Haiti and the United States - Something to Remember...
« prev   random   next »

2
4

Haiti and the United States - Something to Remember...

By BayAreaObserver following x   2018 Jan 13, 8:40am 116 views   3 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


Without the bravery of Haitians, Thomas Jefferson would never have been able to complete the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, and the United States as we know it today would not exist.

This has been almost completely forgotten in the U.S., so now’s as good a time as any to remind ourselves.

Most Americans don’t know that France once colonized huge swaths of North America. At this point, the main remnant of this history is when we go to New Orleans for Mardi Gras and drunkenly scream, “Laissez les bons temps rouler.”

But in the late 1700s, France effectively “owned” much of what is today the U.S., as well as the western third of the Caribbean island of Hispaniola. The French named it Saint-Domingue. Today it’s called Haiti.

France turned Saint-Domingue into a slave society with one goal: to produce the largest quantity of commodity crops, particularly sugar, as possible. It eventually supplied 75 percent of all the sugar on earth and generated more wealth than all 13 American colonies together.

This level of productivity required baroque cruelty. An estimated one-third of each shipment of enslaved Africans died within three years of arriving in Saint-Domingue. One who survived later asked these rhetorical questions about the French:

Have they not hung up men with heads downward, drowned them in sacks, crucified them on planks, buried them alive, crushed them in mortars? Have they not forced them to eat shit? And, having flayed them with the lash, have they not cast them alive to be devoured by worms, or onto anthills, or lashed them to stakes in the swamp to be devoured by mosquitoes? Have they not thrown them into boiling cauldrons of cane syrup? Have they not put men and women inside barrels studded with spikes and rolled them down mountainsides into the abyss? Have they not consigned these miserable blacks to man-eating dogs until the latter, sated by human flesh, left the mangled victims to be finished off with bayonet and poniard?”

Unsurprisingly, this led to intermittent slave revolts. Surprisingly, a rebellion that began in 1791 eventually succeeded a decade later — the only time a slave revolt won in the history of the Western Hemisphere.

By 1803, France had lost tens of thousands of soldiers and was dangerously low on cash. So Napoleon offered Jefferson, then president, the deal of a lifetime: France would sell all of French Louisiana to the U.S. for just $15 million. This, as you recall from fifth-grade history, was the Louisiana Purchase.

Just a glance at a map shows why this made America the country it is now. It’s not simply that the U.S. acquired 828,000 square miles, which instantly doubled the size of the country (and still represents one-quarter of the U.S. land mass). Just as significantly, our new territory ran from Canada down to New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico, opening the way for our further expansion westward to the Pacific Ocean.

So no Haitian rebellion, no Louisiana Purchase; no Louisiana Purchase, and the U.S. would have been cooped up east of the Mississippi River, perhaps forever.

But don’t take my word for it. Here’s what Alexander Hamilton wrote just after the deal was concluded:


Full Article: https://theintercept.com/2018/01/12/haiti-donald-trump-shithole-america-history/

#Haiti #United States #History #Dotard


1   Onvacation   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 13, 8:55am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (3)     quote      

BayAreaObserver says
So no Haitian rebellion, no Louisiana Purchase; no Louisiana Purchase, and the U.S. would have been cooped up east of the Mississippi River, perhaps forever.

No. It was America's manifest destiny to expand to the west coast. Napoleon was just smart enough to get some cash when he could.
2   anon_4480e   ignore (0)   2018 Jan 13, 9:26am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

Interesting history lesson.

Why does the article have Trump's name in it?
3   BayAreaObserver   ignore (1)   2018 Jan 13, 9:33am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)     quote      

"Why does the article have Trump's name in it?"

For the life of me I can not figure it out...

Comment as anon_dc1ed or log in at top of page: