Stephen Miller versus Fake Yapper
« prev   random   next »


Stephen Miller versus Fake Yapper

By TwoScoopsPlissken following x   2018 Jan 7, 12:38pm 226 views   11 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    

Miller takes control of the conversation, calls out Trapper on Condescending Attitude, blasts Bannon, trashes Fake Book.

1   BayAreaObserver   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 7, 4:42pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

Stephen Miller - another fine upstanding team member...nothing to see here at all...and you will obey, no questions allowed, and remember work will set you free !

3   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 7, 4:53pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Maybe Trump should replace Miller with Ben "Flat Affect" Rhodes. That guy has a string of policy victories to celebrate.
4   BayAreaObserver   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 7, 4:53pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

Donald Trump suggests he wants US law to limit free speech in wake of publication of explosive new book...

Suggesting he would like to see tougher laws on speech, Mr Trump said that if libel laws “were strong... you wouldn’t have things like that happen where you can say whatever comes into your head” – referring to Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House

Funny - now the Dotard wants to throttle what people are saying about him but when he talks about Obama's country of birth or any other number of things that happen to "pop in his head" - it's okay. Banana Republic we have arrived...

When do we adopt "Lese Majeste" Laws like they have in Thailand, insulting the King is punishable by up to 15 years in prison. Maybe the DHS and the Justice Department can work together after using this as a source/guide document and we can all really MAGA !

Since the Dotard always has to be one better than the other guy - I guess we will have 30 years minimum first offense, no questions asked, and a reward to anyone who turns someone else in for letting the government know you are not a loyal subject.
5   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 7, 4:56pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

BayAreaObserver says
Donald Trump suggests he wants US law to limit free speech in wake of publication of explosive new book...

A lot of people think the Defamation Laws in the US are way too permissive when it comes to Famous Persons. UK law would be at the other extreme.

"Show your work."
6   BayAreaObserver   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 7, 5:04pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)     quote      

I say we go the route of Thailand and be done with it.

Hell, we have For Profit prisons that aren't even full yet. There's some real money to be made here on this one. Think of the revenue stream from the pay phones, charge people for food and lodging besides having them out of sight and mind, give employment to all those ex police officers who were let go for nefarious reasons...a real deficit buster.

Besides, someone in congress has to have a relative or two or three that can benefit greatly from this kind of bold imaginative legislation.

Think of the fun at the schools as well - got a teacher you don't like, rat them out - who cares if it's a lie. Lets bring back the good old days of per war Germany...those mad cap brown shirts knew a thing or two about having fun, didn't they ?
7   anon_57cc2   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 7, 8:35pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

BayAreaObserver says
I say we go the route of Thailand and be done with it.

I'm so old I remember last year.

When one of the candidates was seen wearing unmistakeably special-tinted Siezure Sunglasses, had Coughing fits lasting a minute every stop, and we were told not to speculate she wasn't healthy. Look, here is two vague paragraphs on one-side of paper from her personal physician!

Then she collapsed head first into a vehicle on 9/11.

Now it's okay to speculate on mental illness from some trolling tweets.
8   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (26)   2018 Jan 7, 9:20pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Miller should have shot Tapper in the face and finished his testimony.

Any jury would have burst into applause.
9   errc   ignore (2)   2018 Jan 7, 9:44pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)     quote      

Your perception is your reality

Trump defeated 17 of the best Republican candidates ever.

Lol. Does #FakeNews get any faker?

He defeated the Bush Dynasty. The Clinton Dynasty. The Media. Lol, sure he did. Except, he didn’t do any such thing

Ted Cruz
Marco Rubio
Jeb Bush
Ben Carson
Jim Gilmore
Chris Christie
Carly Fiorina
Rand Paul
Rick Santorum
Mike Huckabe
George takai
Lindsey Graham
Bobby Jindal
Scott Walker
Rick Perry

As Trump himself said before, this is a sad sorry lot of Failed Losers who also happen to comprise The Swamp.

Now all of a sudden he took down Dynastys and defeated an amazing field. Too fucking funny

He didn’t defeat the Bush Dynasty. There was no more Bush Dynasty. The American people loathed those losers and most wanted to see Bush brought up on War Crimes

He didn’t defeat the “Clinton Dynasty “ either. As evidenced by the election of Trump, Great Americans would rather vote in a trust fund twit with a long history of financial crimes than vote for Hillary. Anyone but Hillary would have beat Hillary.

Trump is an excellent marketer. He’s sold many on a line of shit, so well that they’re still clinging to it to this day

Twump is MAGA!! Goo goo doo doo i just messed my diapers again. Trumpcucks are pathetic
10   TwoScoopsPlissken   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 7, 10:35pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

BayAreaObserver says
Hell, we have For Profit prisons that aren't even full yet

What national level political family is intimately connected with that?

The Democratic Candidate of 2016 was heavily financed by Private Prisons, who have always been big Clinton boosters.
11   anon_4480e   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 8, 7:46am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

BayAreaObserver says

FTR, I disagree, but that's funny AS.

Comment as anon_b30b4 or log in at top of page: