2
0

Brilliant Post from Red Pill


 invite response                
2018 Feb 27, 7:51pm   9,250 views  49 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (12)   💰tip   ignore  

You can say what you will, but demographic data speaks for itself. Conservatism is likely genetic.

Ever since the introduction of mass birth control, and feminism, the liberal birthrate has tanked and is now far below replacement (reducing their population 30%-50% every generation, where as the conservative birthrate is stable, or in a surplus. When you compare liberal vs conservative states, you already see a difference in fertility rates. Given that most conservative states have liberals, and most liberal states have conservatives, one can assume that the divergence when isolating to genetic political bias is even greater.

When you compare traditionally liberal vs conservative groups of people, such as the religious vs the atheists, you see that atheists have sub-replacement fertility rates (thus slowly being eliminated), while the conservatives are a growing population across the board. Religiously unaffiliated sitting around 1.6 births per woman (2.1 as replacement). Christians at 2.6, Muslims at 2.9.

When solely isolating to Jews, and looking at the differences in behavior between Conservative vs Liberal Jews, you see the conservative ones are more likely to be married young, while the conservative orthodox Jews have a fertility rate of 4.1, and irreligious Jews have a fertility rate of 1.5, making them sub-replacement, evolutionary dead-ends.

When looking at the Mormons, we see that they are more likely to be married at a younger age, and have a fertility rate of 3.4, far higher than your average Christian.

Reality doesn't care about your ideology - whether you believe in Marxism, Feminism, Christianity, Islam, or the tenets of the Red Pill. All it cares about is results, and a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future. If your ideology leads you a sub-replacement fertility rate, how can you argue your ideology is successful. It's successful at weeding out your degenerate genetics from humanity, because you can't critically identify which ideologies benefit your self-interests, and which don't.

What do you think the fertility rate is of these childless idiots I read comments from on this sub, that get vasectomy's and never marry. You'll be gone, and conservative, people with children will replace you. The future looks more like us, and less like you.

Every generation from now, moving forward, will be increasingly conservative. There are likely less liberal genetics in existence in the younger cohort of Americans in 2017, than there were in the young cohort of the 70's, as those childless, feminist, liberal women hit their 40's and see the end of their fertility window... And the liberal men that chose to tie their fate to them are childless alongside them. 25% of German women in their 40's are childless. 20% of American women born between 1962 and 1966 are childless. This childlessness most certainly disproportionately affects liberal parents who are promoting feminism, liberalism, and other degenerate anti-patriarchal ideologies to their children. We're experiencing one of the greatest evolutionary events in modern history, on par with WW2. We're seeing the weak, liberal genetics being completely obliterated from the gene pool, with only patriarchal conservatives being spared. In 3 generations time, you'll basically have everyone selfishly looking out for themselves, with strong in-group preferences. We'll have Conservative Europeans, competing with other Conservative ethnic groups, and an ever-decreasing minority of old, liberals in their 70's and 80's dying alone, with no children to give a fuck about them, in depressing facilities where the state will put sick, soon-to-be-dead, childless, old folks. Feminism has absolutely destroying Liberalism. It's fucking glorious, and worth eating popcorn while cheering from the sideline. The only thing conservatives need to do is prepare for the fall out from the liberals dying off, and inheriting their broken systems. We'll need to form new countries in a few generations time, and restructure society. It's just a matter of a time and a few generations at this point.

https://www.reddit.com/user/AmeriStasi

Links to stats in the original post.

Comments 1 - 40 of 49       Last »     Search these comments

1   anonymous   2018 Feb 27, 8:52pm  

Go watch the movie “Idiocracy... it better explains how stupid people breed like rabbits than this crap.
2   anonymous   2018 Feb 27, 8:53pm  

Will we go back to one wage earner households ? I think not. Therefore we're all feminists now. Like it or not. Just not third wave SJW wackos about it. The fringe SJWs are a much smaller segment of the left than "conservatives" like to think. In the same way that racist Nazis are a much smaller percentage of right than SJWs want to believe. . Conservatism is a relative thing. There will always be a "my team against your team" political pathology out there. The owners are the ones that define what the beliefs are on each side.. They go through their cycles.

I believe that as a whole, the culture will have to be to the left of where it is now, even while it is also more conservative in many ways.

Some people have a hard time tknowing the difference between conservative and right wing. I know a lot of conservative liberals that are far more conservative (in the Eisenhower/ BIll Buckley sense of the term than the typical right winger today. Check out George Will. He knows what's up.

Recent tax cuts aren't conservative.
Preventing more robust background checks for gun purchases and being opposed to limiting assault rifles is not conservative.
Racism isn't conservative.
3   anonymous   2018 Feb 27, 8:53pm  

Also, at the rate we are going with “Idiocracy” style leaders like Trump getting elected... coupled with advances in Artificial Intelligence we are all screwed as a species. Elon Musk predicts a “SkyNet” scenario where we nuke ourselves and machines take over in the next generation. So this Red Pill... “conservatism is genetic” nonsense is pointless anyway.
4   Goran_K   2018 Feb 27, 9:24pm  

anon_e0eaf says
Go watch the movie “Idiocracy... it better explains how stupid people breed like rabbits than this crap.


Why watch a movie?

Just look at the black inner city. Generation after generation of being raised on liberal policies, education, and welfare programs. Extremely low graduation rates, high drop out rates, much lower IQs on average than those who do not live in those communities. Electing leaders like Maxine Waters. That's literally the movie Idiocracy in real life. It already happened and blacks are paying for it.
5   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 27, 9:32pm  

Once BT-1000s lose their liberal professional coastal allies due to lack of breeding, conservatives/nationalists/modernists will reform the welfare state and make the old strategy of "fuck a lot of thugs, collect AFDC Cash Allowance for some extra fun money" impossible.

The only real battle with be between Haredi and Islamists for control New York City. But neither will feel a desire to subsidize BT-1000s at the expense of their large families.
6   anonymous   2018 Feb 27, 9:59pm  

anon_e0eaf says
Also, at the rate we are going with “Idiocracy” style leaders like Trump getting elected...


Trump is a SYMPTOM, not the CAUSE.

anon_e0eaf says
coupled with advances in Artificial Intelligence we are all screwed as a species.


A.I. beats out over 80% of the intelligence of the zombies walking around now with their faces stuck in their phones. We are definitely screwed!
7   anonymous   2018 Feb 27, 9:59pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
We're seeing the weak, liberal genetics being completely obliterated from the gene pool,


You make that sound like it's a bad thing. It's not.
8   Strategist   2018 Feb 27, 9:59pm  

anon_e0eaf says
Go watch the movie “Idiocracy... it better explains how stupid people breed like rabbits than this crap.


Muslims breed the most on this planet, which is exactly why the world is a mess.
9   Patrick   2018 Feb 27, 10:01pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
BT-1000s


Had to look that up: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=BT-1000

I learn a lot from you, @TwoScoopsPlissken
10   Strategist   2018 Feb 27, 10:07pm  

Goran_K says
anon_e0eaf says
Go watch the movie “Idiocracy... it better explains how stupid people breed like rabbits than this crap.


Why watch a movie?

Just look at the black inner city. Generation after generation of being raised on liberal policies, education, and welfare programs. Extremely low graduation rates, high drop out rates, much lower IQs on average than those who do not live in those communities. Electing leaders like Maxine Waters. That's literally the movie Idiocracy in real life. It already happened and blacks are paying for it.


This is what bothers me. All these opportunities for anyone to thrive, yet, it's the inner city people who just can't take advantage of it, and end up blaming someone else. Their inability to progress is now the problem of everyone else.
My question is....What are we doing wrong, and how do we fix it?
11   Automan Empire   2018 Feb 27, 10:13pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
the liberal birthrate has tanked and is now far below replacement (reducing their population 30%-50% every generation, where as the conservative birthrate is stable, or in a surplus.


Oh, Reddit...

I'm a regular reader and contributor to TRP, but I find myself rather critical of some of the factions, namely race realism and some of the unsupported pseudoscience.

The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.

and a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future.


Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility. Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.
12   Heraclitusstudent   2018 Feb 27, 10:28pm  

Goran_K says
Just look at the black inner city. Generation after generation of being raised on liberal policies, education, and welfare programs. Extremely low graduation rates, high drop out rates, much lower IQs on average than those who do not live in those communities. Electing leaders like Maxine Waters. That's literally the movie Idiocracy in real life. It already happened and blacks are paying for it.


They are not conservatives, yet breed like rabbits. The common denominator is indeed: idiocracy.
13   Heraclitusstudent   2018 Feb 27, 10:29pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future


There's your great filter explaining the Fermi paradox.
14   mell   2018 Feb 27, 10:31pm  

Automan Empire says
Oh, Reddit...

I'm a regular reader and contributor to TRP, but I find myself rather critical of some of the factions, namely race realism and some of the unsupported pseudoscience.

The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.


It's not a given, but it's more likely to happen that way. Look at Gen-Z, they are staunchly conservative already.

Automan Empire says
and a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future.


Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility. Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.


Not at all, you are simply looking in the rear view mirror like the the potential demographers and sociologists you mention. It is true that a high standard of living and the vanishing need of having to try hard and not being personally responsible does create societies with low birthrates, but they will be wiped out by those who procreate, in the best case simply "conservatives" of the same society, in the worst case by aggressive migrants from the middle-east and Africa. You can conquer a country without firing a single shot simply with an exorbitant birth-rate and a strict religion/culture/dogma passed on and increased over generations.
15   Heraclitusstudent   2018 Feb 27, 10:33pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Christians at 2.6, Muslims at 2.9.


the conservative orthodox Jews have a fertility rate of 4.1... Mormons: 3.4


So... mormons and jews will overtake the Muslims... Oh well.

Except Niger has a fertility rate of close to 7 per women. Massive waves of immigration await.
16   Heraclitusstudent   2018 Feb 27, 10:36pm  

anon_e0eaf says
coupled with advances in Artificial Intelligence we are all screwed as a species.

A.I. Could be our salvation in this case.
17   Ceffer   2018 Feb 27, 11:58pm  

The "free shit" genes are panhandling the tree of evolution.
18   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 7:20am  

Automan Empire says
The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.



Genetically, there may be some predisposition but it's more likely the values transmitted from parents to children. I think by "Conservatism" is largely genetic he meant to say "It's good at reproducing". However, the core of the argument stands I think.
Automan Empire says
Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility. Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.


Lower birthrate is a sign of prosperity, which is great at least until we get Fusion Power, but it's not happening in a vacuum.

IF you go by the idea that evolution is on the side of the team that reproduces itself more effectively, then generic Left/Cosmopolitan types are losing.

I certainly take TRP with a grain of salt since there are plenty of women who stay with shitty men who aren't good looking, "dangerous"/interesting, well resourced, have shining personalities, or intelligent; however for dating it's good advice. But it does explain a lot of female behavior.
19   Bd6r   2018 Feb 28, 9:16am  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
IF you go by the idea that evolution is on the side of the team that reproduces itself more effectively, then generic Left/Cosmopolitan types are losing

Poor countries in Africa and Asia are big winners then:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/Countriesbyfertilityrate.svg

Also, this - https://usatcollege.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/age.png?w=1000&h=990 - seems to contradict idea that values are 100% transmitted from parents to kids (with higher reproduction rates for conservatives, new generation should be more conservative than parents - and it is not). To me, it says that when a person becomes older, he (or she) becomes more conservative - perhaps they earn more, or some other reasons.
20   bob2356   2018 Feb 28, 10:09am  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Ever since the introduction of mass birth control, and feminism, the liberal birthrate has tanked and is now far below replacement (reducing their population 30%-50% every generation, where as the conservative birthrate is stable, or in a surplus. When you compare liberal vs conservative states, you already see a difference in fertility rates. Given that most conservative states have liberals, and most liberal states have conservatives, one can assume that the divergence when isolating to genetic political bias is even greater.


But, but, but we've been told and told that the poor and immigrants are breeding like rabbits and overrunning america with new democrats. Funny how quickly conservatives can abandon arguments when they aren't convenient.

I don't suppose the unknown huge sums of money spent by the ultra rich libertarians promoting conservatism the last 50 years has had any affect at all. No, couldn't be. Of course not. It's like money doesn't influence elections. The check is in the mail I won't cum in your mouth.
21   Goran_K   2018 Feb 28, 10:13am  

bob2356 says
But, but, but we've been told and told that the poor and immigrants are breeding like rabbits and overrunning america with new democrats. Funny how quickly conservatives can abandon arguments when they aren't convenient.


Well to be fair, it's only ONE demographic of the left that is breeding like crazy and taxing public resources. The one that thinks illegally crossing a national border and demanding free entitlements is okay.
22   mell   2018 Feb 28, 10:26am  

drB6 says
new generation should be more conservative than parents - and it is not)


They are, Gen-Z is very conservative, but likely not passed on but due to a reality check and consequential backlash.

drB6 says
To me, it says that when a person becomes older, he (or she) becomes more conservative - perhaps they earn more, or some other reasons.


Def true and has been observable forever, and put into quotes such as "if you're not a socialist at 20 you have no heart, if you're still as socialist at 40 you have no brain" and similar ones ;)
23   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 10:28am  

bob2356 says
But, but, but we've been told and told that the poor and immigrants are breeding like rabbits and overrunning america with new democrats. Funny how quickly conservatives can abandon arguments when they aren't convenient.


They are, but they vote less reliably and they're only part of the equation. If all illegals could vote, and every poor minority voted, Democrats could not win dominance on the national level, ever, without the Coastie Outer Party of White Liberal Professionals.

LaWanda and TayShawn are not reliable voters.

You're seeing the 1930s in reverse; the Dems have lost the working class, and depend on urban area professionals with minorities to win. Whereas now the Republicans have the huge White Working Class and much of the Surburban Middle Classes.
24   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 10:32am  

drB6 says
Poor countries in Africa and Asia are big winners then:


If the West continues to depopulate (which the US barely does not do, but which Europe is definitely doing), then Barbarians can flood the gates. Maybe even encouraged to immigrate, right Merkel?

The other point, however, is that the high birthrate-deathrate in most of Africa is largely possible to massive foreign aid.
25   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 10:36am  

Speak of the Devil:

Irish Government Paid Press to promote Mass Immigration as part of "Project Ireland 2040":
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/martin-attacks-dubious-2040-media-deal-c6wtq772d

Adding one million immigrants to a population of only 4.7 Million, so almost 20% of the population will be foreign born, in 20 years.

And as usual, an agenda driven press. Look for the Dail to start telling Google, Twitter, and Facebook to ban "hate speech" which will include any opponents to the plan.

Ireland (like Poland and Argentina) has a very low birthrate despite the Catholicism. It's a Europe-wide phenomenon.
26   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 11:15am  

Checking the comments here. People are reporting enclaves a Burka Jihadis in Rosecommon and Balinrobe. Not just Dublin or Cork, but little towns in Central and Western Ireland you'd never expect them. All in the past few years.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/02/24/irish-mass-migration/

I guess I shouldn't be surprised, since the Irish are famous bleeding hearts and particularly Irishwomen. Sinn Fein should be renamed to "Becoming Jihadis Ourselves"

Meanwhile, Irish PM demands that Sein Finn in Ulster take their seats in UK Parliament to defeat Brexit:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/leo-varadkar-sinn-fein-seats-westminster-hard-brexit-abstentionist-a8231281.html

Massive and swift demographic change has happened before. I wonder to which country the politicians will flee to with their cash envelopes when all of Europe becomes Islamized.

If Jan Sobeski had lived to see this day... Deus Vult.
27   Bd6r   2018 Feb 28, 11:19am  

mell says
They are, Gen-Z is very conservative

Looked it up, and yes - they are more conservative than their predecessors, which I find really interesting. Perhaps it is backlash against left-wing parents (kind of like youth of 60's rebellion against conservative ideas). Or, perhaps, they see that life will be very difficult for them and they are screwed over by previous generations - so ideas of previous generations are not right for them.
I teach/research at university, and I see that Gen-Z are often reluctant to express their political views, unless they are at either right or left extreme. Expression of political views will hurt job prospects, so they are careful. Many of them are also aware that they are hosed with nearly everything - tuition, housing, medical care, possibilities for well-paying, stable jobs etc.
28   Bd6r   2018 Feb 28, 11:35am  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
People are reporting enclaves a Burka Jihadis in Rosecommon and Balinrobe. Not just Dublin or Cork, but little towns in Central and Western Ireland you'd never expect them. All in the past few years.

I thought they mostly have E. European immigration, where danger is from inebriated drivers and/or drunk fistfights, which might be not that much different from native Irish behavior.
29   Heraclitusstudent   2018 Feb 28, 11:37am  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
Ireland (like Poland and Argentina) has a very low birthrate despite the Catholicism. It's a Europe-wide phenomenon.


I hear Poland recently started throwing tons of benefits and money to women just to have kids.
Let's see what happens.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/poland-low-birth-rate-health-ministry-youtube-advert-rabbits-sex-population-a8045076.html
30   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 12:52pm  

drB6 says
I thought they mostly have E. European immigration, where danger is from inebriated drivers and/or drunk fistfights, which might be not that much different from native Irish behavior.


That would have been my guess also, but some Irish in America go back periodically and they're shocked by the number of Dirka Dirka Full Burkas now appearing in small Irish country towns and fishing villages. Sinn Fein wanted to put 100 African Muslim migrants in a town of 300 that hosts a traditional Irish Fair, and the residents were up in arms saying they've been complaining about infrastructure with the current population, never mind 100 immigrants dumped on them overnight.

Heraclitusstudent says
I hear Poland recently started throwing tons of benefits and money to women just to have kids.


Frankly, I'm not a fan of an increasing birthrate as you probably know. Really, just shut the borders and let the housing costs drop and wages rise, which is exactly what "liberals" in the real sense, of Fine Gael or Merkel's CDU primarily run for the benefit of major landlords and business interests, do not want. Higher Rents! Lower Wages! A lot of loans and investors from the financial crisis still to be paid off.
31   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 12:58pm  

If we want to increase the birthrate, governments should start matchmaking kids in HS and College and offering housing for newlywed couples. Something that young people, esp. in Europe, can't generally afford unless their parents are really well off enough to pay it for them.

Bjork got impregnated by her bandmate to help him get glasses and share a house, Iceland paid for those things for couples with newborns.
32   Shaman   2018 Feb 28, 1:20pm  

Automan Empire says
Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mobility.


Well there you have it! Those are exactly the type of people who are heavily liberal and thus being weeded out! Of course they think they’re doing the right thing. But evolution (in which they claim to believe) doesn’t care what they think. It only cares about the people who spread their genes down the line of history. The rest of them are doomed to be forgotten and worse, irrelevant to that particular dance.

I don’t agree completely with the article because liberalism isn’t solely genetic. Or at least it doesn’t follow that conservatives will breed true, producing more conservatives. However, there is some magic ratio, probably defined by genetic drift, which can predict the rate at which liberalism is fading.

What I think is most hilarious is their insistence that making America less white will bring about the liberal utopia. Just because the blacks can be counted on for liberal votes doesn’t mean that holds true for other races.
As conservative politics embraces more people of various ancestries, the tribal politics followed by humanity’s native tribals won’t hold sway, and we will see a resurgence of conservatives.
33   Reality   2018 Feb 28, 2:04pm  

Not all children are alike. Some are born with the genes for being more beautiful/handsome; some are born with the genes for faster reflexes; some are born with genes for bigger muscles and athleticism; some are born with genes for higher intelligence. Most are born with mediocrity, some are born retarded (or at least by modern western standard of IQ=100 on average, making IQ<80 retarded).

Think of everything we have touched/used today since getting up in the morning. Aside from air (which is free), there is hardly anything we use/consume that is not the fruit of someone else' labor or ingenuity. "Natural resource" doesn't exist because "Nature" doesn't yield much resource until human labor and ingenuity is mixed with it. Even the quintessential resource -- Petroleum -- was little more than a pollutant that ruined farm land in Pennsylvania when it oozed out of the ground before people figured out how to distill Kerosene from it; Kerosene saved Whales from extinction (being hunted for producing lamp oil); yet Kerosene producers poured away Gasoline because the lighter fluid was too dangerous for lighting purpose; it took the invention of Otto-cycle internal combustion engine to make Gasoline into a "resource" instead of a dangerous nuisance. The perpetual problem human society faces is not "over-population" or "resource exhaustion" but too many dumb people who are not productive enough to meet the expectations that the society/media has instilled in them. An IQ=85 person can do quite well in Africa farming among other IQ=80 people, but transplanting that person to an average IQ=100 society is going to result in unemployment and tendency to crime and reliance on welfare (which is just robbery via government) . . . simply because his expectations on living standards are higher than his productivity can deliver. The robbery would have to take place to fulfill his expectations (whether by himself or via government) is going to reduce overall resources available to the society even further, as robbery is always a negative-sum game.

Immigration from low-IQ parts of the world can not solve the demographic problem in the West resulting from Feminism and other -isms that make reproduction too costly. Government subsidy for child births would only work more effectively on lower-income parents while the expense of such a problem would have to be paid by higher-income taxpayers . . . resulting in higher birth rate among lower-IQ population at the expense of higher-IQ population. Not all children are alike, and their statistically likely level of contribution to society will also be dissimilar.

IMHO, what will work well is a proportional tax-cut incentive for people to have more children: e.g. for every child under the age of 18 (or 23, whatever the latest definition of "child" is), a mother and a father each can deduct 10% of their entire income tax bill after DNA verification of paternity/maternity. Such a tax-cut would induce higher-IQ and more productive people to have more children (to counter their higher opportunity cost in the market place), and induce wealthier males to sponsor women's baby projects (for the benefit of society in the long run) instead of pumping-and-dumping young women for short-term hedonistic pursuits; that (the high cost of raising children reducing the number of young women that the wealthier men can have relationship with) in turn will also leave more young women intact to be married by guys who want to get married.
34   Bd6r   2018 Feb 28, 3:09pm  

Quigley says
insistence that making America less white will bring about the liberal utopia

Texas 23rd congressional district - representative Will Hurd (R). District is 55% Hispanic, 41% non-Hispanic white and left-wing utopia has not arrived.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas%27s_23rd_congressional_district
35   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Feb 28, 3:12pm  

As I've been saying, we're already seeing the signs that Hispanics won't be the solid permanent Democratic block the Left expects.
36   anonymous   2018 Feb 28, 3:16pm  

mell says
Automan Empire says
Oh, Reddit...

I'm a regular reader and contributor to TRP, but I find myself rather critical of some of the factions, namely race realism and some of the unsupported pseudoscience.

The above quote is patently ridiculous, and contains several incorrect presuppositions such as that political affiliation is deterministically passed on genetically. A simple napkin calculation shows that liberals would be vanishingly rare today if this was true.


It's not a given, but it's more likely to happen that way. Look at Gen-Z, they are staunchly conservative already.

Automan Empire says
and a declining fertility is a sign of a weak group of people with a dark future.


Funny, most demographers and sociologists find this a sign of prosperity ,education, and upward mo...


How are we defining liberal and conservative?

Does anybody know?
37   dublin hillz   2018 Feb 28, 4:27pm  

Hey "Red Pill" is appropriation from the Matrix and a language abuse at that - the producers of the movie meant to convey the conformity of various institutions such as work, church, paying taxes - instead the marauders stole the ideas to promote 19th century and prior world view regarding race/gender and tried to present it as some sort of "awakening" hoping that no one would notice!
38   dublin hillz   2018 Feb 28, 4:30pm  

Automan Empire says
Another grossly wrong presuppostion. I can't take this essay seriously.


The "essayist" it turns out is a ukranian immigrant residing in california, he sounds like a neo-nazi - where is the "wall" when one really needs it?
39   Shaman   2018 Feb 28, 7:55pm  

dublin hillz says
he sounds like a neo-nazi


That sounds like Left-speek using “Nazi” and “Hitler” and “racist” to shut down ideas that defy Leftist thought.
40   Bd6r   2018 Mar 1, 8:12am  

Quigley says
That sounds like Left-speek using “Nazi” and “Hitler” and “racist” to shut down ideas that defy Leftist thought.

Actually, the problem is that this immigrant is "legal" - if he would be illegal, left would be fine with him. Let illegals in and kick legal immigrants out.

Comments 1 - 40 of 49       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions