« prev   random   next »
1   Hugolas_Madurez   ignore (4)   2017 Dec 5, 8:41am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

No. Too close to projects.
2   Tenpoundbass   ignore (15)   2017 Dec 5, 8:47am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I'm surprised there isn't some Silicone Gel filled Shingles and roofing membrane at least.
3   rigidmember   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 5, 9:03am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

No way for the following reasons:

1) Too close to the projects.
2) You may be close to the City but still not close enough. Try to take muni into the City from out there and it will take forever. Plus, you might want to pack a gun or knife for the ride home in the dark after work.
3) Don't want to deal with the ghettoness of the muni ride and think you'll drive into downtown? Break open that bank account for parking or be prepared for parking tickets and/or getting your car broken into numerous times attempting to street park.
4) It's a superfund site. Do you trust your life and the lives of your kids, born or unborn, to the entities responsible for making sure the site is "clean enough" to be habitable?
5) No one will want to come visit, see #1.

This whole development is catered to those who want to live in the City but can't afford to live "in" the City. You might as well live in the east bay and ride bart.
4   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 5, 9:50am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If you enjoy being blow darted and crucified by pygmies, you will enjoy living in Hunter's Point.
5   BayArea   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 5, 12:39pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Regions that are on a clear path to gentrification, I’d consider... Hunters Point? Probably not.
6   Strategist   ignore (2)   2017 Dec 5, 5:44pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

On a nuclear dump site? Hell no. I'm not stupid.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions