patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,191,723 comments by 13,863 users - AmericanKulak, Ceffer online now
Media Bias on display and the voter takes notice. Stop harassing Trump.
invite response
2018 Jan 8, 11:16am 2,165 views 9 comments
Comments 1 - 9 of 9 Search these comments
1
anonymous
2018 Jan 8, 2:58pm
Only you can say you are done with the cult personality.
There is nothing anyone else can say or do that won't just make a cult member double down.
There is nothing anyone else can say or do that won't just make a cult member double down.
4
anonymous
2018 Jan 31, 11:44am
CNN ran both stories. How is that bias?
If CNN didn't cover the story about the new plant, then you might have a point.
If CNN didn't cover the story about the new plant, then you might have a point.
5
mell
2018 Jan 31, 1:20pm
anon_8f378 says
It's clear bias because the first story is an opinion and they only post 99% negative opinion stories on Trump, the 2nd story is a fact. Yes, they reported it at least, good on them, but it clearly shows the bias if many of the opinions are being rendered useless by later facts.
CNN ran both stories. How is that bias?
If CNN didn't cover the story about the new plant, then you might have a point.
It's clear bias because the first story is an opinion and they only post 99% negative opinion stories on Trump, the 2nd story is a fact. Yes, they reported it at least, good on them, but it clearly shows the bias if many of the opinions are being rendered useless by later facts.
6
anonymous
2018 Jan 31, 1:40pm
mell says
lol--so they can only run opinions that turn out to be true? Should they invest in a time machine?
It's clear bias because the first story is an opinion and they only post 99% negative opinion stories on Trump, the 2nd story is a fact. Yes, they reported it at least, good on them, but it clearly shows the bias if many of the opinions are being rendered useless by later facts.
lol--so they can only run opinions that turn out to be true? Should they invest in a time machine?
7
bob2356
2018 Jan 31, 2:01pm
mell says
Didn't read the article did you? It didn't talk about solar panel manufacturing jobs. The Solar Industries Association predicted job losses in the solar industry not CNN. That's called reporting not opinion. The second story is an announcement not a fact. When and if the plant is built it will be a fact. You seem somehow confused on what all these terms mean.
It's clear bias because the first story is an opinion and they only post 99% negative opinion stories on Trump, the 2nd story is a fact. Yes, they reported it at least, good on them, but it clearly shows the bias if many of the opinions are being rendered useless by later facts.
Didn't read the article did you? It didn't talk about solar panel manufacturing jobs. The Solar Industries Association predicted job losses in the solar industry not CNN. That's called reporting not opinion. The second story is an announcement not a fact. When and if the plant is built it will be a fact. You seem somehow confused on what all these terms mean.
8
mell
2018 Jan 31, 2:05pm
anon_8f378 says
No of course not. But if 99% of the opinions are negative many will turn out false and that's a bias.
bob2356 says
Lol a prediction is an opinion and the 2nd one is a fact. Sure, it could be derailed by unexpected circumstances, but it is 100% more of a fact than the prediction.
mell says
It's clear bias because the first story is an opinion and they only post 99% negative opinion stories on Trump, the 2nd story is a fact. Yes, they reported it at least, good on them, but it clearly shows the bias if many of the opinions are being rendered useless by later facts.
lol--so they can only run opinions that turn out to be true? Should they invest in a time machine?
No of course not. But if 99% of the opinions are negative many will turn out false and that's a bias.
bob2356 says
The Solar Industries Association predicted job losses in the solar industry not CNN. That's called reporting not opinion. The second story is an announcement not a fact. When and if the plant is built it will be a fact. You seem somehow confused on what all these terms mean.
Lol a prediction is an opinion and the 2nd one is a fact. Sure, it could be derailed by unexpected circumstances, but it is 100% more of a fact than the prediction.
9
anonymous
2018 Jan 31, 3:01pm
mell says
anon_8f378 saysmell says
It's clear bias because the first story is an opinion and they only post 99% negative opinion stories on Trump, the 2nd story is a fact. Yes, they reported it at least, good on them, but it clearly shows the bias if many of the opinions are being rendered useless by later facts.
lol--so they can only run opinions that turn out to be true? Should they invest in a time machine?
No of course not. But if 99% of the opinions are negative many will turn out false and that's a bias.
bob2356 saysThe Solar Industries Association predicted job losses in the solar industry not CNN. That's called reporting not opinion. The second story is an announcement not a fact. When and if the plant is built it will be ...
So? It’s not CNN’s prediction just as Bob said, so I think you need to relook at what you are getting fake outraged about.
And how many jobs are predicted to be lost, and how many jobs will the factory create out of interest?
#Politics