« prev   random   next »
1   BlueSardine   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 11, 6:34am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

the next great war will be fought with computers.
so yeah, lets all load up russian antivirus software that has uninhibited access to every byte of data on your system.
2   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 11, 6:49am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

So basically this woman was brought in June of last year as a Hatchet job to put doubt on Trump's legitimacy anyone that doesn't admit that is a bottom feeding moron or a hopless Commie lost to the cause.

The media has reported that Russia hacked up to 39 states’ systems, and Illinois and Arizona declared their systems were among those affected, but this marks the first time that federal officials themselves have publicly described the number of states that were penetrated successfully by Russian hacking.

Jeanette Manfra, the DHS official who disclosed the numbers, declined to name which states had been targeted to protect their confidentiality, though she says the managers of the various threatened systems have been alerted.


Look how she Dumbsplains it for the Stupid Liberal bottom feeding Voters. "Rattled the Doorknob so to speak" What the FUCK? This is our DHS Cyber security expert giving official testimony into a serious allegation against a sovereign state because they hate the Dully elected President.

Also The Media reported, so NYT, Yahoo, and USA today, is our official Intel these days, these people have no credibility.

"The media has reported that Russia hacked up to 39 states’ systems, and Illinois and Arizona declared their systems were among those affected, but this marks the first time that federal officials themselves have publicly described the number of states that were penetrated successfully by Russian hacking.

Jeanette Manfra, the DHS official who disclosed the numbers, declined to name which states had been targeted to protect their confidentiality, though she says the managers of the various threatened systems have been alerted.
In August of 2016, DHS started getting reports of “cyber-related scanning and probing” of U.S. election infrastructure, testified Samuel Liles, another DHS official. At this point, he said, the agency began analyzing and sharing this information with federal, state, and local partners.

Both DHS officials at the hearing said the Russian probing did not affect the actual vote totals during the presidential election. Instead, Liles compared them to a burglar walking down the street and checking if people were home.

“A small number of systems were unsuccessfully exploited, as though somebody rattled the doorknob and was unable to get in, so to speak,” he said. “A small number of the networks were successfully exploited. They made it through the door.”"

Read and think for yourself folks the Left lies about lies.

https://news.vice.com/en_us/article/mb9wb4/feds-wont-say-which-21-state-election-systems-russia-hacked
3   bob2356   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 7:30am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (3)   quote        

Tenpoundbass says


Look how she Dumbsplains it for the Stupid Liberal bottom feeding Voters. "Rattled the Doorknob so to speak" What the FUCK? This is our DHS Cyber security expert giving official testimony into a serious allegation against a sovereign state because they hate the Dully elected President.


Tenpoundbass says
“A small number of the networks were successfully exploited. They made it through the door.”"


You really need to start reading your articles.
4   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 11, 7:49am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

bob2356 says
You really need to start reading your articles.


I did! I based my assessment on the over use of the quantifier "A small number of" then uses the same quantification for his next data group set, without explaining how the two data sets are unrelated if at all.
As someone that has been on the presentation as well the audience side of a Smoke and Mirrors over sell of paltry facts. It's painfully obvious.
I mean these guys were all convinced that Y2K was a a real threat too I bet. I wonder how many of those in their biased audience spent $1200 on a Y2K daughter board so their Quick books will work?

Tenpoundbass says
“A small number of systems were unsuccessfully exploited, as though somebody rattled the doorknob and was unable to get in, so to speak,” he said. “A small number of the networks were successfully exploited. They made it through the door.”"


and BTW as we all know 36 States as alleged, is NOT A FUCKING SMALL NUMBER!
5   Roidy   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 9:38am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

Tenpoundbass says
Dully elected President


Gentle Reader,

Dully elected is entirely correct. Look, Im not saying that Obama was perfect. No US President is perfect, and all Presidents make mistakes. Yes, they do leave a lot undone for the next guy. Still, we really need a good politician with experience as an elected Executive official to serve that office.

Let's think about LBJ for a second. He was a really good politician, but before he had been POTUS after the Kennedy assassination, LBJ had no elected executive experience. The Senate was LBJ and JFK's proving ground. Obama was a Senator, also. All of these guys served as legislators, and some did well enough - Obama and JFK. Some were a disaster- LBJ. LBJ was bad for the same reason that JKF got into trouble in his first term: BAD military advice. JFK learned his lessons, but LBJ was a disaster as the President of Vietnam War. Note that Clinton left us a ticking time bomb in the financial sector that led to a near global financial meltdown.

On the other hand, 'W' and 'George Herbert Walker Bush' both got us into wars that we shouldn't have fought. No one can convince me that the 1st Gulf War didn't lead to the 9-11 Attacks which led to the 2nd Gulf War. We may have been in Iraq during 'W's tenure in any case, since it certainly appears that 9-11 was W's opportunity to attack Iraq.

Remember that 'W' had more experience as a Governor (Texas) for 5 years than: LBJ, JFK, GHWB, Nixon, and Obama, but less than R. Reagan, Clinton, and about the same as Carter.

Ok, here is what I think makes a good President: prior Congressional or Senate experience, prior Governorship, AND GOOD, OBJECTIVE, ADVISORS. Look, the best advisors were in JFK's circle. Furthermore, he actually started to listen to them after the Bay of Pigs murderfest.

Eisenhower had no prior executive experience, but he did have a knock-out set of advisors that he listened to. Reagan had good advisors, also. The rest of them? Mixed bag. Some were good some weren't. I give you Robert McNamara as an example. Great advisor for quantification, but LBJ should have known that McNamara had no POLITICAL experience in evaluation of potential enemies. We then get Westmoreland as the General in charge of S. Vietnam operations. After about four years in a kill-party that we are still living with today, LBJ is done. Enter Nixon.

While there are many, many things we can discuss on the topic of a good POTUS that I have left unaddressed I would like to point out that Trump has a number of problems in his execution of the Office of the POTUS. He has no experience in any elected office, he has no elected executive experience, and he has no really good advisors that Trump will listen to.

What we are getting is an Executive Branch that is incompetent. It could be a good one, but Trump will not really listen and is not capable of governing.

Unfortunately.

Regards,
Roidy
6   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 11, 9:52am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

Roidy says
While there are many, many things we can discuss on the topic of a good POTUS that I have left unaddressed I would like to point out that Trump has a number of problems in his execution of the Office of the POTUS. He has no experience in any elected office, he has no elected executive experience, and he has no really good advisors that Trump will listen to.

What we are getting is an Executive Branch that is incompetent. It could be a good one, but Trump will not really listen and is not capable of governing.


Supportive of the narrative hyperbole and not condusive to the outcomes of the reality.
Trump is knocking it out of the park. The dumbest thing your enemy can do is under estimate you.
And anyone considering Trump, incompetent, or stupid, is selling themselves extremely short, and are destined to fail Fail FAIL!
As the long stream of sorry broken sad sacks Trump has left in his wake to get where we are now can attest to.

Trump Breaks every motherfucker that tries him, like they are some genius and Trump is stupid and an inferior Lummox.
It's been entraining for his constituents. Even eases the burden of dropping Cable and swearing off 90% of Main Stream media in all medium in its forms.

Trump serves two purposes, he's making Us win time and time again, and we're enjoying him Breaking people that need it most.

Step on up and take a swing fools
7   Onvacation   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 11, 10:01am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
Eisenhower had no prior executive experience,


If you don't count his ww2 experience as supreme commander of the allied expeditionary force.
8   Onvacation   ignore (2)   2018 Feb 11, 10:04am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
we really need a good politician with experience as an elected Executive official to serve that office.

No we don't.
All the politicians are bought and paid for. That's why Trump was elected, that and the fact of Hillary.
9   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 11, 10:26am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

China aggressively mines the net for iP of any kind. .. but our deep state moans about anti-virus software updates
10   Roidy   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 11:51am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

Onvacation says
If you don't count his ww2 experience as supreme commander of the allied expeditionary force.


Gentle Reader,

Eisenhower was an excellent administrator and politician. His prior experience does count, but his ability to pick advisors is what makes him a good, competent POTUS even though he was never elected before he was President. Yes, this says much about him and his experience during the WW II.

Regards,
Roidy
11   HEYYOU   ignore (16)   2018 Feb 11, 2:23pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

Mueller may have already found the source & it's name is Trump?
12   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 11, 2:33pm   ↑ like (4)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote        

Roidy says
While there are many, many things we can discuss on the topic of a good POTUS that I have left unaddressed I would like to point out that Trump has a number of problems in his execution of the Office of the POTUS. He has no experience in any elected office, he has no elected executive experience, and he has no really good advisors that Trump will listen to.


One point of reference, the Trump Organization has over 22,000 employees and over 500 business enterprises. How could he have run that size of a company if he's incompetent with no executive experience?

I'm sure there were many VP's and managers that he consulted with every day.

How many employees and business enterprises or executive experience did Obama have prior to becoming president?
13   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 3:10pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

BlueSardine says
the next great war will be fought with computers.
so yeah, lets all load up russian antivirus software that has uninhibited access to every byte of data on your system.


Maybe the Russian Anti-Virus trojans will counteract the Chinese trojans in-bedded in the chips of the Chinese made computers. Like two wrongs making a right.
14   Roidy   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 11, 9:03pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Sniper says
One point of reference, the Trump Organization has over 22,000 employees and over 500 business enterprises. How could he have run that size of a company if he's incompetent with no executive experience?


Gentle Reader,

The Donald has a great deal of success in real estate. Everything else is a "not so much." Yes, he inherited a lot of money, but he has made a lot of money in real estate. That business he does understand. Still, there is little evidence that The Donald is much good at anything else.

Still, he has no executive experience at an elected office. No he is NOT Dwight Eisenhower. From what I have seen his advisors are party hacks or cronies. Jeff Sessions is one of these hacks. Betsy DeVos is another.

Donald Trump is no Dwight Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, RR, WJC, or even 'W', GHWB, or Carter (bleh).

Regards,
Roidy
15   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Feb 11, 9:32pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Only the financial iliterates think Trump is anywhere near successful.

Sniper says
Roidy says
While there are many, many things we can discuss on the topic of a good POTUS that I have left unaddressed I would like to point out that Trump has a number of problems in his execution of the Office of the POTUS. He has no experience in any elected office, he has no elected executive experience, and he has no really good advisors that Trump will listen to.


One point of reference, the Trump Organization has over 22,000 employees and over 500 business enterprises. How could he have run that size of a company if he's incompetent with no executive experience?

I'm sure there were many VP's and managers that he consulted with every day.

How many employees and business enterprises or executive experience did Obama have prior to becoming president?
16   Roidy   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 12, 2:19pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

anon_fad35 says
How many employees and business enterprises or executive experience did Obama have prior to becoming president?


Gentle Reader,

I've a comment to make on your comment. The only president that you connected to the statement quoted above was Barack Obama, yet even if your assertion of 500 business enterprises and 22,000 employees were in any stretch factually correct (It's not, btw.) there are the other erstwhile POUTS who are not African American: Dwight Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, RR, WJC, 'W', GHWB, Carter (bleh). Yet you ignore them.

You've been caught in your prejudice by our own words.

Regards,
Roidy
17   HeadSet   ignore (1)   2018 Feb 12, 2:46pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
anon_fad35 says
How many employees and business enterprises or executive experience did Obama have prior to becoming president?


Gentle Reader,

I've a comment to make on your comment. The only president that you connected to the statement quoted above was Barack Obama, yet even if your assertion of 500 business enterprises and 22,000 employees were in any stretch factually correct (It's not, btw.) there are the other erstwhile POUTS who are not African American: Dwight Eisenhower, JFK, LBJ, RR, WJC, 'W', GHWB, Carter (bleh). Yet you ignore them.

You've been caught in your prejudice by our own words.

Regards,
Roidy


I would say that he listed Obama because Obama was the last President before Trump. Also, Bill Clinton, W, GHWB, RR, and Carter all had executive experience as Governors. This has nothing to do with race. Looking for prejudice where it does not exist says more about you than him.
18   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 12, 3:57pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
Yes, he inherited a lot of money,


That's correct, he took his millions of inherited money and turned it into a multi-Billion dollar company.

Such a failure.
19   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 12, 3:59pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
You've been caught in your prejudice by our own words.


Where was anything said regarding prejudice except for the fact of Obama's lack of experience for the job? If someone applies for a new position, but doesn't get it for lack of past experience, is that prejudice?
20   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 12, 3:59pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
anon_fad35 says
How many employees and business enterprises or executive experience did Obama have prior to becoming president?


Gentle Reader,

I've a comment to make on your comment. The only president that you connected to the statement quoted above was Barack Obama,


What's the answer, what executive experience did Obama have before becoming president?
21   MrMagic   ignore (11)   2018 Feb 12, 3:59pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote        

Roidy says
yet even if your assertion of 500 business enterprises and 22,000 employees were in any stretch factually correct (It's not, btw.)


Sorry, that is factually correct about Trump. Some here might not consider it executive experience, that's on them.

Anyway, here's the factual proof of the 22,450 employees:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Trump_Organization Go look over on the right side box.

Here's proof of the 500 business enterprises:

The Trump Organization is the collective name of approximately 500 business entities of which Donald Trump is the sole or principal owner.

https://qz.com/461688/a-list-of-everything-donald-trump-runs-that-has-his-name-on-it/
Some here might not like Trump, but that doesn't change the facts or his level of executive experience.




The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions