Comments 1 - 38 of 38 Search these comments
There was a guy on Youtube who did a survey on a college campus.
He showed a picture of a typical cucked liberal male and a picture of the typical alpha male (muscled, wearing male clothing, probably likes hunting).
Every SINGLE female lusted over the alpha male over the cucked liberal male.
1. When a woman chooses to be alone with a man, it should be viewed as general consent.
Infinite number of situations where a woman may be with a man alone. Impossible to square that with "well she chose to be alone with me".
I'd be interested in seeing the Youtube if you have the link.
BlueSardine saysInfinite number of situations where a woman may be with a man alone. Impossible to square that with "well she chose to be alone with me".
There really aren't.
BlueSardine saysInfinite number of situations where a woman may be with a man alone. Impossible to square that with "well she chose to be alone with me".
There really aren't.
I'm not going to wave my cock around, but I have made a similar observation.
My philosophy is simple, and I like what Patrick wrote on another thread:
1. When a woman chooses to be alone with a man, it should be viewed as general consent.
redistribution of wealth
The only thing that really matters is how large your penis is. Right? I'm 9 and 1/16th inches. Beat it, I dare anybody.
anon_86e60 saysredistribution of wealth
Do you own your own company? If not, your boss is redistributing his wealth to you. It's possible to work for a woman too. Wouldn't that be tricky. We could call is Social Wealth Redistribution. Or SWR.
The only thing that really matters is how large your penis is. Right? I'm 9 and 1/16th inches. Beat it, I dare anybody.
It's embarrassing to our gender when a man wants redistribution of wealth
Do you own your own company? If not, your boss is redistributing his wealth to you.
WookieMan saysDo you own your own company? If not, your boss is redistributing his wealth to you.
Actually if you are a worker, your boss is most likely redistributing your wealth up to him. Workers almost certainly don't receive all the fruits of their labor.
I get this perspective, honestly. But if that's your thought process, why would you have a boss? Just be a business owner.
WookieMan saysI get this perspective, honestly. But if that's your thought process, why would you have a boss? Just be a business owner.
We shouldn't make this about me, but who says I'm not a business owner?
I was addressing the social stigma of owners bad, employees good, wealth distribution, etc that was brought up. All I'm getting at, is it's not a A OR B conversation. It's an A AND B conversation. You can't have one without the other Al Bundy.
which doesn't happen now.
They are trying to maximize their wealth, like any good capitalist.
'm with you on pretty much everything else you said here. This part of the last sentence stuck out to me though. I would just suggest adding "always" between doesn't and happen. There really are some good business owners out there that would put their employees before themselves. It might only be 5-10% of businesses, but they do exist.
Discuss.