follow MrMagic following
follow MrMagic 2017 Dec 23, 8:16am
4,149 views 24 comments
Can you at least get your sources right Deadeye ?
Is the analysis wrong whoever wrote it?
Pass this on to all your Libbie friends who claim it's a giveaway to the RICH!
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
Maybe the rule for those guys going out for beers is that they all pay for their first two beers, but if one is having 100 beers, they should have to pay for the last 88 themselves. I get why this doesn't really work as an analogy,
anonymous saysThe first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. This is a lie. PAYROLL TAXES !!!!!!!
The real culprit here is the cost of living after what you're left with, which is constantly being eroded by actions of the FED, banks, and congress.
If you can't counter the argument question the source.
We essentially are borrowing money to give to the rich.
The people who already pay the highest taxes will naturally get the most benefit from a tax reduction.
The point stands though. Interesting.
Does Medicaid cover the treatment?
Because paying taxes is nothing like splitting the bill for beers.
expenditure on beer
aren't drinking any of the beer
se paying taxes is nothing like splitting the bill for beers.ja saysexpenditure on beeranon_13ce6 saysaren't drinking any of the beer
se paying taxes is nothing like splitting the bill for beers.
Sniper says:See, should we PAY these guys to drink the beer that they are not paying for? Would that be fairer?