A president who'd all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library or to shine George W. Bush's shoes:
« prev   random   next »

1
1

A president who'd all but call a senator a whore is unfit to clean toilets in Obama's presidential library or to shine George W. Bush's shoes:

By FNWGMOBDVZXDNW following x   2017 Dec 14, 7:49am 416 views   15 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


Politically neutral USA today was trying to keep their opinions to themselves. This strategy seems to have failed them, as their collective head has exploded and spewed a rancid stew of Trump thoughts across their paper.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/12/12/trump-lows-ever-hit-rock-bottom-editorials-debates/945947001/ #politics
1   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2017 Dec 14, 8:15am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

That editorial was completely against every founding principal of USA Today that Gannett and Neuharth and its founding editors had for the publication. I'm sure it inspired a number of phone calls. All light, no heat is what framed the thing. The board meeting that preceded the edition must have been interesting.
2   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 14, 8:37am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

She’s a political whore and everyone knows it. Trump knows it from personal experience. Methinks the Democraps doth protest too much!
3   anon_425a8   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 14, 9:16am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anonymous says
Politically neutral USA today


When was that? They've never been Politically neutral.
4   georgeliberte   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 14, 9:21am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Yeah, she promised to take care of all my needs if I would just vote for her.
5   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 14, 9:54am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

"A president who'd all but call a senator a whore"

I know. Anybody who wastes time stating the obvious like that is just plain senile.
6   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Dec 14, 10:03am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

anon_425a8 says
When was that? They've never been Politically neutral.

I forgot. Breitbart is neutral and Daily Stormer is slightly right of center.

If true Dems ran CNN, they'd be stating what everybody knows. Donny got down on his knees in front of Russian oligarchs and begged them for some of that sweet warm Russian laundry money. In the end, he took it up the ass and is now owned by Russians. In frequent fits of projection, he claims that others would have done similar - 'Mitt would have got down on his knees' (to blow me).. 'Gilibrand would have done anything' (I'm talking about the really nasty shit). We all know the dark nasty place he goes to when he comes up with these lines.
7   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2017 Dec 14, 10:29am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Somali pirates bum blast Gillibrand and she pays them to suck the shit off of their dicks because she hates FREEDOM!

Everyone knows that.
8   HEYYOU   ignore (6)   2017 Dec 14, 10:42am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says
We all know the dark nasty place he goes to when he comes up with these lines.


How dare you offend.....slimy socialist Trump voters/supporters!
9   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 14, 12:07pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says

If true Dems ran CNN, they'd be stating what everybody knows.

Wants to believe in the absence of evidence.

I know, I know, that fabled evidence is "Just around the corner". It's gonna have to be an awful lot of money to bribe a guy who is already rich, gotta be a paper trail somewhere.

I think timelines on the coming "proof" of Trump's "Russia Collusion" can now be measured in Friedman Units

It has now been at least 2.5 FUs since Dems claimed Trump-Russia Collusion.
10   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Dec 14, 12:20pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

There's already plenty of evidence of collusion in my book, and you should start the clock when Mueller was appointed. But this thread isn't really about collusion, unless you are talking about collusion to get senators to suck Donald's little schlong while Melania rapes him with her stilettos and Ivanka feeds him KFC until his dick goes limp and he starts crying and asking where he is.
11   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 14, 12:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Oh, and yes, it was horrible that Pocahontas called Gildebrand or whatever the name of the long time Clinton Crony was, a slut by default.

You can't slut shame somebody without they being called a slut first, so shame on Pocahontas.
12   Rew   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 14, 12:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

How long did Watergate take?
13   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2017 Dec 14, 2:02pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

TRUMPLIGULA! should start every day shrieking at a TV camera commanding AMERICA! and everyone in it to such his dick. After a couple of years, it would seem normal and homey.
14   Ceffer   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 14, 2:11pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
TRUMPLIGULA! should start every day shrieking at a TV camera commanding AMERICA! and everyone in it to such his dick. After a couple of years, it would seem normal and homey.

Yes. Warm, fuzzy and paternal, just as the Founding Fathers intended.
15   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2017 Dec 14, 2:16pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Ceffer says
Yes. Warm, fuzzy and paternal, just as the Founding Fathers intended.


The 2nd Amendment was supposed to provide compliance and blow jobs from Indians who didn't understand their obligations as sex slaves.

Comment as anon_bb286 or log in at top of page: