forgot password / register

reset password

register

patrick.net

 

#misc


#housing #investing #politics #random more»
778,821 comments by 11,510 users, 2 online now: BlueSardine, Tenpoundbass
new post
« prev   misc   next »

« First    « Previous     Comments 37 - 76 of 76     Last »

39 PeopleUnited   ignore (2)   2017 Sep 3, 8:22pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Strategist says

The devil we don't know cannot be worse than the devil we know...Kimfuck the third.


kimfuck may be NK's Sadam. that can of worms should not be opened by US. let china deal with their minion.
40 jazz_music   ignore (2)   2017 Sep 3, 8:27pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

curious2 says
assertion about neutralizing missiles has no foundation


Missiles are neutralized all the time, every year, like I said: threat always launched from Kwajalein and interceptor launched from Vandenberg. This is all kind of ancient history so "dubious" is a ponderous assertion on your part. ABL has also successfully neutralized threats which could have included ballistic missiles.

Do you doubt that? Did you look up BMDO? They were renamed MDA in 2002 when we withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972.

What do you think they did on orbit for 2 years? Nothing? No testing of space-based weapons or counter measures?

My opinion is our defenses are multiple and can be brought to bear simultaneously.

All these successful developments, tests and war games must add up to some real capability.
41 HEY YOU   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 3, 8:38pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

EMP,short for "We're so screwed."
42 jazz_music   ignore (2)   2017 Sep 3, 8:40pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

PeopleUnited says
... anti- American


That clown has no idea what I read, nor will he ever.

His attacks on me are blind, wild, and irresponsible. I have him on ignore for his petulance.

Still he reaches out in his anguish. Isn't that amazing?

You find him interesting? He claims to be quite a success while seeing great fault in many others.
43 jazz_music   ignore (2)   2017 Sep 3, 8:53pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

PeopleUnited says
... anti- American


Based on what exactly?
44 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 3, 8:55pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

You don't attack those countries. You destroy them as quickly as possible to contain and control their nukes...

Strategist says
My fear, both Pakistan and NK could easily give to terrorists a few nuclear devices, and would do so if we were to attack them
45 anonymous   ignore (5)   2017 Sep 3, 8:56pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

jazz_music says
Missiles are neutralized all the time, every year, like I said: threat always launched from Kwajalein and interceptor launched from Vandenberg. ABL has also successfully neutralized threats which could have included ballistic missiles.

Do you doubt that? Did you look up BMDO? They were renamed MDA in 2002 when we withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty of 1972.

What do you think they did on orbit for 2 years? Nothing? No testing of space-based weapons or counter measures?

My opinion is our defenses are multiple and can be brought to bear simultaneously.

All these successful developments, tests and war games must add up to some real capability.


Hate to butt in with the revolution plans you have with Kimfuck, but we would prefer no NK missiles have the capability to even launch any missiles.
By the way, how is your day going? You must be really happy that Kimfuck is gaining the capacity to destroy the evil capitalists like NK Japan and USA.
46 Strategist   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 3, 8:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

jazz_music says
PeopleUnited says
... anti- American


That clown has no idea what I read, nor will he ever.

His attacks on me are blind, wild, and irresponsible. I have him on ignore for his petulance.


he he he.
Who is that asshole Jazz? I can hardly wait to find out.
47 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 3, 9:01pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Link?

jazz_music says
null says
You've posted that


checked
48 Strategist   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 3, 9:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

null says

Hate to butt in with the revolution plans you have with Kimfuck, but we would prefer no NK missiles have the capability to even launch any missiles.
By the way, how is your day going? You must be really happy that Kimfuck is gaining the capacity to destroy the evil capitalists like NK Japan and USA.


Hey that was me. Did i screw up again?
49 jvolstad   ignore (0)   2017 Sep 3, 9:11pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Speaking of Korea, I spent this morning with one of our Korean War veterans in the VA Hospital hospice.

Become a VA Volunteer. It will change you forever!
50 jazz_music   ignore (2)   2017 Sep 3, 9:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

null says
Hate to butt in with the revolution plans you have with Kimfuck


You make no sense whatsoever.

Who is this "we" you speak of?

Me me me huh?
51 Feux Follets   ignore (0)   2017 Sep 4, 2:40am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Fake News. Unless the news is praising Trump or defending Trump, it's fake.

According to an article from one of TPB's (along with a few other posters) favorite sources of news an "Expert Pours Cold Water on North Korea Testing Hydrogen Bomb". Expert's country of origin the same as the ones who found biological growth on the ISS - go figure.

Straight from the totally upfront, honest and unbiased "Gateway Pundit" website but overlooked by usual posters on this forum as well as MSM etc..

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/09/bomb-bluff-expert-pours-cold-water-north-korea-testing-hydrogen-bomb/
Then again China and Japan have announced no detectable levels of radiation so far as reported earlier today in most news sources in that part of the world.

http://www.daily-sun.com/post/252181/Japan-China-say-no-radiation-detected-after-NK-nuke-test
52 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 4, 6:23am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

nuke nk or kiss sk goodbye.
once kim gets icbms he will threaten to launch unless US conventional forces are withdrawn from the peninsula.
then he invades the south.
then he threatens to nuke anybody/everybody unless he gets freebies for NK to survive. who needs industry when you have nukes?
window is closing fast to put this fat fuck down...
53 bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 4, 7:44am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Strategist says
bob2356 says
I'm not sure why a country would spend billions building a bomb then give it to terrorists. The retribution would be the same whether a country bombed us directly or used a terrorist to do it.

I can already think of 3 reasons:
1. Individuals with control of the nukes in a country could sell the bomb to terrorists or other countries for monetary gain. Pakistan has already done that.
2. A country like Pakistan or NK could sell a nuclear bomb to terrorists who would blow up NY City just because they hate us.
3. If attacked, these generals and dictators knowing their end has come, could just start giving away their nukes just for revenge.


1. Monetary gain? WTF. It cost billions to make a bomb. Only 9 countries have ponied up enough money to make it happen. Where are terrorists getting that kind of money? Pakistan sold technology and expertise not bombs.

2&3 Again why would they give a bomb worth billions to terrorists to possibly fuck up an attack instead of attacking us directly. Generals in a military organization are going to hand over atomic bombs to some bearded goat herders? WTF? That's just a stupid idea. Fissionable materials have distinctive characteristics. We would know where the bomb came from anyway.
54 Fucking White Male   ignore (2)   2017 Sep 4, 8:10am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

I would be super surprised if we didn't have a very good middle defense system. Unfortunately I can post why I believe that is so.

I will say that people in this thread are underestimating the US ability to keep things under wraps.

Also can someone please explain to me why building a defensive middle system is "ratcheting up the tensions"? That makes no sense to me. Of course I understand why the Chinese and Russians claim that. But no clue why the US media just laps it up.
55 Strategist   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 4, 8:18am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

bob2356 says
I can already think of 3 reasons:
1. Individuals with control of the nukes in a country could sell the bomb to terrorists or other countries for monetary gain. Pakistan has already done that.
2. A country like Pakistan or NK could sell a nuclear bomb to terrorists who would blow up NY City just because they hate us.
3. If attacked, these generals and dictators knowing their end has come, could just start giving away their nukes just for revenge.


1. Monetary gain? WTF. It cost billions to make a bomb. Only 9 countries have ponied up enough money to make it happen. Where are terrorists getting that kind of money? Pakistan sold technology and expertise not bombs.

It may cost $billions for a nuclear program and a prototype. After that it's just an assembly line. Individuals within a country with access to bombs and enriched uranium could just sell a couple for a few $million.

bob2356 says
2&3 Again why would they give a bomb worth billions to terrorists to possibly fuck up an attack instead of attacking us directly. Generals in a military organization are going to hand over atomic bombs to some bearded goat herders? WTF? That's just a stupid idea. Fissionable materials have distinctive characteristics. We would know where the bomb came from anyway.

Generals know if they use a nuke against us they will be history. So all they have to do is give a couple of nukes to far away terrorist groups and hope it vaporizes New York. Any retaliation will fall on the terrorist groups who are just too eager to martyr themselves. And good luck finding out where the bomb came from after NY is vaporized.
The best prevention is to make sure unfriendly countries don't acquire nukes in the first place.
56 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 4, 2:36pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Dudes, the hydrogen bomb was invented in 1951.

Is it a surprise that after almost ~70 years, someone else couldn't reproduce the same results?
57 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 4, 2:38pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Rin says

Is it a surprise that after almost ~70 years, someone else couldn't reproduce the same results?


I'm sure there's an app for that.
58 APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE   ignore (5)   2017 Sep 4, 4:18pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Easy to clean this up.

Leaflet NK all day every day from the sky with broadsides offering any victim of Kimfuckistan a McDonald's Happy Meal with Extra French Fries for the head of Kimfuck.

Inside of a week a member of the court will get sick of starving to death and shove a screw driver through Kimfuck's eye, rip out his eyeball and skull fuck him in celebration of the feast to come.
59 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 4, 8:50pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

airdrop pizzas inside nk, with condiments laid out like a firing range target , kim fucks head centered..
populace will get the message...
60 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 4, 8:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

kill him and you get to eat...
61 Rin   ignore (7)   2017 Sep 4, 9:57pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Hey Blue Sardine, have you ever thought about dying of natural causes, since it's illegal for me to advocate suicide?
62 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 4, 9:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Rin says
Hey Blue Sardine, have you ever thought about dying of natural causes, since it's illegal for me to advocate suicide?


Does auto-erotic asphyxiation count as natural causes? Because I've got a bet on that in the dead pool.
63 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 5, 6:42am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

It's a demonstration of efficiency and semi-entertaining to watch you draw quotes from one of your alt accounts...

Dan8267 says
Rin says
Hey Blue Sardine, have you ever thought about dying of natural causes, since it's illegal for me to advocate suicide?


Does auto-erotic asphyxiation count as natural causes? Because I've got a bet on that in the dead pool.
64 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 5, 6:44am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

I'm sure that's funny in some other multi-verse...

Dan8267 says
Rin says

Is it a surprise that after almost ~70 years, someone else couldn't reproduce the same results?


I'm sure there's an app for that.
65 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 5, 11:28am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

BlueSardine says
It's a demonstration of efficiency and semi-entertaining to watch you draw quotes from one of your alt accounts...


I have no alt accounts. I have never, ever posted on PatNet with any account but this one. Once more, you are caught in a lie.

BlueSardine says
I'm sure that's funny in some other multi-verse...


Your lack of humor is your problem, not anyone else's. Lack of humor is indicative of poor character.
66 Heraclitusstudent   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 5, 1:19pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Strategist says
The best solution is to nuke Pyongyang when they have a major event and we know the whole leadership of NK including that ugly brat will be there.
If I was President, I would do it.


How would this not start shooting immediately at the 10 millions people in Seoul? With traditional artillery?
How do you avoid China and Russia being pulled in starting WW3?
It's easy to talk tough when it's not your family under the bombs and you don't have to do the math.
67 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 5, 8:41pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

Forcing china's hand is the only viable solution. If they cut off trade with nk, kims game is over.
So for starters, lets start grabbing some of those islands in the south china sea and start developing military bases on them.
Nothing will infuriate china more than that. It may force them to negotiate us out of there by cutting kim loose...

Heraclitusstudent says
Strategist says
The best solution is to nuke Pyongyang
68 Quigley   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 5, 9:10pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Rin says
Dudes, the hydrogen bomb was invented in 1951.

Is it a surprise that after almost ~70 years, someone else couldn't reproduce the same results?


Exactly. NK is 70 years behind. They are no threat.
69 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 5, 9:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

BlueSardine says
I just declared that your stupid statement is funny.....somewhere....and you say I lack humor?
Wow....you are really really stupid...


Someone with humor would have come up with a better put down. You're not even a creative troll.
70 Dan8267   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 5, 9:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Rin says
Isn't that almost akin to 'great minds think alike'?

Rin says
BTW, Blue Sardine, I do pray for your death. Really, your life is of no value.


You and Shrek's mom must be great minds.
71 bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Sep 5, 11:08pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

nuclear physics isStrategist says

Generals know if they use a nuke against us they will be history. So all they have to do is give a couple of nukes to far away terrorist groups and hope it vaporizes New York. Any retaliation will fall on the terrorist groups who are just too eager to martyr themselves. And good luck finding out where the bomb came from after NY is vaporized.
The best prevention is to make sure unfriendly countries don't acquire nukes in the first place.


Read up on nuclear forensics. No luck is needed.

Any country that wants to spend the money to produce nuclear bombs will do so no matter what we do. short of massive nuclear strike which may or may not work. Simple fact.
72 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 6, 5:28am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote        

It's not a putdown, it's an evidence based observation...
The fact you did not recognize this confirms my statement.

Dan8267 says
BlueSardine says
I just declared that your stupid statement is funny.....somewhere....and you say I lack humor?
Wow....you are really really stupid...


Someone with humor would have come up with a better put down
73 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 6, 5:33am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

This is so bad, i'm just gonna assume you wrote it while boarding up your windows.

Dan8267 says
Rin says
Isn't that almost akin to 'great minds think alike'?

Rin says
BTW, Blue Sardine, I do pray for your death. Really, your life is of no value.


You and Shrek's mom must be great minds.
74 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 6, 5:36am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Which is why we are currently at 2:30 minutes to an ELE...
http://thebulletin.org/clock/2017
bob2356 says
Any country that wants to spend the money to produce nuclear bombs will do so no matter what we do. short of massive nuclear strike which may or may not work. Simple fact
75 BlueSardine   ignore (3)   2017 Sep 6, 5:39am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote        

Maybe this is why nobody in government gives a fuck how much debt we run up anymore...

BlueSardine says
Which is why we are currently at 2:30 minutes to an ELE...
http://thebulletin.org/clock/2017
bob2356 says
Any country that wants to spend the money to produce nuclear bombs will do so no matter what we do. short of massive nuclear strike which may or may not work. Simple fact

« First    « Previous     Comments 37 - 76 of 76     Last »


Comment as anon_c9df6 or log in at top of page:

users   about   suggestions   source code   contact  
topics   best comments   comment jail   old posts by year  
10 reasons it's a terrible time to buy  
8 groups who lie about the housing market  
37 bogus arguments about housing  
get a free bumper sticker:

top   bottom   home