« prev   random   next »

21
30

Nunes Memo - A big Nothing Burger- Now Release the Democratic memo

By Tim Aurora following x   2018 Feb 2, 9:39am 7,337 views   207 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


It is an opinion of one man who

* Was a part of Trump Transition Team
* Did a midnight run for the President
* Did not see the underlying document


His opinion

* Steele Dossier was the basis for FISA - Ans: Page was already under surveillance and possibly under FISA even before
* Does not change the fact that Russia interfered in election
* Does not change the fact that there is ample reason to believe that there was collusion


I think Democrats should come out with a minority report

From Wapo

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/02/02/the-nunes-memo-is-out-its-a-joke-and-a-sham/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-f%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.91b3f26382a4
Intelligence experts say it’s unlikely that Steele’s intelligence formed the sole basis for a warrant, and legally, there was no problem with the F.B.I. using information Steele had gathered, even if Democrats helped fund his work. We already know that it wasn’t Steele who sparked the F.B.I.’s Russia inquiry, but Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, who, while drinking with an Australian diplomat in May 2016, said that Russia had dirt on Clinton.

The memo acknowledges that the FISA warrant was extended multiple times. Nunes finds fault in the application because allegedly the court was not told that Fusion GPS which commissioned Steele at one point was paid by an attorney of Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Without proof, it claims he was hired to find disparaging evidence on Trump (Fusion GPS’s founder disputed this under oath). It claims Steele was an FBI source, an allegation for which we have no support. It claims, again without support, that Steele was fired as a source for leaking some of his findings to the press.

It also asserts in confusing fashion that the warrant contained information about George Papadopoulos but there was no evidence of cooperation between the two. A statement released by ranking member Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) and other House Intelligence Committee Democrats suggests there is a connection but Nunes chose to leave that out. In any event, the memo proves something that surely does not help Nunes’s conspiracy theory, namely that the FBI was first alerted to possible interference from Papadopoulos, not by the dossier.

As an afterthought, Nunes then throws in reference to text-message exchanges between FBI employees Lisa Page and Peter Strzok. It’s not clear why that matters or what it has to do with the special counsel’s investigation. What is interesting is that an initial application and three extensions were all approved by the FISA court.

We know that other materials included with the dossier to obtain the warrant were left out of Nunes account, and that a point-by-point rebuttal from Democrats has been suppressed. There is plenty else left out of the memo:

There is no explanation that FISA courts set a high bar for issuance of warrants and generally require multiple pieces of evidence.
There is no acknowledgment that Steele was a respected former MI6 agent or that some of his findings were confirmed by evidence provided from other sources. (Nunes says they were “minimally” sourced.)
There is no recognition the intelligence community already had Page on its radar screen as early as 2013.
There is no indication Steele knew who had funded the dossier (which was begun for a right-leaning publication and later financed by a Democratic associate of Hillary Clinton’s campaign).
There is no proof Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein thought the dossier was unreliable.
There is no proof anything in the dossier was in fact false.
There is no proof that special counsel Robert S. Mueller III or FBI Director Christopher A. Wray (whom Trump hired) had anything to do with the application for the warrant or that it affected their work. Both were hired the year after the initial FISA warrant request.
There is no reason spelled out why Rosenstein, whom Trump later appointed, would have intentionally misled the court.
In short, other than the memo confirming that Nunes and Trump are collectively out to discredit the intelligence community and to thereby impede the investigation into the president’s alleged wrongdoing, I cannot for the life of me figure out what this proves. The media, if forthright, will explain that to Americans who must by this time be very, very confused as to why Nunes and Trump have rejected the advice of top officials who said release of the memo compromises classified information.

This appears to be the second time (the first in the Oval Office with Russian officials) that Trump has handed the Russians classified material. If Trump is not a Russian agent, he surely is acting as effectively as one.

« First    « Previous    Comments 168 - 207 of 207    Last »

168   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (32)   2018 Feb 6, 9:30pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

I talked to four people at State last week.

Everyone snorted about life in a Rod Serling teleplay.

Can I be a CONSPIRATOR!, too?
169   UsualOven   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 6, 10:16pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Tim Aurora says
Why would Putin prefer Trump


Well the theory is that Putin and his fellow criminal oligarchs want sanctions relief. That is relief without changing their activities, Clinton would almost certainly not give it to them, plus he hated Clinton ( get in line Putie baby) for other reasons. So far all indications are Trump would give up on sanctions if he could, a good indication is that he has not enforced new sanctions that were passed almost unanimously by congress that he reluctantly signed rather than have his veto overturned. The whole deal IMO centers around this and whether the Ruskies have enough dirt on Trump to make him their useful fool, it seems they do. At base this is what Muller is going to report on, if he isn't fired first. It isnt about the pee pee tape its about laundering money stolen/extorted from the Russian people through his real estate ventures.
170   bob2356   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 7, 6:06am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (3)   quote        

anon_da695 says

But they've shared it with you? That's how you know there's a great deal of evidence? Or, is this what WaPo said?


But they've shared it with you? That's how you know there isn't a single bit of evidence? You can't have it both ways.
171   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (32)   2018 Feb 7, 6:08am   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

UsualOven says
The whole deal IMO centers around this and whether the Ruskies have enough dirt on Trump to make him their useful fool, it seems they do.


Or, more mundanely, he wants to keep them in good stead as their money launderers. Construction and real estate trading are two tried and true vehicles for moving gangland money into the legitimate economy but they could just as soon work with casinos in Macau.
172   bob2356   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 7, 7:03am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote        

anon_948a1 says
HANNITY: The Senate releases 'Memo 2.0,' and it should scare you.


So this is the memo where obama and hillary go to jail? I thought Memo 1.0 was supposed to do that. or are we going to have to wait for Memo 3.0 or 4.0 or infinity.0.

Wow, deep state. Sounds serous. Most people simply call it the government. Maybe you should live someplace without a functioning government and report back to us how it works out. A visa to Somalia is really easy to get.
173   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 7, 9:14am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

UsualOven says
It isnt about the pee pee tape its about laundering money stolen/extorted from the Russian people through his real estate ventures.


Isn't stealing or extorting money from Russians a good thing? They have less, we have more, right? Not certain that is what you meant, but if Trump stole/extorted money from Russians, cool. I would do the same if I could get away with it and live to see the next day. Why would we be concerned about Russian citizens?

If you're saying he laundered money to avoid US taxes or something, then yeah, that's bad. Less bad if he did that by screwing over Russians I suppose, but still bad.

If Trump goes away in handcuffs, does it really matter? If Hillary goes away in handcuffs, does it really matter? We'll all move on, keep working hard and raising our families. This is just a nice distraction, like the NFL. Oh shit, wait, that's being politicized too!
174   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 7, 9:18am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote        

bob2356 says
anon_da695 says

But they've shared it with you? That's how you know there's a great deal of evidence? Or, is this what WaPo said?


But they've shared it with you? That's how you know there isn't a single bit of evidence? You can't have it both ways.


All the evidence has caused the complete Trump family and campaign to be led away in handcuffs!

Oh wait, nobody has... darn..
175   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 7, 9:26am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

anon_603ec says
All the evidence has caused the complete Trump family and campaign to be led away in handcuffs!

Oh wait, nobody has... darn


At that level, you don't get led off in handcuffs. Your high priced lawyers make an arrangement for you to turn yourself in gracefully. Like Flynn, Manafort, and Gates. Papadapolous did get led away though. He's just the coffee boy, after all.
176   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 7, 9:45am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

HappyGilmore says
Like Flynn, Manafort, and Gates.


Have you figured out exactly what their Russian collusion with the presidential election was yet?
177   TwoScoopsOfWompWomp   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 7, 9:55am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (3)   quote        

socal2 says
If it is so "proven" - kindly tell us EXACTLY what Russia did to cause Hillary to lose? Did the Russians have a bunch of spies manipulating voting machines? Did the Russians encourage the DNC to rig the primary against Sanders? Did the Russians encourage Hillary to set up a secret email server?


But Obama said "No Serious Person" believed you can hack an election back when it looked like Hillary was a shoo-in. All the same people who insist on Russian Collusion now were mocking Trump throughout October and Early November 2016 for suggesting ANYBODY, much less the Russians, could rig a US National Election.

Sore Losers is the Occam's Razor conclusion. Sad!

Stop Whinging, Trump! You're going to lose, but suck it up!

#LosersArentWinners #MuhRussia
178   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 7, 10:04am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

anon_49812 says
Have you figured out exactly what their Russian collusion with the presidential election was yet?


Nope--the special counsel has been pretty mum on that front. The indictments against both are expected to be modified with additional charges, but it probably depends on how helpful they are as to what those additional charges are.

Same with Flynn--he is likely providing evidence to Mueller at this point so it's hard to say exactly what the collusion will end up being. If at all.
180   MAGAbrush   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 7, 7:48pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

BlueSardine says
(Crickets from the libbies)

Crickets to the guy yelling at cars stuck at the red light on the corner too.
181   TwoScoopsOfWompWomp   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 8, 10:47pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

The amazing thing is:

* The FBI/Obama DOJ knew it was from the Clintons when they used it to apply for the FISA warrant and did not disclose this to the FISA Judge
* The FBI/Obama DOJ had knowingly ALSO paid Steele, but did not disclose this to the FISA Judge
* The FBI/Obama DOJ extensively quoted a Yahoo! News piece that was written on the basis of Steele's leaks regarding Dossier (ie the Dossier is true because the Dossier Author says so) and did not disclose this to the Judge.
* Dossier Author Steele and DOJ Bruce Ohr (whose wife is Fusion GPS Dossier Co-Writer Nelly Ohr) are on record with heavy ant-Trump bias, which was, you guessed it, not disclosed to the FISA Judge
* The FBI Agents working on the case were vehemently anti-Trump to a degree that should have precluded them from working this case, and... yep, this was not disclosed to the FISA Judge
* Sally Yates, the person the media moaned about when fired by Trump (even though that's totally normal for high ranking outgoing Admin members even if she hadn't done shit, double if oppo party change in WH), had signed off on the FISA Warrant Request.
* According to the Memo, the Dossier was the Essential part of the FISA Warrant Requests, along with Steele's Own Leak to Yahoo! News via Clinton Water Carrier Michael Issikoff's article.
* And another FISA Warrant requester was McCabe whose wife was paid 6 figures during the election season by Top Clinton Lieutenant Governor McAuliffe.

This means the Judge(s) were mislead into believing the Dossier was an independent construction of current or former British Intelligence Officials and NOT paid by the DNC via Perkins-Coie AND the Obama DOJ via the FBI.

Judges HATE to be lied to, and HATE when Attorneys lie to any Judge.

If you think this is okay, you think not only is Patriot Act wonderful, but that Federal Authorities should be able to mislead Judges when they want to spy on US Citizens and especially those Citizens' broader Networks including Presidential Candidates during an Election.

Why did the FBI/DOJ think they could get away with it? Because FISA Courts reject something like 12 out of 3,000 FISA warrant applications and figured it would just sail through and go unnoticed. Remember, she was supposed to win hands down.
182   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 9, 6:28am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote        

I believe the above post is neither accurate nor truthful.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/05/fbi-footnote-carter-page-warrant-390795

"Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions."
183   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 7:11am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
* The FBI/Obama DOJ knew it was from the Clintons when they used it to apply for the FISA warrant and did not disclose this to the FISA Judge

OK. It was from oppo research funded by multiple people. That is what the FISA application stated. It was literally exactly correct. If they had stated that it was funded entirely by Clinton, they would have been giving factually incorrect information. Further, the timing of the application was October 2016. That is 1 month until the general election. If the FISA judge sees that it is from oppo research and assumes that Clinton was not involved, that would be incompetence at the highest level. If they wanted to know if Clinton was involved, couldn't they have asked?
The warrant was for Carter page who the FBI had been concerned about for 3 years. Carter page was no longer working for the Trump campaign according to Trump's campaign, so the whole thing is not relevant to spying on Trump or his campaign.
This whole 'scandal' is as real as the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. You believe it is there if you really want it to be there, and ....
184   socal2   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 9, 7:42am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

anon_61c8a says
This whole 'scandal' is as real as the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. You believe it is there if you really want it to be there, and ....


So all the FBI and DOJ people involved in the Hillary and Trump investigations who have now resigned or been demoted is all nothing?
185   APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch   ignore (32)   2018 Feb 9, 8:24am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

socal2 says

So all the FBI and DOJ people involved in the Hillary and Trump investigations who have now resigned or been demoted is all nothing?


FBI, DOJ - all feminazi jihadi SJW traitors who live and breath in the hope of installing IHLary as LESBIAN! EMPRESS! FOR! LIFE!

Everyone knows that.
186   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 8:25am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
The amazing thing is:

* The FBI/Obama DOJ knew it was from the Clintons when they used it to apply for the FISA warrant and did not disclose this to the FISA Judge
* The FBI/Obama DOJ had knowingly ALSO paid Steele, but did not disclose this to the FISA Judge
* The FBI/Obama DOJ extensively quoted a Yahoo! News piece that was written on the basis of Steele's leaks regarding Dossier (ie the Dossier is true because the Dossier Author says so) and did not disclose this to the Judge.
* Dossier Author Steele and DOJ Bruce Ohr (whose wife is Fusion GPS Dossier Co-Writer Nelly Ohr) are on record with heavy ant-Trump bias, which was, you guessed it, not disclosed to the FISA Judge
* The FBI Agents working on the case were vehemently anti-Trump to a degree that should have precluded them from working this case, and... yep, this was not disclosed to the FISA Judge
* Sally Yates, the person the media moaned about when fi...


If you know all this, it’s safe to assume the FISA judge(s) do as well. What was their reaction?
187   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 9:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

socal2 says
So all the FBI and DOJ people involved in the Hillary and Trump investigations who have now resigned or been demoted is all nothing?


Of course! FBI and DOJ are all feminazi jihadi bent on installing IHLary as LESBIAN! EMPRESS! OF! AMERICA! for life.
188   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 9:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

socal2 says
So all the FBI and DOJ people involved in the Hillary and Trump investigations who have now resigned or been demoted is all nothing?

It's probably mostly Trump cleaning house. McCabe was eligible for full pension. He cannot work effectively when Trump is tweeting that he is corrupt. Why the fuck would he stay? Just look at my post, and explain where I am wrong. You cannot dismiss what is right in your face because some people are being forced out of the FBI by an administration that is desperate to fend off the investigations.
189   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 9, 9:16am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

errc says
If you know all this, it’s safe to assume the FISA judge(s) do as well. What was their reaction?


How would the FISA judges know the political leanings of the FBI agents?
190   TwoScoopsOfWompWomp   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 9, 9:17am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

I must have debunked the "Jeb paid for the Dossier" thing several times. Here it is again: Jeb's PAC stopped paying Fusion GPS before the Dossier project began, but Perkins-Coie was paying Fusion GPS when Steele was working on the Dossier.

But even if !!!Jeb!!! paid for the Dossier it still doesn't excuse the FBI/DOJ from informing the Judge the Dossier was first and foremost a product of Oppo Research . Nor does it excuse knowingly passing on information in support of the Author and Dossier that itself was a leak from the self same Author, Steele, into the hands of Michael Issokoff, himself a long time Democrat-linked individual and Clinton Crony.

errc says
If you know all this, it’s safe to assume the FISA judge(s) do as well. What was their reaction?


No idea. The FISA Warrant was already issued and renewed, but I can say if any of the participants get charged, they are going to face a hostile judge when the prosecutors reveal what the FBI/DOJ concealed from the Warrant Request.

Another thing is that if Mueller has any info obtained from a "dishonest FISA warrant issue", and given the hostility of Judges to being mislead either themselves and other Judges, in general, it will definitely be of extreme interest to the Court, to put it mildly.

"The prosecution would like to introduce this piece of evidence..."
"Objection your honor, permission to approach the bench? This info came from the FISA Warrant that was dishonestly obtained."
"Sustained. You cannot introduce that fruit of poisoned tree evidence, Mueller. FLOOSH! Down the toilet, you cannot mention it in court."
"ARGH!! Orange Douche!!!"

The effects will be far reaching, whether Mueller tries to charge Trump Associates or if the Trump DOJ goes after McCabe/Strzok/Etc. Remember, Strzok and others worked FOR Mueller for several months before being fired for their texts/emails/etc. Their omissions in the FISA Warrant requests (along with their texts/email chains) will poison all of Mueller's attempts in the Courtroom.

FISA requests for US Citizens like Carter Page, which under the Patriot Act require more steps, more disclosure, and more limited times for execution.

This is bigger than Watergate.
191   TwoScoopsOfWompWomp   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 9, 9:31am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Stzok and Lisa Page's careers are certainly over.

"Comrade Strzok, Deputy Director of Counter-Intelligence, I must inform you that FSB has many photographs of you with Miss Page at Motel 6 Love Shack. Also Audio of makey love. You must not look into Agent Malakov's activities or many bad things will be revealed to your wife and the press."
192   zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 9, 9:54am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Ripped off from another thread:
193   HappyGilmore   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 9, 9:56am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
But even if !!!Jeb!!! paid for the Dossier it still doesn't excuse the FBI/DOJ from informing the Judge the Dossier was first and foremost a product of Oppo Research . Nor does it excuse knowingly passing on information in support of the Author and Dossier that itself was a leak from the self same Author, Steele, into the hands of Michael Issokoff, himself a long time Democrat-linked individual and Clinton Crony.


Not sure if McGee is ignoring me so he didn't see the response or just ignoring the response.

HappyGilmore says
I believe the above post is neither accurate nor truthful.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/05/fbi-footnote-carter-page-warrant-390795

"Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions."
194   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 10:20am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
I must have debunked the "Jeb paid for the Dossier" thing several times. Here it is again: Jeb's PAC stopped paying Fusion GPS before the Dossier project began, but Perkins-Coie was paying Fusion GPS when Steele was working on the Dossier.

But even if !!!Jeb!!! paid for the Dossier it still doesn't excuse the FBI/DOJ from informing the Judge the Dossier was first and foremost a product of Oppo Research . Nor does it excuse knowingly passing on information in support of the Author and Dossier that itself was a leak from the self same Author, Steele, into the hands of Michael Issokoff, himself a long time Democrat-linked individual and Clinton Crony.

errc says
If you know all this, it’s safe to assume the FISA judge(s) do as well. What was their reaction?


No idea. The FISA Warrant was already issued and renewed, but I can say if any of the participants get charged, t...


Occams Razor: Trump has committed crimes and poisoning the well wrt ‘chain of evidence’ is the easiest way to avoid prosecution

Why aren’t the Trumpcucks holding the FISA judge accountable?

Instead they’re still neck deep in Muh Hillary
195   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 10:21am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Why would Obama and Hillary want to spy on Trump?
196   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 9, 1:25pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

errc says
Trump has committed crimes


What crimes would that be?
197   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 9, 1:48pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Sniper says
What crimes would that be?


Likely money laundering, fraud. Possibly collusion and obstruction of justice.
198   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 9, 3:22pm   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

anon_8f378 says
Sniper says
What crimes would that be?


Likely money laundering, fraud. Possibly collusion and obstruction of justice.


"Likely" and "Possibly"...

Do we have any FACTS to back that up, or just hyperbole and conjecture?
199   TwoScoopsOfWompWomp   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 9, 4:44pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

errc says
Occams Razor: Trump has committed crimes and poisoning the well wrt ‘chain of evidence’ is the easiest way to avoid prosecution


You mean "Fruit of the Poisoned Tree".
200   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 17, 1:40pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

So why not release the Democratic Memo
201   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 17, 2:53pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Tim Aurora says
So why not release the Democratic Memo


If anyone seriously doesn't know why then that proves just how low a bottom feeder of information they are.

You do remember talk about if Trump released a Memo that had classified information on it then he couldn't release it.
Then they turned around and released one hoping like hell they could brow beat him to releasing so Find Me an Out Mueller could hang him for the one crime they couldn't find so far.

Ya'll can keep pretending you're bullshitting the voters. We'll see in November wont we?
202   CajunSteve   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 17, 3:06pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote        

Tim Aurora says
So why not release the Democratic Memo


Because Trump doesn't care about transparency. He's scared of Mueller and he tried to deflect attention by having his stooge Nunes release the partisan hack memo. But it backfired because Republican Congressmen oversold the hell out of it and when it was released, they looked like idiots.

If he releases the Dem memo now, it will show how many lies were in the Nunes memo and make him look even worse...

Notice Republicans won't release the actual FISA application either. If there was really any misconduct, they would have made it public a long time ago.
205   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 17, 3:17pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

today

Mueller be like

Trump be like

207   Tim Aurora   ignore (0)   2018 Feb 23, 12:40pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Release the Democratic Memo

« First    « Previous    Comments 168 - 207 of 207    Last »





The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions