2
0

Internet Censorship


 invite response                
2018 Mar 4, 3:18pm   2,731 views  22 comments

by MisdemeanorRebel   ➕follow (12)   💰tip   ignore  

Isn't it interesting that CNN and Youtube are both ganging up on Infowars all of a sudden?

I'm sure it's a coincidence and nobody in politics is coordinating it. Man, if Wikileaks could get somebody to hack some of those media backchannel chats and/or email lists.

Comments 1 - 22 of 22        Search these comments

1   bob2356   2018 Mar 4, 3:24pm  

Infowars? ROFLOL times 10. Infowars ins't news, it's a nut job conspiracy superstore. Jones doesn't believe any of the nutty shit he puts out. He just laughs all the way to the bank about the losers that do believe it
2   mell   2018 Mar 4, 3:27pm  

bob2356 says
Infowars? ROFLOL times 10. Infowars ins't news, it's a nut job conspiracy superstore. Jones doesn't believe any of the nutty shit he puts out. He just laughs all the way to the bank about the losers that do believe it


Then there would be zero need by the Clinton News Network and the rest of the lamestream media to gang up on Jones...oh wait..
3   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Mar 4, 3:43pm  

CNN and others can't stand Infowars and people like Sargon of Akkad or PewDiePie (who isn't really political at all), because they generate hits and subscribers with a teeny-tiny fraction of the budget.

The Alex Jones Channel has around 2M Subscribers, while CNN has around 3M. Now compare the budgets of the two. I'd be shocked if Jones is spending anything anywhere near what CNN spends on production costs and salaries and everything else.

Scares Legacy-Heritage Media to death. Nobody under 40 gives a damn about Jake Tapper or any other anchor. They probably couldn't name a CNN or MSNBC anchor. Times are changing; Oligarchs controlling cable and network TV is no longer a guarantee of their message being promulgated.
4   Heraclitusstudent   2018 Mar 4, 3:51pm  

TwoScoopsPlissken says
CNN and others can't stand Infowars and people like Sargon of Akkad or PewDiePie (who isn't really political at all), because they generate hits and subscribers with a teeny-tiny fraction of the budget.


They were always used to central media channels that they control, like CNN. Their narrative is increasingly drowned by alternative voices on podcasts, youtube, FB etc...

They need to react one way or an other. But it's probably too little too late. You can't control the flood of parallel thoughts, many of which are hitting the nail on the head.

I wouldn't be surprised if we are witnessing the end of the 2 parties system in the US.
6   Ceffer   2018 Mar 24, 8:37pm  

Paranoid Schizophrenics need love and entertainment, too!

Pornhub as a major news outlet? I have mixed feelings and an erection.
9   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 9, 6:47pm  

zzyzzx says


This is horrible.
10   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 9, 6:48pm  

Ceffer says
Pornhub as a major news outlet? I have mixed feelings and an erection.


Think of all the "If you liked a White Dick in a Brown Shithole, you might also like..."
11   bob2356   2018 Jun 10, 5:58am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
The Alex Jones Channel has around 2M Subscribers, while CNN has around 3M. Now compare the budgets of the two. I'd be shocked if Jones is spending anything anywhere near what CNN spends on production costs and salaries and everything else.


Which rather nicely explains why Trump is president. There are 2 million low information lead me by the nose it's true because I believe it should be true people out there who would actually pay for infowars. Tens of millions more who read infowars but can't give up a pack of cigs and six of beer a day to afford a subscription. People who still devoutly believe Obama was born in Kenya and Hillary has a hit squad killing all her former associates and the moon landings are fake news.

Bread and Circus. Works every time.
12   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 10, 9:36am  

bob2356 says
People who still devoutly believe Obama was born in Kenya and Hillary has a hit squad killing all her former associates and the moon landings are fake news.


Well, there are people who still think Mueller is gonna get Trump any minute, that Trump is a Lucky Ducky with no skill or acumen, and that the Russians hacked the Election, etc.
13   bob2356   2018 Jun 10, 10:34am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
bob2356 says
People who still devoutly believe Obama was born in Kenya and Hillary has a hit squad killing all her former associates and the moon landings are fake news.


Well, there are people who still think Mueller is gonna get Trump any minute, that Trump is a Lucky Ducky with no skill or acumen, and that the Russians hacked the Election, etc.


Which is why hillary beat trump in popular vote and the country is fucked. The nutjobs on the fringes control the nomination process. The system has failed.

BTW none of your examples are outright fabrications absolutely proven false. They are opinions about situations. Sorry you don't understand the difference or why it matters, but it explains a lot about your postings.
14   Ceffer   2018 Jun 10, 10:40am  

Pornhub: all the probing commentary you can stand.
15   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 10, 10:42am  

bob2356 says
Which is why hillary beat trump in popular vote and the country is fucked. The nutjobs on the fringes control the nomination process. The system has failed.


Nope, the Electoral College worked precisely as advertised, as it was intended for 200+ years.
16   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 10, 10:44am  

bob2356 says
BTW none of your examples are outright fabrications absolutely proven false. They are opinions about situations. Sorry you don't understand the difference or why it matters, but it explains a lot about your postings.


Sure they are. Don't shift the burden of proof: The burden isn't on me to prove them false, but for the claimaint - ie YOU - to provide evidence. .

So far there isn't a shred of evidence that "Russia hacked the election" or that "Mueller is gonna get Trump".
17   bob2356   2018 Jun 10, 11:14am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says

Sure they are. Don't shift the burden of proof: The burden isn't on me to prove them false, but for the claimaint - ie YOU - to provide evidence. .


Your examples, I don't have to prove jack. Bad examples of contrived demagoguery at that. The russians hacked the election is a bullshit made up rally cry of the right wing echo chamber to dishonestly reframe the discussion. Buying ads on facebook and setting up phony accounts/groups isn't hacking. The russians tried very hard to and possibly did influence the elections. Many conservatives even agree with that.

Provide evidence of what? That there are people with the opinion that mueller might "get" trump. Evidence refers to events not opinions. Man landed on the moon is an event. Obama born in Hawaii was an event. Hillary hired or didn't hire killers is an event. Having a belief in something that is proven false is a lot different than having an opinion on what might happen. If Mueller declared Trump was a pure as the driven snow the investigation is over and people still believed mueller was going to get Trump then you would have an example.

You have a very strange view of what the word evidence means and how it is applied.
18   bob2356   2018 Jun 10, 11:14am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
bob2356 says
Which is why hillary beat trump in popular vote and the country is fucked. The nutjobs on the fringes control the nomination process. The system has failed.


Nope, the Electoral College worked precisely as advertised, as it was intended for 200+ years.


The electoral college has nothing to do with the nomination of candidates.
19   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 10, 11:22am  

bob2356 says
The russians hacked the election is a bullshit made up rally cry of the right wing echo chamber to dishonestly reframe the discussion.
'

You mean the Democrats.

www.youtube.com/embed/QhgPSaAS_3o

By the way, has the DNC asked the FBI to look at their server yet for hacking evidence?

bob2356 says
Your examples, I don't have to prove jack.

What is offered without evidence can FLOOSH! be flushed without consideration.

bob2356 says
Obama born in Hawaii was an event.

Or giving Iran Pallets of Cash was an event. The hostages waiting on the Tarmac saying their Iranian Captors told them they were waiting for the planeload of cash to land before they could leave was an event. The Terrorists controlling huge swaths of Libya thanks to Obama Foreign Policy was an Event. Oh, and the JV Team overruning much of Syria was an Event, too.
20   bob2356   2018 Jun 10, 11:48am  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
bob2356 says
Obama born in Hawaii was an event.

Or giving Iran Pallets of Cash was an event. The hostages waiting on the Tarmac saying their Iranian Captors told them they were waiting for the planeload of cash to land before they could leave was an event. The Terrorists controlling huge swaths of Libya thanks to Obama Foreign Policy was an Event. Oh, and the JV Team overruning much of Syria was an Event, to


There are millions of people claiming none of this happened amid extensive reporting that none of this happened? Where? Very odd world you inhabit.

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
bob2356 says
Your examples, I don't have to prove jack.

What is offered without evidence can FLOOSH! be flushed without consideration.


So we can cay FLOOSH without consideration to pretty much everything written on infowars? Glad you cleared that up.

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
bob2356 says
The russians hacked the election is a bullshit made up rally cry of the right wing echo chamber to dishonestly reframe the discussion.
'

You mean the Democrats.


Nope, nice work at mixing and matching different subjects and themes to totally obscure and change the subject though. If you can't dazzle them with brilliance then baffle them with bullshit. Infowars couldn't have done it better. Bravo.
21   Patrick   2018 Jun 10, 12:48pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
CNN and others can't stand Infowars and people like Sargon of Akkad or PewDiePie (who isn't really political at all), because they generate hits and subscribers with a teeny-tiny fraction of the budget.


Yes, a truly hysterical fear of democracy has gripped the MSM. They can no longer simply spend their way to controlling public opinion. They have to worry about readers and voters not doing as they are told, which is something new thanks to the Internet.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions