Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   Strategist   2017 Sep 9, 9:13am  

They can't be serious. San Jose does not have mass transit. Amazon should go to Dallas.

"Among Amazon’s requirements: a city that is at least 45 minutes from a large international airport; has access to mass transit; and is near a “population center.” It will give preference to cities that have the potential to attract and retain strong technical talent, and that have a “stable and business-friendly environment.”
2   wave9x   2017 Sep 9, 10:39am  

San Jose has a 0.8 jobs:people ratio. They are a jobs poor city. They are picking up the housing slack for Palo Alto and Mountain View but not getting the business tax revenue they should be getting.
4   zzyzzx   2017 Sep 9, 11:43am  

Strategist says
They can't be serious. San Jose does not have mass transit. Amazon should go to Dallas.

and that have a “stable and business-friendly environment.”


That rules out Chicago.
5   Bellingham Bill   2017 Sep 9, 12:14pm  

why not both?
6   tovarichpeter   2017 Sep 9, 12:45pm  

If Amazon even announces it is moving near the SF Bay Area, rents will begin to double.
7   RWSGFY   2017 Sep 9, 12:53pm  

tovarichpeter says
If Amazon even announces it is moving near the SF Bay Area, rents will begin to double.


Gimme my $3M for my shack and I'm outta here!
8   Booger   2017 Sep 9, 2:16pm  

tovarichpeter says
If Amazon even announces it is moving near the SF Bay Area, rents will begin to double.


Do you really think that they are dumb enough to do that?
9   tovarichpeter   2017 Sep 9, 3:56pm  

No, I don't. What does frost me however is when local politicians in an area which has a critical shortage of affordable housing seem to actually want to make it even worse.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions