Mueller being investigated for Russian collusion!
« prev   random   next »

4
1

Mueller being investigated for Russian collusion!

By Quigley following x   2017 Oct 18, 5:48am 1,508 views   33 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


So now it appears that Hillary was the one colluding with the Russians to compromise state security, and the special counsel investigating the Trump campaign for collusion...was involved in the real collusion!

What a world!

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/355957-senate-judiciary-opens-probe-into-obama-era-russian-nuclear-bribery#
1   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 5:58am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Want to post the part where the article mentions Mueller? I can't find it.
2   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 6:42am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

PCGyver says
Some people are just not honest


Mueller or quigley?
3   Sniper   ignore (10)   2017 Oct 18, 7:30am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says
Want to post the part where the article mentions Mueller? I can't find it.


Who was the FBI director at that time?? Duh?
4   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 18, 8:07am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
compromise state security


They approved the sale of a Canadian company to a Russian one. Has anyone laid out a case as to how this would compromise state security? The world has a 200 yr supply of uranium. Is someone afraid that Russia is going to corner the uranium market and start an arms race with us? Are they going to corner the market on hydrogen too? By the way, the Russian company gets control of the uranium mined there, but they cannot export it from the US. That's right, it has to be used in the US.

This seems like pure triggering of the right wing faithful based on... 'Klinton Cash... Uranium..._____'. What am I missing?
5   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 8:22am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Mueller was just the bag man. Clinton collided with Russians corrupting agencies in return for fat speaking fees and $145,000,000 in donations to her private “charity.” That’s now established fact according to unveiled FBI investigations, and Congress has opened their own investigation.

I just find it terribly ironic that a DNC fantasy about Trumpian/Russo collusion which lacks evidence or any degree of reasonable pretext is being hotly pursued while a confirmed case of aggregious corruption by the other candidate was buried by the Obama administration for seven years
6   joeyjojojunior   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 9:02am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Quigley says
I just find it terribly ironic that a DNC fantasy about Trumpian/Russo collusion which lacks evidence or any degree of reasonable pretext is being hotly pursued while a confirmed case of aggregious corruption by the other candidate was buried by the Obama administration for seven years


I'm all for investigating Clinton and investigating Trump. Let's put them both in jail if that's what the evidence shows.
7   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 9:16am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

YesYNot says
Canadian company

with extensive US Uranium holdings that required approval.

The Russians bribed, extorted, threatened many, there was an active investigation into it. They also gave BIG BUCKS to the Clinton Foundation, which cinched the deal.

Hillary colluded with Russia. I heard the McCabe was running the FBI investigation too. The same McCabe whose wife McAuliffe put up for the state legislature.

Quigley says
I just find it terribly ironic that a DNC fantasy about Trumpian/Russo collusion which lacks evidence or any degree of reasonable pretext is being hotly pursued while a confirmed case of aggregious corruption by the other candidate was buried by the Obama administration for seven years


Yep. With Uranium One, there's actual meat there , and money exchanged and results. #LockHerUp
8   HEY YOU   ignore (7)   2017 Oct 18, 9:17am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says
Mueller or quigley?

Republicans! They just can't be blamed because of an insanity defense.
9   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 9:53am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

It's a good thing Uranium One spent millions in bribes and extortion, instead of a few thousand on Facebook Ads and a free Tumblr Pokemon Page, both promoting the subject of Police Brutality . Then it would have been a national news headline long ago.
10   errc   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 18, 9:59am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Is it merely coincidence that this drops at the same time Sessions is being questioned by the judiciary committee?
11   mell   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 10:08am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

This is the reason Trump is prez. You can whine and hate all you want, but the fact is that the establishment on both sides is so corrupt that even left-leaning outlets/people like Wikileaks/Assange prefer DT over HRC. The simple difference is not that Trump is innocent in any way but that he honestly details and lays open the blatant pay to play corruption by admitting and detailing how he took advantage during many "deals" of the corruptness of people like HRC and others to pay them off to lobby for his continued success. And he is using the same game for the US as a nation and for its middle-class people (otherwise only being shamed by the leftoids for bullshit made up such as "white" or "male" privilege) who feel included now in the "deal-making" while exposing their corruption with every deal or compromise he makes. Mainstream Republicucks stabbing him in the back? No problem! There are Dems on the other side of the isle eagerly slobbering for a deal on any topic, be it DACA or something else. And he knows that when any "investigation" completes it will find 1000 times more dirt on his fellow career politician cucks then himself, so it will take them down way before him. You won't see an impeachment any time soon, most likely not at all.
12   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 10:33am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Quigley says
Mueller was just the bag man. Clinton collided with Russians corrupting agencies in return for fat speaking fees and $145,000,000 in donations to her private “charity.” That’s now established fact according to unveiled FBI investigations, and Congress has opened their own investigation.


When did the clinton foundation go private? I missed that. Want to post something about when that happened?

I also missed where the article said mueller was the bag man. I couldn't find mueller's name in the article at all. or any mention of him being investigated. Second request for you to post that section for us to see. Taking up running and hiding like CIC?

TwoScoopsMcGee says
It's a good thing Uranium One spent millions in bribes and extortion,


Who was the bag man for the other 14 votes on the uranium deal and how much did those votes cost? Still waiting and waiting and waiting for an answer. More running and hiding.
13   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 10:36am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says
Who was the bag man for the other 14 votes on the uranium deal and how much did those votes cost? Still waiting and waiting and waiting for an answer. More running and hiding.


We'll have to have an investigation. One good question is "Did Rosneft/Tenex continue to donate to the Clinton Foundation after the merger was approved?"

If they genuinely loved the Clinton Foundation, they'd have kept donating, yes?

Also, Eric Holder has to be investigated.
14   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 10:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-robert-mueller-uranium/
bob2356 says
I also missed where the article said mueller was the bag man.
16   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 11:07am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Quigley says
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-robert-mueller-uranium/
bob2356 says
I also missed where the article said mueller was the bag man.


WTF? This a debunking article. Have you been smoking TBP's dope?
17   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Oct 18, 11:10am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Quigley says
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-robert-mueller-uranium/


Here's the summary of that link:

Despite partisan attempts to make it appear conspiratorial, the transfer of the sample of confiscated uranium was simply an instance of cooperative law enforcement between three countries: the U.S., Georgia, and Russia. The Russia government requested a sample of the uranium for forensic testing, the Georgian government signed off on it, and the U.S. government carried out the delivery.

So some right wing jackoff reads about the above, reports some half truths making it as misleading as possible, and the angry masses get triggered, because they want to believe that the left is the Devil and that Mueller is part of the lefty conspiracy.
It's really sad to see the lack of critical thinking skills in this country.
18   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 11:19am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

TwoScoopsMcGee says
bob2356 says
Who was the bag man for the other 14 votes on the uranium deal and how much did those votes cost? Still waiting and waiting and waiting for an answer. More running and hiding.


We'll have to have an investigation.


Should we also investigate if aliens took down the wtc? So 15 of the highest officials in government were all secretly bribed to vote for a Russian company owning a Canadian company with access uranium production. No one has said a peep about it for 7 years. No bank transactions, no whistleblowers, no no financial trail, no nothing. All those millions of dollars just disappeared into the ether. Yet the president couldn't keep a blowjob in his own office secret.

Trumptards get crazier and crazier every day.
19   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 11:24am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

You asked for a link asserting Mueller was the bag man. I gave you the most Leftist site I could find which confirms that.
What’s the problem?
20   joeyjojojunior   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 12:01pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
You asked for a link asserting Mueller was the bag man. I gave you the most Leftist site I could find which confirms that.
What’s the problem?


Can you show me the part that "confirms" it? I see nothing in there that remotely confirms anything you said.
21   justme   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 12:27pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Bullshit headline, there is not a word about Robert Mueller in the article, if I can trust my browser search function.

See also: http://patrick.net/post/1311199/?c=1451040
22   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 1:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says
Should we also investigate if aliens took down the wtc? So 15 of the highest officials in government were all secretly bribed to vote for a Russian company owning a Canadian company with access uranium production. No one has said a peep about it for 7 years. No bank transactions, no whistleblowers, no no financial trail, no nothing. All those millions of dollars just disappeared into the ether. Yet the president couldn't keep a blowjob in his own office secret.


Yeah, okay. A Sec. of State's Foundation takes money from a Russian firm that needs US Approval to buy a Company, donations were actually made, the FBI was aware of skulldruggery around the Acquisition, and the Russian firm eventually gets approval, but it's the equivalent of looking into Space Aliens.

Pretty Desperate Attempt, it wasn't apples and oranges, it was Apples and Limestone, the latter isn't even a fruit or food at all.
23   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 3:47pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

TwoScoopsMcGee says


Yeah, okay. A Sec. of State's Foundation takes money from a Russian firm that needs US Approval to buy a Company, donations were actually made,


me123 says
Try this Bullshit Bobby, since apparently Google doesn't work on your computer:


How did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes guys. Run and hide. Run and hide.
24   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 5:45pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says

How did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes guys. Run and hide. Run and hide.


False equivalency! You don’t need to prove collusion or corruption of every person to prove that one person is guilty. That’s just asinine.
25   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 18, 6:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
bob2356 says

How did the Russians pay for the other 14 votes guys. Run and hide. Run and hide.


False equivalency! You don’t need to prove collusion or corruption of every person to prove that one person is guilty. That’s just asinine.


So how did the Russians get all 15 votes for the uranium production if only 1 person was bribed? Explain that. What is the point of only corrupting 1 person when you need 15 votes? That's asinine.
27   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Oct 18, 9:15pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

bob2356 says
What is the point of only corrupting 1 person when you need 15 votes? That's asinine.


So NOW you’re interested in motive? When people everywhere pointed out that the DNC conspiracy theory about Trump-Russia collisions didn’t make sense because motive, you didn’t care. Now we have true corruption and collusion and you want to split hairs on motive? She was the top dawg on that list. Obviously she wanted the most quid pro quo. The other smaller fry probably got subscriptions to the jelly of the month club or phat positions on her charity or donations to their PAC or whatever. It’s not my job to chase that down. A fair number probably didn’t need to be bought at all. They were just told that this was the right decision by The Kkklinton Kartel and they’d vote the right way if they didn’t want to wind up a suspicious suicide!
28   joeyjojojunior   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 19, 3:30am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
When people everywhere pointed out that the DNC conspiracy theory about Trump-Russia collisions didn’t make sense because motive, you didn’t care.


What are you talking about? The motive was obvious--they would control Trump.. He almost immediately paid dividends by changing the Republican platform on Russia/Ukraine.
29   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 19, 3:51am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

me123 says
bob2356 says
So how did the Russians get all 15 votes for the uranium production if only 1 person was bribed?


Is Google broken out in your barn?


Google didn;t come up with any answer for me how about yuou share what you found on this. Run and hide.
30   bob2356   ignore (1)   2017 Oct 19, 4:03am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Quigley says
So NOW you’re interested in motive? When people everywhere pointed out that the DNC conspiracy theory about Trump-Russia collisions didn’t make sense because motive, you didn’t care. Now we have true corruption and collusion and you want to split hairs on motive? She was the top dawg on that list. Obviously she wanted the most quid pro quo. The other smaller fry probably got subscriptions to the jelly of the month club or phat positions on her charity or donations to their PAC or whatever. It’s not my job to chase that down. A fair number probably didn’t need to be bought at all. They were just told that this was the right decision by The Kkklinton Kartel and they’d vote the right way if they didn’t want to wind up a suspicious suicide!


She was top dawg on what list? Can you post the list for us? Probably got subscriptions is the best you can come up with? Clinton got hundreds of millions and everyone else got subscriptions? Positions on her charity? Donations to their pac? Show me the money. Or run and hide.

Do you want to stop embarrassing yourself now or keep on going?


I

Comment as anon_1a476 or log in at top of page: