Comments 1 - 7 of 7        Search these comments

1   anonymous   2017 Aug 31, 8:58am  

I presume Trump/Mar-a-Lago would charge them for that, so wouldn't you say it's more of a nonpartisan action to not hold events that enrich a sitting President?
2   Tenpoundbass   2017 Aug 31, 9:20am  

Something tells me Trump did solicit them host anything there, and certainly didn't solicit them to virtue signal by wanting to host there, then at a later date provided best opitics. Release a scatheing shitstorm and pull out of said event they never were seriously considering hosting there in the first place.
3   anonymous   2017 Aug 31, 9:40am  

Trump obviously didn't, but what exactly do you think part of the marketing team's job is at Mar-a-Lago?
And charities should never opt to hold events there, but I don't recall you screaming about any organizations who do so being partisan. In your bizarro world view, that only apparently applies when they DON'T hold events there.
4   HEY YOU   2017 Aug 31, 10:21am  

Don't mess with Texass!
Let the Lone Star State stand alone.
Everyone knows they are the Greatest State & are self sufficient.
Fucking SOCIALISTS!
5   Ceffer   2017 Aug 31, 10:23am  

I will only send donations to charities who have executives earning 300k and more apiece.
6   Strategist   2017 Aug 31, 11:28am  

Too many phony charities spring up every time we have a disaster. Just send your donations to the Red Cross and the Salvation Army, and you will be fine.
7   Shaman   2017 Aug 31, 1:14pm  

I don't think any charity has any business hosting an event at a ritzy place like Trump's hotel playground! That money is supposed to go for people in need, not executives in need of sweet hotel rooms and fancy entertainment!
Don't contribute to those funds BECAUSE they even considered hosting events there!

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions