« prev   random   next »

6
9

Calling Mueller investigation a coup is extremely irresponsible

By Tim Aurora following x   2017 Dec 18, 1:33pm 4,553 views   53 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


#politics

Calling Mueller investigation a coup is extremely irresponsible. Even when Trump got elected using an enemy power ( and yes I am very convinced of that) , Democrats did not call it a coup but rather stuck to their democratic norms.

Now Fox news is calling a legitimate investigation, and it may be imperfect, a coup and calling Mueller to be taken out in cuffs is extremely irresponsible and a sign of a fascist government.

« First    « Previous    Comments 14 - 53 of 53    Last »

15   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Dec 19, 7:40am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

anon_8f378 says
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/10/21/17-intelligence-agencies-russia-behind-hacking/92514592/


17 intelligence organizations or 4?

"I heard it was 17 agencies. I said, boy, that’s a lot. Do we even have that many intelligence agencies? Right, let’s check that," Trump told NBC’s Hallie Jackson. "We did some heavy research. It turned out to be three or four. It wasn’t 17.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/jul/06/17-intelligence-organizations-or-four-either-way-r/
16   someone else   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 19, 7:45am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
Even when Trump got elected using an enemy power ( and yes I am very convinced of that)


Maybe it's easier to believe it was a nefarious plot by Boris and Natasha than it is to believe the truth that our democracy worked correctly, and reflected the will of the people to elect anyone but Hillary.

17   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Dec 19, 7:51am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rando says
Tim Aurora says
Even when Trump got elected using an enemy power ( and yes I am very convinced of that)


Maybe it's easier to believe it was a nefarious plot by Boris and Natasha than it is to believe the truth that our democracy worked correctly, and reflected the will of the people to elect anyone but Hillary.



@Patrick it’s nice to see you’ve come around, to the actual reason Trump won the election. ABC
18   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Dec 19, 8:00am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I disagree that democracy worked correctly.

The media sabotaged Bernies run, by blacklisting pretty much all coverage of him, and constantly airing #FakeNews wrt the delegate count in the primary.

The DNC also colluded to subvert Democracy, and the will of the people, in every which way, between avoiding prime time debates and instead, scheduling them when people would be least likely to watch, to pushing the narrative that Hilldog already had it in the bag
19   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 19, 8:02am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rando says
Maybe it's easier to believe it was a nefarious plot by Boris and Natasha than it is to believe the truth that our democracy worked correctly, and reflected the will of the people to elect anyone but Hillary.


Patrick--do you dispute the conclusions from all the US Intelligence Services then? On what basis?
20   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 19, 8:10am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Perhaps on the basis that the three agencies which actually attested (based on third party analysis) that the Russians did it were the FBI (which recently has been exposed for using political and not justice criteria for their actions), the CIA (big Clinton fans, Deep State as Deep State gets), and the NSA (discredited agency found to be abusing the Constitution and doing tons of illegal surveillance).

So three agencies known for their extreme political leanings “examined” a few pages of data released by a third party private company and decided the Russians did it.

So not believable.

If you believe that, I have a WaPo story about banned words to sell you.

What’s that? You already bought that story?
How embarrassing for you!

http://patrick.net/post/1312531/2017-12-17-cdc-gets-a-list-of-banned-words-such-as-science-based-or-evidence-based
21   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2017 Dec 19, 8:12am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
Perhaps on the basis that the three agencies which actually attested (based on third party analysis) that the Russians did it were the FBI (which recently has been exposed for using political and not justice criteria for their actions), the CIA (big Clinton fans, Deep State as Deep State gets), and the NSA (discredited agency found to be abusing the Constitution and doing tons of illegal surveillance).


That's factually incorrect. And what do you mean by "did it"?

It is well established that the Russians waged a huge campaign to help Trump's election chances. There is absolutely no denying it.
22   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Dec 19, 8:29am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
Perhaps on the basis that the three agencies which actually attested (based on third party analysis) that the Russians did it were the FBI (which recently has been exposed for using political and not justice criteria for their actions), the CIA (big Clinton fans, Deep State as Deep State gets), and the NSA (discredited agency found to be abusing the Constitution and doing tons of illegal surveillance).

So three agencies known for their extreme political leanings “examined” a few pages of data released by a third party private company and decided the Russians did it.

So not believable.

If you believe that, I have a WaPo story about banned words to sell you.

What’s that? You already bought that story?
How embarrassing for you!

http://patrick.net/post/1312531/2017-12-17-cdc-gets-a-list-of-banned-words-such-as-science-...


Proof that Propaganda works very effectively

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42409144
23   anonymous   ignore (null)   2017 Dec 19, 8:32am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Perhaps on the basis that the three agencies which actually attested (based on third party analysis) that the Russians did it were the FBI (which recently has been exposed for using political and not justice criteria for their actions), the CIA (big Clinton fans, Deep State as Deep State gets), and the NSA (discredited agency found to be abusing the Constitution and doing tons of illegal surveillance)

———————-

So the Hyper-Authoritarian FBI, CIA, and NSA, are all out to get Trump? That’s bizarre, especially because the majority of the people that comprise these institutions are Right Wing Authoritarians, why on Earth would they all conspire against Trump? Trump and his minions embody everything that they stand for. I think you’re confused about reality here
24   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (34)   2017 Dec 19, 8:54am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Guys at NSA are the most left-wing crowd you will likely meet as a cohort in USG.

They'll talk to CIA and FBI delegations when it entertains them. For the most part, NSA regards personnel from these agencies as sub-standard, the way FBI would view ATF.

From NSA's point of view, Trump is another wackjob like Milosovic or Videla or Whitlam on his way to the dumpster fire of history.
25   Quigley   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 19, 9:13am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

HappyGilmore says
It is well established that the Russians waged a huge campaign to help Trump's election chances. There is absolutely no denying it.


There’s still oceans of doubt on that issue, combined with a severe lack of damning evidence.
However! If the Russians DID wage such an effective effort to get Trump elected, this should be viewed as a demonstration of friendship to the American people, whereby the Russians came to our aid against the deeply entrenched and abusive elite oligarchy. This is good on many fronts, as we need friendship with the Russians if we are to halt our national decline and ensure American relevance into the future. Conflict with another stable and potentially friendly nuclear power is the opposite of our interests as citizens.

Considering the nuclear papers that were recently released, the certainty of extinction of most life on Earth should a nuclear war break out among the powers, and the very real possibility that such a war would extinguish human life from the universe, i declare this truth.
Anyone who pushes for conflict with Russia is a traitor to the human race.
26   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2017 Dec 19, 9:20am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

anon_968c8 says
Would that be all 17 intelligence agencies? or maybe 10? or maybe 3? or maybe NONE?


The analysts were literally hand picked by Obama's Clapper and Brennan. They came to the conclusion they were chosen to reach.

Quigley says
However! If the Russians DID wage such an effective effort to get Trump elected, this should be viewed as a demonstration of friendship to the American people, whereby the Russians came to our aid against the deeply entrenched and abusive elite oligarchy. This is good on many fronts, as we need friendship with the Russians if we are to halt our national decline and ensure American relevance into the future. Conflict with another stable and potentially friendly nuclear power is the opposite of our interests as citizens.

Yep, if the Russians were behind Wikileaks, Podesta Hack, etc. they should get the Pulitzer Prize.

The Russians "Rigged" the Election by leaking information that proved the DNC/Hillary Campaign Rigged the Primaries.

A good relationship with Russia = more sources of oil, the lifeblood of the US Economy, a "monopoly" on Nukes since only the US/Russia have them in massive quantities, and checks the spread of Radical Islam, China, AND the EuroReich. With us, the Russians no longer need to kiss Chinese - the real potential threat - butt.

Consider the EuroFuhrer won't contribute the minimum to NATO but is pushing hard for an EU Army.

Under Grouchy Europeans, they had a massive bloody war every 20 years. Since the NATO and thus the USA in charge of European Military Affairs, there hasn't been a war in 70 years. The Germans will never stop trying to dominate Europe, by military or economic/political means.
27   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2017 Dec 19, 9:26am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

errc says
The media sabotaged Bernies run, by blacklisting pretty much all coverage of him, and constantly airing #FakeNews wrt the delegate count in the primary.


The Emails "Russia" leaked actually proved that it was the DNC/Hillary Camp, Media figures were even begging them for anti-Bernie leads to use in stories. Total Collusion to rig the primary, and thus the Election.

If Bernie had ran, Trump may not have been President because unlike Hillary, Bernie could turn out the Youth Vote.
29   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Dec 19, 9:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
However! If the Russians DID wage such an effective effort to get Trump elected, this should be viewed as a demonstration of friendship to the American people,

They did wage the effort. They helped further division in the electorate. They helped elect a guy who was friendly toward authoritarians and lowers the US status in the world. That helps drive more countries toward Russia or China. However, they like anybody who deals with Trump probably are getting something different than was advertised.
TwoScoopsMcGee says
A good relationship with Russia = more sources of oil, the lifeblood of the US Economy, a "monopoly" on Nukes since only the US/Russia have them in massive quantities, and checks the spread of Radical Islam, China, AND the EuroReich

We don't need Russian oil. Further, sharing a 'monopoly' on nukes is not good if you disagree on how to use that power. What would happen to all of the alliances around the world? Would we then be friendly with Iran, because Russia is? Would we let our 'buddy' Russia roll over neighboring countries, because Trump thinks that Putin is swell?
30   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2017 Dec 19, 10:48am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

FNWGMOBDVZXDNW says
We don't need Russian oil. Further, sharing a 'monopoly' on nukes is not good if you disagree on how to use that power. What would happen to all of the alliances around the world? Would we then be friendly with Iran, because Russia is? Would we let our 'buddy' Russia roll over neighboring countries, because Trump thinks that Putin is swell?


Yes, Trump is really cozying up to Iran. I mean, c'mon man... hahahaha. The Neoliberal Old Guard talking heads are actually mad at Trump over criticism of the Iran Deal.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/10/23/trumps-irrational-hatred-of-the-iran-deal
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/10/11/politics/iran-trump-reliability-north-korea/index.html
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-wagner/can-the-iranian-nuclear-d_b_13453668.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/13/trump-iran-nuclear-deal-congress
I think you've got him confused with the last President, who took an axe into a highly productive investigation on Hezbollah's criminal activities, probably as a signal of goodwill to authoritarian Iranian Mullahs.
31   HEYYOU   ignore (18)   2017 Dec 19, 12:39pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Trump can fire Mueller.
He can't fire the States' Attorney's General.
Pandora's Box- Fraud,Tax evasion,Money laundering?
Just a start?
32   rocketjoe79   ignore (0)   2017 Dec 19, 1:09pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
Quigley says
Tim Aurora says
Even when Trump got elected using an enemy power ( and yes I am very convinced of that) , Democrats did not call it a coup but rather stuck to their democratic norms.


So even when they came up with a pet theory which had absolutely no factual evidence to suggest or prove any aspect of it, Democrats restrained themselves from seizing military control and organizing a White House coup? How magnanimous!


You did not get my point. Democrats could have call Trump's victory as a coup, as it was due to Russian meddling


This, after Obama plainly said during the election the chances of any foreign entity, including Russia, or hijacking the election was ZERO. So, you don't believe the current administration you didn't elect, but you happily disavow the previous one you did. You really can't have it both ways.
33   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2017 Dec 19, 1:16pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

rocketjoe79 says
This, after Obama plainly said during the election the chances of any foreign entity, including Russia, or hijacking the election was ZERO. So, you don't believe the current administration you didn't elect, but you happily disavow the previous one you did. You really can't have it both ways.



Let's go to the video tape. October, 2016, when Hillary was supposed to win by a landslide.

"What does that even mean? Where do I start?" snickered Obama when asked by a worshipful press for comments on Orange Douche's stance that he would contest a close elections. "Conspiracy Theory" "Federal Government doesn't run elections. States, Counties, Cities do."

Thanks for mentioning ANOTHER pre-positioning 4D Trump Move that came back to bite the Democrats, can't believe I forgot that one. He trolled them into taking a firm stance that it was impossible to rig the national election. Promptly upon losing, the Democrats and the Media's Very Serious People who had mocked Trump's "Conspiracy Theory" invented a slew of their own over Putin.
34   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   ignore (2)   2017 Dec 19, 1:43pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsMcGee says
Yes, Trump is really cozying up to Iran. I mean, c'mon man
That's because he's not on Team Putin. If you assume that we were on the same side and could together have a monopoly on nukes (not true anyway), then you would have to assume that we have the same goals. But Putin is not going to roll over and switch sides to take our national interests up are they? What kind of dream land must one be in to assume such a thing? There are strategic reasons that we are not on Team Putin, and Iran is one obvious one. Ukraine is another. Sure, it would be great if we got along with Russia, as long as Russia didn't fuck us over. But, Team Trump was just going to give away the store without getting anything in return. At least Obama got something for what he gave away in the Iran deal (like the deal or not).
35   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 5, 8:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says
Maybe it's easier to believe it was a nefarious plot by Boris and Natasha than it is to believe the truth that our democracy worked correctly, and reflected the will of the people to elect anyone but Hillary.


Thankfully we have now moved from a 400 pound somewhere in Jersy to Boris and Natasha. At least you are getting closer to Putin
36   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 5, 8:24pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Gee, if the Russian Interference happened during the election, why didn't the Wonderful Holy Obama Regime catch it?

Indeed, just days before the Election, POTUS was telling us it was impossible to rig US Elections, because they're decentralized, and "no serious person" (his exact words) believed it possible.

Wow, Obama dropped the ball on the Russian Hacking. We need an investigation into how he failed so badly.

Newsflash: Neolib-con deadenders now claiming Italy's elections were rigged because of Sputnik.tv. Nevermind probably not even 1% of the Italian Electorate saw a single piece of content from Sputnik in the months leading up to the Election.
37   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 5, 8:25pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Gee, if the Russian Interference happened during the election, why didn't the skillful Obama Regime catch it.


https://www.npr.org/2018/02/21/587614043/fact-check-why-didnt-obama-stop-russia-s-election-interference-in-2016


So if Obama tried to do right wingers call it " coup" and if he does you call it "incompetent". Obama was stuck because Mich put party over country.
38   just_dregalicious   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 5, 8:31pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

It's the coupe of coupes!

Sad sad pathetic post.
39   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 5, 8:31pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

PlisskenCheck: MOSTLY FALSE.

One of the great things about America’s democracy is we have a vigorous, sometimes bitter political contest and when it’s done, historically, regardless of party, the person who loses the election congratulates the winner, who reaffirms our democracy and we move forward.

Holy shit, we lost. Fuck that tradition shit! MUH RUSSIA!!! Fuckin' Married Female Traitors!!! Rednecks!!! Cat Ladies, Put on your Pussyhats!

We Cannot Normalize this President!


That’s how democracy survives because we recognize that there’s something more important than any individual campaign. And that is making sure that the integrity and trust in our institutions sustains itself.

Unless it's Dangerous POPULISM!!! That refutes anemic performance by my Elite Class! Those little shits!

Because democracy, by definition, works by consent, not by force. I have never seen, in my lifetime or in modern political history, any presidential candidate trying to discredit the elections and the election process before votes have even taken place.

But you sure as shit did after November 8th, 2016. White Lash! Putin!! Hacked Server never turned over for forensic analysis! IT admin murder and likely leaker pure coincidence!

It’s unprecedented. It happens to be based on no facts; every expert, regardless of political party, regardless of ideology, conservative or liberal, who has ever examined these issues in a serious way, will tell you that instances of significant voter fraud are not to be found, that — keep in mind, elections are run by state and local officials, which means that there are places like Florida, for example, where you’ve got a Republican governor, whose Republican appointees are going to running and monitoring a whole bunch of these election sites.

The notion that somehow if Mr. Trump loses Florida, it’s because of those people that you have to watch out for, that is both irresponsible and, by the way, doesn’t really show the kind of leadership and toughness that you want out of a president.

If you start whining before the game’s even over, if whenever things are going badly for you and you lose, you start blaming somebody else, then you don’t have what it takes to be in this job because there are a lot of times when things don’t go our way or my way.


That’s OK, you fight through it, you work through it, you try to accomplish your goals. But the larger point I want to emphasize here is that there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even — you could even rig America’s elections, in part, because they are so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved.

There is no evidence that that has happened in the past or that there are instances in which that will happen this time. And so I’d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.

OBAMA: And if he got the most votes, then it would be my expectation of Hillary Clinton to offer a gracious concession speech and pledge to work with him in order to make sure that the American people benefit from an effective government.


http://time.com/4535623/president-obama-donald-trump-stop-whining-transcript/

This Q&A is Hypocrisy Gold, especially since IMMEDIATELY after the election, there was no gracious concession but a huge conspiracy theory cooked up by the DNC and routinely served by the Oligarch Heritage Media. And Hillary started a bitter book tour that blamed everyone from Married Women to Russia for why she lost.
40   Rin   ignore (3)   2018 Mar 5, 8:40pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

someone else says
Maybe it's easier to believe it was a nefarious plot by Boris and Natasha than it is to believe the truth that our democracy worked correctly, and reflected the will of the people to elect anyone but Hillary.


I'd like to bang Natasha!

41   lostand confused   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 5, 10:49pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

At thos time Muelelr, Sessions, Rosentein all need to be investigated for high crimes and treason-enough of this farce.
42   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 6, 1:47pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

lostand confused says
At thos time Muelelr, Sessions, Rosentein all need to be investigated for high crimes and treason-enough of this farce.




I am not what are the crime that you accuse Mueller or Rosenstein with. Just for doing their job and for what they were hired to do, and that too with all the Trumpsters like you screaming for their head.

Let them complete their investigations.
43   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 1:52pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Okay, the Mueller investigation is not a coup.

It's a delegitimization campaign powered by Clinton Donors and Allies. I mean that literally, as in McCabe.

Almost every piece of the investigation came about due to a Clinton Donor, including the Dodgy Dossier and the FISA Warrant.
44   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Mar 6, 3:00pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

SHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Quiet everyone! I'm getting a mind control message from the Kremlin.
It says... Putin wants you... to... Vote for... a MAGA...
Ah Fuck I lost IT!!! KGB Russian mind control technology is very buggy.
45   Rin   ignore (3)   2018 Mar 6, 3:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Rin says




Hello! Why aren't we talking about Natasha's tits and ass?!
46   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 3:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Putin wanted Trump elected so Trump would arm the Ukrainians and impose more sanctions on Russia.

As opposed to the Woman he already engineered billion-dollar Russian Uranium buyouts with.
47   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 6, 3:59pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Putin wanted Trump elected so Trump would arm the Ukrainians and impose more sanctions on Russia.


It is the Congress that imposed sanctions, not Trump
48   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 6, 4:01pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
It is the Congress that imposed sanctions, not Trump



How does Congressional Legislation become law?
49   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 11:52am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says

How does Congressional Legislation become law?


It was enough majority to ride a presidential veto, 98-2 in senate and 419-3 in the house. The President cannot veto that.
50   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 12:29pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Tim Aurora says
It was enough majority to ride a presidential veto, 98-2 in senate and 419-3 in the house. The President cannot veto that.



Did he sign it?

Oh yeah, he did.
51   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 1:10pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Tim Aurora says
It was enough majority to ride a presidential veto, 98-2 in senate and 419-3 in the house. The President cannot veto that.



Did he sign it?

Oh yeah, he did.


Did he have a choice? Oh no, he didn't
52   socal2   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 1:21pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Did he sign it?

Oh yeah, he did.


And it was Trump's hand-picked National Security Adviser and Secretary of Defense (both well known Russian hawks) who made the recommendations to send lethal aid to Ukraine. Something that was never done under Obama.
53   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 1:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RafiMaas says
Did he have a choice? Oh no, he didn't


Yes, he could have veto'd it, and then Congress would have overruled him. To make a point.

But he didn't.

Indeed, since then, he's actually bombed Russian positions in Syria, too.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/13/world/europe/russia-syria-dead.html

And ragged on Russia and Putin several times, most recently a few days ago:
https://www.rferl.org/a/us-says-russia-has-unique-responsibility-for-killing-syrias-eastern-ghouta-reign-in-assad/29058192.html

Boy, Putin is sure getting his $10,000 Facebook Ads and Free Tumblr Pokeman Giveaway to BLM Sympathizer's money's worth for "helping" Trump

« First    « Previous    Comments 14 - 53 of 53    Last »





The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions