California student told that not wearing a bra makes 'people assume bad things'
« prev   misc   next »
1 Ceffer   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 21, 4:52pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

"California student told that not wearing a bra makes 'people assume bad things'".

It worked!

2 mell   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 21, 5:11pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Why is it that suddenly every slutty teenager wants to go braless? Would you really want your teenage daughter to go to school braless tank topped and dolled-up? Or your teenage son with ass-less chaps? twitter tag rxmybxtch, ok. Make your parents proud again.

3 mell   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 21, 5:13pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Also looks lime the commenters mostly "strongly sympathize" with the school's/teacher's rules.

4 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Aug 22, 3:25pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote        

High school girls are all having sex and distributing nude pictures of themselves anyway. And the moment they get into college they ride dozens of cocks.

Parents lost the ability to keep their daughters chaste back when those parents were teenagers. That battle is long over. Short term sexual affairs and one night stands have been the norm for 20+ years.
5 zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 23, 8:08am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

#fuckcalifornia
6 Ernie   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 23, 8:20am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

Dan8267 says
have been the norm for 20+ years.


40+ years, other than that your sentiment is 100% correct.
If ultra-religious zealots do not like this, they may need to take a page out of Islamist's' playbook and demand that women cover themselves 100%.
7 mell   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 23, 4:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

drBu says

If ultra-religious zealots do not like this, they may need to take a page out of Islamist's' playbook and demand that women cover themselves 100%.

That has nothing to do with being religious or not. Most parents would not want their underaged daughter to run around slutty. But even that is besides the point. The point is the school and their teachers have the right to enforce a dress code, so does every club. This is another entitled snowflake who can walk around as she sees fits in her free-time.

8 APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE   ignore (5)   2017 Aug 23, 6:30pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

No one can take a chick seriously that isn't wearing crotchless pants and a T-shirt that points at her bush and shouts, "EAT AT THE Y!"

9 errc   ignore (2)   2017 Aug 23, 7:59pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

mell says

Why is it that suddenly every slutty teenager wants to go braless? Would you really want your teenage daughter to go to school braless tank topped and dolled-up? Or your teenage son with ass-less chaps? twitter tag rxmybxtch, ok. Make your parents proud again.

Are you really that offended by teenage girls getting dolled up and going bra-less?

What's next, the cheerleaders should wear burkas?

10 jvolstad   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 23, 8:16pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

errc says

mell says

Why is it that suddenly every slutty teenager wants to go braless? Would you really want your teenage daughter to go to school braless tank topped and dolled-up? Or your teenage son with ass-less chaps? twitter tag rxmybxtch, ok. Make your parents proud again.

Are you really that offended by teenage girls getting dolled up and going bra-less?

What's next, the cheerleaders should wear burkas?

Her father should be somewhat concerned.

11 mell   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 23, 8:38pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

errc says

Are you really that offended by teenage girls getting dolled up and going bra-less?

What's next, the cheerleaders should wear burkas?

I could care less how she dresses privately. The school however does care, so does her future employer. And her parents I'd assume. Cheerleaders are supposed to dress in sexy uniforms, that's their job. So that's somewhat of a non-sequitur.


Comment as anon_d18a7 or log in at top of page: