Nah, there's no left wing media bias
« prev   misc   next »
2   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 12, 2:55pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

"The church shooting does no favors to the liberal narrative, so it must be ignored. The shooter was black. He’s a Sudanese immigrant. He killed a white woman. He was stopped by a good guy with a gun. If the races were switched and you removed the pesky pro-Second Amendment element of the story, perhaps it may have fighting chance to compete with choreographed protests in professional sports for airtime."

It's kind of a Leftist horror show!
I'm surprised they covered it at all!
3   TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 12, 5:36pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Fascist Nazi Right Wing Biased Pew Research:

The coverage of Trump was unbelievably negative, even more negative than Obama's first 60 days was one big Media panegyric.
http://patrick.net/post/1310788/putin-s-pew-research
4   just_passing_through   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 12, 8:00pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

We just lost our CTO - she went out on maternity leave for a few months and things ran very smoothly. When she got back she was let go because it was clear we didn't need her. (reasonably sized startup biotech/hitech company)
5   iwog   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 12, 8:34pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

just_passing_through says
We just lost our CTO - she went out on maternity leave for a few months and things ran very smoothly. When she got back she was let go because it was clear we didn't need her. (reasonably sized startup biotech/hitech company)


Pretty common. It's part of the reality-that-shall-not-be-spoken.

This is the main reason why there is no feminism in 3rd world nations. It's because they don't have the luxury of paying lots of women who do nothing except hold meetings and answer phones and tell people what to do and organize birthday clubs. Just so I'm not sexist, I'll say that plenty of men occupy these roles also.

What makes it a gender issue is the fact that when you enter the jobs territory only inhabited by men, such as digging ditches or climbing power poles, useless people can easily be identified in a day and terminated without fuss.
6   anonymous   ignore (4)   2017 Oct 12, 8:44pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

"Useless people can be identified in a day and terminated without a fuss."

They should speak their mind and blog about "working conditions" while gone. This will guarantee their employer will be fearful to fire them due to Patrick's full employment policy for the useless loudmouths.
7   joeyjojojunior   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 13, 5:08am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

TwoScoopsMcGee says
The coverage of Trump was unbelievably negative, even more negative than Obama's first 60 days was one big Media panegyric.


You don't think his actions played a role in that?

In related news, coverage of Dylan Bundy and Ted Kaczinksi was unbelievably negative as well.
8   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 13, 5:37am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

TwoScoopsMcGee says

The coverage of Trump was unbelievably negative, even more negative than Obama's first 60 days was one big Media panegyric.


I'm very surprised you only read the left wing coverage of trump and obama. You should check out media American Conservative, Breitbart and Fox. No unbelievably negative coverage to be seen.

Oh right I forgot, any inconvenient facts that don't jive with what you want to believe in are fake news.
9   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 13, 5:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

just_passing_through says
We just lost our CTO - she went out on maternity leave for a few months and things ran very smoothly. When she got back she was let go because it was clear we didn't need her. (reasonably sized startup biotech/hitech company)


If this is true, which I seriously doubt, then you work for a company with a grossly incompetent executive team.
10   CBOEtrader   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 13, 5:55am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

bob2356 says
Fox. No unbelievably negative coverage to be seen.


Fox coverage was 52% negative of Trump as per that Harvard study a while back. Fox is basically NBC these days. All of them are part of the establishment mouthpiece. I like Tucker, that's about it.
12   HEYYOU   ignore (4)   2017 Nov 26, 11:50pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Red State can't protect it's citizens. Everyone knows that,why report it.

Rep/Con media: Iraq has WMD.

What a joy to see Wingnuts made to look like fools.
And it's awfully easy.
14   Patrick   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 9, 3:10pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

More details from the original post:

The media, eager to bury the story of the mass shooting at a church in Tennessee on Sunday in which a Sudanese immigrant, who is black, murdered a white mother of two and wounded six other people, including the pastor, has totally ignored the incident, conveniently using the NFL/ Trump controversy as grist for its mill.

Emanuel Kidega Samson, from Sudan, first murdered Melanie Smith, 39, in the parking lot, then entered Burnette Chapel Church of Christ and started shooting. He was only stopped by the heroism of an usher, Caleb Engle, 22, who was pistol-whipped in the face, but held tight until Samson accidentally shot himself. Engle then retrieved his firearm from his car and stood guard over Samson until police arrived.


Yes, this was studiously ignored by the mainstream media, and it is a plausible explanation that the story was ignored because of media prejudice.
15   anon_eb65b   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 9, 3:12pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

No media bias in the first story.
If I write something on my piece of paper I'm a forger.
Republicans are so stupid.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-news-corrects-story-claiming-204946923.html
16   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 9, 5:00pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

Fucking White Male says
http://www.dailywire.com/news/21559/media-ignore-mass-shooting-tennessee-because-it-hank-berrien


It's not a mass shooting. The definition of mass shooting is 3 or more people killed.

Patrick says

Yes, this was studiously ignored by the mainstream media, and it is a plausible explanation that the story was ignored because of media prejudice.


There have been 317 mass shootings as of nov 15th. Were they all in the mainstream media? No, not even close. So what makes 1 person killed in this 1 case so special the "mainstream media" should have jumped on it when they didn't cover hundreds of much bigger shootings? Looks like the daily wire story is the bias.
17   TwoScoopsMcGee   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 9, 6:06pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Has the media recently made a big "mistake" on breaking news in favor of Trump, to the detriment of a Democrat?

Always seems they're correcting stories that originally are targeting GEOTUS and never ones that make his foes look bad.

Some leaker just got busted today, or it was deliberate. No way multiple agencies made the same careless mistake at the same time. "Trusted Sources" gave them a barium meal with "September 4th" on it.

Comment as anon_85b70 or log in at top of page: