THIRD of people up for cheating on partner with sex robot
forgot password / register

reset password

register

patrick.net

 

#rin


#housing #investing #politics #random more»
778,979 comments by 11,534 users, 2 online now: GonzoReal, mell
new post
« prev   rin

2
0

THIRD of people up for cheating on partner with sex robot

By RAPE following x   2017 Aug 25, 7:40am 1,972 views   52 comments   watch   quote     share  


http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/639744/sex-robots-better-humans-not-cheating

MORE than a third of us would happily have sex with a robot – and 40% would not consider they were cheating on their partner.

But, oddly, people told a survey they’d be disgusted to discover one of their pals had been getting horny with a cyborg.

The raunchy fantasies mirror robotic romances in TV thriller Westworld, where holidaymakers lived out their dreams in a theme park full of automatons.

Expert Prof Noel Sharkey, said: “We’re still a long way off that technical sophistication, but dolls are being used in the adult entertainment industry so we can expect robots to join them soon.”

The news comes after a brothel in Vienna, Austria, revealed that sex doll Fanny is more popular with punters than her human rival.

She has become a top-selling prostitute at Kontakthof, and other brothels are now rushing to include sex dolls on their lists of services.

Peter Laskaris, who operates two brothels in Vienna, said that although life-like dolls from Japan "cost up to 7,000 euros (£6,382) it is "obviously a trendy sex fetish" which other brothels must also follow.

#rin

« First    « Previous     Comments 13 - 52 of 52     Last »

13 georgeliberte   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 11:41am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

That someone's wife divorced the guy because she came home and found him alone with a blow up sex doll.
Actually she just thought that the blow-up doll could do better, and come to it, so could she (the wife). Anyway women will probably not mind in the end.
14 georgeliberte   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 11:44am   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

I injured my right arm once and my right hand threatened to leave me when it found out I was doing it with my left. Having your hand leave you is even worse than having a woman leave you.
15 iwog   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 11:47am   ↑ like (6)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Strategist says

I'm sure they will come up with male sex dolls with throbbing dicks too. Just imagine a male dick that can pump away like the energizer bunny.

Yes but that doesn't matter. Women need men to survive and they trade sex. Men need sex so they trade material support. Removing a woman's sole stock in trade is not going to have good consequences and will cause panic.

It's a dirty little secret that it's only men and not women who make this 1st world lifestyle possible.

16 Ernie   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 11:52am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says

Lifelike sex robots would be the biggest threat to human female survival strategies ever experienced in the genetic history of the species so don't expect them to roll over for this one.

Owning one will most likely be made illegal.

Will be interesting/educational to see justification for making sex robots illegal. My best guess - women will suddenly become extremely religious.
17 zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 11:54am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Strategist says

I'm sure they will come up with male sex dolls with throbbing dicks too.

Already exists. It's called a vibrator.

18 zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 11:55am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

georgeliberte says

That someone's wife divorced the guy because she came home and found him alone with a blow up sex doll.

You bring up something important here, in that these dolls will be way cheaper than divorce.

19 zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 11:56am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Just seems to me that the other pictures posted in the article, the doll is wearing way too much.

20 Heraclitusstudent   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 12:11pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says
Women need men to survive and they trade sex


You forget their second and arguably most important asset: their ability to create offsprings.
Sex is just an intermediary step.

You want to pass on your genes? pay up!
21 Heraclitusstudent   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 12:13pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says
It's a dirty little secret that it's only men and not women who make this 1st world lifestyle possible.


Yes, but women have skills like taking care of kids that are just as important for all societies including 1st world ones.
22 iwog   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 12:41pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

Heraclitusstudent says

Yes, but women have skills like taking care of kids that are just as important for all societies including 1st world ones.

Not correct. As a rule, all children survive in a 1st world economy. They might not survive mentally intact but that's an artificially imposed standard and not an evolutionary one. The ONLY RULE in evaluating evolutionary psychology is does the individual survive and create more offspring?

Women have successfully countered their depreciation in child rearing value with a new religion called feminism that seeks to drive the value of men lower in they eyes of the public. They have been partially successful however I think they are at the end of their rope on this one.

23 TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 12:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Women would have to convince men to invest in a child with them,you'd see teamwork for raising children based on other things than 'love' BS.

Great work, mostly male AI and materials scientists! You've liberated the human race. Think about the savings on expensive weddings alone, a whole frivolous industry disrupted. So beautiful, folks.
24 TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 1:24pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

They're already at it:

https://campaignagainstsexrobots.org/
@Rin

Their argument, like dungeons and dragons, porn, and video games, centers on actual inanimate objects increasing prostitution (which should be legal), violence, and abuse. Reality: These things are either neutral or greatly reduce it.
25 Ernie   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 1:32pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

TwoScoopsMcGee says
These things are either neutral or greatly reduce it.

Absolutely correct. Why leave house if you have sex robot in it?
26 TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 1:35pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

I would get 5 and do my fantasy of the doggy style lineup, a blonde, a brunette, an asian, big butt, small tight butt, etc.

And my wife, what the hell ;)
27 TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 1:39pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Trying to think of all the things that would be disrupted:

Half of Catering and Event Halls, bye bye.
Family Lawyers dwindling
Male Bashing Ads disappearing; men would be single households and control their own spending, hence less anti-male ads
Better Childrearing
Fewer STDs
Less Mental Illness
Less Crime
28 CBOEtrader   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 1:53pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

TwoScoopsMcGee says
Women would have to convince men to invest in a child with them,you'd see teamwork for raising children based on other things than 'love' BS.

Great work, mostly male AI and materials scientists! You've liberated the human race. Think about the savings on expensive weddings alone, a whole frivolous industry disrupted. So beautiful, folks.


Haha some day you need to share your story w the forum. Bad divorce?

I can't be the only one who would still prefer a live woman's company over a doll.

I don't see much of a change for the status of women via this doll.

Feminism, the destruction of gender roles, etc... will ultimately lower the value of women more than these sex dolls. Women want to pretend like they can compete w men in competitive fields. Reality disagrees w feminist theory.
29 TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 2:06pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Oops - that was me in the Anon post above.

I was saying that I'm happily married for 10+ years, and only married once.

It's a generational thing. To you and I this is going to be some kind of novelty thing, like with Silent Generation on the Internet. "oh, gee wilikers, I forgot about craigslist. Okay, found a new weedwhacker. Now, back to watching ESPN." Baby boomer generation uses it more often, but still largely TV-based. Gen X heavily uses but remembers a time without it; Many Milennials don't even have Cable or TV.

When I was a kid, not having TV was the mark of a weirdo, or somebody with weirdo parents. If Sex Robots become a big thing in 5 years, then those kids born today will be like "Later, Dude, I'm gonna fuck my robot." "Have fun." They might not even call it a robot, but "My girlfriend Shelly" because she's actually interactive.

Sex Robots are going to be so disruptive, far more disruptive to human society than the Internet ever was.
30 Ernie   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 2:23pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

CBOEtrader says
I can't be the only one who would still prefer a live woman's company over a doll.

I don't see much of a change for the status of women via this doll.

Feminism, the destruction of gender roles, etc... will ultimately lower the value of women more than these sex dolls. Women want to pretend like they can compete w men in competitive fields. Reality disagrees w feminist theory.

Reality disagrees with feminism for last 80 years, yet feminism is still here.
With sex robots, the likely outcome will be that competition among women for men will be much more severe. Even removing 10-20% of men from market (conservatively) will increase competitiveness greatly. Why do East European women tend to dress nicely and to take care of themselves, much more so than women in West? Because large percentage of men are terminal alcoholics and are out of dating/marriage game. I read somewhere of a situation in Russian small town, where five women share one functional man and they all know about the arrangement and are OK with it.
31 TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Aug 31, 2:42pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Right now due to hypergamy, you have broken, nasty inside-and-out bitches who should be pariahs, landing not-so-attractive but attentive, devoted men they definitely don't deserve, divorce-raping them and inflicting the fallout of their own psychological damage on children. Not to mention ending up raising them in poverty.

Think of all those pumping out bastards left and right at tattooed felons, gangster rappers, and meth selling bikers, producing huge pools of psychopathic-trait children.

In the sex robot future, partnering to have children will be a carefully considered thing, and very rarely done to satisfy the urges of either party. Stable, Mature Men will become the ideal father again.

Other fantastic things:
1. Pedos greatly reduced
2. Rapists greatly reduced
3. Bastard Factories greatly reduced
4. Divorce Rape greatly reduced
5. Violence greatly reduced (primary cause: Fewer Women than men/Sexual Competition). Groups like ISIS will be far less appealling.
6. Anti-Male advertising greatly reduced - no need to please sexual gatekeeper females = more single men = more men controlling their household income = less ads pumping up women.
7. Welfare greatly reduced
8. STDs greatly reduced
9. Booming Economy
10. Advanced AI and Efficient Power and etc. because Sex Doll research will have direct impact on other electronics/AI technologies.
11. Overpopulation will cease to be a problem.
12. Mental Health issues due to sick parents greatly reduced.

And seriously, if anything can fuel an industry, it's the male sex drive.

Jesus, I remember being like 13-14. Imagine channeling all energy that into an industry.
32 somecrappynumber   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 3:09pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says

The ONLY RULE in evaluating evolutionary psychology is does the individual survive and create more offspring?

Women have successfully countered their depreciation in child rearing value with a new religion called feminism that seeks to drive the value of men lower in they eyes of the public


Can you elaborate on this? If I understand you correctly, you seem to be suggesting that women (either first world or otherwise) do not have a biological imperative to raise their offspring and that feminism is so overpowering that they would just ditch them at the roadside after birth because she the individual would "survive and create more offspring". If so I highly disagree. I think that in any state, be it first world or post apocalyptic for MOST women the biological imperative to raise them til say at least 6 or 7- just like it is in the animal word where most mothers take care of the very young until they can fend for themselves.
33 BrownIncome   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 4:57pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says

Yes but that doesn't matter. Women need men to survive and they trade sex. Men need sex so they trade material support. Removing a woman's sole stock in trade is not going to have good consequences and will cause panic.

Do you have evidence to support it? Last study I read showed a correlation of only about 50%. Women also need, for instance, good looking men to share their genes with.

34 errc   ignore (2)   2017 Aug 31, 5:13pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Yea and goodbye mega touch at the bar, no more Wednesday night rodeo ride the mechanical bull.

Like an arcade but instead of video games machines it's sex robots. They can be self cleaning, kinda like a urinal.

I know what I want for Christmas
35 WorkInProgress   ignore (0)   2017 Aug 31, 5:14pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

TwoScoopsMcGee says

Right now due to hypergamy, you have broken, nasty inside-and-out bitches who should be pariahs, landing not-so-attractive but attentive, devoted men they definitely don't deserve, divorce-raping them and inflicting the fallout of their own psychological damage on children. Not to mention ending up raising them in poverty.

Think of all those pumping out bastards left and right at tattooed felons, gangster rappers, and meth selling bikers, producing huge pools of psychopathic-trait children.

In the sex robot future, partnering to have children will be a carefully considered thing, and very rarely done to satisfy the urges of either party. Stable, Mature Men will become the ideal father again.

Other fantastic things:
1. Pedos greatly reduced
2. Rapists greatly reduced
3. Bastard Factories greatly reduced
4. Divorce Rape greatly reduced
5. Violence greatly reduced (primary cause: Fewer Women than men/Sexual Competition). Groups like ISIS will be...

Wow, those are some great observations.

If we could take all the sexual energy, as it is expended into these dolls, we might have discovered a never ending electrical source.

36 errc   ignore (2)   2017 Aug 31, 5:37pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

I wish I was hanging with my sex robot right now
37 HEY YOU   ignore (7)   2017 Aug 31, 6:29pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

She can't see. You won't have to wear a bag.
38 Heraclitusstudent   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 1, 7:20am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says
The ONLY RULE in evaluating evolutionary psychology is does the individual survive and create more offspring?

Well yes, but the value for men is they mostly don't have to do that job.
What men do, as valuable as it is, are just peripheral activities around what women do. (or at least should be doing).
39 zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 1, 7:25am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

errc says
They can be self cleaning, kinda like a urinal.


I was wondering if I was going to have to break out the power washer..
40 CBOEtrader   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 1, 7:30am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

drBu says
I read somewhere of a situation in Russian small town, where five women share one functional man and they all know about the arrangement and are OK with it.


We need a pat.net convention in Kiev.
41 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 6, 7:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

This is simply Rin-Wah law!

http://patrick.net/post/1309680/rin-wah-law-needs-an-anthem-to-promote-its-point

Aerosmith's "Train Kept A Rollin":
42 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 6, 7:05pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

or

ACDC's "You Shook Me All Night Long":
43 Ceffer   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 6, 7:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

errc says
They can be self cleaning, kinda like a urinal.


"Come in me, my stallion! FLUSHHHHHH!Whirl!"
44 rpanic01   ignore (0)   2017 Sep 6, 7:53pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Ceffer says
errc says
They can be self cleaning, kinda like a urinal.


"Come in me, my stallion! FLUSHHHHHH!Whirl!"


They could design them to be like squirters at the end.
45 iwog   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 6, 8:02pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

somecrappynumber says
Can you elaborate on this? If I understand you correctly, you seem to be suggesting that women (either first world or otherwise) do not have a biological imperative to raise their offspring and that feminism is so overpowering that they would just ditch them at the roadside after birth because she the individual would "survive and create more offspring". If so I highly disagree. I think that in any state, be it first world or post apocalyptic for MOST women the biological imperative to raise them til say at least 6 or 7- just like it is in the animal word where most mothers take care of the very young until they can fend for themselves.


You've taken my point to an illogical extreme. I'll explain further.

Prior to the modern age, women had to take significant steps to make sure their children were safe, clothed, fed, and relatively free from disease. This required learning many skills from sewing to cooking to gardening to home economics.

The skills required today to ensure the survival of children is to keep them out of the street and throw some McDonald's on the table a couple times a day. That's pretty much it. Of course there are Darwin award winners who forget their babies in a hot car or get drunk at a casino while their kids are locked up at home but these are anomalies. For all practically purposes, all children live.

This means women have no function in this society besides simple reproduction. I know it sounds sexist but I'll balance it out by saying that in a decade or two with more complex robotics, men will have no function in this society either. Women just reached this point earlier than men did.
46 iwog   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 6, 8:10pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

BrownIncome says
Do you have evidence to support it? Last study I read showed a correlation of only about 50%. Women also need, for instance, good looking men to share their genes with.


No, women don't select for looks unless they have determined that the way a man looks contributes to HIS sexual success. There is ample evidence that men who look like complete drug-dealing criminal thugs can be outrageously successful in getting laid. Likewise the standard for male appearance varies widely throughout the world. In Japan a big fat Sumo wrestler is the standard of male virility. On the flip side I've seen men who look like GQ models strike out repeatedly if they are shit-tested and come out wanting. Women are pea-cocking men at an incredible rate.

For those who don't know, pea-cocking is an evolutionary term for arbitrary female mating pressure to force the male phenotype to get more and more ridiculous. The male peacock has a massive tail that is an extremely poor survival adaptation, takes great nutritional resources to maintain, and probably gets as many peacocks killed as laid. However female peahens have "decided" that having this stupid tail is sexy so they force the males to adapt or die without offspring.

In humans, Western females are pea-cocking men to be violent sociopaths. The Antifa thug gets laid. The White Nationalist thug gets laid. The hard working beta who contributes to society gets nothing. The species is fucked beyond most people's comprehension.
47 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 10, 3:19pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Iwog, a woman has also tried out a male sex doll and liked it ...



Perhaps the Rin-Wah future is not too far away.
48 iwog   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 10, 5:39pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Rin says
Iwog, a woman has also tried out a male sex doll and liked it ...


Sure for publicity. She might have even enjoyed the lay. The problem is the same problem women have with casual sex. Women aren't fulfilled unless it's traded for something. Financial gain, a father for her kids, or superior DNA. It's hard for men to wrap their minds around a woman who says she feels "cheap" or accuses another woman of being "easy" because men don't have those feelings when they copulate with a stranger. For a woman however, cheap means she literally gave it up for too little. Easy means the man didn't have to do much to gain access to her uterus.

Anyway the war over sex is incidental. The problem women face is that they don't keep their 1st world lifestyle running. Only men do that to a 99% certainty. It remains to be seen that if men no longer need women for realistic sexual conquest, will they have any reason to share their labor and their resources?

The question is far more complex than it seems. Female jobs are almost entirely tied to children, organization, sales, clerical, and some health care. With the exception of skilled health care jobs, women ONLY enhance the profitability of men's labor. A man pours the concrete for a house, a man builds the wooden frame, a man wires it, a man plumbs it, and a man paints it and installs the floors. Only men, every time, every house in America. (again I'll stipulate the anomaly rule that there are probably exceptions that don't exceed 1 or 2% of the total) However once all the value is created, a woman markets the house and sells it and earns more money than every single man who created the house in the first place. This is fucking ridiculous however because of sex, it's tolerated.

In a system where women are no longer desired for sex, it's hard to see how this can continue. When I worked for AT&T, girls got promoted because they fucked the right manager. Everyone knew it, everyone talked about it, but no one did anything about it. When men have the hottest lifelike robot they can imagine, one that can change her entire personality by pushing a button or modify her kinks and one that will never get tired no matter how long she's got to yank the crank, I don't think women will be allowed those overpaid telephone answering jobs any longer.
49 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 10, 6:10pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

Rin says
, a woman has also tried out a male sex doll
Rin, i bet those smell sex dolls are mostly bought by gay men.
50 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 10, 6:39pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

iwog says
Anyway the war over sex is incidental. The problem women face is that they don't keep their 1st world lifestyle running. Only men do that to a 99% certainty. It remains to be seen that if men no longer need women for realistic sexual conquest, will they have any reason to share their labor and their resources?


Since I'm one of those futuristic men (albeit, a decade or two ahead of those times), the answer is no. Men will not share resources with biological women in the centuries ahead.

Dan8267 says
i bet those smell sex dolls are mostly bought by gay men


Sure, that's probably the largest market segment.

During the transition period, 2020 to 2040, women will be using strap-on dildos with each other, since the number of white knighters will drop precipitously.
.
Afterwards, as women grow weary of each other, since lesbians have the highest divorce rate, they'll be forced into using sex robots, ones programmed with stupid dramatics and/or other dysfunctional behavior patterns.
51 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 10, 6:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

RAPE says
The raunchy fantasies mirror robotic romances in TV thriller Westworld, where holidaymakers lived out their dreams in a theme park full of automatons.


BTW, Westworld's main premise is wrong.

For one, if men can bang an android look-a-like of let's say yesteryear's bombshell Raquel Welch, as oppose to a slightly above average looking Thandie Newton ... chances are, they won't be motivated to commit mass killings, Clint Eastwood style, as the show portrays.

In that reality, men will bliss out, listen to Rock 'n Roll, play tennis, write novels, engage in philosophical debates, and develop the sciences. In other words, it would unleash the Age of Pericles in postmodern America.
52 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 10, 6:53pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Rin says
unleash the Age of Pericles


I'd mentioned this phenomena in my thread below ...

http://patrick.net/post/1307023/if-rin-were-born-filthy-rich-you-wouldn-t-have-heard-about-him-on-this-forum


Let's be honest, the only reason why you've heard about me was because I was born into a working class family and thus, had to work my way up the ladder, first in a worthless STEM track and then, in financial services, while becoming the hoe bonker that I am today.

If I were Rin Rockefeller, I would have been sexually serviced since puberty and thus, wouldn't have any affinity for the working classes out there.

I would have simply boinked and then, followed my natural interests in life.

« First    « Previous     Comments 13 - 52 of 52     Last »


Comment as anon_1c765 or log in at top of page:

users   about   suggestions   source code   contact  
topics   best comments   comment jail   old posts by year  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker:

top   bottom   home