Why all the Bannon "noise", Maybe because of this - FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation
« prev   random   next »

15
5

Why all the Bannon "noise", Maybe because of this - FBI launches new Clinton Foundation investigation

By Sniper following x   2018 Jan 4, 8:13pm 676 views   38 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


The Justice Department has launched a new inquiry into whether the Clinton Foundation engaged in any pay-to-play politics or other illegal activities while Hillary Clinton served as Secretary of State, law enforcement officials and a witness tells The Hill.

FBI agents from Little Rock, Ark., where the Foundation was started, have taken the lead in the investigation and have interviewed at least one witness in the last month, and law enforcement officials said additional activities are expected in coming weeks.

The officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity, said the probe is examining whether the Clintons promised or performed any policy favors in return for largesse to their charitable efforts or whether donors made commitments of donations in hopes of securing government outcomes.

The probe may also examine whether any tax-exempt assets were converted for personal or political use and whether the Foundation complied with applicable tax laws, the officials said.

The Wall Street Journal reported late last year that several FBI field offices, including the one in Little Rock, had been collecting information on the Clinton Foundation for more than a year.



http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/367541-fbi-launches-new-clinton-foundation-investigation
#crime
1   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 4, 9:02pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

The Counter Attack Begins

Original Draft of Comey Memo heavily edited by "subordinates" to remove references to felonies and misdemeanors, phrases like "reasonably likely" (that the server was hacked) changed to "Possibly". And of course the "Gross Negligence" was changed (because Gross Negligence opens the door to prosecution or administrative penalties) to "Extremely Careless"
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/367528-comeys-original-clinton-memo-released-cites-possible-violations "Extremely Careless" alteration revealed months ago:
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/358982-early-comey-memo-accused-clinton-of-gross-negligence-on-emails
Gee, I wonder if some of those "subordinates" names might be familiar to us from the Mueller Investigation and OIG emails.

Clinton Foundation Case: New Investigation - see above
http://patrick.net/post/1312872/2018-01-05-why-all-the-bannon-noise-maybe-because-of-this-fbi-launches-new-clinton-foundation-investigation
House Panel wins Court Case, to be given Bank Records from FusionGPS re: Dossier financing.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/04/fusion-gps-house-intel-records-325396 "dedicated to transparency, but we plead the 5th"

Fusion GPS, authors of a dirty hitpiece with almost no verifiable claims, now claims to be the victims.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/fusions-russia-fog-1515024911

#LockHerUp #PromisesKept #Politics
3   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Jan 4, 9:34pm   ↑ like (6)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

TwoScoopsPlissken says
The Counter Attack Begins


TwoScoopsPlissken says
Oh, one more thing.


Well, that all really doesn't matter, well, because, ahhhh, hhmmmm, oh, I know, Trump's a racist (and eats McDonalds)!
4   anon_25c83   ignore (3)   2018 Jan 5, 7:38am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

So your claim is Bannon loves Hillary Clinton and wants to protect her by releasing a book about Trump's treason this week?

You guys are getting harder to follow.
5   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 8:23am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

In a TOTALLY unrelated piece of news, a house fire broke out at the Clinton estate in NY two days ago.
I’m sure it had nothing to do with burning evidence.
6   Tenpoundbass   ignore (6)   2018 Jan 5, 8:25am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

Her house caught fire within hours of the announcement. I bet Manafort wishes he had a heads up so he could have burned his evidence.
7   anon_ee8db   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 9:32am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Sniper says
Does that help?


Huh? Trump's former Chief strategist accusing him of treason and incompetence isn't the biggest news story right now and shouldn't be getting huge coverage? What the hell?
8   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 10:05am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

anon_ee8db says
Huh? Trump's former Chief strategist accusing him of treason and incompetence isn't the biggest news story right now and shouldn't be getting huge coverage


Sources are important. A widely discredited political writer isn’t exactly unimpeachable with his fictionalized accounts of the election. What people did or didn’t say is not able to be determined by the assertion of this one man.
9   HEYYOU   ignore (6)   2018 Jan 5, 10:24am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
What people did or didn’t say is not able to be determined by the assertion of this one man.


What's wrong with you?
If a Patnetter says it, it's absolute! roflmao
10   anon_25c83   ignore (3)   2018 Jan 5, 10:46am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
Sources are important. A widely discredited political writer isn’t exactly unimpeachable with his fictionalized accounts of the election. What people did or didn’t say is not able to be determined by the assertion of this one man.


Um okay. So a demand letter from Trump's lawyers was for nothing? Trump going crazy was for nothing? I've heard of suspending disbelief before but this is ridiculous.
11   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 11:11am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

Senators pushing for criminal investigation of Christopher Steele.
http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/367631-gop-senators-request-criminal-investigation-of-trump-dossier-author
I was hoping Michael Cohen would sue him in the UK for defamation, where the laws strongly favor the plaintiff.


Quigley says
I’m sure it had nothing to do with burning evidence.

Just another Coinky-Dink only Conspiracy Theoriest who are like, Literal Misogynist Nazis, would believe.

The Counter Attack is definitely on. The Smart thing is to wait until Late Summer/Early Fall to drop the big bombs, just before the Elections.
12   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 12:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Remember Wasserman's Computer?

Watch DWS try to strong arm the Police to return the "laptop of a (House) member" i.e. Her Laptop.

That was in the possession of the Awan Brothers, who apparently left it in an office building.

But now, DWS says it's not her laptop after all.

Yet:
Nonetheless, the officer opened the MacBook and found that its login screen did not have Awan’s username, but rather “RepDWS.”

http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/06/exclusive-did-imran-want-capitol-police-to-find-wasserman-schultzs-laptop/
The above link has a huge list of all the Dem Representatives the Awan Family was hired to do IT work for (and attendant access to passwords, emails, etc.)

Trump's recent tweet about Pakistan is another impregnated tweet: Get the Media to talk about how wonderful Pakistan is and how crazy Trump is. Then weeks, months later, the Awan Brothers are in Court and it comes out they sold, transferred information directly from House Members to Pakistani contacts or at least threatened to do so if not paid.
13   Sniper   ignore (10)   2018 Jan 5, 12:10pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_ee8db says
Sniper says
Does that help?


Huh? Trump's former Chief strategist accusing him of treason and incompetence isn't the biggest news story right now and shouldn't be getting huge coverage? What the hell?


Considering the author of that book is a self admitted liar, do yo-u believe every thing yo-u read on the Internet?

Here is the relevant part of the note, from the 10th page of the book's prologue:

"Many of the accounts of what has happened in the Trump White House are in conflict with one another; many, in Trumpian fashion, are baldly untrue. These conflicts, and that looseness with the truth, if not with reality itself, are an elemental thread of the book.

http://www.businessinsider.com/michael-wolff-note-says-he-doesnt-know-if-trump-book-is-all-true-2018-1
14   anon_25c83   ignore (3)   2018 Jan 5, 1:01pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Just another Coinky-Dink only Conspiracy Theoriest who are like, Literal Misogynist Nazis, would believe.


I still don't understand and the Trump people keep muddying the water on this.

How is this a left wing offensive when the biggest players making all the headlines are Bannon, Bannon's publisher, Donald Trump, and Trump's lawyers? You don't think this is the story? You think Trump is the mayor of a town in Nebraska with 8000 people?
15   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 1:13pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

Bannon didn’t write the book claiming to “quote” him. If you don’t understand something, you might want to check your assumptions.
16   DoofusRicky   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 5, 1:18pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Quigley says
Bannon didn’t write the book claiming to “quote” him. If you don’t understand something, you might want to check your assumptions.
I

It's just amazing to me. So Bannon sits idly by as the media and the publisher commit brutal slander against his former good friend in his name. This is what you think is happening? It's not like Bannon is in media silence or anything. He's running Breitbart.
17   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 1:33pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_25c83 says
How is this a left wing offensive


Check out the second post, I'm suggesting it's Trump launching a counter-offensive.

Regards to "coinky-dink", I'm suggesting Ceffer's reference of a mysterious Fire in Chappaqua, ties into "Oh shit, he's opening all these new investigations", let's destroy some evidence. Maybe the wipe, like with a cloth, rags caught on fire. Funny timing, that!

DoofusRicky says
It's just amazing to me. So Bannon sits idly by as the media and the publisher commit brutal slander against his former good friend in his name. This is what you think is happening? It's not like Bannon is in media silence or anything. He's running Breitbart.

I don't know if Bannon is Trump's "Good Friend", but I'm not so sure WHAT is going on with Wolff. He seems to be hated by a segment of the Media for "Hyper-Cynicalism" and "Fabrication".

But it could also be Sun-Tsu:

Lay out bait for the enemy. Feign Disorder. Then Strike.

Mercer invited Bannon to a party in October. She cut off funding, but she could always give again. A thousand possibilities, including it looks like what it is.
18   DoofusRicky   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 5, 1:44pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

I don't see how some of you are able to spin this into fake news or propaganda or anything except a massive war between two demigods of the alt right. Please correct me if I'm wrong but last week every last Trump supporter would be singing unqualified praise of Steve Bannon. Now he's Satan?
19   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 2:04pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Clearly Doofus is trying to spin this while acting dumb. I’m not fooled.
20   DoofusRicky   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 5, 2:06pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says
There is a lot going on "behind the curtain" that you're not aware of,


This is true of course but I guess I wonder what makes you think you know what's going on behind the curtain in order to make that statement?
21   BlueSardine   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 5, 2:11pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Well the dude is avatar-wise...

Quigley says
Clearly Doofus is trying to spin this while acting dumb. I’m not fooled.
22   anon_33654   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 2:23pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Kakaya krasivaya zhenshina, prosto voshititelnaya!
23   HEYYOU   ignore (6)   2018 Jan 5, 2:52pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

All Patnetters know what Mueller knows!
24   anon_e144f   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 4:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says


Considering the author of that book is a self admitted liar, do yo-u believe every thing yo-u read on the Internet?


Quigley says
Sources are important.


So sniper believes an anonymous claim is an important story, bigger than a book about the inner workings of team trump? What happened to anonymous being bad? You clowns can't have it both ways.
25   anon_4460e   ignore (2)   2018 Jan 5, 5:11pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

No one cares whether this country was taken by a hostile regime with high treason by a kleptocrat and family devoting his time to silencing his critics. --this is just not a priority.

Fuck Bannon! He lost his status as the anointed one from most high.

Who is privy to the secret strategies now? Infowars? 4Chan? Sniper?
26   anon_8044e   ignore (2)   2018 Jan 5, 5:11pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Better question: why all the Clinton noise? Perhaps the Russia collusion probe is getting awfully close to the danger zone.
27   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 5:16pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

anon_8044e says
Perhaps the Russia collusion probe is getting awfully close to the danger zone.


If the Russian Collusion Probe was going anywhere, we wouldn't be hearing about Mental Illness and the 25th Amendment yet again.

They only get off the #RussianCollusion wagon when it's stalled.

Now, to the ignore list.
28   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 5, 5:17pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      



Wait, what did I just read?
29   DoofusRicky   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 5, 7:50pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says
I've seen this pattern develop before. If you've been paying attention, you'd see it.


I'm pretty sure I was paying attention but I still think you need to explain how you know what is happening behind the scenes this time. You are being extremely condescending with statements that you couldn't possibly support.
30   DoofusRicky   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 5, 8:19pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Sniper says
Go research all the past "Breaking News Trump Scandals" announced by CNN, NYT and WaPO and then go read a week later what happened when the truth came out.


You are saying this like all past scandals were not true. This is not even partially true and there are now two men who have pled guilty to crimes that I think you would have called fake news and probably did.

It's kind of beside the point because even if one of the scandals in the past was proved to be fake, it absolutely doesn't mean that this current kerfuffle is fake.
31   anon_8044e   ignore (2)   2018 Jan 6, 11:36am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Stupid argument TwoScoopsPlissken says
anon_8044e says
Perhaps the Russia collusion probe is getting awfully close to the danger zone.


If the Russian Collusion Probe was going anywhere, we wouldn't be hearing about Mental Illness and the 25th Amendment yet again.

They only get off the #RussianCollusion wagon when it's stalled.

Now, to the ignore list.
32   DoofusRicky   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 6, 12:22pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

That's really how you see the world? 95% of all news is fake? Brother sniper I don't see any possible way that you could argue this. But even if it's all true, it still doesn't mean you know what is happening behind the scenes and you keep claiming you do.

Comment as anon_d8415 or log in at top of page: