« prev   random   next »

7
0

Sessions to make major ‘sanctuary jurisdiction announcement’ in Sacramento tomorrow

By Patrick following x   2018 Mar 6, 6:03pm 7,328 views   143 comments   watch   sfw   quote     share    


Attorney General Jeff Sessions is scheduled to be in Sacramento on Wednesday to make what his office describes as a “major sanctuary jurisdiction announcement,” just blocks from the state Capitol, where a new law making California a sanctuary state was passed and signed.

Sessions did not provide advance details of his announcement, but his Justice Department has been in an escalating legal battle with California, dozens of cities and counties in the state, including San Francisco, and hundreds nationwide whose laws and policies restrict local police and jailers from taking part in federal immigration enforcement.

His targets have included the local and state sanctuary laws, already the subject of court battles, as well as local officials like Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, who publicly warned the immigrant community Feb. 24 of an impending Bay Area raid by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.


https://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Sessions-to-make-major-sanctuary-jurisdiction-12731976.php

« First    « Previous    Comments 104 - 143 of 143    Last »

104   Heraclitusstudent   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 7, 6:20pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Brown wants his unlimited immigration into California - but no housing.

Anything else is a declaration of war against California.

Watch the words. This is an evolution that, worse case and not soon, but could end up with CA breaking away from the US.
105   MisterLefty   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 4:29am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

During any invasion, there is always a side that collaborates.
106   bob2356   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 8, 5:21am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
bob2356 says
It's pretty clear you don't have a clue what AB 450 actually says if you are throwing out bogus arguments about I9's.


Pretty clear you don't have a clue:

bob2356 says
States have the right to make privacy laws. Period. Other states require anyone including any federal agencies to have a warrant to look at any employment records of anyone, not just immigrants. Even if the employer is willing to do a voluntary hand it over. Is that making federal law? Where is your outrage (crickets chirping again). Feel free to keep on throwing out strawmen and tap dancing around that issue.
The I-9 is an immigration document enforced by ICE, not just an "employment record" that may by the various State Government Agencies.


I don't have a clue?

7285.1. (a) Except as otherwise required by federal law, an employer, or a person acting on behalf of the employer, shall not provide voluntary consent to an immigration enforcement agent to enter any nonpublic areas of a place of labor. This section does not apply if the immigration enforcement agent provides a judicial warrant.

(2) This subdivision shall not apply to I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification forms and other documents for which a Notice of Inspection has been provided to the employer.


Except as otherwise required by federal law. Does not apply to I-9. Seems pretty clear to me.

Were is your outrage about states that require a warrant for any employees records? That obstruction. doesn't bother you? Lots of crickets chirping, no answer in sight.

TwoScoopsPlissken says

It's about the State of California illegally demanding via compulsion that US Citizens/Entities warn others that an ICE inspection is about to take place.

California has NO powers over immigration and NO powers to set regulations for ICE which is a Federal, not State, Entity.


You seem very confused on this point. It's not a regulation for ICE, it's a regulation for employers to give notice to employees their records are being examined. ICE is not hindered any more than any other state that requires a warrant. Still no outrage about the other states obstructing? Why is that?
107   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 8, 6:14am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
RafiMaas says
Except as otherwise required by federal law, an employer, or a person acting on behalf of the employer, shall not provide voluntary consent to an immigration enforcement agent to enter any nonpublic areas of a place of labor.


Wow, WTF?


You omitted the last and most important sentence

This section does not apply if the immigration enforcement agent provides a judicial warrant.

So why not just get a warrant?

No Real American wants the federal government doing warrant less anything. If they have probable cause, get a warrant. Otherwise piss straight off
108   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 6:42am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says

No Real American wants the federal government doing warrant less anything. If they have probable cause, get a warrant. Otherwise piss straight off
.

I know ,right?
People got their panties in a bunch because California doesn't want to have to do the federal governments job. Also they are saying that we should just voluntarily give up our rights. I don't see them voluntarily handing over their right to the 2cd amendment.

Folks you can't make this stuff up.
109   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 7:29am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Heraclitusstudent says
Brown wants his unlimited immigration into California - but no housing.

Anything else is a declaration of war against California.

Watch the words. This is an evolution that, worse case and not soon, but could end up with CA breaking away from the US.


What happens to the water CA gets from the Colorado River if they decide to break away from the US? I think succession is a non-starter out the gate because of this. But I admit I don't fully understand the water issues out there. My guess is agriculture dries up without that source of water, literally in SoCal.

I know it gets thrown about that CA is one of the states that needs the least from the federal government. But as a state, it probably can't function at today's levels without an entire regions watershed helping feed the AG business and supply a good chunk of the drinking water. CA is technically a state that is the most dependent on others (other states and feds) if you really think about it.
110   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 7:43am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WookieMan says
Heraclitusstudent says
Brown wants his unlimited immigration into California - but no housing.

Anything else is a declaration of war against California.

Watch the words. This is an evolution that, worse case and not soon, but could end up with CA breaking away from the US.


What happens to the water CA gets from the Colorado River if they decide to break away from the US? I think succession is a non-starter out the gate because of this. But I admit I don't fully understand the water issues out there. My guess is agriculture dries up without that source of water, literally in SoCal.

I know it gets thrown about that CA is one of the states that needs the least from the federal government. But as a state, it probably can't function at today's levels without an entire regions watershed helping feed the AG business and supply a good chunk of the drinking water. CA is techni...


Actually the northern part of California supplies a lot of water for central California, think Humboldt area the emerald triangle. Also 1/3 of CAs water is stored freely in snow fall. Socals water does come from the Colorado River. But then again a shitload of imports come through long beach, tariffs for water?

What could, maybe should happen in CA is breaking into 2 or 3 states.
111   Goran_K   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 8, 8:46am   ↑ like (3)   ↓ dislike (2)   quote   flag        

Guys, relax with the personal attacks. Thanks.
112   Quigley   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 9:00am   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Bah, can’t even refer to the quality of someone else’s argument? Didn’t attack the user, just their false statements.
113   DASKAA   ignore (3)   2018 Mar 8, 9:03am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

CA is not going anywhere and not breaking into anything.
114   zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 8, 9:04am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

errc says
So why not just get a warrant?


I agree that it's easy enough to do, but CA will just fabricate another reason not to cooperate.
115   zzyzzx   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 8, 9:05am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RafiMaas says
What could, maybe should happen in CA is breaking into 2 or 3 states.


I don't think we should let any state break apart until at least 2 New England States get consolidated.
116   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 9:14am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RafiMaas says
Actually the northern part of California supplies a lot of water for central California,


Although off topic just wanted to share more about CA water. I was under the impression that the tubes Brown wants to build would go down to LA but the Tubes are to take water from the top of the Delta to the bottom of the Delta. From that point the infrastructure is already built and used to take the water down south. The purpose is to rejuvenate the Delta.
117   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 8, 9:28am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

zzyzzx says
RafiMaas says
What could, maybe should happen in CA is breaking into 2 or 3 states.


I don't think we should let any state break apart until at least 2 New England States get consolidated.


Why is that?
118   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 8, 10:04am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

zzyzzx says
errc says
So why not just get a warrant?


I agree that it's easy enough to do, but CA will just fabricate another reason not to cooperate.


So if it’s easy enough to simply get a warrant, why all the harping on California?

Shouldn’t the ire be directed at ICE for wasting resources and not doing their job?
119   WookieMan   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 10:21am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RafiMaas says
Although off topic just wanted to share more about CA water


It's off topic, but it's going to be an ongoing issue in CA. Everyone needs water. I don't understand all the underlying issues, but unless there's an alternative water source, or more storage, not sure how fresh water can keep up with the population growth in CA. Mainly SoCal as you mentioned, but as one state, everyone is going to have to deal with it.

Even if CA isn't one of the fast growing states, the neighbors that need the same water are. Nevada and Arizona are growing and so is their CO river water usage would be my guess (not sure if UT relies on the Colorado, but they quickly growing too). Somethings got to give. https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/economy/2018/01/15/fastest-growing-and-shrinking-states-closer-look/1019429001/
120   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 12:50pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

WookieMan says
It's off topic, but it's going to be an ongoing issue in CA. Everyone needs water. I don't understand all the underlying issues, but unless there's an alternative water source, or more storage, not sure how fresh water can keep up with the population growth in CA. Mainly SoCal as you mentioned, but as one state, everyone is going to have to deal with it.


I know little about CA Water Issues, but apparently there are years when man made lakes and water areas are actually overfilled, but I heard the Libbies dump it out to sea instead of holding onto to it for future use.

Also I heard there really hasn't been any new water supply areas created in something like 50 years, even though that 1950's governor's water plan called for double the water management areas CA has now, if/when the population reached today's level of population.

Just shit I heard, not very familiar with the whole thing.
121   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 12:53pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

It's quoting a movie, and the insults are directed towards your argument, not you.
122   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 12:57pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
It's quoting a movie, and the insults are directed towards your argument, not you.


No quotes
123   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 12:59pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

Principal: Mr. Madison, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Billy Madison
124   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 1:00pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
It's quoting a movie, and the insults are directed towards your argument, not you.


Biggest load of bullshit, my argument is me and I say 'you' not 'your argument'. The original is down and I deleted my comment so done and done.
125   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 1:18pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RafiMaas says
Unfortunately, CA is looking at it as a privacy issue. One can cry and scream all they want but that doesn't change how this will be fought in court.

No, California is desperately trying to obstruct the Federal Government from enforcing the law and trying to find an excuse to hang their hat on.

That is why Moonbeam and the Gathering of Hippie-cum-Yuppies (aka CA Legislature) are passing all these laws now.
126   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 1:21pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

RafiMaas says
Biggest load of bullshit, my argument is me and I say 'you' not 'your argument'. The original is down and I deleted my comment so done and done.


"what you have just said" = your argument
"at no point your rambling, incoherent response..." = referring to the argument
"we are all dumber for having listened to it" = argument was called dumb
"I award you no points" = your argument stank
"and may god have mercy on your soul" = not an insult,

I actually parsed it out to try to be fair when I approved it.
127   RafiMaas   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 8, 1:34pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (1)   quote   flag        

TwoScoopsPlissken says
"at no point your rambling, incoherent response..." = referring to the argument


Unfortunately this was not in the quote so it wasn't a quote. And even if a quote is used still a personal attack.

"Absolutely nothing you posted was factual." Is what it said and is no different than calling me a liar.

I will now send the personal comment back for a third time.
130   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 8, 4:13pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Democrats, 2010: "Only the Federal Government can make immigration law, not the States. Therefore, as President, I've instructed Eric Place Holder to initiate a Lawsuit against Arizona requiring companies to regularly cooperate with the DHS/ICE."
Democrats, 2017: "Not Only the Federal Government can make immigration law. Therefore, as Governor Moonbeam, I intend to enforce this mirror image law of Arizona's law that forbids companies from voluntary cooperation with DHS/ICE."
132   NuttBoxer   ignore (2)   2018 Mar 9, 1:26pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Patrick says
whose laws and policies restrict local police and jailers from taking part in federal immigration enforcement.


The fuck!? I thought California was trying to stop feds from enforcing immigration. Apparently feds want us to do their job, fuck off.
134   just_dregalicious   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 9, 8:06pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Satoshi_Nakamoto says


My mom had lots of brothers and a sister in the NorCal Yuba City area - they worked in the fields as pickers when they were young. Gave them a great work ethic most are multi or multi-multi millionaires now.

Funny story from one of my uncles: I think it was the 60s but some demoncrat politico took a tour through their area North of Sacramento and saw all the migrant farm workers (legal back then) squatting down picking strawberries. So he got a law (maybe regulation) passed that said they must be given long handled tools (I'm paraphrasing like crazy) so that they don't have to squat down like that when they work. Shortly after my uncle drove through and saw all the pickers still squatting down picking strawberries with handles sticking up several feet into the air. "You have to get down low to pick strawberries". The picture in my mind back then was sort of like a garden hoe.
135   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 10, 6:34pm   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        



No. please stay, I beg you. Without illegals, nothing ever got done in this country... The Polio Vaccine, Hoover Dam, Apollo Program, Microcomputer Revolution, it was all done thanks to Holy Illegals and not the evil conniving Jew Male White.
136   Tenpoundbass   ignore (11)   2018 Mar 12, 10:50am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Oh yeah? My Brother In Law self deported because Obama lied to the Latinos in 2008 and promised to do something with illegal immigrants when he got elected.
By 2010, my BIL was left without a Drivers License in Florida because at that time the State of Florida refused license to illegals.
They wanted him to work in the flooring trade that was OK, he was supposed to undercut the white workers. But I taught him so well he was a high demand expert PreMidona that would touch a job for less than scale and demanded extra for every extra. But had he been caught driving W/O a lisence he would have been sent to Chrome Detention and his Van and tools comfiscated. He just self deported rather than be burdon any of his Family that lives in America legally.

So these Mexicans are doing the sensible honorable thing.
If they are lucky as Louis was. He wasn't the only one that self deported. He was one of hundreds of thousands of Peruvians that returned from America over the last decade. They brought their desire for success and upward mobility back with them. Bless their American hearts. They have built the communities and boroughs outside of Lima into bustling enclaves with excellent standard living, employment and local economies. In 2001 when first went to Lima my MIL house was nestled in between shanties, shacks and leantoos it was a dreary depressing squalid sight. My MIL was living modern and had a decent standard. But her neighbors were in a deplorable state. Destitute and broke. I was glad to leave it was such a sad sight. By 2010 I saw first hand many changes, there was 60% improvement many of those makeshift houses were starting to take shape with real brick walls and concrete floors. I saw video over Christmas my MIL street now looks like a street in Queens NY or something.

I think all of those Peruvians that came to America and then self deported or were deported. Did more for their country by coming back, I couldn't be more proud of what they accomplished.
137   dr6B   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 12, 10:54am   ↑ like (2)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Logical question is, why Sessions/Trump does not make E-verify mandatory if they are so against illegal immigration? Perhaps what they do is just a smoke screen or illusion of taking action?
138   anonymous   ignore (null)   2018 Mar 12, 11:04am   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

drB6 says
Logical question is, why Sessions/Trump does not make E-verify mandatory if they are so against illegal immigration? Perhaps what they do is just a smoke screen or illusion of taking action?


Chum for the retards, obviously
139   TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce   ignore (4)   2018 Mar 14, 1:34pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Texas State ban on "Sanctuary Cities" upheld, Federal Court Rules.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/13/us/texas-immigration-law-sb4.html

Unlike the State-Federal relationship, there is nothing to prevent State Legislatures from forbidding cities and counties to implement "no cooperation" policies.

The only part that was struck down was a ban on Sheriffs endorsing Sanctuary Cities as policies.
140   someone else   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 14, 1:56pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

drB6 says
Logical question is, why Sessions/Trump does not make E-verify mandatory if they are so against illegal immigration? Perhaps what they do is just a smoke screen or illusion of taking action?


Yes, I do worry about that. If they are serious, E-verify should certainly be mandatory, along with jail time for the employers of illegals.

So the possibility remains that the Trump administration is not actually serious about ending illegal immigrantion. Please forward this comment to members of the Trump administration. Hey, you never know, there's a slim chance it will help.
141   RC2006   ignore (0)   2018 Mar 14, 2:25pm   ↑ like (0)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

If E-verify was implemented along with other measures to fix illegal immigration the elites ability to divide and control us would be greatly diminished. When do politicians ever end things that give them more power, hope I'm wrong about being pessimistic about it.
142   dr6B   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 14, 2:41pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

someone else says
So the possibility remains that the Trump administration is not actually serious about ending illegal immigrantion. Please forward this comment to members of the Trump administration. Hey, you never know, there's a slim chance it will help.

Wall is also somewhat idiotic - it is more of a symbol to make Trump voters happy. It might work for densely populated areas where one jumps over the border and then easily blends into surrounding population, but for more remote areas drones in air 24x7 for a fraction of price of a wall would be more efficient. Say, TX Big Bend area or AZ desert.

If solutions can be decoupled from ideology, they usually are rather simple, efficient, and cost relatively little. Unfortunately, if Trump comes on TV and with grand posturing declares that he will build a 100-ft high, 10000 mi long wall, and Mexicans will pay for it while liberals will hate it, some of his electorate will wet their pants in happiness. Simple "make E-verify mandatory" might not get him as many votes and might not energize his base, and will cause large fraction of business to hate him.
143   Booger   ignore (1)   2018 Mar 14, 4:22pm   ↑ like (1)   ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

drB6 says
for more remote areas drones in air 24x7 for a fraction of price of a wall would be more efficient. Say, TX Big Bend area or AZ desert


For more remote areas, a minefield will work better and cheaper.

« First    « Previous    Comments 104 - 143 of 143    Last »





The Housing Trap
You're being set up to spend your life paying off a debt you don't need to take on, for a house that costs far more than it should. The conspirators are all around you, smiling to lure you in, carefully choosing their words and watching your reactions as they push your buttons, anxiously waiting for the moment when you sign the papers that will trap you and guarantee their payoff. Don't be just another victim of the housing market. Use this book to defend your freedom and defeat their schemes. You can win the game, but first you have to learn how to play it.
115 pages, $12.50

Kindle version available


about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions