follow Patrick following
follow Patrick 2018 Mar 4, 9:51am
137 views 3 comments
The plaintiffs claim that they are the victims of discrimination as a result of their conservative viewpoint, and make further arguments that YouTube has breached its contracts and injured their business.More recently, similar suits have been filed against Twitter by users farther out on the right.Johnson’s case runs over some of the same points as Prager U’s. Filings say that Twitter is a public forum, in its materials and promotions it says as much, and in this role it has an “almost monopolistic presence”. It also says that Johnson’s ban is a “political hit job”.