Waveform Analysis Suggests m240 Was the Weapon Used in Vegas
« prev   random   next »

1
8

Waveform Analysis Suggests m240 Was the Weapon Used in Vegas

By NuttBoxer following x   2017 Oct 9, 11:26am 814 views   25 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


The m24 is a belt fed machine gun primarily used by military. Reading through some of the comments I see military/veterans who have handled an m240 affirming the video's analysis. My question is simple. Who really killed and injured all those innocent people in Las Vegas? I think an investigation of the family's finances in the past year would be a good place to start.
1   Satoshi_Nakamoto   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 9, 11:27am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

NuttBoxer says
The m24 is a belt fed machine gun only legal for military use.


Not true: there are some of these floating around on civilian market. You'll have to shell out north of $200K to get one though.
2   NuttBoxer   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 9, 11:34am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sorry, in California everything's illegal, so I tend to make some assumptions. I've corrected the post.
3   iwog   ignore (3)   2017 Oct 9, 11:42am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

I've heard the audio from Las Vegas and I've heard belt-fed machine guns first hand.

There was no gunfire happening at 10 rounds per second. What I heard on all the videos was entirely constant with a bump stock semi-automatic rifle with a large magazine. Also a M24 would not have needed frequent reloading.

This was not a conspiracy and there was not a secret second shooter.
4   NuttBoxer   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 9, 11:52am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

People who fire those guns for a living disagree with you.
5   CBOEtrader   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 9, 12:05pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Inconclusive.

Wouldn't they be able to check the forensics of the bullets and determine gun type, direction, etc...?

This part seems like an easy puzzle to solve.
6   iwog   ignore (3)   2017 Oct 9, 12:59pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

NuttBoxer says
People who fire those guns for a living disagree with you.


I'm positive you're wrong. What you really meant to say is a number of conspiracy theorists who claim to be gun experts disagree with me. This is like the 9/11 truther nonsense where actual experts who actually blew up buildings for a living claimed it was two planes hitting the towers and a bunch of idiots with just tangental knowledge of explosives decided they were experts and claimed the building was demolished by controlled explosions.
7   NuttBoxer   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 9, 2:08pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

CBOEtrader says
Wouldn't they be able to check the forensics of the bullets and determine gun type, direction, etc...?

This part seems like an easy puzzle to solve.


Agreed, so the fact that the guns don't sound the same, or seem to have the same rate of fire makes me either question the competence of the investigators, or the credibility of their findings.
8   NuttBoxer   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 9, 2:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

@iwog Don't you think we owe it to the deceased to go over every detail of this incident with a fine tooth comb, more than once if elements of the official story appear questionable? Especially if they could point to the killer still being at large?

Why are you so dismissive based on personal recollection that is how old and not recorded? If you can disprove the relevance of the video itself, I'd be more interested in that than what you think you remember two different guns sounding like.
9   jazz_music   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 9, 3:51pm   ↑ like (7)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

I feel disinterested because I know that the authorities are not going to reveal what they know unless and until they can all agree that it has been properly sanitized with respect to political effects and possibilities for agitation of certain factions.

The value, the tenet, of a well-informed public has fallen to the the needs of authoritarian rulership on behalf of monied interests and keeping social order above all else.

Those are the principles that pay. Those are the ideals that yield the bonuses, the promotions, the cushy assignments and the re-elections.

Unless we all show up with pitchforks and torches yelling for something, we are basically set up to get as dismissed as we can possibly be.

Call me paranoid.
10   anonymous   ignore (5)   2017 Oct 9, 4:05pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Nuttboxer, I hear you, but according to YouTube There is 100% PROOF (they all love stressing that word) of the following

1. There was a second shooter on the 32nd floor.
2. There was a second shooter on the 4th floor.
3. There was a second shooter at the bellagio and the media won't report it.
4. There were no shooters on the 32nd floor
5. The brother in FL who did the interviews is wearing a wire and SOMEONE is feeding him information.
6. There was a shooter on the grounds.
7. The shooting was staged and no one was hurt (i.e. They used crisis actors & fake blood)
8 Now - they used a M240.

So yes while a thorough investigation should be done - should they knock down EVERYTHING that someone says on Youtube? Where do you draw the line?

It's funny - unlike the Kennedy assasination where there was only one video - you would think all the video cameras now would make the "truth" easier to determine. Instead, the opposite has happened and all the video footage seems to do is exponentially multiply the number of conspiracy theories.
11   iwog   ignore (3)   2017 Oct 9, 5:31pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

NuttBoxer says
@iwog Don't you think we owe it to the deceased to go over every detail of this incident with a fine tooth comb, more than once if elements of the official story appear questionable? Especially if they could point to the killer still being at large?


No we don't.

The experts will render expert opinions and the keyboard geniuses will call them all liars and make the families of the dead suffer. They will appear on TV and cause horrible emotional pain because they need something in their pathetic lives to live for.

This is horrible behavior and I consider it vile and sick.
12   anonymous   ignore (5)   2017 Oct 9, 7:57pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Iwog said "They will appear on TV and cause horrible emotional pain. "

At minimum. Recall how obsessed Gary was about the Sandy Hook dad with "no tears"? Turns out to this day, self styled "investigators" seek out the families and confront them - accusing them of being globalists or other similar nonsense. As if Losing a family member isn't bad enough - after 5 years they may be able to put their loss behind them and start a new family- yet they live in constant fear of their next confrontation with some guy from the internet seeking THE TRUTH.

In all seriousness- pray that the survivors in those Las Vegas videos are never identified. In many ways, their suffering is only beginning.
13   Patrick   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 9, 8:05pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Yup, seems about 10 rounds per second:
14   Patrick   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 9, 8:07pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Again, about 10 rounds per second:
16   Patrick   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 9, 8:18pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Not perfectly spaced though. Makes me think it's not military equipment, which I would expect would be higher precision.
17   errc   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 9, 8:58pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Still searching for answers?

By late Tuesday, I ceded to what’s the point? Nothing will change.

Not to mention, at that point there is larger problems to concern with. Like the reactions to this horrific event, by the segment of the population who share much in common with the shooter. Failed Loser Alcoholics with an unhealthy Love of Guns.

The people who fight for your right to go Paddock on my family, all the whole fight against our ability to receive healthcare afterwards. It’s actually something real worthy of having a healthy fear of.
18   BorderPatrol   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 9, 9:00pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

my impartial opinions on these conspiracy theories:

- lone shooter on the 32rd floor. no conspiracy theories here.
- 9/11 an inside job? i have not seen any solid evidence, but considering Americans have been tricked into war several times before, i wouldn't be surprised.
- Emily's arm DOES look crooked. other claims are not credible.
- JFK definitely a conspiracy and cover-up. we even have a dead-bed confession.
- man on the moon. LOL. not a chance in hell.

btw, now is a good time to invest in LV rentals?
19   anonymous   ignore (5)   2017 Oct 9, 9:36pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Patrick says
Again, about 10 rounds per second:


LISTEN to this video. There are two guns being fired. What are the odds a single person was acting alone?
20   Sniper   ignore (10)   2017 Oct 9, 9:51pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anonymous says
LISTEN to this video. There are two guns being fired.


Any chance that was an echo, and I'm not talking about Amazon?
21   anonymous   ignore (5)   2017 Oct 9, 10:13pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Yes - as someone who grew up there the very dry air causes a marked & pronounced echo. I never heard it to that degree living in CA or now back east. 4th of July in particular was an amazing light & acoustic show out at the old Silver Bowl.
22   HEY YOU   ignore (7)   2017 Oct 10, 12:11am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

The big question is; Who Pissed him off?
23   BorderPatrol   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 10, 12:13am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anonymous says
LISTEN to this video. There are two guns being fired. What are the odds a single person was acting alone?


i think just one gun. the sound of the muzzle flashes and the sound of the bullets hitting the ground.
24   NuttBoxer   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 10, 12:05pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anonymous says
Nuttboxer, I hear you, but according to YouTube There is 100% PROOF (they all love stressing that word) of the following


How much work is too much when this many people died? I would say to track down every lead that has any credibility. The video I posted seems to be one of those, as the fire pattern doesn't line up with the official story.
25   jazz_music   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 10, 4:23pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Waveform Analysis Suggests ...

LOL

There actually was a Stanford research study that showed tinfoil hats leave your head more exposed to rays (i.e. CIA mind-reading rays)

So the Illuminati will melt your brain if you leave your head unprotected. This could explain the shooter's motive too!!!

Comment as anon_1a476 or log in at top of page: