, 2:08pm  

Time to ban links to news articles on p.net.

9   Dan8267   2017 Aug 17, 2:16pm  

jazz_music says

Do you feel especially negative about The Guardian?

No, but it was the perfect setup.

10   HEY YOU   2017 Aug 17, 3:02pm  

Iraq has WMD, don't read anything else,just believe it idiot Republicans.

11   Patrick   2017 Aug 17, 5:46pm  

jazz_music says

This is essentially the loss of a real public service in favor of greater profitability and the back-door profitability of propagandizing the public in exchange for the support of massive centralized wealth and the agenda of accelerating the process of centralizing the wealth into only the hands that currently hold the majority of it. --a very corrupt situation compared to what we once enjoyed as a freer society in to 1960's.

Truly a great comment @jazz_music !

12   NuttBoxer   2017 Aug 17, 5:52pm  

Patrick says

News is bad for you and giving up reading it will make you happier

I was thinking about this post and wondered, "What would the world be like with no news?" I guess we would talk about local things, possibly be more creative, talk about hobbies, engage in more personal conversations.

It seems that news has become a tool for feeding hate and divisive debates. Now news is not all bad, and there is news we could benefit from, positive news, like Goran's story, news about health issues, news about corruption, news about local issues, like a decision to remove a monument. If everyone just watched local news, who would show up to monument protests? Locals, and they're the only ones who matter.

I know a guy who tried to not look at too much news for the reason in the quote. Not the first time I've heard this. But it's really clicking for me. I'm swearing off news until they make is beneficial again. Thanks for the post Patrick!

13   Patrick   2017 Aug 18, 12:00am  

jazz_music says

Unhinged on the Alt Right are making up lies too such as about BLM and antifa as if those anarchistic little groups had some kind of command structure that is capable of mounting some overarching conspiracy to make some changes.

You mean the main stream media building up an enemy like the Nazis and KKK as if those little groups had some kind of command structure that is capable of mounting some overarching conspiracy to make some changes.

14   Ceffer   2017 Aug 18, 12:01am  

No news is good news.

15   WookieMan   2017 Aug 18, 7:01am  

rando says

You mean the main stream media building up an enemy like the Nazis and KKK as if those little groups had some kind of command structure that is capable of mounting some overarching conspiracy to make some changes.

This. I think it was the NBC Today show on in the background yesterday morning. I look at the screen and they're fucking interviewing a white supremacist on national TV. There will always be KKK, Nazi sympathizers, etc. You can protest, rally and tear down whatever you want (which by the way gives these ass holes even more press). But the media is just nuts. They sit there and blather in a serious tone how bad these people are, Trump needs to condemn them every waking breath. Then it's like, "in our next segment we will give this white supremacist air time and a platform to spread his nonsense. But we'll be combative with him to show we're serious about how seriously bad these people are, while putting him on in millions of American's living rooms."

The reference I've always heard from media type is, don't show the guy running onto the football field during a playoff game (not all news media, but it seems common enough for me to have noticed). If you glamorize it and every news outlet shows video of this guy running on the field it will just create more of theses dumb asses that think they'll get their 15 minutes of fame. Unfortunately running onto a football field is pretty trivial. Interviewing a Nazi or KKK member on your main channel, morning news program it just outright lunacy. It's pretty clear that those in the media have straight up been lobotomized and are going full retard at this point. It's rather scary that anyone listens to pretty much ANY news outlet at this point, especially on the TV end.

At some point, I will have to revoke my citizenship and move back to Kashyyyk if this gets much more crazy.

16   Patrick   2017 Aug 18, 9:12am  

WookieMan says

If you glamorize it and every news outlet shows video of this guy running on the field it will just create more of theses dumb asses that think they'll get their 15 minutes of fame. Unfortunately running onto a football field is pretty trivial. Interviewing a Nazi or KKK member on your main channel, morning news program it just outright lunacy. It's pretty clear that those in the media have straight up been lobotomized and are going full retard at this point.

Yes, exactly. You could have 10,000 perfectly reasonable demonstrators, and one wacko Nazi in the crowd, and who are they going to interview?

It's not necessarily full retard. It seems more like an explicit policy to slander anyone who questions the PC Koran by always insisting that the worst guy in the crowd represents the whole crowd.

17   WookieMan   2017 Aug 18, 9:30am  

rando says

It's not necessarily full retard. It seems more like an explicit policy to slander anyone who questions the PC Koran by always insisting that the worst guy in the crowd represents the whole crowd.

I get what you're saying. But at what point does someone like a Matt Lauer on NBC, take a step back and say to himself, "I just fucking interviewed a Nazi on national television. What am I doing?" I get that they have bosses and they're not creating the content. To some extent some these morning shows are just teleprompter bimbos. But that guy is a multi-millionaire. He could push back or even quit and be set for life. I guess that's where I have a disconnect and mention a lobotomy. Anyone with half a brain should know they're giving these idiots a platform that they're interviewing.

It's like that one muslim dude in Britain. Can't remember his name. These news outlets have him on, knowing he's basically a terrorist sympathizer and will make nut job comments to get publicity (yes I know, he does believe what he's saying about islam). It's like WTF, why are you giving this guy any validity even if you're being combative in the interview? I don't know, maybe there's just so much money in these anchorman jobs that they're just fucking blinded by greed and have zero moral compass. If anyone asked me to interview a Nazi, my first question would be why? Regardless of the answer I would then proceed to tell them no. There's no value, in my opinion, to give idiots a platform.

18   WookieMan   2017 Aug 18, 9:34am  

And yes, I know these news outlets do it for ratings and the money. But why are advertisers so complicit. If you're fucking Chevy and your commercial leads into the next segment. "We're back and with us now Nathan Nazi tells us about what it's like be Nazi. Nathan please tell."

19   Patrick   2017 Aug 18, 10:39am  

Couple of reasons:

1. TV journalists lack ethics
2. controversy is good for ratings, making Nazis and extreme Muslims especially good for ratings
3. advertisers don't suffer any loss of revenue for being on TV shows that interview Nazis and extreme Muslims

20   WookieMan   2017 Aug 18, 11:58am  

jazz_music says

There ARE some real journalists left and they are like great great heroes exposing the corruption and rot that undermines our nation.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but who? What media outlet or specifically journalist?

jazz_music says

It's much worse than that, ever since Fox News, the main thing they offer is bimbo looks with long legs exposed behind glass desks and LIMITED reading abilities.

Are you saying only Fox news does this? I see it everywhere. Actually I'll add on to Patrick's reasons: #4 sex sells.

21   Patrick   2017 Aug 18, 8:21pm  

Don't worry about the house thing. Stock market worked out at least as well for me. I wasn't wrong at all about waiting. But when I was really really right, in 2009, I probably should have bought. At least from the financial point of view.

Never said anyone shouldn't buy a house. Just said they shouldn't overpay.

I hope things are going well for you.

22   ChapulinColorado   2017 Aug 18, 9:12pm  

Thanks Patrick.. I think there are a lot of people that feel exactly as you do. I do think we are living in a country of extremists that are controlling the narrative the Communists (Antifa(who are really the Fascists)/BLM/SJW) vs the Nazi's (KKK). I truly believe this could seriously lead to Civil War. It is tragic how the Globalists/TPTB/Military-Media-Industrial complex will completely go against the populist/anti-establishment to have their way. Sad, very sad.

23   MAGA   2017 Aug 19, 1:03am  

Everybody should read Patrick.net!

25   marcus   2017 Aug 20, 7:10pm  

jazz_music says

Between Trumps daily gaffes, Korean nukes and Nazis months will pass and when we all wake up from that, the rich will have far lower taxes, financial markets will have even less regulation, all our freeways and bridges will be privately owned toll roads, the national parks will belong to the states, employees will have even less rights, healthcare will be more expensive and more tenuous for people who get sick.

OOPS you were too busy screaming at each other about Trump, Nazis, SJWs and Kim Jong-Un.

Yep pretty much. Throw in a few newer crazy Trump dramafests and that's about right. At least it's what they will try.

26   patriotid   2017 Aug 21, 9:34pm  

totally agree in fact I started learning to play guitar instead of wasting hours online so much better too!

27   BayArea   2017 Aug 22, 5:29am  

I agree with the post.

Extended periods of time where I've turned off the TV and put down the phone have resulted in me being happier and less anxious, no question.

28   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Aug 22, 6:00am  

jazz_music says

WookieMan says

but who?

I've liked several major works by Matt Taibbi, Tim Dickinson, Tom Engelhardt, Jamelle Bouie, The ACLU directly publishes exposés at times,

There are serious journalists exposing corruption typically, and there is plenty of it to expose too. It warms the heart and brings a patriotic tear to the eye.

The Rolling Stone Magazine presents serious journalism on occasion.

MattTabbibi is a drug addict who actively lies in his Rolling Stone articles.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions